Electroencephalography Findings in Crohn's Disease

Prevalence of epileptiform electroencephalographic abnormalities in people without a history of seizures: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abnormal patterns identified on electroencephalogram (EEG) are one of the primary diagnostic tests for epilepsy. However, epidemiological studies have established that both benign and epileptiform abnormalities (EAs) occur on the EEG of nonepileptic, seizure-free people as well. The reported rates of EAs in nonepileptic, seizure-free populations vary, and the true prevalence is unknown. The primary objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the overall prevalence of EAs in the EEG of people without a history of seizures. Secondary aims were to characterize (1) the cortical localization of focal abnormalities, (2) the proportion of findings that occurred during standard EEG stimulation protocols, and (3) the persistence and implications of abnormalities at follow-up. A comprehensive electronic search of six bibliographic databases was completed: Embase, MEDLINE, PsycInfo, Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register for Controlled Trials, and Web of Science. No search date restrictions were applied. Overall effect size was calculated using a generalized linear mixed-effects model. Fifty-three studies, totaling 73 990 individuals, met our inclusion criteria. The overall point prevalence of EAs was 1.74% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-2.67). Due to the risk of bias in the literature, especially from participant selection, we believe this to be an overestimate of the true prevalence. Prevalence of EAs was greater in children (2.45%, 95% CI = 1.41-4.21) and the elderly (5.96%, 95% CI = 1.39-22.13) compared with adults (.93%, 95% CI = .48-1.80). Reports of developing epilepsy after an EA-positive EEG were rare. The likelihood of subsequent positive findings on follow-up EEG may be as high as 50%. Our study has limitations in that males were overrepresented in the study samples, there is substantial heterogeneity among studies, and many studies provided insufficient detail about their exclusion criteria. Nonetheless, our estimates provide benchmark data for future studies examining EAs in clinical populations, particularly behavioral and psychiatric populations.

Exploring changes in brain function in IBD patients using SPCCA: a study of simultaneous EEG-fMRI

Research on functional changes in the brain of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients is emerging around the world, which brings new perspectives to medical research. In this paper, the methods of canonical correlation analysis (CCA), kernel canonical correlation analysis (KCCA), and sparsity preserving canonical correlation analysis (SPCCA) were applied to the fusion of simultaneous EEG-fMRI data from 25 IBD patients and 15 healthy individuals. The CCA, KCCA and SPCCA fusion methods were used for data processing to compare the results obtained by the three methods. The results clearly show that there is a significant difference in the activation intensity between IBD and healthy control (HC), not only in the frontal lobe (p < 0.01) and temporal lobe (p < 0.01) regions, but also in the posterior cingulate gyrus (p < 0.01), gyrus rectus (p < 0.01), and amygdala (p < 0.01) regions, which are usually neglected. The mean difference in the SPCCA activation intensity was 60.1. However, the mean difference in activation intensity was only 36.9 and 49.8 by using CCA and KCCA. In addition, the correlation of the relevant components selected during the SPCCA calculation was high, with correlation components of up to 0.955; alternatively, the correlations obtained from CCA and KCCA calculations were only 0.917 and 0.926, respectively. It can be seen that SPCCA is indeed superior to CCA and KCCA in processing high-dimensional multimodal data. This work reveals the process of analyzing the brain activation state in IBD disease, provides a further perspective for the study of brain function, and opens up a new avenue for studying the SPCCA method and the change in the intensity of brain activation in IBD disease.

Neurology of inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) are chronic inflammatory conditions affecting the digestive system, comprising two main distinctive entities, ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD). Besides gastrointestinal manifestations, IBD causes extraintestinal manifestations in the central and peripheral nervous system. The incidence of neurological complications in IBD ranges from 0.25% to 47.5%. The pathophysiology of neurological manifestations of IBD is mostly immune mediated, but dysfunction of the brain-gut axis, arterial and venous thromboembolism, infections, nutritional deficiencies and side-effects of medications (steroids, metronidazole, sulfasalazine, anti-TNF-α, anti-integrin antibodies) are other contributory mechanisms. Patients with IBD have an increased risk of arterial and venous stroke, mainly during periods of exacerbations. Vasculitis is extremely rare. There is a bidirectional association between multiple sclerosis and IBD, with a relative risk for comorbidity of 1.54, being 1.53 for the risk of multiple sclerosis in IBD and 1.55 for the risk of IBD in multiple sclerosis patients. Anti-TNF-α therapy is contraindicated in the treatment of patients who have both IBD and multiple sclerosis. Demyelinating disorders can also be a rare complication of anti-TNF-α therapy. Optic neuritis, transverse myelitis, progressive myelopathy, central nervous system infections, epilepsy and encephalopathy are among other uncommon neurological complications. Peripheral nervous system manifestations include peripheral neuropathy, either demyelination and axonal, myasthenia gravis and polymyositis/dermatomyositis and localized forms of myositis.

Evaluation of fecal Lactobacillus populations in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy: a pilot study

Background

Idiopathic epilepsy is a common neurological disorder of dogs characterized by recurrent seizures for which no underlying basis is identified other than a presumed genetic predisposition. The pathogenesis of the disorder remains poorly understood, but environmental factors are presumed to influence the course of disease. Within the growing body of research into the microbiota-gut-brain axis, considerable attention has focused on the protective role of Lactobacilli in the development and progression of neurological disease. Investigations into the association between the gut microbiome and epilepsy are in their infancy, but some preliminary findings support a role for Lactobacilli in drug resistant epilepsy. To date, there are no published studies evaluating the gut microbiome in dogs with epilepsy. This pilot study was undertaken to evaluate fecal Lactobacillus populations in dogs with idiopathic epilepsy compared to healthy dogs.

Results

Fecal samples were obtained from 13 pairs of dogs, consisting of a drug-naïve epileptic dog and a healthy dog from the same household and maintained on the same diet. Evaluation of large-scale microbial patterns based on 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing identified a household effect in the study population. Differential prevalence testing at the 16S rRNA gene sequence variant and genus levels did not identify any statistically significant differences between epileptic and control dogs. Quantitative PCR of Lactobacillus species isolated through culture revealed no statistically significant difference between the epileptic and control dogs (median concentration, 3.8 log₁₀ CFU/g feces and 4.6 log₁₀ CFU/g feces, respectively). Lactobacillus in culture was not killed by exposure to phenobarbital, potassium bromide, zonisamide, or levetiracetam.

Conclusions

This pilot study did not identify any difference in large-scale microbial patterns or relative or absolute abundance of Lactobacillus species in drug-naïve epileptic dogs compared to healthy dogs. Further studies are warranted to evaluate the role of the gut microbiome in disease progression and treatment response in dogs with epilepsy. Lactobacilli in culture were not killed or inhibited from growing when exposed to phenobarbital, potassium bromide, zonisamide or levetiracetam, suggesting that antiepileptic drug administration is less likely to be a confounding factor in future studies evaluating the role of Lactobacillus in epilepsy.