Restenosis After Carotid Endarterectomy in Patients with Paired Vein and Dacron Patch Reconstruction

Primary closure, routine patching, and eversion endarterectomy: what is the current state of the literature supporting use of these techniques?

Our objective in this article was to review the most recent literature on the status of carotid patching or primary carotid closure following carotid endarterectomy; to determine the best patch material if needed; and to clarify the place of eversion carotid endarterectomy in management of carotid artery atherosclerosis. In order to accomplish this, a literature review was performed of the Ovid, PubMed and MedLine databases using appropriate search terms. An evidence-based approach was taken; with all articles graded using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network system (levels of evidence 1 to 5) and recommendations were made using an A to D system. Most weight was given to well-conducted, adequately powered, randomized control trials. After review of the literature, we were able to make the following Grade A recommendation: carotid patching is superior to primary closure, resulting in fewer postoperative strokes and a lower incidence of restenosis in most surgeons' hands. However, it was also concluded that, based on review of the literature, that the choice of patch material in 2007 has little impact; eversion carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and conventional patch CEA have equivalent postoperative morbidity and similar incidences of long-term restenosis. In conclusion, the technique of CEA continues to evolve, but in most reported series, immediate and long-term outcomes are excellent. A variety of technical approaches are acceptable, but it appears that carotid patching remains superior to primary closure.

Prospective randomized trial of carotid endarterectomy with polytetrafluoroethylene versus collagen-impregnated dacron (Hemashield) patching: late follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To compare the late clinical outcome and incidence of recurrent stenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) versus Hemashield patching.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Several randomized trials have confirmed the advantages of patching over primary closure when performing CEA.

METHODS

Two hundred CEAs (180 patients) were randomized into 100 with PTFE patching and 100 with Hemashield. All patients underwent postoperative color duplex ultrasounds at 1, 6, and 12 months, and every year thereafter. The mean follow-up was 26 months. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the risk of re-stenosis, stroke, and stroke-free survival. A multivariate analysis of various risk factors was also done.

RESULTS

Demographic and clinical characteristics were similar in both groups. The incidence of all ipsilateral strokes (early and late) was 8% (7% perioperative) for Hemashield versus 0% for PTFE patching. Both groups had similar mortality rates. The cumulative stroke-free rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 93%, 93%, 93%, and 89% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE patching. The cumulative stroke-free survival rates at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months were 90%, 89%, 87%, and 79% for Hemashield versus 98%, 98%, 92%, and 92% for PTFE patching. Kaplan-Meier analysis also showed that freedom from 50% or greater re-stenosis at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 89%, 81%, 73%, and 66% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 92% for PTFE. Similarly, the freedom from 70% or greater re-stenosis at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months was 93%, 91%, 86%, and 78% for Hemashield versus 100%, 100%, 100%, and 100% for PTFE. Univariate and multivariate analyses of demographic and preoperative risk factors showed that only Hemashield was significantly associated with a higher incidence of 70% or greater recurrent stenosis.

CONCLUSIONS

PTFE patching was superior to Hemashield in lowering the incidence of postoperative ipsilateral strokes and late recurrent stenosis.