Making Rash Decisions in Epilepsy: Evaluating Hypersensitivity Reactions to Anti-seizure Medications

Evaluation of risk factors for recurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions due to anti-seizure medications in children: A retrospective study

Background: Cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) are one of the most important reasons for anti-seizure medication (ASM) discontinuation in epilepsy. However, such discontinuations can cause an increase in seizures. This study investigates the risk factors for ASM-related rash recurrence in children. Methods: This retrospective case-control study consisted of the patient group with a single rash due to ASMs (group 1), the patient group with rash recurrence (group 2), and the control group. While the demographic and clinical features of group 1 and the control group were compared in terms of a single rash, group 1 and group 2 were compared for rash recurrence. Results: Group 1, group 2, and control group consisted of 112, 33, and 166 patients, respectively. Female gender was a risk factor for a single rash (P < 0.001) but not for recurrence (P = 0.439). Presence of atopic disease [odds ratio (OR): 9.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 3.8-23.1, P < 0.001], family history of drug allergy (OR: 26.3, 95% CI: 9.6-72.1, P < 0.001), and polytherapy (OR: 23.5, 95% CI: 8.7-62.9, P < 0.001) were risk factors for rash recurrence. Aromatic nature of both the ASMs associated with the first rash (OR: 14.4, 95% CI: 3.2-63.2, P < 0.001) and rash recurrence (OR: 11.3, 95% CI: 4.6-27.5, P < 0.001) were determined as risk factors separately. Conclusion: Careful use of aromatic drugs may prevent recurrence of ASM-related CAR in children, particularly in cases of personal history of allergic disease and family history of drug allergy.

A Case of Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis Caused by Lamotrigine Combined With Valproic Acid and Literature Review

After suffering from frequent symptomatic seizures secondary to cerebral hemorrhage, a 58-year-old male patient was prescribed a one-time 50 mg dose of lamotrigine, which he took for a week. However, the patient's seizure symptoms were not controlled until a dosage of 500 mg of sodium valproate tablets was taken twice daily, which ultimately resolved his seizures. Unfortunately, about two weeks after the combination, the patient developed a rash. Nine days later, the patient developed new blisters, necrotizing epidermal desquamation, and lesions over 80% of their body surface area. This was diagnosed as toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) resulting from the combination of lamotrigine and sodium valproate. The sodium valproate and lamotrigine were discontinued and treated symptomatically for about one month. The patient's condition improved as the fatal rash gradually subsided. However, after the onset of TEN, unexpected psychiatric symptoms such as poor sleep, less than four hours of sleep, irritability, paranoia, crying, fear of rash recurrence, and suspicious hallucinations and delusions emerged in the patient. Surprisingly, after discontinuation of lamotrigine and sodium valproate due to the rash, the patient did not experience any further seizures.

Black-Box Warnings of Antiseizure Medications: What is Inside the Box?

Antiseizure medications can cause serious adverse reactions and have deleterious drug interactions that often complicate the clinical management of patients. When the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) wants to alert healthcare providers and patients about the risk of potentially serious or fatal drug reactions, the FDA requires the manufacturers of these medications to format these warnings within a "black-box" border, and prominently display this box on the first section of the package insert; such warnings are called "black-box warnings (BBWs)". The BBW is a way for the FDA to urge physicians to evaluate patients more rigorously and carefully weigh the risks and benefits, before prescribing medication that has the potential to cause serious adverse reactions, and to formulate a plan for close monitoring during therapy. The FDA BBW provides the extra layer of safety but many healthcare providers fail to comply with these warnings. Currently, there are 26 FDA-approved antiseizure medications in the US market, 38% of which have received BBWs, and most of the antiseizure medications with BBWs are older-generation drugs. Some antiseizure medications have multiple BBWs; for example, valproic acid has three BBWs including hepatotoxicity, fetal risk, and pancreatitis, carbamazepine has BBWs of serious skin and hematological reactions, and felbamate also has two BBWs including hepatic failure and aplastic anemia. The purpose of this review is to provide insight into each BBW received by antiseizure medications and discuss the FDA recommendations for evaluating the drug benefit/risk, and for monitoring parameters before the initiation of and during treatment.

Antiseizure Medications for Adults With Epilepsy: A Review

IMPORTANCE

Epilepsy affects approximately 65 million people worldwide. Persistent seizures are associated with a 20% to 40% risk of bodily injuries (eg, fractures, burns, concussions) over 12-month follow-up. The primary goal of epilepsy treatment is to eliminate seizures while minimizing adverse effects of antiseizure drugs (ASDs).

OBSERVATIONS

An epileptic seizure is defined as a sudden occurrence of transient signs and symptoms caused by abnormal and excessive or synchronous neuronal activity in the brain. Focal and generalized epilepsy are the 2 most frequent types of epilepsy; diagnosis is based on the type of seizures. There are 26 US Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for epilepsy, of which 24 have similar antiseizure efficacy for focal epilepsy and 9 have similar efficacy for generalized epilepsy. The decision to initiate an ASD should be individualized, but should be strongly considered after 2 unprovoked seizures or after 1 unprovoked seizure that occurred during sleep and/or in the presence of epileptiform activity on an electroencephalogram and/or in the presence of a structural lesion on the brain magnetic resonance imaging. The ASDs must be selected based on the seizure and epilepsy types, the epilepsy syndrome, and the adverse effects associated with the drug. For focal epilepsy, oxcarbazepine and lamotrigine are first-line therapy, while levetiracetam can be also considered if there is no history of psychiatric disorder. For generalized epilepsy, the selection of the ASD is based on the type of epilepsy syndrome and the patient's sex, age, and psychiatric history. Seizure freedom is achieved in approximately 60% to 70% of all patients. A total of 25% to 50% of patients also experience neurologic, psychiatric, cognitive, or medical disorders, such as mood, anxiety, and attention deficit disorders and migraines. For these patients, selecting an ASD should consider the presence of these disorders and concomitant use of medications to treat them. ASDs with cytochrome P450 enzyme-inducing properties (eg, carbamazepine, phenytoin) may worsen comorbid coronary and cerebrovascular disease by causing hyperlipidemia and accelerating the metabolism of concomitant drugs used for their treatment. They can also facilitate the development of osteopenia and osteoporosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Epilepsy affects approximately 65 million people worldwide and is associated with increased rates of bodily injuries and mortality when not optimally treated. For focal and generalized epilepsy, selection of ASDs should consider the seizure and epilepsy types and epilepsy syndrome, as well as the patient's age and sex, comorbidities, and potential drug interactions.

Levetiracetam vs. Fosphenytoin for Second-Line Treatment of Status Epilepticus: Propensity Score Matching Analysis Using a Nationwide Inpatient Database

Objective: Status epilepticus is a major emergency condition. The choice of antiepileptic drugs for second-line treatment after benzodiazepine remains controversial, including levetiracetam vs. fosphenytoin. We compare the safety of intravenous levetiracetam and fosphenytoin as a second-line treatment in patients with status epilepticus using a nationwide database.

Methods: An observational study conducted with the Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination inpatient database identified adult patients who had been admitted for status epilepticus and who had received intravenous diazepam on the day of admission from March 1, 2011 to March 31, 2018. Patients who received intravenous levetiracetam on the day of admission were defined as the levetiracetam group and those who received intravenous fosphenytoin on the day of admission were defined as the fosphenytoin group. Propensity score matching was performed to compare outcomes obtained for the levetiracetam and fosphenytoin groups.

Results: The analysis examined data of 5,667 patients. Overall, 1,403 (25%) patients received levetiracetam; 4,264 (75%) received fosphenytoin. One-to-one propensity score matching created 1,363 matched pairs. No significant difference was found in in-hospital mortality (5.2 vs. 5.1%; odds ratio, 1.03; 95% confidence interval, 0.73–1.46). The proportion of vasopressor use on the day of admission was significantly lower for the levetiracetam group than for the fosphenytoin group (3.2 vs. 4.9%; odds ratio, 0.63; 95% confidence interval, 0.43–0.92). No significant difference was found in other secondary outcomes including total hospitalization cost.

Conclusion: Levetiracetam was related to significantly reduced vasopressor use on the day of admission than that found for fosphenytoin, in adult status epilepticus.