[Bispecific antibodies: An old story with a bright future… with CAR-T cells!]

CAR-T cells originate from two different approaches, cellular immunotherapy based on tumor immunosurveillance by T lymphocytes, combined with molecular engineering of bispecific antibodies and antibody fragments. The latter makes it possible to retarget immune effector cytotoxic cells (such as NK cells and T lymphocytes) to tumor cells through the binding to tumor-associated antigens. We present herein the history of bispecific antibodies, highlighting how such antibodies played a major role in CAR-T cell development. We will first evoke how antibody engineering led to the construction of various bispecific formats, in particular using the single chain Fv fragment (scFv) which has been used as the initial building block to generate chimeric bi-, tri- or multifunctional molecules. We will also describe how bispecific antibodies, either full IgG or as scFv or F(ab')₂ format, directed against Fcγ receptors or CD3ɛ and against tumor-associated antigens, induce a potent anti-tumor cytotoxicity following the recruitment and activation of immune effector cells, including CD3⁺ T lymphocytes. These anti-tumor effects have been translated into the clinics, especially to treat malignant hemopathies. At last, recently generated bispecific CAR-T cells suggest that the embrace between cell therapy and bispecific antibodies is not over and that we are yet to witness further discoveries enabling these cells to be even more efficient.

Immunoengineering approaches for cytokine therapy

Since the discovery of cytokines, much effort has been put forth to achieve therapeutic translation for treatment of various diseases, including cancer and autoimmune diseases. Despite these efforts, very few cytokines have cleared regulatory approval, and those that were approved are not commonly used due to their challenging toxicity profile and/or limited therapeutic efficacy. The main limitation in translation has been that wild-type cytokines have unfavorable pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles, either eliciting unwanted systemic side effects or insufficient residence in secondary lymphoid organs. In this review, we address protein-engineering approaches that have been applied to both proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines to enhance their therapeutic indices, and we highlight diseases in which administration of engineered cytokines is especially relevant.

CCR7 as a therapeutic target in Cancer

The CCR7 chemokine axis is comprised of chemokine ligand 21 (CCL21) and chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19) acting on chemokine receptor 7 (CCR7). This axis plays two important but apparently opposing roles in cancer. On the one hand, this axis is significantly engaged in the trafficking of a number of effecter cells involved in mounting an immune response to a growing tumour. This suggests therapeutic strategies which involve potentiation of this axis can be used to combat the spread of cancer. On the other hand, the CCR7 axis plays a significant role in controlling the migration of tumour cells towards the lymphatic system and metastasis and can thus contribute to the expansion of cancer. This implies that therapeutic strategies which involve decreasing signaling through the CCR7 axis would have a beneficial effect in preventing dissemination of cancer. This dichotomy has partly been the reason why this axis has not yet been exploited, as other chemokine axes have, as a therapeutic target in cancer. Recent report of a crystal structure for CCR7 provides opportunities to exploit this axis in developing new cancer therapies. However, it remains unclear which of these two strategies, potentiation or antagonism of the CCR7 axis, is more appropriate for cancer therapy. This review brings together the evidence supporting both roles of the CCR7 axis in cancer and examines the future potential of each of the two different therapeutic approaches involving the CCR7 axis in cancer.

A highly potential cleavable linker for tumor targeting antibody-chemokines

Chemokines are the large family of chemotactic cytokines that play an important role in leukocyte movement and migration stimulation. Until now, several antibody-cytokine (chemokine) fusion proteins have been investigated in clinical trials because of their ability to evoke the circulating leukocytes far from the tumor site. In this case, creating the concentration gradient regarding the chemokine is very important to recruit the circulating leukocytes with maximum performance to the tumor environment. To achieve a proper gradient, the chemokine separation from the tumor antigen-bounded antibody can be very crucial. Thus, we designed a novel linker that can be cleaved by enzymes presented around the tumor site including cathepsin B, urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs). Also, it can inhibit tumor progression by competing with the native substrate of key proteases in the tumor microenvironment. The proposed linker was evaluated using some bioinformatics approaches. In silico results showed that the linker is structurally stable and could be detected and cleaved using the mentioned enzymes.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Immunostimulatory biomaterials to boost tumor immunogenicity

Cancer immunotherapy is exhibiting great promise as a new therapeutic modality for cancer treatment. However, immunotherapies are limited by the inability of some tumors to provoke an immune response. These tumors with a 'cold' immunological phenotype are characterized by low numbers of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, high numbers of immunosuppressive leukocytes (e.g. regulatory T cells, tumor-associated macrophages), and high production of immune-dampening signals (e.g. IL-10, TGF-β, IDO-1). Strategies to boost the aptitude of tumors to initiate an immune response (i.e. boost tumor immunogenicity) will turn 'cold' tumors 'hot' and augment the anti-tumor efficacy of current immunotherapies. Approaches to boost tumor immunogenicity already show promise; however, multifaceted delivery and immunobiology challenges exist. For instance, systemic delivery of many immune-stimulating agents causes off-target toxicity and/or the development of autoimmunity, limiting the administrable dose below the threshold needed to achieve efficacy. Moreover, once administered in vivo, molecules such as the nucleic acid-based agonists for many pattern recognition receptors are either rapidly cleared or degraded, and don't efficiently traffic to the intracellular compartments where the receptors are located. Thus, these nucleic acid-based drugs are ineffective without a delivery system. Biomaterials-based approaches aim to enhance current strategies to boost tumor immunogenicity, enable novel strategies, and spare dose-limiting toxicities. Here, we review recent progress to improve cancer immunotherapies by boosting immunogenicity within tumors using immunostimulatory biomaterials.

Recruitment of CD103+ dendritic cells via tumor-targeted chemokine delivery enhances efficacy of checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy

Although a clinical breakthrough for cancer treatment, it remains that a minority of patients respond to checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) immunotherapy. The composition of tumor-infiltrating immune cells has been identified as a key factor influencing CPI therapy success. Thus, enhancing tumor immune cell infiltration is a critical challenge. A lack of the chemokine CCL4 within the tumor microenvironment leads to the absence of CD103+ dendritic cells (DCs), a crucial cell population influencing CPI responsiveness. Here, we use a tumor stroma-targeting approach to deliver CCL4; by generating a fusion protein of CCL4 and the collagen-binding domain (CBD) of von Willebrand factor, we show that CBD fusion enhances CCL4 tumor localization. Intravenous CBD-CCL4 administration recruits CD103+ DCs and CD8+ T cells and improves the antitumor effect of CPI immunotherapy in multiple tumor models, including poor responders to CPI. Thus, CBD-CCL4 holds clinical translational potential by enhancing efficacy of CPI immunotherapy.

Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins: Biopharmaceuticals with immunomodulatory properties for cancer therapy

Cytokines have long been used for therapeutic applications in cancer patients. Substantial side effects and unfavorable pharmacokinetics limit their application and may prevent dose escalation to therapeutically active regimens. Antibody-cytokine fusion proteins (often referred to as immunocytokines) may help localize immunomodulatory cytokine payloads to the tumor, thereby activating anticancer immune responses. A variety of formats (e.g., intact IgGs or antibody fragments), molecular targets (e.g., extracellular matrix components and cell membrane antigens) and cytokine payloads have been considered for the development of this novel class of biopharmaceuticals. This review presents the basic concepts on the design and engineering of immunocytokines, reviews their potential limitations, points out emerging opportunities and summarizes key features of preclinical and clinical-stage products.

Immunocytokines and bispecific antibodies: two complementary strategies for the selective activation of immune cells at the tumor site

The activation of the immune system for a selective removal of tumor cells represents an attractive strategy for the treatment of metastatic malignancies, which cannot be cured by existing methodologies. In this review, we examine the design and therapeutic potential of immunocytokines and bispecific antibodies, two classes of bifunctional products which can selectively activate the immune system at the tumor site. Certain protein engineering aspects, such as the choice of the antibody format, are common to both classes of therapeutic agents and can have a profound impact on tumor homing performance in vivo of individual products. However, immunocytokines and bispecific antibodies display different mechanisms of action. Future research activities will reveal whether an additive of even synergistic benefit can be obtained from the judicious combination of these two types of biopharmaceutical agents.