The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland guideline on the management of anal fissure

AIM

The management of anal fissure: ACPGBI position statement was written 15 years ago. [KLR Cross et al., Colorectal Dis, 2008]. Our aim was to update the guideline and provide recommendations on the most effective treatment for patients with anal fissures utilising a multidisciplinary, rigorous guideline methodology.

METHODS

The development process consisted of six phases. In phase 1 we defined the scope of the guideline. The patient population included patients with acute and chronic anal fissure. The target group was all practitioners (primary and secondary care) treating patients with fissures and, in addition, healthcare workers and patients who desired information regarding fissure management. In phase 2 we formed a guideline development group (GDG) including a methodologist. In phase 3 review questions were formulated, using a reversed PICO process, starting with possible recommendations based on the GDG's knowledge. In phase 4 a comprehensive literature search focused on existing systematic reviews addressing each review question, supplemented by more recent studies if appropriate. In phase 5 data were extracted from the included papers and checked by the GDG. If indicated, meta-analysis of systematic review data was updated by the GDG. During phase 6 the GDG members decided what recommendations could be made based on the evidence in the literature and strength of the recommendation was assessed using 'grade'.

RESULTS

This guideline is divided into two sections: Primary care which includes (i) diagnosis; (ii) basic treatment; (iii) topical treatment; and secondary care which includes (iv) botulinum toxin therapy; (v) surgical intervention and (vi) special situations (including pregnancy and breast-feeding patients, children, receptive anal intercourse and low-pressure fissures). A total of 23 recommendations were formulated. A new term clinically healed was described by the GDG.

CONCLUSION

This guideline provides an up-to-date evidence-based summary of the current knowledge of the management of anal fissure and may serve as a useful guide for clinicians as well as a potential reference for patients.

The Italian Unitary Society of Colon-proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colonproctologia) guidelines for the management of anal fissure

INTRODUCTION

The aim of these evidence-based guidelines is to present a consensus position from members of the Italian Unitary Society of Colon-Proctology (SIUCP: Società Italiana Unitaria di Colon-Proctologia) on the diagnosis and management of anal fissure, with the purpose to guide every physician in the choice of the best treatment option, according with the available literature.

METHODS

A panel of experts was designed and charged by the Board of the SIUCP to develop key-questions on the main topics covering the management of anal fissure and to performe an accurate search on each topic in different databanks, in order to provide evidence-based answers to the questions and to summarize them in statements. All the clinical questions were discussed by the expert panel in different rounds through the Delphi approach and, for each statement, a consensus among the experts was reached. The questions were created according to the PICO criteria, and the statements developed adopting the GRADE methodology.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with acute anal fissure the medical therapy with dietary and behavioral norms is indicated. In the chronic phase of disease, the conservative treatment with topical 0.3% nifedipine plus 1.5% lidocaine or nitrates may represent the first-line therapy, eventually associated with ointments with film-forming, anti-inflammatory and healing properties such as Propionibacterium extract gel. In case of first-line treatment failure, the surgical strategy (internal sphincterotomy or fissurectomy with flap), may be guided by the clinical findings, eventually supported by endoanal ultrasound and anal manometry.

Efficacy of Anal Sphincter Division During Fistulotomy in Anal Fissure-Associated Fistula

BACKGROUND

A subset of chronic anal fissures beget focal infection, leading to concomitant fistula. The optimal management of fissure-associated fistula is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to characterize healing rates and effects of fistulotomy in fissure-associated fistula.

DESIGN

Retrospective study.

SETTING

Urban tertiary center.

PATIENTS

Adults who underwent fistulotomy for a fistula associated with a chronic anal fissure were included in the study. However, those with Crohn's disease, a history of lateral internal sphincterotomy, and a fistula not amenable to fistulotomy were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were managed with fistulotomy. Fissures were otherwise managed conservatively with a step-up approach.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary end point was healing, defined as resolution of symptoms and both fistula and fissure wounds within 1 year. Subgroup analysis compared those who underwent subcutaneous fistulotomy (group A) with those who underwent fistulotomy involving anal sphincter fibers (group B).

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 38 patients (63%) healed with a median overall follow-up of 6.6 months (4.2-14.1). The overall median time to healing was 4.4 months (2.2-6.0). No clinical or pathologic factors predicted healing. In subgroup analysis, overall subcutaneous fistulotomy healing rates were nonstatically lower at 46% (6/13) compared to fistulotomy involving anal sphincter fibers at 72% (18/25; p = 0.16). There was no difference in time to healing (subcutaneous fistulotomy, 6.7 mo [5.2-8.4] vs fistulotomy involving sphincter, 5.1 mo [2.1-7.0]; p = 0.36).

LIMITATIONS

The limitations include treatment bias, with increased utilization of chemical sphincter-relaxing agents in those who did not heal. Findings are not applicable to complex fistulas, Crohn's disease, or atypical fissures.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients presenting with chronic fissure and associated subcutaneous, intersphincteric, or low transphincteric fistula are successfully managed with fistulotomy. Patients with a subcutaneous fistula tract exhibited nonstatistically significantly lower rates of healing. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C145 .

EFICACIA DE LA DIVISIN ESFINTRICA DURANTE LA FISTULOTOMA EN CASOS DE FSTULA ASOCIADA A FISURA ANAL

ANTECEDENTES: Ciertos subgrupos de fisuras anales crónicas ocasionan infección localizada, induciendo la aparición de una fístula anal concomitante. Se desconoce el manejo óptimo de la fístula concomitante a una fisura anal.OBJETIVO: Se trata de caracterizar las tasas de curación y el efecto de la fistulotomía en el tratamiento de la fístula concomitante a la fisura anal.DISEÑO: Estudio retrospectivo.EMPLAZAMIENTO: Centro terciario urbano.PACIENTES: Adultos sometidos a fistulotomía por una fístula concomitante a una fisura anal crónica. Se excluyeron la enfermedad de Crohn, el antecedente de una esfinterotomía lateral interna y las fístulas no susceptibles de fistulotomía.INTERVENCIONES: Los pacientes fueron manejados con una fistulotomía clasica. Por lo demás, las fisuras se trataron de forma conservadora con un enfoque médico escalonado.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO: El criterio principal de valoración fué la cura definitiva, determinada como la resolución completa de los síntomas y de las heridas tanto de la fístula como de la fisura en el plazo de un año. El análisis de los subgrupos comparó los que se sometieron a una fistulotomía subcutánea (grupo A) versus una fistulotomía que involucró las fibras del esfínter anal interno (grupo B).RESULTADOS: 24/38 pacientes (63%) curaron con una mediana de seguimiento global de 6,6 meses (4,2-14,1). El tiempo medio general de curación fue de 4,4 meses (2,2-6,0). Ningún factor clínico o patológico predijo la cura. En el análisis de subgrupos, las tasas generales de cura de la fistulotomía subcutánea no fueron estadísticamente más bajas de 46 % (6/13) comparados con la fistulotomía que involucró las fibras del esfínter anal interno en 72 % (18/25; p = 0,16). No hubo diferencia en el tiempo de cicatrización [fistulotomía subcutánea 6,7 meses (5,2-8,4) conparada a la fistulotomía y esfínterotomía parcial interna a 5,1 meses (2,1-7,0); p = 0,36].LIMITACIONES: Sesgo del tratamiento, con mayor utilización de agentes químicos relajantes de la musculatura esfínteriana en aquellos pacientes que no sanaron. No aplicable a fístulas complejas, enfermedad de Crohn o fisuras atípicas.CONCLUSIÓNES: Los pacientes que presentan fisura crónica y fístula subcutánea, inter-esfintérica o trans-esfintérica baja concomitante se manejan con éxito con una fistulotomía. Los pacientes con un trayecto de fístula subcutánea exhibieron tasas de curación más bajas y no estadísticamente significativas. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C145 . (Traducción-Dr. Xavier Delgadillo ).

The treatment of anal fistula: second ACPGBI Position Statement - 2018

It is over 10 years since the first ACPGBI Position Statement on the management of anal fistula was published in 2007. This second edition is the result of scrutiny of the literature published during this time; it updates the original Position Statement and reviews the published evidence surrounding treatments for anal fistula that have been developed since the original publication.

Combined treatment approach to chronic anal fissure with associated anal fistula

BACKGROUND

Anal fistula in association with chronic anal fissure (fissure-fistula) is infrequently described. Recognizing this association and managing both components may help prevent some treatment failures seen with chronic anal fissure. This study aims to report on the outcomes of 20 consecutive patients with fissure-fistula managed with fistulotomy and injection of botulinum A toxin.

METHODS

The study is a retrospective, observational study, assessing the success of symptom resolution following fistulotomy with botulinum A toxin, in patients identified as having a chronic anal fissure with associated anal fistula. The study included all patients with this condition treated with combination treatment by a single surgeon at a tertiary care hospital between January 2013 and January 2016.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with fissure-fistula treated with fistulotomy and botulinum toxin A were identified. The median cohort age was 44 years (range 25-78), with a predominance of males (80%) and posterior fissure position (80%). The most common presenting symptoms were anal pain (70%), rectal bleeding (55%), anal discharge (35%) and anal pruritus (35%). Mean follow-up was 10.5 weeks and all patients who attended follow-up appointments reported resolution of symptoms. There were no cases of incontinence and none of the cohort required further surgical intervention for the condition.

CONCLUSION

Chronic anal fissure with associated anal fistula can be successfully managed with fistulotomy and injection of botulinum toxin A. Further studies would be helpful in determining if recognition and management of the fistula component in isolation with fistulotomy is as effective as fistulotomy plus botulinum A toxin.

Myoxinol ointment for the treatment of acute fissure

Myoxinol is a complex of oligopeptides obtained from the seeds of Hibiscus esculentus used in cosmetic as natural alternative to botulin toxin. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of local myoxinol for the treatment of acute anal fissure. All the consecutive patients with acute fissure treated from January to June 2014 underwent 30 days of topical treatment (twice/day) with a mioxinol based ointment. Pain, symptomatic relief, fissure healing and re-epithelization, 1-year recurrence rate, subjective satisfaction and need for further treatments were evaluated. During the study period 157 patients were eligible for data analysis (91 males: 58%; mean age 38 years: range 17-83). Median anal pain score was 7.1 pre-treatment and 1.7 and 0.9 after 30 days and 12 months from treatment, respectively (p: 0.0001). After the treatment period complete healing was achieved in 103 patients (65.5%), relevant improvement in 31 (20%) and no improvement in 21 patients (13.5%). Overall efficacy rate was 85.5%. A significant difference was reported considering patients with pre-treatment VAS between 1-5 and 6-10 (p: 0.004). Twenty-nine patients (18.5%) required further treatments. Hydrolyzed Hibiscus esculentus extract was proven to be an effective and well-tolerated topical treatment for acute fissure, with a high healing rate, a significant reduction of pain and a low 1-year recurrence rate.

Maintenance therapy with partially hydrolyzed guar gum in the conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure: results of a prospective, randomized study

Purpose. This study was designed to evaluate the role of maintenance therapy with partially hydrolyzed guar gum (PHGG) after topical application of glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) in the conservative treatment of chronic anal fissure (CAF). Methods. From all the patients with CAF observed during the study period, 165 subjects with healed CAF after standard therapy with topical GTN 0.4% ointment were randomized to receive (group II) or not (group I) maintenance therapy with PHGG for 10 months. Clinical and manometric followup was carried out 6 and 12 months after treatment. Results. At six-month followup, median visual analogue scale score was significantly higher in group I if compared with group II. The success and recurrence rate at 12-month followup were, respectively, 38.3% (28/73) in group I versus 58.5% (41/70) in group II (P = 0.019; Fisher's exact test) and 30.2% (13/43) in group I versus 14.5% (7/48) in group II (P = 0.0047; Fisher's exact test). Conclusion. The maintenance therapy with PHGG in patients with healed CAF after chemical sphincterotomy by topical application of GTN 0.4% ointment seems associated with a significant reduction of recurrence rate and with a significant increase of success rate at 12-month followup.

The treatment of anal fistulas with biologically derived products: is innovation better than conventional surgical treatment? An update

New technical approaches involving biologically derived products have been applied in the treatment for anal fistulas in order to avoid the risk of fecal incontinence. The aim of this review was to evaluate the scientific evidence present in the literature regarding these techniques. Trials comparing surgery (fistulotomy, advancement mucosal flap closure and placement of seton) versus fibrin glue, fistula plug or acellular dermal matrix were considered. In fibrin glue versus traditional surgical treatment the healing rate was higher in the surgery group, and the recurrence rate was lower in the traditional surgery group, but these results were not statistically relevant. In acellular dermal matrix (ADM) versus traditional surgical treatment the recurrence rate of fistulas was significantly lower in the ADM group, but non-significant differences were recorded in incontinence and anal deformity. Our review shows that there are no significant advantages of the new techniques involving biologically derived products. Further randomized controlled trials are needed.