Factors Impacting Management of Breast Cancer-Related Lymphedema (BCRL) in Hispanic/Latina Breast Cancer Survivors: A Literature Review

Predicting lymphedema self-management behaviours in breast cancer patients: A structural equation model with the Integrated Theory of Health Behaviour Change

AIMS

To explore predictors of lymphedema self-management behaviours among Chinese breast cancer survivors based on the Integrated Theory of Health Behaviour Change, and to clarify the interrelationship among these variables.

DESIGN

Further analysis of a multicentre cross-sectional and survey-based study.

METHODS

A total of 586 participants with breast cancer were recruited from December 2021 to April 2022 in different cities in China. We used self-reported questionnaires to collect data. Descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis and structural equation model were performed.

RESULTS

The Integrated Theory of Health Behaviour Change is suitable for predicting lymphedema self-management behaviours. The final structural model showed good model fit. Social support, self-efficacy and lymphedema knowledge positively affected lymphedema self-management behaviours, directly and indirectly. Self-regulation acted as a crucial mediator between these variables and self-management. The direct path between social support and self-regulation was not significant. Lymphedema knowledge and social support also influenced self-management via illness perception, self-efficacy and self-regulation, sequentially. These variables explained 55.9% of the variance in lymphedema self-management behaviours.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified model based on the Integrated Theory of Health Behaviour Change fitted well in predicting lymphedema self-management behaviours among breast cancer patients. Lymphedema knowledge, illness perception, self-efficacy, social support and self-regulation directly and indirectly influenced lymphedema self-management behaviours.

IMPACT

This study provides a theoretical basis for the assessment and interventions of lymphedema self-management behaviours in breast cancer patients. Lymphedema self-management behaviours should be assessed regularly and comprehensively, taking these predictors into consideration to identify potential barriers. Further research is needed to explore effective interventions integrating these significant predictors.

REPORTING METHOD

This study was reported following Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist for cross-sectional studies.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

No patient or public contributed to the design or conduct of the study, analysis or interpretation of the data, or in the preparation of the manuscript. WHAT DOES THIS PAPER CONTRIBUTE TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY?: This study focused on identifying and predicting mechanism of self-management based on a theory of behaviour change. The results can be applied among patients with other chronic diseases or high-risk populations, and inspire the assessment and interventions facilitating self-management behaviours.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study was registered as an observational study at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: http://www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2200057084).

IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE

For breast cancer patients with poor lymphedema self-management behaviour, attention should be raised among nurses and involved healthcare staffs that lymphedema self-management is multi-faced. Strategies targeted at improving social support, self-regulation, knowledge, self-efficacy and illness perception should be also addressed in lymphedema self-management programs, to facilitate more effective improvement of lymphedema self-management behaviours.

Breast cancer survivors' experiences of barriers and facilitators to lymphedema self-management behaviors: a theory-based qualitative study

PURPOSE

Lifelong self-management plays a critical role in the prevention and management of lymphedema among breast cancer survivors. However, adherence to lymphedema self-management behaviors has remained suboptimal. Hence, we adopted a theory-informed method to elucidate the facilitators and barriers of lymphedema self-management for breast cancer survivors.

METHODS

In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted between August and October 2022 in the lymphedema nursing clinic of a tertiary cancer hospital. The maximum variation sampling technique was used to ensure a diverse sample. The ITHBC (Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change) framework was used to inform the interview outline and data analysis. Interview transcripts were coded line-by-line and mapped to domains in accordance with the ITHBC, using both deductive and inductive content analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 16 participants were interviewed (aged 35 to 67). Twenty-three themes (12 facilitators and 11 barriers) were mapped onto the three domains (knowledge and belief, social facilitation, and self-regulation skill and ability) of ITHBC as facilitators and barriers to lymphedema self-management. Three additional themes including limited treatment resources for lymphedema, inconvenience of lymphedema management, boredom and tedium of lymphedema self-management were categorized under the domain of other barriers.

CONCLUSIONS

Incorporating these findings into the ITHBC framework allows for a more systematic selection of theory-based strategies that may improve the design of effective lymphedema self-management interventions for breast cancer survivors.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Elucidating impact factors, especially facilitators and barriers, for lymphedema self-management adherence is essential for developing effective intervention programs to enhance breast cancer survivors' lymphedema self-management behaviors.

Factors associated with lymphedema self-management behaviours among breast cancer survivors: A cross-sectional study

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this empirical study was to explore the current status and associated factors of lymphedema self-management behaviours among Chinese breast cancer survivors.

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer-related lymphedema is a lifetime concern for survivors and is currently incurable. Lifetime lymphedema self-management takes a significant role in preventing development and progression of lymphedema. Understanding influencing factors of lymphedema self-management behaviours can help to develop targeted intervention programs.

DESIGN

A multicentre cross-sectional study.

METHODS

From December 2021 to April 2022, a convenience sample of 586 participants were recruited at four tertiary hospitals in four cities in China. Self-reported questionnaires were used to measure socio-demographic characteristics, disease-and treatment-related characteristics, lymphedema self-management behaviours, lymphedema knowledge, illness perception, self-efficacy, self-regulation and social support. Descriptive analysis, bivariate analysis and hierarchical multiple regression were conducted. This study was registered at Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200057084), and was reported followed the STROBE checklist.

RESULTS

Breast cancer survivors reported moderate level of lymphedema self-management behaviours. Promotion of lymph reflux management was ranked the least performed self-management behaviours, while the affected limb protection management ranked the most. 36.2% of self-management behaviours was explained by exercise regularly, level of attention on lymphedema prevention, unclear about the tumour stage (vs. stage I), knowledge, self-efficacy, emotional illness representation and social support.

CONCLUSIONS

Lymphedema self-management behaviours of breast cancer survivors was insufficient. Performance of lymphedema self-management varied with different socio-demographic characteristics, along with different levels of knowledge, self-efficacy, perception and social support. All these identified predictors should be reckoned in assessment and intervention of lymphedema self-management behaviours.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study addressed that breast cancer survivors' lymphedema self-management behaviours should be promoted. Focusing on identified predictors, further lymphedema surveillance, knowledge education or social facilitation programs are recommended to enhance their self-management performance and adherence.

Financial strain, neighborhood cohesion, and health-related quality of life among rural and urban Spanish-speaking Latina breast cancer survivors

PURPOSE

Among Latina breast cancer survivors, explore associations between rural/urban residence and health-related quality of life (HRQL), and whether associations are moderated by financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion.

METHODS

We combined baseline data from two randomized controlled trials of a stress management intervention conducted among 151 urban and 153 rural dwelling Latinas with nonmetastatic breast cancer. Generalized linear models estimated associations between rural/urban status and HRQL (overall, emotional, social-family, physical, and functional well-being), and we examined moderation effects of financial strain and low neighborhood cohesion, controlling for age, marital status, and breast cancer characteristics.

RESULTS

Rural women reported better emotional (β = 1.85; 95% CI = 0.37, 3.33), functional (β = 2.23; 95% CI = 0.69, 3.77), and overall (β = 5.68; 95% CI = 1.12, 10.25) well-being than urban women, regardless of degree of financial strain or neighborhood cohesion; moderation effects were not statistically significant. Financial strain was inversely associated with emotional (β = -2.34; 95% CI = 3.63, -1.05), physical (β = -2.56; 95% CI = -4.12, -1.01), functional (β = -1.61; 95% CI = -2.96, -0.26), and overall (β = -6.67; 95% CI = -10.96, -2.98) well-being. Low neighborhood cohesion was inversely associated with emotional (β = -1.27; 95% CI = -2.50, -0.04), social-family (β = -1.72; 95% CI = -3.02, -0.42), functional (β = -1.63; 95% CI = -2.92, -0.34), and overall (β = -5.95; 95% CI = 9.76, -2.14) well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural Latina breast cancer survivors reported better emotional, functional and overall well-being than their urban counterparts. Greater financial strain and less neighborhood cohesion were associated with worse HRQL on most domains regardless of rural/urban context.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Interventions that focus on increasing perceived neighborhood cohesion and reducing or better managing financial strain, could help improve Latina cancer survivors' well-being.

An Ecologic Model for Identifying Coping Resources to Manage Psychological Distress Among Spanish-Speaking Latina Women Newly Diagnosed With Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To examine associations of coping resources for psychological distress among newly diagnosed Spanish-speaking Latina women with breast cancer (LWBC).

SAMPLE & SETTING

Analyses used baseline data from a randomized controlled trial of a stress management intervention among 151 LWBC.

METHODS & VARIABLES

Dependent variables were health distress and anxiety. Coping resources at the intrapersonal, interpersonal, and organizational/community levels were included.

RESULTS

At the intrapersonal level, self-efficacy for coping with breast cancer treatment was associated inversely with health distress and anxiety, and coping confidence with general problems was associated inversely with health distress. At the interpersonal level, having a sense of neighborhood cohesion was associated inversely with health distress. No organizational/community level resources were associated with health distress or anxiety.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING

Interventions that enhance self-efficacy in coping and foster skills to identify sources of neighborhood support may decrease psychological distress for Spanish-speaking LWBC.

Breast cancer-related lymphedema patient and healthcare professional experiences in lymphedema self-management: a qualitative study

PURPOSE

Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) self-management plays an important role in the lymphedema therapy. However, clinical knowledge of BCRL self-management remains minimal. This study aims to explore the experience surrounding lymphedema self-management from the perspectives of BCRL patients and healthcare professionals.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were implemented with BCRL patients and healthcare professionals. Audio-recordings of interviews were transcribed verbatim and thematic analysis was undertaken to analyze the interview data.

RESULTS

Thirteen BCRL patients (aged 34-65 years) and nine healthcare professionals (2 physicians, 4 nurses, and 3 lymphedema therapists) were interviewed. Five themes emerged from interviews with participants: knowledge-attitude-practice surrounding lymphedema self-management, emotional reactions towards lymphedema self-management, factors influencing lymphedema self-management, support needs for lymphedema self-management, healthcare professional support of BCRL self-management.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed knowledge-attitude-practice, feelings, influencing factors, roles, dilemmas, and support needs regarding BCRL self-management. Greater effort is required for healthcare professionals to strengthen the lymphedema self-management. Providing more educational program and holistic support, and strengthening the facilitators and controlling the barriers might benefit promoting lymphedema self-management. Likewise, healthcare professionals need adequate training to be able to meet patients' self-management support needs.