Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery in patients with post-thrombotic venous insufficiency--is it justified?

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the management of incompetent perforators in patients with chronic venous insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

Incompetent perforator veins (IPVs) contribute to venous pathology and are surgically treated based on hemodynamic measurement, size, and Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, and Pathophysiological (CEAP) classification. The objective of this study was to systematically review and synthesize current literature regarding surgical management of IPVs, including open ligation, subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS), endovascular laser ablation (EVLA), ultrasound guided sclerotherapy (USGS), and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

English-language literature published prior to November 2021 was reviewed from the PubMed, EMBASE, and MEDLINE databases for primary literature reporting safety and efficacy outcomes in the surgical treatment of incompetent perforating veins. Study quality and risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for comparative studies and a modified version of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for non-comparative studies. A random effects model was used to pool effect sizes for efficacy outcomes of wound healing and freedom from wound recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 81 studies were included for qualitative synthesis representing 7010 patients with a mean age of 54.7 years. Overall evidence quality was low to intermediate, with moderate to high risk of bias in comparative studies. There was an 11.3% complication rate across interventions, with no reported incidences of stroke or air embolism. With regards to efficacy, pooled estimates for short-term (up to 1-year) wound healing were 99.9% for USGS (95% CI 0.81 - 1), 72.2% for ligation (95% CI 0.04, 0.94) and 96.0% for SEPS (95% CI 0.79 -0.99). For short-term freedom from wound recurrence, the pooled estimate for SEPS is 91.0% (95% CI 0.3 - 0.99).

CONCLUSION

Current evidence regarding treatment of incompetent perforator veins is limited due to low adherence to reporting standards in observational studies and lack of randomization, blinding, and allocation concealment in comparative studies. Additional comparative studies are needed to guide clinical decision-making regarding invasive treatment options for incompetent perforator veins.

Open Surgical Reconstruction for Deep Venous Occlusion and Valvular Incompetence

This article considers the potential options for open deep venous reconstructions based on pathologic complication (obstruction vs insufficiency), anatomic location, presence of disease-free venous architecture, and patient need. Other things being equal, less invasive techniques and disease locations will be attempted as first-line therapy. When other options fail and symptoms persist, open venous surgery by means of bypass for obstructive disease and valve repair or replacement for deep venous insufficiency remains a viable option. The basic techniques available and overall success rates of each are considered.

The Treatment of Post-Thrombotic Syndrome

BACKGROUND

Post-thrombotic syndrome (PTS) arises in 20-50% of patients who have sustained a deep vein thrombosis and markedly impairs their quality of life.

METHODS

This review is based on pertinent publications retrieved by a selective literature search in PubMed and the Cochrane Library, and on the guidelines of the German Societies of Phlebology and Vascular Surgery (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Phlebologie, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gefässchirurgie).

RESULTS

The treatment options are conservative treatment with compression and patient exercises, endovascular recanalization with stent angioplasty, and open bypass surgery of the iliac obstructions. The endovascular techniques yield patency rates of 73 to 100%, with thrombotic stent occlusion and hematoma as potential complications. The open operations have only been documented in studies with small case numbers (3 to 85 cases per study, patency rates 58 to 100%). The complications of these invasive procedures can include thrombotic bypass occlusion, hematoma, and wound infection. There have been randomized trials of conservative treatment, but not of surgical treatment. The American Heart Association, in its guidelines, gives the same weak recommendation for all surgical methods (IIb).

CONCLUSION

All conservative options should be exhausted as the first line of treatment. If PTS symptoms persist and markedly impair the patient's quality of life, the possible indication for surgery should be considered. As PTS hardly ever leads to death or limb loss, its treatment should be as uninvasive as possible. Endovascular recanalization is an attractive option in this respect. A conclusive evaluation of the role of endovascular procedures in PTS must await randomized trials of this form of treatment and of the optimal stent configuration.

Open surgical treatment for postthrombotic syndrome

The postthrombotic syndrome counts as a frequent long-term complication after deep vein thrombosis with approximately 20%–50% of affected patients after deep vein thrombosis. The earliest that diagnosis of postthrombotic syndrome can be made is 6 months after deep vein thrombosis. Most patients suffer from swelling and chronic pain. In all, 5%–10% of patients may even develop venous ulcers. The complex etiology consists of limited venous drainage because of chronic occlusions and secondary insufficiencies of venous valves inducing non-physiological venous reflux. Conservative management, first of all compression therapy, is of crucial importance in treatment of postthrombotic syndrome. Endovascular and open surgical techniques can additionally be used in a small subgroup of patients. Although rarely performed, this article illuminates the open surgical techniques in treatment of postthrombotic syndrome such as venous bypass surgery, valve repair and varicose vein surgery.

[Venous insufficiency in the lower limbs]

BACKGROUND

Venous insufficiency is a common condition that presents with various symptoms and is often treated inadequately. The purpose of the article is to provide an overview of the prevalence, recommended investigations and indications for treatment of venous insufficiency.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The literature reviewed was identified through a non-systematic search in PubMed based on the authors' experience in research, investigations and treatment of this patient group.

RESULTS

Venous insufficiency is a common condition with a prevalence of about 30 %. Some patients will develop distal dystrophic skin changes (prevalence <or= 3 %) and a few will experience venous leg ulcers (prevalence < 1 %). Dystrophic skin changes and venous leg ulcers can be caused by an isolated superficial venous insufficiency, accessible for varicose vein surgery.

INTERPRETATION

Further evaluations (e.g. colour duplex scanning and direct measurement of venous pressure or plethysmography) are recommended for all patients with skin changes, recurrent varices, previous deep venous thrombosis or other circumstances rendering it difficult to conclude from clinical investigations. Indications for superficial venous surgery are mainly based on symptoms. Prophylactic surgery on superficial veins is considered only in cases with dystrophic skin changes or ulcers. Compression therapy represents the best prophylactic measure to reduce varicose vein progression.

Meta-analysis of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) for chronic venous insufficiency

Objectives

The degree of benefits and risks, and the role of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery (SEPS) in the management for chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) remains uncertain.

Methods

A multiple health database search was performed including Medline, Embase, Ovid, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Cochrane Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effectiveness, on all studies published between 1985 and 2008 that reported on health outcomes in patients with CVI treated with SEPS and comparing this therapy with the conventional Linton procedure. Three studies, which compared SEPS with conventional surgery, were included in the present meta-analysis.

Results

Between SEPS and Linton groups, there was a significant lower rate of wound infections for SEPS (odds ratio [OR] 0.06 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.02 to 0.25]) and a significantly reduced hospital stay for SEPS (OR –8.96 [95% CI –11.62 to –6.30]). In addition, SEPS was associated with a significant reduced rate of recurrent ulcers (mean follow-up 21 months) (OR 0.15 [95% CI 0.04–0.62]). There was no significant difference between the groups in the following dimensions: rate of hospital re-admission (OR 0.21 [95% CI 0.03 –1.31]), death at six months (OR 3.00 [95% CI 0.11–78.27]), ulcer healing rate at four months (OR 0.44 [95% CI 0.09–2.12]), and the rate of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR 0.35 [95% CI 0.01–8.85]).

Conclusion

From the level of evidence available by now it seems that SEPS, used as a part of a treatment regimen for severe CVI, benefits most patients in the short term regarding ulcer healing and the prevention of ulcer recurrence. It can be safely performed with less early postoperative complications compared with the Linton procedure. However, further prospective randomized trials are required to define the long-term benefits of SEPS.

True Long-term Healing and Recurrence of Venous Leg Ulcers Following SEPS Combined with Superficial Venous Surgery: A Prospective Study

BACKGROUND

The role of perforator surgery remains unclear in the management of patients with leg ulcers. The aim of this study was to assess long-term healing and recurrence rates of leg ulcers following surgical intervention with combined Subfascial Endoscopic Perforator Surgery (SEPS) and superficial venous surgery.

METHOD

Case series with prospective long-term follow-up of 90 consecutive patients operated on with open (CEAP C6) or healed (CEAP C5) venous ulcers in 97 legs. Popliteal vein reflux was present in 21 legs. All 97 legs were treated with SEPS and 87% had additional superficial venous surgery. Patients were follow-up for a median of 77 months (range 60-112 months) with a minimum of 5 years.

RESULTS

87% of all ulcerated legs healed. The three and five year recurrence rates were 8% and 18% respectively among survivors. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis previous vein surgery was the only factor significantly associated with recurrent ulceration (p=.004).

CONCLUSION

SEPS combined with superficial venous surgery leads to healing with a low recurrence rate in patients with open and healed venous ulcers. Previous venous surgery was found to be a significant risk factor for ulcer recurrence. This result emphasizes the importance of assiduous technique for varicose vein surgery and suggests a continuing role for perforator surgery in leg ulcer patients.

Safety and efficiency of perilesional sclerotherapy in leg ulcer patients with postthrombotic syndrome and/or oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon

BACKGROUND

The positive effects of perilesional sclerotherapy for venous leg ulcers is well documented. Although many patients with venous leg ulcers require oral anticoagulation or have had a deep vein thrombosis, the effects of these factors on perilesional sclerotherapy are unknown. The aim of this study was to review effects of oral anticoagulation and/or postthrombotic syndrome on perilesional sclerotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

28 patients with venous leg ulcers were observed. 12/28 had a postthrombotic syndrome, 5/12 were on oral anticoagulants (phenprocoumon with INR 2-3). During each treatment session, 1 ml sclerosing foam (1:5, polidocanol 2 %, method of Tessari) was injected. Treatment was continued until all extrafascial veins in the 15cm surrounding the ulcer were closed.

RESULTS

Closure of the perilesional veins was achieved in all patients with 2.5 +/- 1.8 injections. In 10 of 28 patients (35.7 %), just one injection was needed. More injections were needed, both in patients with postthrombotic syndrome (3.3 +/- 2.1 vs. 1.8 +/- 1.3) and on anticoagulation with phenprocoumon (4.2 +/- 1.2 vs. 2.1 +/- 1.7). There were only two complications: an ascending phlebitis up to the accessory saphenous vein and a superficial erosion at an injection site which healed within 1 week.

CONCLUSIONS

Perilesional sclerotherapy with foam is a safe and efficient therapy for patients with chronic venous leg ulcers even with postthrombotic syndrome and/ or ongoing anticoagulation.

Mid-term recurrence rate of incompetent perforating veins after combined superficial vein surgery and subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the mid-term (mean, 3.7 years) clinical results and the results of duplex Doppler sonographic examinations of subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery (SEPS) in patients with mild to severe chronic venous insufficiency (clinical class 2-6) and assessed the factors associated with the recurrence of insufficient perforating veins (IPVs).

METHODS

Eighty patients with mild to severe chronic venous insufficiency undergoing SEPS were evaluated, and duplex findings, as well as clinical severity and disability scores before and after the operation, were compared. Patients with prior deep vein thrombosis (<6 months) or prior SEPS were excluded from this study.

RESULTS

There were 27 men and 53 women with a median age of 59.8 years (range, 34.3-80.0 years). The distribution of clinical classes (CEAP) was as follows: class 2, 13.1% (12 limbs); class 3, 22.8% (21 limbs); class 4, 19.6% (18 limbs); class 5, 21.7% (20 limbs); and class 6, 22.8% (21 limbs). The etiology of venous insufficiency was primary valvular incompetence in 83 limbs (90.2%) and secondary disease in 9 limbs (9.8%). Concomitant superficial vein surgery was performed in 89 limbs (95.7%). Twenty (95%) leg ulcers healed spontaneously within 12 weeks after operation, whereas one patient required additional split-thickness skin grafting. Eighteen patients had previous surgery of the great and/or short saphenous vein before SEPS. During a mean follow-up of 3.7 years, recurrence of 22 IPVs was observed in 20 (21.7%) of 92 limbs, and recurrent leg ulcers were observed in 2 (9.5%) of 21 limbs. We performed univariate and multivariate analyses to predict factors influencing the recurrence of IPVs (recurrent superficial varicosis, secondary disease, active or healed leg ulcer [C5/6], compression treatment, and previous operation). On multivariate analysis, previous surgery (P = .014) was identified as the only significant factor for the recurrence of IPVs.

CONCLUSIONS

SEPS is a safe and highly effective treatment for IPVs. Within a median follow-up period of 3.7 years, only 2 of 21 venous ulcers recurred, both in patients with secondary disease. Nevertheless, we observed recurrence of IPVs in 21.7% of the operated limbs. On multivariate analysis, patients who had undergone previous surgery were found to have a significantly higher rate of recurrence.

Reduction in deep vein reflux after concomitant subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery and superficial vein ablation in advanced primary chronic venous insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Subfascial endoscopic perforating vein surgery (SEPS) and superficial vein surgery (SVS) have been the recommended treatment for advanced chronic venous insufficiency (CVI), despite a high prevalence of deep vein reflux in these patients. The anatomic and hemodynamic results of these procedures, however, remain uncertain. It is hypothesized that concomitant SEPS and SVS would result in a reduction of deep vein reflux in patients with advanced primary CVI. We investigated the effect of concomitant SEPS and SVS on deep vein reflux as well as the associated hemodynamic and clinical changes after surgery in a cohort of patients with advanced primary CVI.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated 53 consecutive SEPSs with concomitant SVS procedures in 47 patients with advanced primary CVI. There were 25 men and 22 women with a mean age of 58 years at operation. Thirty-four procedures (64%) were performed for limbs with active venous ulcers (class 6), and the other 19 procedures were performed for 15 class 5 limbs, one class 4a limb, and three class 4b limbs, respectively. Duplex scan and air plethysmography were performed before operation, at 1 month, and at 1 year after operation. The patients were followed up regularly with clinical assessment, and the ulcer healing and recurrence rates were documented.

RESULTS

The proportion of limbs with common femoral vein incompetence decreased from 68% to 28% at 1 month and to 32% at 1 year after operation. The proportion of limbs with deep vein incompetence at more than one site also decreased from 42% to 15% at 1 month and to 12% at 1 year after concomitant SEPS and SVS. Venous hemodynamics as measured by air plethysmography improved significantly after operation. The cumulative ulcer healing was 85% at 3 months and 97% at 6 months. With a mean follow-up of 31 +/- 16 months, all ulcers healed. Only three recurrent ulcers (6%) were detected during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant SEPS and SVS are effective in reducing deep vein reflux and results in hemodynamic and clinical improvements in patients with advanced primary CVI. Deep vein reconstruction procedures may not be necessary in these patients.

Superficial vein surgery and SEPS for chronic venous insufficiency

Venous insufficiency in its severe forms leads to skin changes which, in turn may be treated by surgical therapy. Interventions are directed towards correction of the underlying abnormal venous physiology. This involves removal of varicose veins and ablation of incompetent axial veins and relevant perforating veins. In performing ablation of saphenous vein reflux, techniques include high ligation with stripping, radiofrequency ablation, endovenous laser therapy, and foam sclerotherapy. Incompetent perforator interruption can be accomplished surgically by subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) or controlled sclerotherapy using ultrasound. A variety of techniques have emerged to manage the varicose veins themselves. Surgical treatment of chronic venous insufficiency with high ligation in the groin and inversion stripping of the great saphenous vein to the knee combined with stab avulsion of varicose veins continues to be the standard in treatment of varicose veins. There are few comparisons of sclerotherapy of perforating veins with SEPS, but SEPS has become the most popular of surgical options.

Surgical treatment of venous ulcers: role of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein ligation

Existing data in the literature lack answers to several questions about the optimal treatment of patients with advanced CVI, especially venous ulcers. There is no level I evidence to support the superiority of surgical over medical treatment and the extent of surgical intervention. Specifically, knowledge about the efficacy and applicability of SEPS is incomplete, and prospective, randomized studies are needed. In the light of present-day knowledge, all patients should undergo a trial of medical management before resorting to surgery. Patients who benefit from surgical treatment and the addition of SEPS, if indicated, are patients with ulcers resulting from PVI of the superficial and perforating veins, with or without DVI. Based on available data, these patients can be assured an 80% to 90% chance of long-term freedom from ulcer recurrence. Despite subjective symptomatic and objective clinical score improvement, the role of surgery and SEPS is controversial in patients with PT because only 50% of patients can be predicted to have long-term freedom from ulcer recurrence. Patients with ulcer recurrence after SEPS should undergo duplex scanning to exclude recurrent or persistent perforators. If these are found to be incompetent, repeat SEPS is warranted. If there is no perforator incompetence, patients should be considered for deep venous reconstruction.