de Donato G, Weber G, de Donato G. Minimally invasive or conventional aorto-bifemoral by-pass. A randomised study.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2002;
24:485-91. [PMID:
12443742 DOI:
10.1053/ejvs.2002.1680]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION
open transperitoneal aorto-bifemoral by-pass is still associated with a relatively high morbidity and mortality. To decrease this surgical stress, minimally invasive direct aortic surgery (MIDAS) was developed, utilizing a minilaparotomy and a retroperitoneal approach to the aorta.
OBJECTIVES
to compare in a randomised controlled trial whether mortality and morbidity could be reduced with MIDAS.
METHODS
from October 1997 to September 2000, 300 patients were randomised to either MIDAS (n=150) or conventional aorto-bifemoral by-pass surgery (n=150).
RESULTS
the perioperative (30 days) mortality (2.6%), was equal in both groups. MIDAS were significantly reduced length of hospital stay (3.1 days), and pulmonary dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS
MIDAS reduced trauma and pain, which resulted in a shorter hospital stay, and a reduction in costs.
Collapse