Assessment of enamelysin (MMP-20) selectivity to three peptide bonds on amelogenin sequence

Identification and characterization of matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP20; enamelysin) genes in reptile and amphibian

Matrix metalloproteinase-20 (MMP20; enamelysin) is important for proteolytic processing of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins during the formation of enamel and plays a critical role in proteolytic processing of amelogenin (AMEL), the most abundant enamel ECM protein. MMP20 might have played a role in the emergence of teeth, because jawless vertebrates with primordial teeth on their external skeletons may have possessed the MMP20 gene, and MMP20 and enamel ECM proteins are thought to have evolved together in a special relationship over time. Thus, an understanding of the molecular evolution of the MMP20 gene is important for elucidating the evolution of enamel and it is necessary to identify the orthologs of the MMP20 gene in non-mammals, as it has been identified in mammals. In the present study, orthologs of the MMP20 genes from a reptile (caiman) and an amphibian (African clawed toad) were cloned and characterized. Comparisons of the orthologs revealed that the MMP20 proteins were highly conserved throughout the evolution of tetrapods. Further, the caiman, toad, and mammalian MMP20 shared several unique features specific for MMP20, but not for other matrix metalloproteinases. In addition, the toad MMP20 gene was transcribed only in the upper jaw, presumably in teeth. These results suggest that MMP20 in a common ancestor of tetrapods might have been recruited for the processing of AMEL and conserved over 350 million years of evolution.

How do enamelysin and kallikrein 4 process the 32-kDa enamelin?

The activities of two proteases--enamelysin (MMP-20) and kallikrein 4 (KLK4)--are necessary for dental enamel to achieve its high degree of mineralization. We hypothesize that the selected enamel protein cleavage products which accumulate in the secretory-stage enamel matrix do so because they are resistant to further cleavage by MMP-20. Later, they are degraded by KLK4. The 32-kDa enamelin is the only domain of the parent protein that accumulates in the deeper enamel. Our objective was to identify the cleavage sites of 32-kDa enamelin that are generated by proteolysis with MMP-20 and KLK4. Enamelysin, KLK4, the major amelogenin isoform (P173), and the 32-kDa enamelin were isolated from developing porcine enamel. P173 and the 32-kDa enamelin were incubated with MMP-20 or KLK4 for up to 48 h. Then, the 32-kDa enamelin digestion products were fractionated by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) and characterized by Edman sequencing, amino acid analysis, and mass spectrometry. Enamelysin cleaved the 32-kDa enamelin only after it was deglycosylated. Kallikrein 4 digestion of the 32-kDa enamelin generated nine major cleavage products, six of which were successfully characterized. After 12 h of digestion with KLK4, all of the 32-kDa enamelin had been cleaved, but some cleavage products persisted after 48 h of digestion.

Matrix metalloproteinase inhibition impairs the processing, formation and mineralization of dental tissues during mouse molar development

Organotypic cultures of embryonic mouse tooth germs were used to investigate the developmental expression and roles of MMPs in the formation and mineralization of dentin and enamel matrices. The spatially and temporally regulated expression of MMP-2, MMP-9 and MMP-20 in developing mouse tooth germs in vivo was maintained in culture. The inhibition of metalloproteinases activity by marimastat altered the morphogenesis and mineralization of the tooth germs associated with an inhibition of the activation of both MMP-20 and MMP-2. MMP inhibition deregulated the molecular processing of two major dental matrix proteins, amelogenin and dentin sialoprotein (DSP). This coincided with their accumulation and the loss of their normal distribution within the extracellular matrix, resulting in a defective mineralization of dentin and enamel matrices. These findings demonstrate the critical role of MMPs in the processing and maturation of the dental matrix.

Two related low molecular mass polypeptide isoforms of amelogenin have distinct activities in mouse tooth germ differentiation in vitro

Embryonic mouse tooth germs were cultured in vitro in the presence of two related amelogenin isoforms to determine their effects on tooth development. Our results show that these individual proteins have specific but quite different effects on epithelial-derived ameloblasts versus mesenchymal-derived odontoblasts.

INTRODUCTION

Amelogenins, the main protein components of enamel matrix, have been shown to have signaling activity. Amelogenin isoforms differing only by the presence or exclusion of exon 4, designated [A+4] (composed of exons 2, 3, 4, 5, 6d, and 7) and [A-4] (composed of exons 2, 3, 5, 6d, and 7), showed similar, but different, effects both in vitro and in vivo on postnatal teeth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Lower first molar tooth germs of E15/16 CD1 mice were microdissected and cultured in vitro in a semisolid media containing either 20% FBS, 2% FBS, or 2% FBS with either 1.5 nM [A+4], [A-4], or both for 6 days. Tooth germs were analyzed by H&E staining and immunohistochemistry for collagen I, dentin matrix protein 2, and DAPI nuclear staining.

RESULTS

Teeth cultured in media containing 20% FBS showed normal development with polarized ameloblasts, and odontoblasts producing dentin matrix, and DMP2 expression in odontoblasts and pre-ameloblasts. Culture in 2% FBS media resulted in no ameloblast polarization and modest odontoblast differentiation with scant dentin matrix. Tooth germs cultured with [A+4] in 2% FBS media had well-polarized odontoblasts with robust dentin production and concomitant ameloblast polarization. DMP2 expression was equal to or greater than seen in the 20% FBS culture condition. In cultures with [A-4] in 2% FBS media, odontoblast polarization and dentin production was reduced compared with [A+4]. However, the pre-ameloblast layer was disorganized, with no ameloblast polarization occurring along the dentin surface. DMP2 expression was reduced in the odontoblasts compared with the 20% FBS and [A+4] conditions and was almost completely abrogated in the pre-ameloblasts.

CONCLUSION

These data show different signaling activities of these closely related amelogenin isoforms on tooth development. Here we make the novel observation that [A-4] has an inhibitory effect on ameloblast development, whereas [A+4] strongly stimulates odontoblast development. We show for the first time that specific amelogenin isoforms have effects on embryonic tooth development in vitro and also hypothesize that DMP2 may play a role in the terminal differentiation of both ameloblasts and odontoblasts.