Clinical Course of Hemodialysis Access After Initial Endovascular Intervention for Stenosis in Asian Renal Failure Patients

Demography and Outcomes of Arteriovenous Fistula: Challenges and Future Directions

The incidence and prevalence rates of treated end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patients are on the rise worldwide. Hemodialysis remains the main modality of providing renal replacement therapy for the ESKD patients, and the preferred vascular access is an arteriovenous fistula (AVF). The objective is to assess the patency rates and primary failures of the AVF. All patients who attended the Royal Hospital in Muscat, Oman, from January 2010 to December 2014 for AVF creation were included in this study. Data were extracted from the hospital's electronic medical record system where data are entered prospectively. During the period of study from 2010 to 2014, 465 primary fistulae were created in 427 patients. The mean age of the patient was 58 years. Only 6% needed general anesthesia, while the rest were done under regional or local anesthesia. Fifty-one percent of the patients were diabetic. Preemptive AVF was constructed in only 12% of patients. Most cases (47%) had left brachiocephalic (BC) fistulae. The left radiocephalic (RC) fistulae constituted 25.7% and the left brachiobasilic fistulae 9.9%. The remaining were constructed in the right upper limb. The total patency was achieved in 80% of fistulae and the failure rate was 20% at 6 months. Whereas, at 12 months, the total patency rate was 71% and the failure rate was 29%. Thus, we can conclude that more than 50% of patients, half of them being females, were diabetics. This resulted in more fistulae being constructed in the arm, namely left BC fistulae and left RC fistulae. Furthermore, it is important to note that only a very small percentage of patients had an established preemptive AVF. These factors may be responsible for a failure rate of 20% and 29% of the AVFs at 6 months and 12 months, respectively.

Determinants of venous catheter hemodialysis onset and subsequent switch to arteriovenous fistula: An epidemiological study in Lazio region

BACKGROUND

The factors associated with the inability to start hemodialysis with an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in chronic kidney disease patients are not fully understood.

AIM

Evaluating factors associated with type of vascular access at the first chronic hemodialysis and at 1 year after it.

METHODS

The study cohort includes patients registered in the Regional Dialysis and Transplant Registry of Lazio undergoing first hemodialysis between 2008 and 2015. Logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between socio-demographic, clinical and care/organizational factors, and vascular access at first hemodialysis. Cox regression models were used to assess the odds of switching to AVF during the first year of hemodialysis among patients starting dialysis with central venous catheter (CVC).

RESULTS

In the cohort of 6208 incident hemodialysis patients, 52.7% had an AVF and 47.3% had a CVC. Among the 2939 incident patients with CVC, 27.4% switched to FAV after 1 year. A higher probability of starting dialysis with AVF was observed among males (OR = 1.83; 95% CI 1.63-2.06), while a lower probability was observed among patients aged >85 years (OR 0.64; IC 95% 0.51-0.80). Patients with early referral to a nephrologist had a triple probability of start dialysis with AVF. We observed a higher odds of switch to AVF among males (HR = 1.62; 95% CI 1.40-1.89) and a lower odds among patients over 65 years.

CONCLUSION

The observed high rate of AVF at the start of hemodialysis and of the switch from CVC to AVF in the first year, although declining since 2008, is a positive outcome. However, over one-third of patients maintain the CVC as vascular access for the first year because of unmodifiable factors, such as gender, age, comorbidity. The present study suggests that logistics/management and assistance/welfare problems may contribute to the delay or lack of AVF placement in incident hemodialysis patients or within the first year of dialysis.

Angiography and phlebography in a hemodialysis population: A retrospective analysis of interventional results

OBJECTIVE

To clarify the reasons and beneficial effects and duration of arteriovenous fistula patency after radiological interventions in arteriovenous fistula. The patients investigated were referred due to arteriovenous fistula access flow problems.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In 174 patients, 522 radiological investigations and endovascular treatments such as percutaneous transluminal angioplasty were analyzed, retrospectively. All investigations were performed due to clinical suspicion of impaired arteriovenous fistula function.

RESULTS

Arterial stenosis was significantly more frequent among patients with diabetic nephropathy (p < 0.001) and interstitial nephritis (p < 0.001). According to the venous stenosis, the diagnosis did not affect the frequency (p = 0.22) or the degree (p = 0.39) of stenosis. The degree of stenosis prior to percutaneous transluminal angioplasty correlated significantly with the degree of remaining stenosis after intervention (p < 0.001). Of the 174 patients, 123 (71%) performed a total of 318 investigations including percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Repeated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty was performed significantly more often in patients with diabetic nephropathy. The median times to the first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and to the subsequent percutaneous transluminal angioplasties were 9.5 and 5 months, respectively. Arteriovenous fistula in patients with diabetic nephropathy performed similar to most other diagnoses, although performing more percutaneous transluminal angioplasty/patient than most other diagnoses.

CONCLUSION

Many patients could maintain long-term patency of arteriovenous fistula, including those with diabetic nephropathy, with repeated interventions; this motivates a closer follow-up for these patients. Clinically significant stenosis should be dilated as meticulously and as soon as possible. Occlusions of the arteriovenous fistula in most instances can be successfully thrombolyzed or dilated upon early diagnosis.

Mineralocorticoid receptor: A hidden culprit for hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction

Hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction is a common and intractable problem in clinical practice with no definitive therapy yet available. As a key mediator of vascular and cardiac maladaptive remodeling, mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) plays a pivotal role in vascular fibrosis and intimal hyperplasia (IH) and is potentiated locally in hemodialysis vascular access following diverse injuries, like barotrauma, cannulation and shear stress. MR-related genomic and non-genomic pathways are responsible for triggering vascular smooth muscle cell activation, proliferation, migration and extracellular matrix overproduction. In endothelial cells, MR signaling diminishes nitric oxide production and its bioavailability, but amplifies reactive oxygen species, leading to an inflammatory state. Moreover, MR favors macrophage polarization towards a pro-inflammatory phenotype. In clinical settings like post-angioplasty or stenting restenosis, the beneficial effect of MR antagonists on vascular fibrosis and IH has been validated. In aggregate, therapeutic targeting of MR may provide a new avenue to prevent hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction.

•

MR signaling is instrumental in both insufficient outward remodeling and exuberant inward remodeling of AVF.

•

The effects of MR in VSMC, endothelial cell, and macrophage act synergistically to promote IH and vascular fibrosis in AVF.

•

Pharmacological targeting of MR represents a novel therapeutic strategy to prevent hemodialysis vascular access dysfunction.