No visible scar (NVIS) colectomy: a new approach to minimal access surgery to the colon

Cosmesis in Patients after Multiport Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery: Does the Extraction Incision Matter?

The ideal incision for specimen extraction during laparoscopic colorectal surgery is controversial. The objective of this study was to compare incision types (Pfannenstiel, periumbilical, lower midline, and right upper quadrant transverse) with regard to postoperative scar appearance, symptoms, preference, and satisfaction. This study is a retrospective survey review performed in an urban teaching hospital. The study participants were patients undergoing multiport laparoscopic colorectal surgery. Two web-based questionnaires, the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire and Photo-Series Questionnaire, were used to assess study parameters. The main outcome measures were incision symptoms and cosmetic satisfaction. The 112 study patients included 54 patients with a Pfannenstiel incision (Group P) and 58 patients with an alternate incision (Group A). Of the 58 patients in Group A, 19 (33%) had a periumbilical incision, 10 (17%) a lower midline incision, and 29 (50%) a right upper quadrant transverse incision. Although Groups P and Awere comparable in all five subscales of the Patient Scar Assessment Questionnaire, more Group P participants (n = 12; 22%) said their incision felt “fairly numb” than Group A participants (n = 2; 3%) (P = 0.008). There was no significant difference between study groups in all Photo-Series Questionnaire domains; however, after comparing patients’ own incisions with photographs of various alternative incisions, 36 (62%) Group A patients would choose an alternative incision compared with only 11 (19%) Group P patients (P = 0.001). Selection bias, recall bias, external validity, and variability of scar lengths were the limitations of the study. It was concluded that although a Pfannenstiel incision seems to be the optimal cosmetic choice, it is associated with a higher incidence of wound numbness than alternate extraction incisions.

Sarcoma excision and pattern of complicating sensory neuropathy

A potential complication of sarcoma excision surgery is a sensory neurological dysfunction around the surgical scar. This study utilised both objective and subjective sensation assessment modalities, to evaluate 22 patients after sarcoma surgery, for a sensory deficit. 93% had an objective sensory deficit. Light touch is less likely to be damaged than pinprick sensation, and two-point discrimination is significantly reduced around the scar. Results also show that an increased scar size leads to an increased light touch and pinprick deficit and that two-point discriminatory ability around the scar improves as time after surgery elapses. 91% had a subjective deficit, most likely tingling or pain, and numbness was most probable with lower limb sarcomas. Results also demonstrated that there were no significant relationships between any specific subjective and objective deficits. In conclusion, sensory disturbance after sarcoma surgery is common and debilitating. Efforts to minimize scar length are paramount in the prevention of sensory deficit. Sensation may also recover to an extent; thus, sensory reeducation techniques must become an integral aspect of management plans. Finally to obtain a comprehensive assessment of sensory function, both objective and subjective assessment techniques must be utilised.

The technical approach to laparoscopic colectomy in patients who have undergone prior abdominoplasty

BACKGROUND

For those patients undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery who have had prior abdominoplasty, cosmetic outcome is important and the technical considerations for laparoscopy in post-abdominoplasty patients have not been previously addressed. The aim of the present study was to define the technical approach to the post-abdominoplasty patient undergoing laparoscopic colorectal surgery after abdominoplasty.

METHODS

Utilizing the technical approach described, eleven patients underwent laparoscopy after prior abdominoplasty over a 7-year period.

RESULTS

The majority of patients (10/11) felt their laparoscopic colorectal resection had no adverse effect on the aesthetics of their prior abdominoplasty. From a surgeon's standpoint, the only significant challenge was due to the loss of abdominal wall compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

The surgical approach to laparoscopic colectomy in the post-abdominoplasty patient requires careful planning. Cosmetic outcome is a particularly important consideration for this subset of patients, and this should be appreciated by the operating surgeon.

Suprapubic appendectomy: a different single-incision approach

INTRODUCTION

Appendectomy is performed on almost 700 000 patients per year in the European Community, rendering it the most common acute surgical procedure. Since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery, there has been increased interest in carrying out procedures with fewer incisions and less ports.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

After the inception of single-port access, it is possible to insert into the abdominal cavity multiple instruments through a single device. A total of 15 patients--mean age 22 years and mean body mass index 27 kg/m(2)--with acute appendicitis were included in this study.

RESULTS

Mean operative time was 35 minutes with no conversions. Local suction drain was needed in 2 patients. Mean hospital stay was less than 24 hours with no complications.

CONCLUSION

Single-port suprapubic appendectomy is feasible and safe, and can allow a more direct vision of the operating field depending on the position of the appendix and presents good cosmetic and postoperative outcomes.