Randomized clinical Trial Comparing drug Eluting Stent Zilver PTX® Versus Bare Metal Stent Zilver Flex® for Treatment of Lesions in Femoral and Popliteal Arteries in Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Drug eluting stents (DES) might improve the results of stenting in the femoropopliteal (FP) segment, but randomized data between DES and BMS in the treatment of patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI) is lacking. The aim of this study was to perform a randomized comparison, between DES and bare metal stent (BMS) implantation in a subgroup of CLTI patients with lesions in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) and the P1-P2 portion of the popliteal artery.

METHODS

Patients presenting with CLTI scheduled for endovascular treatment of FP lesions were randomly assigned by blinded envelopes 1:1 in a single blinded, parallel group design to DES or BMS after lesion crossing. Primary endpoints were target lesion revascularization (TLR) at 12 and 24 months and primary patency at 12 and 24 months. Secondary endpoints were technical success (TS), clinical success, secondary patency at 12 and 24 months, limb salvage, serious adverse events (SAE) at 24 month and survival at five years.

RESULTS

A total of 48 CLTI patients and 49 limbs, were enrolled, 22 in the BMS group and 27 in the DES group. Demographics, comorbidities, and Rutherford class were similar in both treatment arms. The overall rate of total occlusions was 96% and the corresponding overall median lesion length was 240 mm. No patients were lost to follow up. No significant differences were detected between groups regarding TLR and primary patency. The overall primary patency at 12 and 24 months was 42.9% and 36.7% respectively and the overall freedom from TLR was 67.3% and 61.2% respectively. The results in the two groups were also similar regarding secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

This single centre, randomized study could not demonstrate superiority of DES compared to BMS when treating long FP lesions in patients with CLTI but was limited by insufficient patient inclusion.

Radial access for peripheral vascular intervention: the S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ Vascular Stent System

INTRODUCTION

Radial access is the standard of care for nearly all cardiac catheterization procedures. It improves patient satisfaction, reduces the length of stay, and is associated with fewer complications. However, few devices and tools are available for the treatment of peripheral arterial disease via a transradial approach (TRA). The S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ Vascular Stent System is among the RADIANZ suite of products, which is aimed at expanding the portfolio of devices to treat peripheral arterial disease.

AREAS COVERED

In this Expert review, the following areas will be covered: (1) Current Landscape of peripheral vascular intervention (PVI) using TRA (2) Detailed description of the S.M.A.R.T. RADIANZ Vascular Stent System. (3) Ongoing clinical trials to evaluate safety of this approach. (4) Future directions and current regulatory status.

EXPERT OPINION

TRA for PVI is a promising approach. It holds the possibility of substantially improving the care of patients with peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Numerous challenges must be overcome to realize the full potential of a radial-to-peripheral (RTP) approach. The length of devices and the small sheath size are the main constraints of this approach. The results of the ongoing RADIANCY trial will demonstrate the safety, in selected patients, of the RADIANZ suite of products.

A method of assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness under cyclic deformations experienced during limb movement

Poor outcomes of peripheral arterial disease stenting are often attributed to the inability of stents to accommodate the complex biomechanics of the flexed lower limb. Abrasion damage caused by rubbing of the stent against the artery wall during limb movement plays a significant role in reconstruction failure but has not been characterized. Our goals were to develop a method of assessing the abrasiveness of peripheral nitinol stents and apply it to several commercial devices. Misago, AbsolutePro, Innova, Zilver, SmartControl, SmartFlex, and Supera stents were deployed inside electrospun nanofibrillar tubes with femoropopliteal artery-mimicking mechanical properties and subjected to cyclic axial compression (25%), bending (90°), and torsion (26°/cm) equivalent to five life-years of severe limb flexions. Abrasion was assessed using an abrasion damage score (ADS, range 1-7) for each deformation mode. Misago produced the least abrasion and no stent fractures (ADS 3). Innova caused small abrasion under compression and torsion but large damage under bending (ADS 7). Supera performed well under bending and compression but caused damage under torsion (ADS 8). AbsolutePro produced significant abrasion under bending and compression but less damage under torsion (ADS 12). Zilver fractured under all three deformations and severely abraded the tube under bending and compression (ADS 15). SmartControl and SmartFlex fractured under all three deformations and produced significant abrasion due to strut penetration (ADS 20 and 21). ADS strongly correlated with clinical 12-month primary patency and target lesion revascularization rates, and the described method of assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness can guide device selection and development. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Poor outcomes of peripheral arterial disease stenting are related to the inability of stents to accommodate the complex biomechanics of the flexed lower limb. Abrasion damage caused by rubbing of the stent against the artery wall during limb movement plays a significant role in reconstruction failure but has not been characterized. Our study presents the first attempt at assessing peripheral stent abrasiveness, and the proposed method is applied to compare the abrasion damage caused by Misago, AbsolutePro, Innova, Zilver, SmartControl, SmartFlex, and Supera peripheral stents using artery-mimicking synthetic tubes and cyclic deformations equivalent to five life-years of severe limb flexions. The abrasion damage caused by stents strongly correlates with their clinical 12-month primary patency and target lesion revascularization rates, and the described methodology can be used as a cost-effective and controlled way of assessing stent performance, which can guide device selection and development.

Efficacy and Safety of a Novel Helical Self-Expanding Nitinol Stent for Femoropopliteal Artery Obliterans Disease

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel self-expanding nitinol stent (Smartflex stent) in femoropopliteal artery obliterans disease.

METHODS

From June 2016 to May 2019, patients with atherosclerotic occlusion disease of the superficial femoral and popliteal arteries using the Smartflex stents were retrospectively analyzed in our institution. Patients were monitored at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. The main characteristics of the diseased vessels, perioperative and follow-up outcome were evaluated. Kaplan-Meier method was used to assess patency rate and the rate of freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR).

RESULTS

A total of 50 limbs from 48 patients (mean age 69.4 ± 8.95 years; 38 men) were included. Eighty-eight Smartflex stents (1.76 stents per limb) were deployed successfully. Of the study patients, 82% had claudication (Rutherford III), 10% had rest pain (Rutherford IV), and 8% had tissue loss (Rutherford V). Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus II C and D lesions were 26% and 42%, respectively. The mean lesion length was 18.2 ± 8.5 cm and the mean stented length was 22.3 ± 9.9 cm. The average follow-up time was 16.4 ± 8.2 months. Of these lesions, 42 (94%) were chronic total occlusions and 16 (32%) were severely calcified. The primary patency rate at 1 year per Kaplan-Meier estimating, the rate of freedom from CD-TLR at 1 year, and the second patency rate was 83.3%, 88.1%, and 94%, respectively. Among them, 90% patients had improved ankle-brachial indexes (0.47 ± 0.13 before and 0.84 ± 0.16 after). No stent fractures and kinking were identified.

CONCLUSIONS

Stenting of the femoropopliteal artery diseases using the Smartflex stent appeared to be safe and effective. It performed well in long-segment and above knee joint lesions.