Clinical outcomes and risk factors associated with drug-coated balloon treatment for femoropopliteal artery disease in patients on maintenance hemodialysis

The effect of drug-coated balloons (DCB) on hemodialysis (HD) in patients with femoropopliteal (FP) disease remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the outcomes of DCB therapy in patients with FP artery disease on HD. A total of 185 patients with FP lesions (140 HD patients) who underwent DCB treatment were included in the study. The incidence of restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 months were measured. Risk factors for TLR were also investigated. The mean age was 71.7 years, and diabetes was observed in 82.3% of patients. The mean duration of receiving dialysis was 8.8 years. The mean lesion length was 11.0 cm, and approximately half of the lesions were severely calcified. Severe dissection after DCB therapy was observed in 19.5% of patients. During the follow-up period, 74 restenosis, 68 TLRs, 8 major amputations, and 28 deaths were observed. The freedom rates from restenosis and TLR at 12 months were 63.8% and 71.3%, respectively. The freedom rates after low- and high-dose DCB at 12 months were 61.9% and 70.6% for restenosis (P = 0.49) and 66.4% and 79.4% for TLR (P = 0.095), respectively. Independent risk factors for TLR at 12 months of age were diabetes, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and severe calcification. When patients were divided into four groups according to the number of these three risk factors, the rates of freedom from TLR at 12 months were 100%, 94.8%, 76.7%, and 30.3% in the groups with no risk factors, any one risk factor, any two risk factors, and all risk factors, respectively (P < 0.0001). Clinical outcomes after endovascular therapy in HD patients with FP disease remain unsatisfactory, even if they are treated with DCB. In particular, patients on HD with diabetes, chronic limb-threatening ischemia, and severe calcification have poor outcomes.

Effect of Comorbidities on Outcomes of Infrapopliteal Angioplasty in Patients with Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

This subgroup analysis aimed to evaluate the effect of comorbidities on infrapopliteal angioplasty outcomes in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI).

METHODS

This was an observational study evaluating eligible CLTI patients aged >18 years who underwent infrapopliteal angioplasty between April 2014 and May 2017 at a tertiary care center. Subgroup analyses were based on (1) baseline glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c ≤6.5% vs >6.5%), (2) presence/absence of chronic kidney disease (CKD), and (3) control of lipid parameters.

RESULTS

A total of 231 patients with 332 infrapopliteal vessels were treated. While diabetes was prevalent in all participants, hypertension, coronary artery disease, and CKD were reported in 76.6%, 46.3%, and 25.5% of patients at baseline, respectively. The overall technical success rate was 84.4%, and the patency rate at 6 months was 82.04%. Patency at 6 months, wound healing, in-line flow, and complete plantar arch formation were numerically higher in patients with HbA1c ≤6.5% versus >6.5%, but all comparisons were nonsignificant. According to multivariable analysis, the odds of wounds not healing was 2.38 times higher (odds ratio [OR] = 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2 to 4.5) and developing plantar arch was 5.88 times higher (OR = 5.9, 95% CI: 1.3 to 25) among patients with CKD compared with patients without CKD.

CONCLUSIONS

The 6-month outcomes of infrapopliteal angioplasty may be better in patients with controlled versus uncontrolled glycemic levels. Control of lipid parameters may not have a significant influence on outcomes, especially in patients on statin therapy. The short-term outcomes may be similar in patients with and without CKD.

Long-Term Outcomes of Extra-Anatomic Femoro-Tibial Bypass Reconstructions in Chronic Limb-Threating Ischemia

(1) Background: While tibial bypass surgery still plays a role in the treatment of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia and diabetic foot syndrome; only a few centers have recorded considerable numbers of these conditions. The current study aimed to determine contemporary practice with special focus on the performance of extra-anatomic grafting to the infrapopliteal arteries. (2) Methods: A retrospective, single-center study included patients with tibial bypass grafts from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2019. Primary endpoints were complication rate, graft patency, amputation, overall survival, and major adverse cardiac (MACE) or limb event (MALE). The cohort was stratified by extra-anatomic vs. anatomic position. (3) Results: A total of 455 patients (31% female) with Rutherford stage 4 (12.5%) and 5/6 (69.5%) were included (thereof, 19.5% had high amputation risk according to the Wound Ischemia Foot Infection score). Autologous reconstruction was performed in 316 cases, and prosthetic reconstruction in 131 cases, with a total of 51 (11.2%) extra-anatomic grafts. Early occlusion rate was 9.0% with an in-hospital overall mortality of 2.8%. The in-hospital rate of MACE was 2.4% and of MALE, 1.5%. After one, three and five years, the primary patency of venous bypasses was 74.5%, 68.6% and 61.7%, respectively. For prosthetic grafts, this was 55.1%, 46.0%, and 38.3%, respectively (p < 0.001). The patency of extra-anatomic prosthetic grafts performed significantly better compared with anatomically positioned prosthetic grafts (log-rank p = 0.008). In multivariate analyses, diabetes (hazard ratio, HR 1.314, CI 1.023−1.688, p = 0.032), coronary artery disease (HR 1.343, CI 1.041−1.732, p = 0.023), and dialysis dependency (HR 2.678, CI 1.687−4.250, p < 0.001) were associated with lower odds of survival (4) Conclusion: In this large, single-center cohort, tibial bypass surgery demonstrated satisfactory results with overall low perioperative complication rates and long-term patency rates of 60% and 38%, respectively. Extra-anatomic bypasses represent a feasible alternative to venous grafts in terms of patency. A tailored, patient-centered approach considering predictors such as diabetes, dialysis dependency, and coronary artery disease along with prediction models may further improve the long-term results in the future.

Principal predictors of major adverse limb events in diabetic peripheral artery disease: A narrative review

Background and aims

The increasing prevalence of diabetes mellitus is causing a massive growth of peripheral artery disease incidences, a disabling complication of diabetic atherosclerosis, which leads often to the amputation of the affected limb. Critical limb ischemia is the terminal disease stage, which requires a prompt intervention to relieve pain and save limbs. However, patients undergoing revascularization often suffer from cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and major adverse limb events with poor outcomes. Furthermore, the same procedure performed in apparently similar patients has various outcomes and lack of an outcome predictive support causes a high lower limb arterial revascularization rate with disastrous effects for patients. We collected the main risk factors of major adverse limb events in a more readable and immediate format of the topic, to propose an overview of parameters to manage effectively peripheral artery disease patients and to propose basics of a new predictive tool to prevent from disabling vascular complications of the disease.

Methods

Most recent and updated literature about the prevalence of major adverse limb events in peripheral artery disease was reviewed to identify possible main predictors.

Results

In this article, we summarized major risk factors of limb revascularization failure and disabling vascular complications collecting those parameters principally responsible for major adverse limb events, which provides physio-pathological explanation of their role in peripheral artery disease.

Conclusion

We evaluated and listed a panel of possible predictors of MALE (Major Adverse Limb Event) in order to contribute to the development of a predictive score, based on a summary of the main risk factors reported in scientific articles, which could improve the management of peripheral artery disease by preventing vascular accidents.

Bypass surgery versus endovascular intervention for lower extremity revascularization in patients with chronic renal disease or end-stage renal disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovascular revascularization (ER) and open revascularization (OR) are recognized treatment modalities for peripheral artery disease, but whether one technique provides better outcomes than the other is unclear, especially in patients with chronic or end-stage renal disease.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature search on the PubMed, Scopus, and Google scholar databases. We considered randomized-controlled trials, and retrospective record-based and prospective studies for inclusion. All included studies compared patient outcomes between the two management modalities and reported adjusted effect sizes.

RESULTS

We found the risks of in-hospital mortality (OR 0.52; 95% CI 0.30-0.92) and 30-day mortality (OR 0.63; 95% CI 0.49-0.80) during the post-operative period to be significantly lower in patients undergoing ER than in those undergoing OR. The pooled odds of amputation within 30 days of the post-operative period suggested a significantly higher risk of amputation in patients undergoing ER (OR 1.51; 95% CI 1.32-1.73) than in the others. Compared to patients undergoing OR, those undergoing ER had higher odds of being discharged to home (OR 2.30; 95% CI 1.58-3.36), lower odds of wound complications within 24 months of the post-operative period (OR 0.34; 95% CI 0.15-0.79), and a reduced length of hospital stay (WMD - 5.9; 95% CI - 10.8 to - 1.00).

CONCLUSIONS

For elderly patients with ESRD and chronic limb ischemia, ER may be the best choice due to its lower risk of mortality, lower odds of wound complications, reduced length of hospital stay, and reduced risk of re-intervention requirement when compared to OR. However, OR should be considered as an option when limb salvage is preferred.

End-stage renal disease patients undergoing angioplasty and bypass for critical limb ischemia have worse outcomes compared to non-ESRD patients: Systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is associated with increased morbidity and mortality following lower extremity amputation for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Angioplasty and bypass are used in ESRD patients with CLI; however, the treatment of choice remains controversial. We compared the long-term outcomes in patients with CLI undergoing angioplasty or bypass to evaluate the differences between patients with ESRD and those without ESRD.

METHODS

Established databases were searched for observational studies comparing outcomes following bypass or angioplasty for CLI in patients with ESRD to those in non-ESRD patients. End points included survival, limb salvage, amputation-free survival (AFS), and primary and secondary patency at 1-year post-procedure. Pooled odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using a random effect model.

RESULTS

We included 20 studies with a total of 24,851 patients. ESRD patients compared to non-ESRD patients with CLI had significantly lower survival post-angioplasty (OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.72, p < .001) and post-bypass (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.15-0.45, p < .001). ESRD patients had lower rates of limb salvage post-bypass (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.21-0.53, p < .001) and post-angioplasty (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41-0.70, p < .001). AFS was significantly lower in ESRD patients compared to non-ESRD patients following angioplasty (OR 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.71, p < .001) and bypass (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.16-0.47, p < .001) despite no significant differences in primary patency. ESRD patients had overall worse secondary patency post-angioplasty and/or bypass (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.32-0.94, p = .03) compared to non-ESRD patients. A meta-analysis of four studies directly comparing survival in ESRD patients with CLI based on whether they underwent angioplasty or bypass showed no difference (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.64-1.35, p = .69).

CONCLUSION

ESRD patients have worse survival, limb salvage, and AFS outcomes following angioplasty and bypass for CLI compared to non-ESRD patients. Large randomized controlled trials comparing these two modalities of treatment in this patient population are needed for further clarity.

A novel technique of percutaneous intraluminal cracking using a puncture needle for severe calcified lesions of below-the-knee and below-the-ankle arteries

PURPOSE

Endovascular therapy has recently become acceptable for the reconstruction of below-the-knee (BTK) and below-the-ankle (BTA) arterial lesions. However, we have sometimes experienced BTK or BTA lesions with calcifications that are too severe for balloon catheters to cross or expand despite successful guidewire passage. In this study, we assessed the feasibility and safety of the novel inner PIERCE technique for breaking down the calcium burden of BTK and BTA arterial lesions.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients who had undergone endovascular therapy between August 2018 and December 2019. The inner PIERCE technique was performed in those cases where low-profile balloon catheters were unable to pass through the target lesions or balloon indentation did not disappear beyond the rated burst pressure. An externalized guidewire system was established in 8 cases via bidirectional approaches, and a 20-gauge needle was directly inserted through the guidewires from the distal puncture site. In 10 cases of successful antegrade wiring, the tibial or pedal arteries distal to the lesion site were punctured for a retrograde guidewire approach to the lesion. The needle was slowly rotated and advanced across the lesion.

RESULTS

We found that all lesions were severely calcified and 83.3% had chronic total occlusion. The inner PIERCE procedure allowed successful passage of the needle and subsequent low-profile balloon catheters in all cases. Optimal balloon dilatation was achieved in 94.4% of the cases using this technique. No procedure-related adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

The novel inner PIERCE technique is a safe and feasible method for disrupting calcified BTK and BTA lesions.

Influence of end-stage renal disease on long-term survival after major amputation

Background: To analyze long-term outcomes and possible influencing factors in patients with endstage renal disease (ESRD) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) after major amputation compared to patients with normal renal function and non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease. Patients and methods: Abstraction of single-center medical records of patients undergoing above knee (AKA) and below knee (BKA) amputation over a 10 years period (n = 436; 2009-2018). Excluded were amputations due to trauma or tumor. Patients were subdivided according to renal function in three categories: ESRD patients (n = 98), non-dialysis dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD, n = 98) and normal renal function (NF, n = 240). Predefined endpoints were survival and postoperative complications. Cox-regression models were built to analyze independent risk factors for outcome parameters. Results: In total, 298 AKA, 133 BKA and 5 knee joint exarticulations were performed. ESRD patients showed inferior in-hospital results as to death (ESRD 36.7 % vs. CKD 19.4 % and NF 20.0 %, P = .002). Similarly, long-term survival rates (6 months: ESRD 55.0 % vs. CKD 69.4 %, NF 67.9 % 1 year: ESRD 48.6 %, CKD 60.2 %, NF 60.8 % 5 years: ESRD 9.9 %, CKD 31.8 %, NF 37.1 %, P < .001) were significantly decreased for ESRD patients. Median postoperative survival was 10 months in ERSD, and 22 months in CKD and NF, respectively. Analysis of postoperative surgical complications revealed no differences between groups (ESRD 19.4 %, CKD 17.3 %, NF 17.0 %; P = 0.433). Cox regression analysis indicated that dialysis (HR 1.63; 95 % CI 1.22-2.16; P = .001), hypertension (HR 1.59; 95 % CI 0.99-2.54) and smoking (HR 1.22; 95 % CI 1.03-1.44; P = .022) was associated with increased risk of death during follow-up. Conclusions: Mortality after limb amputation in ERSD patients remains high. Survival of ERSD patients is lower in relation to chronic kidney disease and patients with normal renal function. Due to poor in hospital outcomes and absent long-term survival, benefit of primary amputation in ERSD seems scarce.