Formalin Instillation for Hemorrhagic Radiation Proctitis

Intrarectal formalin treatment for haemorrhagic radiation-induced proctopathy: efficacy and safety

AIM

Pelvic radiotherapy is limited by dose-dependent toxicity to surrounding organs. The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intrarectal formalin treatment for radiotherapy-induced haemorrhagic proctopathy (RHP) at the Royal Marsden Hospital.

METHOD

Adult patients were enrolled. Haemoglobin was evaluated before and after formalin treatment. Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation treatment and administration of transfusion were recorded. The interval between completion of radiotherapy and the first intrarectal 5% formalin treatment was assessed and the dose of radiotherapy was evaluated. Clinical assessment of the frequency and amount of rectal bleeding (rectal bleeding score 1-6) and endoscopic appearance (grade 0-3) were classified. Complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were enrolled, comprising 13 men (68%) and 6 women. The mean age was 75 ± 9 years. The median time between completion of radiotherapy and the first treatment was 20 months [interquartile range (IQR) 15 months] and the median dose of radiotherapy was 68 Gy (IQR 14 Gy). Thirty-two procedures were performed (average 1.7 per patient). In total, 9/19 (47%) patients were receiving anticoagulation and/or antiplatelet medication and 5/19 (26%) received transfusion prior to treatment. The mean value of serum haemoglobin before the first treatment was 110 ± 18 g/L and afterwards it was 123 ± 16 g/L (p = 0.022). The median rectal bleeding score before the first treatment was 6 (IQR 0) and afterwards 2 (IQR 1-4; p < 0.001), while the median endoscopy score on the day of first treatment was 3 (IQR 0) compared with 1 (IQR 1-2) on the day of the last treatment 1 (p < 0.001). One female patient with a persistent rectal ulcer that eventually healed (18 months of healing) subsequently developed rectovaginal fistula (complication rate 1/19, 5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with intrarectal formalin in RHP is effective and safe.

The effectiveness of hyperbaric oxygen therapy for managing radiation-induced proctitis - results of a 10-year retrospective cohort study

Introduction

Despite modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques, radiation-induced proctitis (RIP) remains a significant complication of RT for pelvic organ malignancies. Over the last decades, an enormous therapeutic armamentarium has been considered in RIP, including hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT). However, the evidence regarding the impact of HBOT on RIP is conflicting. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of HBOT in the treatment of RIP.

Methods

Ten-year (2013-2023) retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients with RIP treated with HBOT at Centro de Medicina Subaquática e Hiperbárica (CMSH) (Armed Forces Hospital - Lisbon, Portugal). Patients were exposed to 100% oxygen at 2.5 ATA, in a multiplace first-class hyperbaric chamber, for 70-min periods, once daily, five times per week. Fisher's exact test was performed using SPSS (version 23.0); p<0.05 was accepted as statistically significant.

Results

Of a total of 151 patients with RIP, 88 were included in the final analysis, of whom 38.6% evidenced other concurrent radiation-induced soft tissue lesions. The most reported primary pelvic tumor treated with RT was prostate cancer (77.3%), followed by cervical cancer (10.2%). Hematochezia was the most observed clinical manifestation (86.4%). After a median of 60 HBOT sessions (interquartile range [IQR]: 40-87.5), 62.5% and 31.8% of patients achieved a clinical complete and partial response, respectively, with a hematochezia resolution rate of 93.7% (complete or partial). While partial and complete responses require fewer than 70 sessions of HBOT in terms of overall RIP symptoms (p=0.069), isolated hematochezia tends to require at least 70 sessions (p=0.075). Individuals with at least two concurrent late radiation tissue injuries were associated with a complete response to HBOT (p=0.029). Only about 5.7% of patients did not respond to the treatment. Eighteen patients (20.5%) developed reversible ear barotrauma. The number of HBOT sessions was a predictor of HBOT side effects (odds ratio: 1.010; 95% confidence interval, 1.000-1.020; p=0.047).

Conclusion

The HBOT proved to be an effective and safe treatment for RIP refractory to medical and/or endoscopic treatments. This real-world evidence study adds value to published data on the management of RIP with HBOT.

Therapeutics in Radiation-induced Proctopathy: A Systematic Review

Malignant neoplasms are increasingly prevalent in the daily clinical practice. Up to 61% of patients with pelvic malignancies undergo pelvic radiotherapy in different doses, which may cause intestinal damage, and the rectum is the segment most frequently affected due to its fixed position in the pelvis. Currently, there are several strategies to minimize the effects of radiation on the tissues surrounding the neoplastic site; despite those strategies, radiotherapy can still result in serious damage to organs and structures, and these injuries accompany patients throughout their lives. One of the most common damages resulting from pelvic radiotherapy is acute proctitis.The diagnosis is confirmed by visualizing the rectal mucosa through rigid or flexible rectosigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy. The objective of the present study was to review the forms of radiation-induced proctopathytherapy, and to evaluate the results of each method to propose a standardization for the treatment of this pathology. Despite the prevalence of radiation-induced proctopathy, there is no definitive standardized treatment strategy so far. The first approach can be tried with local agents, such as mesalazine and formalin. For refractory cases, control can usually be achieved with argon plasma coagulation, hyperbaric oxygen, and radiofrequency ablation therapies. Regarding the study of radiation-induced proctopathy, there is a lack of robust studies with large samples and standardized therapies to be compared. There is a lack of double-blinded, randomized controlled studies to determine a definitive standard treatment algorithm.

Mesalazine suppository for the treatment of refractory ulcerative chronic radiation proctitis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of mesalazine suppository in the treatment of refractory ulcerative chronic radiation proctitis (CRP). In total, 10 refractory ulcerative CRP patients who did not respond to previous medical treatments were recruited for the present study and were treated with mesalazine suppository (0.5 g) twice daily for 24 weeks. For each patient, the severity of clinical symptoms and endoscopic appearance was assessed before and after the treatment. For symptom scoring, the reductions in the mean total symptom score (pre- vs. post-treatment, 8.20 vs. 0.90; P<0.01), rectal bleeding score (2.40 vs. 0.30; P<0.01), rectal pain score (2.00 vs. 0.50; P<0.01), stool frequency score (2.00 vs. 0.10; P<0.01) and tenesmus score (1.80 vs. 0.00; P<0.01) were all statistically significant. For mucosal damage scoring, there was a reduction in the mean scores for total scores (9.22 vs. 5.22; P<0.01), telangiectasia (2.78 vs. 1.89; P=0.009), edema (2.89 vs. 1.78; P=0.001) and ulceration (2.44 vs. 0.89; P=0.003). However, statistically reductions in the median symptom scores were not observed for stenosis (0.78 vs. 0.67; P=0.347) and necrosis (0.33 vs. 0.00; P=0.081). Furthermore, no adverse events were observed during and after the treatment. The topical mesalazine suppository may be a safe and effective treatment for CRP, particularly for patients with deep ulcers. Adequately randomized controlled trials are required to confirm the results of the present study.

Successful Treatment of Acute Radiation Proctitis with Aloe Vera: A Preliminary Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Acute radiation proctitis (ARP) is a common side-effect that affects up to 50% of patients receiving radiotherapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of a topical preparation of Aloe vera in the treatment of ARP induced by radiotherapy of pelvic area.

SUBJECTS AND INTERVENTIONS

In this double-blind placebo-controlled trial, 20 consecutive patients with ARP after external-beam radiation therapy (46-72 Gy) of pelvic malignancies were randomized to receive either Aloe vera 3% or placebo ointment, 1 g twice daily for 4 weeks. These patients presented with at least two of the following symptoms: rectal bleeding, abdominal/rectal pain, diarrhea, or fecal urgency. These symptoms were rated by the patients in terms of their severity (grade 0-4) for each of the symptoms mentioned earlier at baseline and then weekly for 4 weeks. A symptom index was calculated by the addition of the scores (16 most symptomatic). Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) acute toxicity criteria and psychosocial status of the patients were also recorded weekly. The lifestyle impact of the symptoms was assessed by questionnaire grading from 0 (no effect on daily activity) to 4 (afraid to leave home).

RESULTS

There was a significant (p < 0.05) improvement in the symptom index (before treatment vs. after treatment with Aloe vera) for diarrhea (median score: 0.67 vs. 0.11), fecal urgency (median score: 0.89 vs. 0.11), clinical presentation total (median score: 4.33 vs. 1.22), RTOG total (median score: 2.89 vs. 0.89), and lifestyle (median score: 1.1 vs. 0.33). Hemorrhage and abdominal/rectal pain did not improve significantly. The odds ratios for advantage of Aloe vera over placebo for "clinical presentation total" and "RTOG total" were 3.97 (1.3-11.9) and 5.9 (1.6-21.6), respectively.

CONCLUSION

A substantial number of patients with radiation proctitis seem to benefit from therapy with Aloe vera 3% ointment.

Effects of ozonated olive oil on acute radiation proctitis in rats

BACKGROUND

Acute radiation proctitis is a common complication of pelvic radiation and management of acute radiation proctitis is under evaluation. The beneficial effects of ozonated olive oil (OzOO) have already been shown in the treatment of chronic wounds. Thus, this study was designed to evaluate the therapeutic effects of topical OzOO on acute radiation proctitis.

AIMS

To evaluate the therapeutic effects of topical OzOO on acute radiation proctitis.

STUDY DESIGN

Animal experimentation.

METHODS

RATS WERE DIVIDED INTO THREE GROUPS: control; irradiation+saline (1 mL); and irradiation +OzOO (1 mL). A single fraction of 17.5 Gy was delivered to each rat. The OzOO was administered rectally each day after irradiation. Each rat was observed daily for signs of proctitis. Irradiated rats were euthanised on days 5 and 10. The mucosal changes were evaluated macroscopically and pathologically.

RESULTS

According to the clinical findings, five rats in the irradiation+saline group showed Grade 4 symptoms on the 10(th) day. Macroscopic finding scores on the 10(th) day in the irradiation+saline and irradiation+OzOO groups were statistically significantly different. On pathological examination, radiation-induced mucosal damage was the most prominent 10 days after irradiation in saline-treated rats. On the 10(th) day, the irradiation+OzOO group showed mild inflammation and slight crypt change, which corresponded to Grade 1 pathological findings.

CONCLUSION

OzOO attenuates macroscopic and pathological findings of acute radiation proctitis in rats.

Clinical and proctoscopic evaluation of topical formalin application in the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic radiation proctitis is a disease associated with radiotherapy of cancer in the pelvic region. The main symptom is rectal bleeding. Several treatment modalities have been attempted, but few have demonstrated satisfactory effects. We present our experience with formalin applied locally to the rectal mucosa in the treatment of chronic radiation proctitis. Furthermore, we assess possible complications, the gravest suggested being cancer. Previous studies on the subject have reported good results, but often with a somewhat vaguely defined follow-up. Our evaluation of the treatment was based on both subjective symptoms and proctoscopic findings.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A small study (N = 11) was conducted retrospectively. All patients treated for chronic radiation proctitis with formalin in our clinic were identified, and data concerning effect and complications were collected by studying the patients' records, with a questionnaire and a follow-up interview and proctoscopy.

RESULTS

The study showed a marked decrease in bleeding and objective signs of proctitis in all patients. Complete cessation of bleeding was achieved in five patients. Possible complications to the treatment detected in our study were the following: anorectal pain, tenesmus, incontinence, diarrhea, and mucous rectal discharge. No signs of neoplasia were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The formalin treatment had a very good effect on chronic radiation proctitis. Possible complications were detected. Except in the case of anorectal pain, these are all of a questionable nature and can possibly be attributed to chronic radiation proctitis itself rather than the formalin treatment. Further study is warranted to confirm long-term effects of the formalin and to exclude possible complications, especially secondary anorectal cancer.

Systematic review of agents for the management of gastrointestinal mucositis in cancer patients

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to review the available literature and define clinical practice guidelines for the use of agents for the prevention and treatment of gastrointestinal mucositis.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted by the Mucositis Study Group of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer/International Society of Oral Oncology (MASCC/ISOO). The body of evidence for each intervention, in each cancer treatment setting, was assigned an evidence level. Based on the evidence level, one of the following three guideline determinations was possible: recommendation, suggestion, and no guideline possible.

RESULTS

A total of 251 clinical studies across 29 interventions were examined. Panel members were able to make one new evidence-based negative recommendation; two new evidence-based suggestions, and one evidence-based change from previous guidelines. Firstly, the panel recommends against the use of misoprostol suppositories for the prevention of acute radiation-induced proctitis. Secondly, the panel suggests probiotic treatment containing Lactobacillus spp., may be beneficial for prevention of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-induced diarrhea in patients with malignancies of the pelvic region. Thirdly, the panel suggests the use of hyperbaric oxygen as an effective means in treating radiation-induced proctitis. Finally, new evidence has emerged which is in conflict with our previous guideline surrounding the use of systemic glutamine, meaning that the panel is unable to form a guideline. No guideline was possible for any other agent, due to inadequate and/or conflicting evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated review of the literature has allowed new recommendations and suggestions for clinical practice to be reached. This highlights the importance of regular updates.

[Radiation proctitis and chronic and refractory bleeding. Experience with 4% formaldehyde]

INTRODUCTION

Bleeding is a common complication of proctitis secondary to radiotherapy of pelvic tumours. Between 5 and 10% may become severe and refractory to topical and endoscopic treatment. Experience with the application of 4% formaldehyde is presented.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

A retrospective and descriptive study was performed on a patient cohort with severe radiation proctitis admitted to the Hospital Universitario Donostia between January 2003 and September 2009. All patients were diagnosed by colonoscopy and admitted due to the severity of their treatment. Both 4% formaldehyde and the gauze technique were used, as well as using enemas, in cases refractory to topical and endoscopic treatment with argon. The technique was performed in theatre with regional anaesthetic. Clinical and endoscopic follow up was carried out.

RESULTS

The study included 25 males (73.5%) and 9 women (26.5%), with a mean age of 69 years (32-80) who had rectal bleeding due to radiation proctitis and required admission. All treatments failed in 6 (28.5%) patients, and 4% formaldehyde was used, with a complete response to the bleeding in all 6 patients, with 3 cases requiring one session, and the 3 others 2 sessions. The gauze technique was used in 4 patients and another 2 were given a formaldehyde enema due to the presence of stenosis. Pain appeared as the main complication in 2 (33.3%) patients. The median follow up was 60 months (interquartile range 26 to 67 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of 4% formaldehyde in bleeding due to radiation proctitis is an effective, easy to reproduce technique, with a low morbidity.

Argon plasma coagulation for the treatment of hemorrhagic radiation colitis

Radiation colitis is a common consequence of pelvic radiation. Its complications may include anemia due to chronic bleeding requiring transfusions. Many of these patients are managed with rectal medications which are often inadequate for control. Argon plasma coagulation (APC) has been well described for its efficacy in treating radiation proctitis. Here we present two cases in whom APC therapy was used to treat severe radiation colitis. We reviewed two cases originally seen at the regional cancer center (Cross Cancer Institute) in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. Both patients received pelvic radiation for recurrent endometrial cancers and were referred for active bleeding secondary to radiation colitis that had required numerous transfusions. Radiation-induced telangiectasias were found from 10–50 cm in the sigmoid colon. Both patients had significant improvement of symptoms after one session of APC treatment set at 40–60 W and gas flow of 2.0 l/min. There were no complications from the procedures. Neither patient required blood transfusions after the treatment with improvement in their hemoglobin levels and were doing well at 3- and 6-month follow-up. APC can be used effectively to provide immediate and sustained resolution of symptoms in patients with radiation colitis.

A novel treatment for haemorrhagic radiation proctitis using colonic irrigation and oral antibiotic administration

AIM

Radiation-induced haemorrhagic proctitis is not uncommon after radiotherapy for pelvic malignancy. Various treatments have been described. Recurrent bleeding and subsequent complications associated with treatment have been reported. Colonic irrigation has been used to treat defaecation disorders; however, it has not been used to treat radiation-induced proctitis.

METHOD

A pilot study was undertaken of 12 patients with haemorrhagic radiation proctitis after radiotherapy. Four patients had had cervical cancer, five had uterine cancer, one had prostatic cancer, one had vesical cancer and one had vaginal cancer. Daily self-administered colonic irrigation with tap water and a 1-week period of oral antibiotics (ciprofloxacin and metronidazole) were prescribed.

RESULTS

The median dose of radiation given was 54 (50-70) Gy. The median interval from radiation to the development of haemorrhagic proctitis was 26 (8-44) months. The median duration of symptomatic rectal haemorrhage prior to treatment was 8 (1-48) months. There was a significant improvement in rectal bleeding after treatment with colonic irrigation and oral antibiotic administration, accompanied by an improvement in bowel frequency and urgency, and diarrhoea. There were no complications. The majority of the patients (11/12) were satisfied with the treatment. The five patients who had previously undergone formalin therapy preferred the treatment regimen used in this study.

CONCLUSION

The preliminary results of colonic irrigation and oral antibiotics indicate that this treatment is safe and effective for radiation-induced proctitis. Further study is warranted.

Efficacy of polaprezinc for acute radiation proctitis in a rat model

PURPOSE

The purpose of the present study was to standardize the experimental rat model of radiation proctitis and to examine the efficacy of polaprezinc on radiation proctitis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 54 female Wistar rats (5 weeks old) were used. The rats were divided into three groups: those treated with polaprezinc (PZ+), those treated with base alone, exclusive of polaprezinc (PZ-), and those treated without any medication (control). All the rats were irradiated to the rectum. Polaprezinc was prepared as an ointment. The ointment was administered rectally each day after irradiation. All rats were killed on the 10th day after irradiation. The mucosal changes were evaluated endoscopically and pathologically. The results were graded from 0 to 4 and compared according to milder or more severe status, as applicable.

RESULTS

According to the endoscopic findings, the proportion of mild changes in the PZ+, PZ-, and control group was 71.4%, 25.0%, and 14.3% respectively. On pathologic examination, the proportion of low-grade findings in the PZ+, PZ-, and control group was 80.0%, 58.3%, and 42.9% for mucosal damage, 85.0%, 41.7%, and 42.9% for a mild degree of inflammation, and 50.0%, 33.3%, and 4.8% for a shallow depth of inflammation, respectively. The PZ+ group tended to have milder mucosal damage than the other groups, according to all criteria used. In addition, significant differences were observed between the PZ+ and control groups regarding the endoscopic findings, degree of inflammation, and depth of inflammation.

CONCLUSIONS

This model was confirmed to be a useful experimental rat model for radiation proctitis. The results of the present study have demonstrated the efficacy of polaprezinc against acute radiation-induced rectal disorders using the rat model.

Instilação de formalina endoluminal como opção terapêutica da retite actínica hemorrágica

A retite actínica hemorrágica é um quadro grave que pode ocorrer em qualquer paciente submetido à radioterapia pélvica, por vezes, sendo necessária terapia transfusional e internação hospitalar. A abordagem terapêutica ainda é bastante controversa. Tanto para o tratamento inicial como para casos refratários, uma das opções é a aplicação de formalina. Este método é barato, facilmente disponível, de simples execução e eficaz no controle da hemorragia. Os autores relatam dois casos de retite actínica hemorrágica de pacientes tratados com instilação de formalina endoluminal, e sua eficácia terapêutica e complicações são discutidas

Oral vitamin A enhances the effectiveness of formalin 8% in treating chronic hemorrhagic radiation proctopathy

PURPOSE

Chronic radiation proctopathy occurs in 5 to 20% of patients receiving radiation therapy, with rectal bleeding as its most common presentation. Although formalin treatment for rectal bleeding is promising, improvement is possible. Given the success of vitamin A in other radiation-induced treatments, we studied the efficacy of combining formalin with vitamin A in controlling bleeding symptoms of chronic radiation proctopathy.

METHODS

A retrospective review (1993-2007) was performed of patients presenting with features of chronic radiation proctopathy. Formalin 8% in a buffered solution was applied to the affected mucosa with use a tip applicator, and 10,000 units of vitamin A were given orally on a daily basis. Formalin treatments were repeated at three-week to four-week intervals until symptoms resolved.

RESULTS

A comparison was made between patients who received formalin alone (n = 30) and those who received formalin in combination with vitamin A (n = 34). The 64 patients had a mean age of 79 years (range, 54-90 years). The combination group required fewer treatments (mean, 1.9) and a shorter time (11 weeks) for resolution of symptoms compared with the formalin-alone group (mean, 5.2 and 31 weeks, respectively) (P < 0.001). The overall success rate in controlling bleeding was only 64% in the formalin-alone group when compared with 94% in the combination group.

CONCLUSIONS

When vitamin A was added to the regimen, a significant reduction was observed in the number of treatments and the time needed for resolution of symptoms, and there was an increased overall success rate. This combination represents a simple, effective, and well tolerated method of controlling hemorrhagic chronic radiation proctopathy.

Consensus and controversies in platelet transfusion

Platelet transfusion therapy is the standard of care for thrombocytopenic patients with hemato-oncological disorders and bone marrow failure states due to intensive chemoradiotherapy. Guidelines to lower triggers for prophylactic and therapeutic transfusions are being developed based on better levels of evidence. The optimum transfusion dose, the choice of platelet concentrate and transfusion interval pose a challenge to balance scientific advances with cost-effective strategies. Platelet refractoriness requires "matched" platelets and is a difficult to treat phenomenon. Pathogen inactivation is a crucial issue in view of susceptibility of platelet concentrates to bacterial contamination. This article reviews the current developments and challenges in optimizing platelet transfusion therapy.

[Nonsurgical treatment of chronic radiation-induced hemorrhagic proctitis]

The incidence of radiation-induced chronic hemorrhagic proctitis is less than 10 to 20%. The onset of this proctitis is delayed relative to the radiation therapy and generally develops from 6 to 24 months later. There are numerous predisposing factors, the most important of which is the radiation therapy dose: risk increases exponentially above 40-45 Gy. Its pathophysiology involves progressive obliterating endarteritis and transmural interstitial fibrosis, which induce chronic ischemia that is irreversible and progressive during the years after radiation therapy. Its diagnosis depends most often on the combination of clinical history and typical endoscopic appearance (congestive mucosa and/or telangiectases). Topical administrative of sucralfate or corticosteroids as well as argon plasma coagulation, with formalin treatment if necessary, provides relief for most patients.

Treatment of radiation proctitis

Late complications of pelvic radiotherapy occur in 5-20% of patients, particularly chronic radiation proctitis (CRP). Rectal bleeding is the most common symptom. Other symptoms include difficulty in defaecation or tenesmus because of loss of distensibility of the rectum or rectal structuring. Treatment options of CRP include oral therapy (5-aminosalicylates, metronidazole), rectal instillation therapy (hydrocortisone, sucralfate, 5-aminosalicylates, formalin), thermal therapy (argon plasma coagulation, heater probe or laser) and hyperbaric oxygen. It is difficult to recommend evidence-based therapy. There are no adequately powered studies of the treatment of CRP and most data are uncontrolled, non-blinded observation studies from single sites. There are no standard evaluation tools (including endoscopic grading, symptom scores and quality-of-life scores), adequate description of preceding radiotherapy dose or adequate follow-up in most studies. Many studies have poor documentation of complications and few are carried out prospectively. A pragmatic approach is to use sucralfate enemas and oral metronidazole. Thermal methods seem to be effective and safe. Simple heater probe treatment or argon plasma coagulation are the preferred methods due to their better safety profile. Intra-rectal formalin seems to be effective, but possibly has a higher rate of complications. For resistant disease, hyperbaric oxygen may be an option.

Two percent formalin retention enemas for hemorrhagic radiation proctitis: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

The short-term safety and efficacy of 2 percent formalin administered as a retention enema for hemorrhagic radiation proctitis was studied.

METHODS

A group of 24 patients with hemorrhagic radiation proctitis who received radical radiotherapy were administered 2 percent formalin as a retention enema and the treatment was followed up from 1 to 29 (mean, 15.34) weeks. The enema was performed on an outpatient basis under sedation with pentazocine and promethazine with a retention time of two minutes. The symptoms and proctoscope findings were graded and converted into a numeric score, ranging from 1 to 4. The mean improvements in scores before treatment and after the last follow-up were analyzed for statistical significance by using the paired t-test.

RESULTS

There was complete cessation of bleeding in 47.8 percent of patients and very negligible bleeding in 30.4 percent. A total of 78.2 percent responded positively to treatment with 2 percent formalin retention enema. More than one application was required in 34.7 percent of the patients. The procedure was well tolerated and most of the side effects were mild. Side effects were diarrhea in 23.5 percent, abdominal pain and tenesmus in 8.8 percent, and fever with vomiting in 2.9 percent of patients. There was a statistically significant reduction in bleeding and proctoscopy scores (P<0.01). None of the patients in this study required surgery to palliate their symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Two percent formalin when given as a retention enema is a safe, inexpensive, and effective intervention for hemorrhagic radiation proctitis. Any trained health worker using simple precautions can perform this procedure. The long-term efficacy and safety of 2 percent formalin retention enemas need further assessment with randomized, controlled trials.

Treatment of haemorrhagic radiation-induced proctopathy using small volume topical formalin instillation

BACKGROUND

Between 2 and 5% of patients undergoing pelvic radiotherapy develop chronic radiation proctopathy, occurring as a result of damage to the rectal mucosa during the treatment. Rectal bleeding of varying severity can occur as a consequence. There have been no formal trials of treatment for haemorrhagic radiation proctopathy and a variety of methods are currently used.

AIM

In a retrospective study of 20 patients treated at a single centre, we assessed the efficacy of small volume topical formalin instillation to control bleeding from radiation proctopathy.

METHOD

Patients were treated by a single operator using 20 mL of a 5% solution of formalin instilled into the rectum via a flexible sigmoidoscope for 3 min. Patients were followed up for an average of 22.7 months (range: 2-69).

RESULTS

A single session of formalin treatment was effective in 13 of 20 (65%) patients and a further four (20%) patients responded to a second treatment. No complications of the treatment was identified.

CONCLUSION

Small volume formalin instillation therapy appears to be safe and effective in the context of haemorrhagic radiation proctopathy. The technique is simple, inexpensive, quick and requires no sedation. We suggest that it should be considered as a first line for patients presenting with this distressing condition.