Intraoperative duplex ultrasound during carotid endarterectomy

String-like mobile echodensities on postoperative ultrasound after CEA: A retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND

String-like mobile echodensities (SLMEs) are sometimes found on postoperative duplex ultrasound (DUS) performed after carotid endarterectomy (CEA); however, they may not be visible on intraoperative DUS. The reasons for these echo findings and associated clinical course remain unknown.

METHODS

Routine postoperative DUS evaluation after CEA was retrospectively examined in 101 consecutive patients (107 lesions) who underwent CEA between April 2015 and December 2021, at our institution.

RESULTS

Ten SLMEs were identified in eight patients. All SLMEs were 1-3 mm long, mobile, and extended straight from the intima-media complex of the wall of the common carotid artery or carotid bulb. Most lesions resolved spontaneously; a few lesions were observed repeatedly, albeit not causing cerebral infarction or transient ischemic attacks.

CONCLUSIONS

SLMEs can be observed in a small percentage of patients after CEA, and they do not seem to be of clinical significance.

Intraoperative completion studies in carotid endarterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Declining perioperative stroke and death rates over the past 3 decades have been paralleled by an increasing use of intraoperative completion studies (ICS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Techniques applied include angiography, intraoperative duplex ultrasound (IDUS), flowmetry, and angioscopy. This systematic review and meta-analysis is aiming on providing an overview of techniques and corresponding outcomes.

METHODS

A PubMed based systematic literature review comprising the years 1980 through 2020 was performed using predefined keywords to identify articles on different ICS techniques. Pooled analyses and meta-analyses estimating risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were performed to compare outcomes of different ICS modes to nonapplication of any ICS. I2 values were assessed to quantify study heterogeneities.

RESULTS

Identification of 34 studies including patients undergoing CEA with angiography (n=53,218), IDUS (n=20,030), flowmetry (n=16,812), and angioscopy (n=2,291). Corresponding rates of perioperative stroke were 1.5%, 1.8%, 3.6%, and 1.5%, perioperative stroke or death occurred in 1.7%, 1.9%, 2.2%, and 2.0%. Intraoperative surgical revision rates were 6.2%, 5.9%, and 7.9% after CEA with angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy, respectively. Compared to nonapplication of any ICS, the pooled analysis revealed angiography to be significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.47; 95% CI, 0.36-0.62; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.76; 95% CI, 0.70-0.83; P<0.0001). IDUS was significantly associated with lower rates of stroke (RR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.43-0.73; P<0.0001) and stroke or death (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.74-0.93; P=0.0018), whereas angioscopy showed a significant association with a lower stroke rate (RR 0.48; 95% CI, 0.033-0.68; P=0.0001), but no effect on the combined stroke or death rate. Angioscopy was associated with a higher intraoperative revision rate compared to angiography (RR 1.29; 95% CI, 1.07-1.54; P=0.006). The meta-analyses confirmed lower perioperative stroke or death rates for angiography (RR 0.83; 95% CI, 0.76-0.91) and IDUS (RR 0.86; 95% CI, 0.76-0.98) compared to non-application of any ICS, whereas flowmetry showed no significant association.

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first systematic literature review and meta-analysis on usage of ICSs in CEA. Data strongly indicate a significant beneficial effect of angiography, IDUS, and angioscopy on perioperative CEA outcomes. Any carotid surgeon should consider implementation of ICSs in his routine armamentarium.

Applications of intraoperative Duplex ultrasound in vascular surgery: a systematic review

Objective

This review aims to summarise the contemporary uses of intraoperative completion Duplex ultrasound (IODUS) for the assessment of lower extremity bypass surgery (LEB) and carotid artery endarterectomy (CEA).

Methods

We performed a systematic literature search using the databases of MEDLINE. Eligible studies evaluated the use of IODUS during LEB or CEA.

Results

We found 22 eligible studies; 16 considered the use of IODUS in CEA and 6 in LEB. There was considerable heterogeneity between studies in terms of intervention, outcome measures and follow-up. In the assessment of CEA, there is conflicting evidence regarding the benefits of completion imaging. However, analysis from the largest study suggests a modest reduction in adjusted risk of stroke/mortality when using IODUS selectively (RR 0.74, CI 0.63–0.88, p = 0.001). Evidence also suggests that uncorrected residual flow abnormalities detected on IODUS are associated with higher rates of restenosis (range 2.1% to 20%). In the assessment of LEB, we found a paucity of evidence when considering the benefit of IODUS on patency rates or when considering its utility as compared to other imaging modalities. However, the available evidence suggests higher rates of thrombosis or secondary intervention in grafts with uncorrected residual flow abnormalities (up to 36% at 3 months).

Conclusions

IODUS can be used to detect defects in both CEA and LEB procedures. However, there is a need for more robust prospective studies to determine the best scanning strategy, criteria for intervention and the impact on clinical outcomes.

[Intraoperative completion diagnostics in open vascular surgery]

Intraoperative imaging diagnostics during open vascular surgical procedures aim to enhance diagnostic certainty during the operation, ensure quality control documentation and reduce avoidable complications; however, the evidence for the various diagnostic imaging procedures with respect to improvement of perioperative outcome is not confirmed for carotid endarterectomy or for infrainguinal bypass surgery. Nevertheless, an intraoperative diagnostic control is principally recommended. The advantage of intraoperative imaging is confirmed and essential for the surgical reconstruction of bypass occlusions and acute thromboembolic occlusions.

Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy Performed With Routine Intraoperative Duplex Ultrasonography and Arterial Patch Closure: A Contemporary Series

The restenosis rates of 5% to 15% have been reported after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). We undertook this investigation to determine whether the routine practice of carotid artery patch closure and intraoperative completion duplex ultrasonography would result in lower rates of carotid restenosis after CEA. All consecutive carotid endarterectomies performed between 2000 and 2004 at a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. Patients underwent CEA using a longitudinal arteriotomy, followed by routine patching and intraoperative completion duplex ultrasonography. Only patients with at least one postoperative duplex scan performed at a minimum of 180 days after CEA were included. During the 5-year study period, 407 consecutive carotid endarterectomies were performed, with a combined 30-day stroke and mortality rate of 2.5%; 217 patients (53%) had one or more duplex ultrasound examinations performed at least 180 days after CEA. The mean follow-up duration was 692 days. Of the patients who underwent intraoperative intervention based on the results of the completion duplex study, none experienced restenosis, stroke, or death. CEA that is performed with routine patching and intraoperative duplex completion ultrasonography is a safe, durable operation with restenosis rates below those commonly reported.

Role of Residual Defects Following Carotid Endarterectomy in the Occurrence of Cerebrovascular Symptoms

Carotid endarterectomy deals successfully with carotid atheromatous lesions, thus eliminating a potential source of cerebral emboli. At times, however, residual hemodynamic irregularities may occur as a result of technique imperfection or anatomic variations. These irregularities have been associated with a number of immediate and late postoperative complications, such as recurrent cerebrovascular symptoms and secondary episodes of stroke. For this reason, the detection of flow abnormalities or intimal defects in patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy and the achievement of normal intraoperative and postoperative hemodynamics are essential for the elimination of potentially life-threatening perioperative and late cerebrovascular events.

Intraoperative sonography during carotid endarterectomy: normal appearance and spectrum of complications

Carotid endarterectomy is a commonly performed procedure for prevention of stroke related to carotid stenosis. Intraoperative sonography is used to identify potentially correctable technical defects during carotid endarterectomy. The main risk of endarterectomy is perioperative stroke, and great effort has been put into trying to reduce this risk through various surgical techniques and evaluation of the surgical bed. Postoperative carotid thrombosis, or thombo-embolization from the arterectomy site, remains a common cause of perioperative stroke and is often related to technical defects in the arterial reconstruction procedure. Re-exploration and repair of any imperfections have the potential to improve outcomes. Intraoperative imaging can identify potentially occult lesions, provide the option for correction, and thus reduce chance of stroke. Familiarity with the spectrum of intraoperative sonographic findings helps correctly identify residual intimal dissection flaps, plaque, thrombi, and stenosis, which may require immediate surgical revision. Our objective is to illustrate the spectrum of intraoperative findings and their importance.

Carotid Endarterectomy: A Review

Background:

Since the validation of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) as an effective means of stroke prevention, there has been renewed interest in its best indications and methods, as well as in how it compares to carotid angioplasty and stenting (CAS). This review examines these topics, as well as the investigation of carotid stenosis and the role of auditing and reporting CEAresults.

Investigation:

Brain imaging with CTor MRI should be obtained in patients considered for CEA, in order to document infarction and rule out mass lesions. Carotid investigation begins with ultrasound and, if results agree with subsequent, good-quality MRAor CTangiography, treatment can be planned and catheter angiography avoided. An equally acceptable approach is to proceed directly from ultrasound to catheter angiography, which is still the gold-standard in carotid artery assessment.

Indications:

Appropriate patients for CEA are those symptomatic with transient ischemic attacks or nondisabling stroke due to 70-99% carotid stenosis; the maximum allowable stroke and death rate being 6%. Uncertain candidates for CEA are those with 50 - 69% symptomatic stenosis, and those with asymptomatic stenosis ≥ 60% but, if selected carefully on the basis of additional risk factors (related to both the carotid plaque and certain patient characteristics), some will benefit from surgery. Asymptomatic patients will only benefit if surgery can be provided with exceptionally low major complication rates (3% or less). Inappropriate patients are those with less than 50% symptomatic or 60% asymptomatic stenosis, and those with unstable medical or neurological conditions.

Techniques:

Carotid endarterectomy can be performed with either regional or general anaesthesia and, for the latter, there are a number of monitoring techniques available to assess cerebral perfusion during carotid cross-clamping. While monitoring cannot be considered mandatory and no single monitoring technique has emerged as being clearly superior, EEG is most commonly used. “Eversion” endarterectomy is a variation in surgical technique, and there is some evidence that more widely practiced patch closure may reduce the acute risk of operative stroke and the longer-term risk of recurrent stenosis.

Carotid angioplasty and stenting:

Experience with this endovascular and less invasive procedure grows, and its technology continues to evolve. Some experienced therapists have reported excellent results in case series and a number of randomized trials are now underway comparing CAS to CEA. However, at this time it is premature to incorporate CAS into routine practice replacing CEA.

Auditing:

It has been shown that auditing of CEA indications and results with regular feed-back to the operating surgeons can significantly improve the performance of this operation. Carotid endarterectomy auditing is recommended on both local and regional levels.

Eight-year experience with carotid artery stenting for correction of symptomatic and asymptomatic post-endarterectomy defects

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to be superior to medical therapy alone in the prevention of stroke only if it can be safely performed (ie, with a complication rate less than 3% in asymptomatic patients and less than 6% in symptomatic patients). Technical defects are the most common cause of neurological complications after CEA, and their correction has traditionally been performed through standard surgical techniques.

METHODS

From 1999, we started to treat intimal flaps, dissection, or partial thrombosis after CEA with carotid artery stenting (CAS). A retrospective analysis of the operating room registry and of the registry of our Interventional Cardiology laboratory was conducted in order to identify all the patients that underwent stenting of the internal carotid artery after CEA between January 2001 and June 2009.

RESULTS

During the time period considered, 5012 CEA were performed at our institution and a total of 34 patients (34/5012; 0.6%) were found to have received carotid stenting after CEA, both for symptomatic and asymptomatic defects. Immediate technical success was obtained in all patients. One major cerebrovascular adverse event (1/34; 3%) in the immediate perioperative period was recorded. At a mean follow-up of 18.6 months (range, 3-84 months; median, 12 months), we did not observe any neurological symptoms related to the treated carotid artery, nor hemodynamic in-stent restenosis. Long-term follow-up (ie, equal or greater than 4 years) was available for five patients: all patients remained event-free during the entire period.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study adds to the assumption that CAS in post-CEA symptomatic and asymptomatic patients is safe and technically feasible, and represents a valid and quick alternative to standard surgical revision. Even if in a small group of patients, long-term results seem promising.

Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England

OBJECTIVES

We studied surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging (duplex or arteriography), and their association with 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis of 6115 CEAs, we categorized surgeons based on use of completion imaging as rarely (<5% of CEAs), selective (5% to 90%), or routine (≥90%). Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis rates were examined across surgeon practice patterns. Finally, we audited 90 operative reports of patients who underwent re-exploration and characterized findings and interventions. We analyzed the effect of re-exploration on outcomes.

RESULTS

Practice patterns in completion imaging varied: 51% of surgeons performed completion imaging rarely, 22% selectively, and 27% routinely. Crude 30-day stroke/death rates were highest among surgeons who routinely used completion imaging (rarely: 1.7%; selectively: 1.2%, routinely: 2.4%; P = .05). However, after adjusting for patient characteristics predictive of stroke/death, the effect of surgeon practice pattern was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] for routine-use surgeons, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.17; P = .10; selective-use surgeons, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40-1.41; P = .366). Stenosis >70% at 1 year showed a trend toward lowest rates for surgeons who performed completion imaging (rarely: 2.8%, selectively: 1.1%, and routinely: 1.1%; P = .09). This effect became statistically significant for selective-use surgeons after adjustment (hazard risk [HR] for selective-use surgeons, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92; P = .02). Overall, 178 patients (2.9%) underwent operative re-exploration. Routine-use surgeons were most likely to perform re-exploration (7.6% routine, 0.8% selective, 0.9% rare; P < .001). An audit of 90 re-explored patients demonstrated technical problems, the most common being flap, debris, and plaque. Rates of stroke/death were higher among patients who underwent re-exploration (3.9% vs 1.7%; P = .03); however, this affect was attenuated after adjustment (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-5.0; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of completion imaging during CEA varies widely across our region. There is little evidence that surgeons who use completion imaging have lower rates of 30-day stroke/death, although selective use of completion imaging is associated with a small but a significant reduction in stenosis 1 year after surgery. We also demonstrate an association between re-exploration and higher risk of 30-day stroke/death, although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for patient-level predictors of stroke/death. Future work is needed to direct the selective use of completion imaging to prevent stroke, rather than cause unnecessary re-exploration.

Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative Imaging in Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE:

There has never been a large, randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of intraoperative imaging on the success of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This comparison involves cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS:

We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare effectiveness and costs of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) and completion angiography as adjuncts to CEA. Data on procedural mortality, morbidity, and costs were obtained from the English-language literature. The review included a total of 52 reports, encompassing more than 22,000 patients. The main components of costs were those of the monitoring interventions and the care of perioperative stroke.

RESULTS:

Mean perioperative outcome without completion imaging is approximately 96.7% of what it would be in the absence of perioperative stroke or death. IUS and completion angiography each result in approximately 2% improvement in expected outcome. Mean perioperative costs are $396.50 for IUS, $721.30 for no monitoring, and $840.90 for completion angiography. Because IUS is significantly more effective at detecting technical errors that would likely result in perioperative stroke than no imaging and is significantly less costly than angiography, this strategy dominates the other two (i.e., it provides greater effectiveness at lower cost).

CONCLUSION:

Although surgical complications are uncommon, IUS substantially lowers the rate of perioperative stroke and mortality and thus is significantly more cost-effective than either completion angiography or no operative imaging.

Intraoperative carotid artery duplex scanning in a modern series of 650 consecutive primary endarterectomy procedures

PURPOSE

Thromboembolic complications after carotid endarterectomy are frequently associated with technical defects. We analyzed the effect of intraoperative duplex scanning in detection of significant but clinically unsuspected technical defects and residual common carotid artery (CCA) disease as a potential source of postoperative transitory ischemic attack (TIA) and stroke.

METHODS

From April 2000 to April 2003, 650 consecutive primary carotid endarterectomy procedures were performed in 590 patients at a single institution by two vascular surgeons. Patients included 335 men (57%) and 255 women (43%). Indications for surgery were asymptomatic internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis (>or=70%) in 464 patients (71%). All procedures were performed with the patient under general anesthesia, with synthetic patch angioplasty in 644 (99.1%). Major technical defects at intraoperative duplex scanning (>30% luminal internal carotid artery stenosis, free-floating clot, dissection, arterial disruption with pseudoaneurysm) were repaired. CCA residual disease was reported as wall thickness (0.7-4.8 mm; mean, 1.7 +/- 0.7) and percent stenosis (16%-67%; mean, 32% +/- 8%) in all cases. Postoperative 30-day TIA, stroke, and death rates were analyzed.

RESULTS

There were no clinically detectable postoperative thromboembolic events in this series. All 15 major defects (2.3%) identified with duplex scanning were successfully revised. These included 7 intimal flaps, 4 free-floating clots, 2 ICA stenoses, 1 ICA pseudoaneurysm, and 1 retrograde CCA dissection. Diameter reduction ranged from 40% to 90% (mean, 67 +/- 16%), and peak systolic velocity ranged from 69 to 497 cm/s (mean, 250 +/- 121 cm/s). Thirty-one patients (5%) with the highest residual wall thickness (>3mm) in the CCA and 19 (3%) with the highest CCA residual diameter reduction (>50%) did not have postoperative stroke or TIA. Overall postoperative stroke and mortality rates were 0.3% and 0.5%, respectively; combined stroke and mortality rate was 0.8%. One stroke was caused by hyperperfusion, and the other occurred as an extension of a previous cerebral infarct. No patients had TIAs. Two deaths were caused by myocardial infarction, and one death by respiratory insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

We believe intraoperative duplex scanning had a major role in these improved results, because it enabled detection of clinically unsuspected significant lesions. Residual disease in the CCA does not seem to be a harbinger of stroke or TIA.

Intraoperative duplex ultrasound of visceral revascularizations: optimizing technical success and outcome

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the use of intraoperative duplex ultrasound scanning (IOUS) during visceral revascularizations and correlate its results with clinical outcome.

METHODS

We studied 68 patients (15 men and 53 women, mean age 66.5 years, range 27-86 years) who underwent visceral revascularization with concomitant IOUS examination of 120 visceral arteries (52 celiac, 60 superior mesenteric, and 8 inferior mesenteric arteries) from 1992 to 2002. Patients were divided into two groups on the basis of ultrasound findings: normal and abnormal IOUS. The incidence of early and late graft-related complications (thrombosis, restenosis, recurrent symptoms, reintervention) and graft-related death was compared in both groups.

RESULTS

One-hundred and two (85%) arteries had normal IOUS. Eight (6.6%) arteries had minor defects, including small kinks (4), mild residual stenoses (3), and small intimal flap (1). Ten (8.4%) arteries had major defects, consisting of hemodynamically significant residual stenoses (4), thrombus (2), kinks (2), bidirectional flow (1), and intimal flap (1). Major defects were successfully revised in all except three cases: two persistent mild stenoses and one bidirectional flow. Patients with abnormal IOUS at the end of the operation had increased incidence of graft-related complications and/or death (55.5% vs 7.8%; P =.004), early graft thrombosis (14.2% vs 1.0; P =.04), reintervention (21.4% vs 3.2%; P =.03), and graft-related death (33.3% vs 1.9%; P =.02), compared with patients with normal IOUS.

CONCLUSION

This study supports the routine use of IOUS during visceral revascularizations to optimize technical success and outcome. Persistent ultrasound scanning abnormalities are associated with risk of early graft failure, reintervention, and death. Patients with normal ultrasound scans can expect excellent results.

Intraoperative duplex ultrasonography as an adjunct to technical excellence in 100 consecutive carotid endarterectomies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the relationship of intraoperative duplex ultrasonography (duplex) results to neurologic outcomes and restenosis among patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

One hundred consecutive CEAs were performed at a military medical center over 28 months. Prospectively acquired demographics, duplex results, revisions, and surgical outcomes were reviewed.

RESULTS

Thirty-four percent (34 of 100) of sites were abnormal by completion duplex. Of these, 70% (24 of 34) were B-mode flap type defects located in the common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid artery (ICA), or external carotid artery (ECA). Twenty-one percent of the defects (7 of 34) were technically unacceptable and immediately revised. Subsequently, 3 perioperative neurologic events occurred, 2 strokes and 1 transient ischemic attack (TIA), all among patients with an identified but unrepaired defect involving the ICA or CCA. This association of unrepaired defect with early stroke or TIA was significant (P = 0.02). No significant association (P >0.05) between unrepaired defects and late ipsilateral stroke or TIA or restenosis was identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative duplex scanning is a useful adjunct to CEA that can identify correctable mechanical problems. Residual elevated velocities or B-mode flaps 2 mm or greater in the ICA warrant consideration for immediate repair. Findings not requiring revision include flaps <2 mm, as well as isolated ECA defects. Prospectively validated duplex criteria are needed to further define which defects require immediate repair.

Carotid artery reconstruction combined with myocutaneous flap coverage: a complex and durable rescue operation

Carotid reconstruction combined with myocutaneous flap coverage is a rare and challenging operation. We reviewed our experience to define the indications and outcome of this complex procedure. Clinical data and neurologic, wound, and vascular complications of all patients who underwent carotid artery reconstruction combined with myocutaneous flap coverage over a 17-year period were retrospectively reviewed. Results from this procedure indicate that pectoralis major myocutaneous flap is a safe and durable option for wound coverage in patients who undergo carotid endarterectomy, resection, and/or reconstruction for neck malignancy, previous irradiation or graft infection. Late outcome is favorable with low neurologic, vascular, and wound complication rates.

Internal carotid artery flow volume measurement and other intraoperative duplex scanning parameters as predictors of stroke after carotid endarterectomy

PURPOSE

Intraoperative duplex scanning (IDS) after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been shown to reliably identify major defects either by significant changes in peak systolic velocities or by B-mode imaging. To evaluate whether IDS could also predict postoperative strokes in technically flawless CEAs, we analyzed several hemodynamic parameters and correlated them with patient outcome.

METHODS

From March 2000 to February 2001, 226 consecutive primary CEAs were performed in 208 patients (120 men). Of these, 153 lesions were asymptomatic. General anesthesia and synthetic carotid artery patches were used routinely. Intraluminal shunts were used when internal carotid artery (ICA) back-pressures were <50 mm Hg (35% of cases). IDS consisted of B-mode and color-flow imaging and spectral analyses of the common, external, and internal carotid arteries. Volume flows were measured three times, and the mean flow rate was used for this study.

RESULTS

The first set of data was analyzed when the twenty-ninth patient had the second immediate postoperative stroke. It was noted that the two patients who had postoperative strokes had mean ICA volume flows (MICAVF) of 48 mL/min and 85 mL/min. Only two additional patients had MICAVF <100 mL/min. The remaining 25 cases had MICAVF ranging from 102 to 299 mL/min, with a mean of 165 +/- 57 mL/min (+/-SD) (P <.02). Although there was a significant correlation between MICAVF and ICA peak systolic velocity (P <.01), the latter was not found to be a significant predictor of postoperative stroke. Moreover, end-diastolic velocities, resistive index, ICA diameter, and ICA back-pressure also did not correlate with neurologic events. These findings led us to change our protocol for patients with MICAVF <100 mL/min. This included a repeat set of volume flow measurements after 15 to 20 minutes, withholding the reversal of heparin, and the liberal use of completion arteriography. Of the following 197 CEAs, 26 (13%) were found to have MICAVF <100 mL/min (range 55 to 99 mL/min; mean 79 +/- 18 mL/min). Of these, five had arteriography that documented spasm of the intracranial portion of the ICA in four and a small-diameter ICA (<2 mm) in one. Except for the five cases, the remaining 21 cases had MICAVF >100 mL/min (range 105 to 158 mL/min, mean 127 +/- 20 mL/min [+/-SD]) on repeat study. Four patients with persistent ICA low flow (70 to 99 mL/min) were treated with postoperative anticoagulation. One of the last 197 patients had a stroke caused by hyperperfusion syndrome 2 weeks after operation. Overall, six of 226 cases (2.7%) required revision on the basis of abnormal B-mode imaging results or peak systolic velocities >150 cm/s. There were two common carotid artery flaps, two ICA stenoses, one ICA flap, and one localized thrombus. All six were successfully revised and had repeat normal IDS study results, and none of these patients had a postoperative stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

IDS is helpful in identifying residual lesions or defects that may contribute to postoperative neurologic deficits. MICAVF <100 mL/min are suggestive of spasm that could lead to thrombus formation and stroke, particularly in the presence of synthetic patches. We suggest that heparin reversal should not be used unless ICA flow rates are >100 mL/min. ICA spasm is short lived in most patients undergoing CEA.