Insufficient Balance Recovery Following Unannounced External Perturbations in Persons With Stroke

Characteristics of unsuccessful reactive responses to lateral loss of balance in people with stroke

PURPOSE

The effectiveness of reactive responses to a sudden loss of balance is a critical factor that determines whether a fall will occur. We examined the strategies and kinematics associated with successful and unsuccessful balance recovery following lateral loss of balance in people with stroke (PwS).

METHODS

Eleven PwS were included in the analysis. They were exposed to unannounced right and left horizontal surface translations and demonstrated both successful and unsuccessful balance responses at the same perturbation magnitude. Reactive step strategies and kinematics were investigated comparatively in successful and unsuccessful recovery tests.

RESULTS

The crossover strategy was used in most of the unsuccessful tests (7/11) while the unloaded-leg side-step in the successful tests (6/11). There were no significant differences in the reactive step initiation time in unsuccessful vs. successful tests. However, the step execution time, step length and center of mass displacement were significantly higher during the first recovery step in unsuccessful tests.

CONCLUSIONS

PwS have difficulties in controlling and decelerating the moving center of mass following a lateral loss of balance. The increased step time and step length of the first reactive step in unsuccessful vs. successful tests suggest the crossover step strategy may be ineffective for PwS.

Characteristics of uneven surface walking in stroke patients: Modification in biomechanical parameters and muscle activity

BACKGROUND

Stroke patients have difficulty walking in outdoor environments, including uneven surfaces, reducing their opportunities for social participation. Changes in stroke patients' gait while walking on even surfaces have been reported; however, gait alterations on uneven surfaces remain unclear.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To what extent do biomechanical parameters and muscle activity during even and uneven surface walking differ between stroke patients and healthy people?

METHODS

Twenty stroke patients and 20 age-matched healthy people walked on a 6 m even and uneven surfaces. Data on gait speed, root mean square (RMS) of trunk acceleration as a measure of gait stability, maximum joint angle, average muscle activity, and muscle activity time were quantified using accelerometers attached to the trunk, video camera images, and electromyography of lower extremities. A two-factor mixed-model analysis of variance was used to test the effects of group, surface, and group × surface interactions.

RESULTS

Gait speed decreased (p < 0.001) on the uneven surface in stroke patients and healthy people. RMS showed an interaction (p < 0.001), and the post-hoc test revealed an increase in stroke patients in the mediolateral direction during the swing phase on the uneven surface. The hip extension angle during the stance phase showed an interaction (p = 0.023), and the post-hoc test revealed a decrease in stroke patients on the uneven surface. The soleus muscle activity time showed an interaction during the swing phase (p = 0.041), and the post-hoc test revealed an increase in stroke patients compared to healthy people only on the uneven surface.

SIGNIFICANCE

While walking on an uneven surface, stroke patients showed decreased gait stability, decreased hip extension angle during stance phase, and increased ankle plantar flexor activity time during swing phase. These changes may result from impaired motor control and compensatory strategies used by stroke patients on uneven surfaces.

Daily Outdoor Cycling by Older Adults Preserves Reactive Balance Behavior: A Case-Control Study

We examined whether older adults who cycle outdoors regularly have better reactive balance control than noncycling older adults. Sixteen cyclist older adults and 24 age-, sex-, and health-matched controls who did not cycle (noncyclists) were exposed to unannounced perturbations of increased magnitudes in standing. We evaluated the strategies and kinematics employed at each perturbation magnitude. We found that cyclists exhibited a significantly higher stepping threshold, lower probability of stepping at each perturbation magnitude, and lower number of trials in which the participant needed to make a step to retain their balance. Cyclists also tended to recover balance using unloaded leg strategies in the first recovery step rather than a loaded leg strategy; they showed faster swing phase duration in the first recovery step, better controlling the displacement of center of mass than noncyclists. Older adults who cycle regularly outdoors preserve their reactive balance functions, which may reduce fall risks.

Migraine With Aura Is Related to Delayed Motor Control Reaction and Imbalance Following External Perturbations

Background: It is evidenced that migraineurs present balance deficits. However, the balance recovery following unexpected ground perturbations, which reflect conditions of everyday activities, has not been investigated in this population. Aim: We aimed to assess the reactive postural responses among patients with migraine with and without aura, chronic migraine, and controls. We further aimed to assess the factors associated with greater self-report of falls. Methods: Ninety patients diagnosed by headache specialists were equally classified into three migraine subgroups according to the presence of aura and chronic migraine. Thirty controls were also recruited. All participants underwent the motor control test (MCT) and adaptation test (ADT) protocols of dynamic posturography tests (EquiTest®, NeuroCom, USA). Clinical and headache features and information on falls in the previous year, fear of falling, and vestibular symptoms were also assessed. Results: Patients with aura presented a greater sway area in most of the MCT conditions than the other three groups (p = 0.001). The aura group also presented delayed latency responses after perturbations compared with controls and patients without aura (p < 0.03). In the ADT, a greater sway area was observed in patients with aura than in groups without aura, chronic migraine, and controls (p < 0.0001). The MCT and ADT sway area, the frequency of aura, and the fear of falling explained 46% of the falls in the previous 12 months. Conclusion: Patients with aura exhibited greater delay and sway area after unexpected ground perturbations than controls and other migraine subgroups, which are related to the reported number of falls.

The Stepping Threshold Test for Reactive Balance: Validation of Two Observer-Based Evaluation Strategies to Assess Stepping Behavior in Fall-Prone Older Adults

Introduction: Measurement of reactive balance is critical for fall prevention but is severely underrepresented in the clinical setting due to the lack of valid assessments. The Stepping Threshold Test (STT) is a newly developed instrumented test for reactive balance on a movable platform, however, it has not yet been validated for fall-prone older adults. Furthermore, different schemes of observer-based evaluation seem possible. The aim of this study was to investigate validity with respect to fall risk, interpretability, and feasibility of the STT using two different evaluation strategies. Methods: This study involved 71 fall-prone older adults (aged ≥ 65) who underwent progressively increasing perturbations in four directions for the STT. Single and multiple-step thresholds for each perturbation direction were determined via two observer-based evaluation schemes, which are the 1) consideration of all steps (all-step-count evaluation, ACE) and 2) consideration of those steps that extend the base of support in the direction of perturbation (direction-sensitive evaluation, DSE). Established balance measures including global (Brief Balance Evaluations Systems Test, BriefBEST), proactive (Timed Up and Go, TUG), and static balance (8-level balance scale, 8LBS), as well as fear of falling (Short Falls Efficacy Scale-International, FES-I) and fall occurrence in the past year, served as reference measurements. Results: The sum scores of STT correlated moderately with the BriefBEST (ACE: r = 0.413; DSE: r = 0.388) and TUG (ACE: r = -0.379; DSE: r = -0.435) and low with the 8LBS (ACE: r = 0.173; DSE: r = 0.246) and Short FES-I (ACE: r = -0.108; DSE: r = -0.104). The sum scores did not distinguish between fallers and non-fallers. No floor/ceiling effects occurred for the STT sum score, but these effects occurred for specific STT thresholds for both ACE (mean floor effect = 13.04%, SD = 19.35%; mean ceiling effect = 4.29%, SD = 7.75%) and DSE (mean floor effect = 7.86%, SD = 15.23%; mean ceiling effect = 21.07%, SD = 26.08). No severe adverse events occurred. Discussion: Correlations between the STT and other balance tests were in the expected magnitude, indicating convergent validity. However, the STT could not distinguish between fallers and non-fallers, referring to a need for further studies and prospective surveys of falls to validate the STT. Current results did not allow a definitive judgment on the advantage of using ACE or DSE. Study results represented a step toward a reactive balance assessment application in a clinical setting.

Temporal But Not Spatial Gait Parameters Associated With Lower Balance Capacity in Moderate-High Functioning Persons With Stroke

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Falls are a major health concern after stroke. Spatial and temporal gait asymmetry and variability can contribute to instability and increased fall risk in persons with stroke (PwS). We aimed to quantify gait spatiotemporal symmetry and variability parameters in PwS undergoing rehabilitation in the subacute stage of the disease, by comparison to healthy participants, and to examine the associations between these parameters and patients' reactive and proactive balance capacity.

METHODS

Twenty-two PwS and 12 healthy adults walked over a computerized treadmill system at their self-selected walking speed. Symmetry and variability of gait parameters (step length, swing time, and stance time) as well as upper extremity and lower extremity angular range of motion in the sagittal plane were extracted. In addition, the Berg Balance Scale (BBS) and the fall threshold in response to sudden surface translations at increasing intensities were assessed.

RESULTS

PwS demonstrated significantly higher asymmetry in all gait parameters in comparison to controls. Also, PwS demonstrated increased stance time variability in comparison to healthy controls and increased swing time variability in the paretic lower extremity. Significant negative associations were found between fall threshold and stance time asymmetry in PwS (r = -0.48, P = 0.022), between the BBS and swing time asymmetry (r = -0.50, P = 0.018), and between the BBS and stance time variability of the paretic lower extremity (r = -0.56, P = 0.006).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the importance of gait temporal symmetry and variability measures for dynamic balance control after stroke. These parameters should be considered when assessing gait recovery and safety in PwS.Video Abstract available for more insight from the authors (see the Video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, available at: http://links.lww.com/JNPT/A355).

Posterior fall-recovery training applied to individuals with chronic stroke: A single-group intervention study

BACKGROUND

To assess the effects of the initial stepping limb on posterior fall recovery in individuals with chronic stroke, as well as to determine the benefits of fall-recovery training on these outcomes.

METHODS

This was a single-group intervention study of 13 individuals with chronic stroke. Participants performed up to six training sessions, each including progressively challenging, treadmill-induced perturbations from a standing position. Progressions focused on initial steps with the paretic or non-paretic limb. The highest perturbation level achieved, the proportion of successful recoveries, step and trunk kinematics, as well as stance-limb muscle activation about the ankle were compared between the initial stepping limbs in the first session. Limb-specific outcomes were also compared between the first and last training sessions.

FINDINGS

In the first session, initial steps with the non-paretic limb were associated with a higher proportion of success and larger perturbations than steps with the paretic limb (p = 0.02, Cohen's d = 0.8). Paretic-limb steps were wider relative to the center of mass (CoM; p = 0.01, d = 1.3), likely due to an initial standing position with the CoM closer to the non-paretic limb (p = 0.01, d = 1.4). In the last training session, participants recovered from a higher proportion of perturbations and advanced to larger perturbations (p < 0.05, d > 0.6). There were no notable changes in kinematic or electromyography variables with training (p > 0.07, d < 0.5).

INTERPRETATION

The skill of posterior stepping in response to a perturbation can be improved with practice in those with chronic stroke, we were not able to identify consistent underlying kinematic mechanisms behind this adaptation.

Characteristics of upper-extremity reactions to sudden lateral loss of balance in persons with stroke

BACKGROUND

Upper-extremity reactions are part of a whole-body response to counterweight the falling center of mass after unexpected balance loss. Impairments in upper-extremity reactions due to unilateral hemiparesis may contribute to stroke survivors propensity for falling. We aimed to characterize upper-extremity (paretic and non-paretic sides) reactive movements in response to lateral balance perturbations in Persons with Stroke vs. healthy controls.

METHODS

Twenty-six subacute persons with stroke and 15 healthy controls were exposed to multidirectional sudden unannounced surface translations in stance. Spatiotemporal parameters of upper- and lower-extremity balance responses to lateral perturbations were analyzed.

FINDINGS

In both groups reactive upper-extremity movement initiation preceded reactive step initiation. In response to a loss of balance toward the paretic side, persons with stroke demonstrated delayed movement initiation of both upper- and lower-extremity compared with healthy controls (In persons with stroke: 234.7 ± 60.0 msec and 227.1 ± 39.6 msec for upper extremities vs. 272.1 ± 59.1 msec for lower-extremity; and in controls: 180.1 ± 39.9 msec and 197.8 ± 61.3 msec for upper-extremities vs. 219.3 ± 40.8 msec for lower-extremity; p = 0.001, Cohen's d's: 0.59-1.03) and a greater abduction excursion in the ipsilateral upper-extremity compared with the contralateral upper-extremity (In persons with stroke: 39.3 ± 23.6 cm vs. 24.9 ± 10.1 cm, respectively; In Controls: 42.6 ± 21.8 cm vs. 29.3 ± 17.3 cm, respectively).

INTERPRETATION

The faster upper-extremity reactive movement reactions compared to reactive step initiation in both persons with stroke and healthy controls suggests that balance recovery is an automatic "reflex-like" response. Delayed upper-extremity reactive reactions in conditions of surface translation toward the non-paretic side in persons with stroke may increase the risk of falls in the direction of the paretic side.

Does stroke-induced sensorimotor impairment and perturbation intensity affect gait-slip outcomes?

People with chronic stroke (PwCS) demonstrate similar gait-slip fall-risk on both paretic and non-paretic side. Compensatory stepping and slipping limb control are crucial to reduce gait-slip fall-risk. Given the unpredictable intensities of real-life perturbations, this study aimed to determine whether recovery from paretic or non-paretic slips vary as a function of perturbation intensity among PwCS. Forty-four PwCS were assigned to non-paretic low intensity slip, non-paretic high intensity slip, paretic low intensity slip, or paretic high intensity slip group. Participants were subjected to a novel overground gait-slip with a distance of 24 cm (low) or 45 cm (high), under either limb. Recovery strategies, center of mass (CoM) state stability and slipping kinematics were analyzed. Both non-paretic high and low intensity groups demonstrated similar percentage of aborted and recovery stepping, however, paretic high intensity group demonstrated greater aborted stepping (p > 0.05). Both high and low intensity paretic slip groups demonstrated reduced post-slip CoM stability relative to the non-paretic slip groups (p < 0.05). Slip displacement was greater in paretic high group compared with non-paretic high group (p < 0.05). Greater slip displacement at higher intensity was noted only in paretic slip group (p < 0.05). The slip velocity was faster in paretic groups compared to non-paretic slip groups (p < 0.05). Paretic slips showed lower stability at both intensities associated with difficulty in modulating slipping kinematics and resorting to an increased aborted stepping strategy compared to non-paretic slip. These findings are suggestive of developing balance interventions for improving both compensatory non-paretic limb stepping and reactive control of slipping paretic limb for fall-risk reduction.

The kinematics and strategies of recovery steps during lateral losses of balance in standing at different perturbation magnitudes in older adults with varying history of falls

BACKGROUND

Step-recovery responses are critical in preventing falls when balance is lost unexpectedly. We investigated the kinematics and strategies of balance recovery in older adults with a varying history of falls.

METHODS

In a laboratory study, 51 non-fallers (NFs), 20 one-time fallers (OFs), and 12 recurrent-fallers (RFs) were exposed to random right/left unannounced underfoot perturbations in standing of increasing magnitude. The stepping strategies and kinematics across an increasing magnitude of perturbations and the single- and multiple-step threshold trials, i.e., the lowest perturbation magnitude to evoke single step and multiple steps, respectively, were analyzed. Fall efficacy (FES) and self-reported lower-extremity function were also assessed.

RESULTS

OFs had significantly lower single- and multiple-step threshold levels than NFs; the recovery-step kinematics were similar. Surprisingly, RFs did not differ from NFs in either threshold. The kinematics in the single-step threshold trial in RFs, however, showed a significant delay in step initiation duration, longer step duration, and larger center of mass (CoM) displacement compared with NFs and OFs. In the multiple-step threshold trial, the RFs exhibited larger CoM displacements and longer time to fully recover from balance loss. Interestingly, in the single-stepping trials, 45% of the step-recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy, about two times more than OFs and NFs (22.5 and 24.2%, respectively). During the multiple-stepping trials, 27.3% of the first-step recovery strategies used by RFs were the loaded-leg strategy about two times more than OFs and NFs (11.9 and 16.4%, respectively), the crossover stepping strategy was the dominated response in all 3 groups (about 50%). In addition, RFs reported a lower low-extremity function compared with NFs, and higher FES in the OFs.

CONCLUSIONS

RFs had impaired kinematics during both single-step and multiple-step recovery responses which was associated with greater leg dysfunction. OFs and NFs had similar recovery-step kinematics, but OFs were more likely to step at lower perturbation magnitudes suggesting a more "responsive" over-reactive step response related from their higher fear of falling and not due to impaired balance abilities. These data provide insight into how a varying history of falls might affect balance recovery to a lateral postural perturbation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered prospectively on November 9th, 2011 at clinicaltrials.gov ( NCT01439451 ).

Characteristics of proactive balance and gait performance in subacute stroke patients demonstrating varying reactive balance capacity: A research study

BACKGROUND

Persons with stroke (PwS) demonstrate impaired reactive balance control placing them at increased risk of falls. Yet, tests used in clinical practice to assess this risk usually rely on proactive balance control.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate differences in proactive balance in PwS with varying reactive balance capacity.

METHODS

Reactive balance control was assessed in 48 first-event subacute PwS by measuring multiple-step threshold and fall threshold in response to unannounced surface perturbations. They were classified as low-, medium- high- threshold fallers and non-fallers in accordance with the perturbation magnitude at which they were unable to maintain balance (fall threshold). Proactive balance control and gait performance were tested using the Berg Balance test, 10-meter walk test, 6-minute walk test and the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC).

RESULTS

PwS who demonstrated poor reactive balance capacity were also more impaired in their proactive balance and gait. Proactive balance and gait performance were significantly different between the 4 groups while ABC was not. The associations between reactive and proactive measures of balance were moderate (r = 0.53-0.67).

CONCLUSIONS

The moderate correlations between reactive and proactive balance control suggest the recruitment of different neural mechanisms for these two operations, highlighting the importance of assessing and treating reactive balance in clinics.