Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage After Pancreatic Surgery in Patients Receiving Anticoagulation or Antiplatelet Agents

Impact of antithrombotic therapy on postpancreatectomy hemorrhage in 7116 patients: A project study by the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

BACKGROUND

We previously reported an association between antithrombotic therapy and an increased risk of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH). To validate our findings, we conducted a large-scale multicenter retrospective study from 63 high-volume centers in Japan.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2018, 7116 patients who underwent pancreatectomy were enrolled. The antithrombotic group consisted of 920 patients (12.9%) who received preoperative antithrombotic agents including aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, prasugrel, warfarin, and direct oral anticoagulants.

RESULTS

PPH occurred in 235 (3.3%) of the patients. The incidence of PPH and mortality were significantly higher in the antithrombotic group than in the control group (5.7 vs. 3.0% and 2.2 vs. 0.9%, respectively; both p < .001). In multivariate analysis, a history of antithrombotic use was an independent risk factor for grade C PPH (p = .036). In the antithrombotic group, PPH tended to be delayed in the patients with restarting antithrombotic therapy. Notably, the occurrence of delayed PPH after restarting antithrombotic therapy was observed only when antithrombotic therapy was restarted within 10 days after pancreatectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter study demonstrated that a history of antithrombotic use was a significant risk factor for PPH and mortality. In particular, the resumption of antithrombotic therapy in the early postoperative period should be done with caution.

Impact of Aspirin Intake on Postoperative Survival after Primary Pancreatic Resection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma-A Single-Center Evaluation

(1) Background: The intake of aspirin (ASS) has been demonstrated to have a relevant impact on the pathogenesis, incidence and outcome in different solid gastrointestinal tumors. However, data on the effect of ASS on the short-term outcome and the long-term survival in patients with pancreatic carcinoma are still limited. (2) Methods: A total of 213 patients who underwent primary resection of PDAC at the University Hospital of Erlangen from January 2000 to December 2018 were included in this retrospective single-center study in total. Patients were stratified according to the aspirin intake into three groups: continuous aspirin intake (cASS), perioperatively interrupted aspirin intake (iASS) and no aspirin intake (no ASS) at the timepoint of surgery. The postoperative outcome as well as long-term survival were compared between the groups. (3) Results: There were no differences regarding postoperative morbidity (iASS: 54% vs. cASS: 53% vs. no ASS: 64%, p = 0.448) and in-hospital mortality (iASS: 4% vs. cASS: 10% vs. no ASS: 3%, p = 0.198) between the groups. The overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ in the groups when comparing the ASS-intake status (OS: iASS 17.8 months vs. cASS 19.6 months vs. no ASS 21.6 months, p = 0.489; DFS: iASS 14.0 months vs. cASS 18.3 months vs. no ASS 14.7 months, p = 0.957). Multivariate analysis revealed that age (hazard ratio (HR) 2.2, p < 0.001), lymph node-positive status (HR 2.0, p < 0.001), R status 1 or 2 (HR 2.8, p < 0.001) and differentiation with a grading of 3 (HR 1.7, p = 0.005) were significant independent prognostic factors regarding the OS. Moreover, age (HR 1.5, p = 0.040), lymph node-positive status (HR 1.8, p = 0.002) and high-grade (G3) carcinomas (HR 1.5, p = 0.037) could be identified as independent prognostic parameters for DFS. (4) Conclusions: In patients undergoing primary surgery for curative resection of pancreatic carcinoma, the perioperative intake of ASS had no significant impact on postoperative outcome, overall and disease-free survival.

Risk adjusted venous thromboembolism prophylaxis following pancreatic surgery

This study analyzes pancreatectomy cases performed between 2016 and 2021 to determine the impact of using Caprini guideline indicated VTE prophylaxis on VTE and bleeding complications. This is a retrospective study of cases performed in a single academic health care system, in which Caprini score and VTE prevention measures were determined retroactively and prevention practices binarized as appropriate or not appropriate. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed of 1,299 pancreatectomy case. Most patients were stratified as high risk for postoperative VTE. Receiving appropriate VTE prophylaxis during admission was associated with a 3-fold reduction in VTE complications (0.82% vs. 2.64%, p=0.01) without increasing bleeding complications. All VTE complications occurring with 30-day (1.2%) and 90-day (2.7%) from hospital discharged occurred in those not receiving appropriate prophylaxis, and discharged bleeding complications were also not associated with receivng appropriate discharged VTE prophylaxis. The findings our the study are significant as it highlights the ongoing need for standardization in VTE risk assessment and prevention measures to increase compliance to risk adjusted VTE prevention practice guidelines, thus reducing preventable VTE complications and potentially associated morbidity and mortality.

A Propensity-Matched Analysis of the Postoperative Venous Thromboembolism Rate After Pancreatoduodenectomy Based on Operative Approach

BACKGROUND

The use of minimally invasive approaches for pancreatoduodenectomy has increased in recent years, but the risk of postoperative VTE is undefined. We aimed to compare venous thromboembolism (VTE) rates after open and minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy using an administrative dataset.

METHODS

Patients who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy within the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program targeted pancreatectomy database (2016-2018) were identified. VTE was compared between patients who underwent open or minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy directly and after propensity score matching 1:1 for demographics, comorbidities, and peri-/intra-operative factors.

RESULTS

A total of 12,227 patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy during the study period (open: n = 11,217; minimally invasive: n = 1010). Before matching, the VTE rate was higher among patients who underwent minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (5.2% vs. 3.8%, p = 0.033), and minimally invasive resection was independently associated with VTE (OR = 1.46, 95%CI = 1.09-2.06). After matching, there were 916 patients per group without differences in demographics or comorbidities. Patients who underwent minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy had longer median operative times (422 vs. 348 min). The VTE rate remained higher following minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy after matching (5.1% vs. 2.9%, p = 0.018), mainly driven by a higher DVT rate (3.9% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.005).

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with a higher postoperative VTE rate compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy.

Safety of pancreatic surgery with special reference to antithrombotic therapy: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) is the most severe type of complication after pancreatic surgery, although the effect of antithrombotic therapy (ATT) on PPH is largely unknown. The safety and efficacy of chemical thromboprophylaxis for venous thromboembolism (VTE) remains controversial.

AIM

To elucidate the effect of ATT on PPH.

METHODS

Published articles between 2013 and 2020 were searched from PubMed and Google Scholar, and after careful reviewing of all studies, studies concerning ATT and pancreatic surgery were included. Data such as study design, type of surgical procedures, type of antithrombotic drugs, and surgical outcome were extracted from the studies.

RESULTS

Nineteen published articles with a total of 37863 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included in the systematic review. Fourteen were cohort studies, with only three being prospective in nature. Two studies demonstrated that in patients receiving chronic ATT, which were mostly managed by heparin bridging, the risk of PPH was higher compared with those without ATT, and one study showed that patients with direct-acting oral anticoagulants managed by heparin bridging had significantly higher postoperative bleeding rates than others. The remaining six studies reported that pancreatic surgery can be safely performed in patients receiving chronic ATT, even under preoperative aspirin continuation. Concerning chemical thromboprophylaxis for VTE, most studies have shown a potentially high risk of PPH in patients undergoing chemical thromboprophylaxis; however, its effectiveness against VTE has not been statistically demonstrated, particularly among Asian patients.

CONCLUSION

Pancreatic surgery in chronically ATT-received patients can be safely performed without an increase in the occurrence of PPH, although the safety and efficacy of chemical thromboprophylaxis for VTE during pancreatic surgery is still controversial. Further investigation using reliable studies with good design is required to establish definite protocols or guidelines.

Effect of antithrombotic therapy on postoperative outcome of 538 consecutive emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis: two Italian center's study

The risk of developing hemorrhagic complications during or after emergency cholecystectomy (EC) for acute cholecystitis (AC) in patients with antithrombotic therapy (ATT) remains uncertain. In this double-center study, we evaluated post-operative outcomes in patients with ATT undergoing EC. We retrospectively evaluated 538 patients who underwent laparoscopic EC for AC between May 2015 and December 2019 at two referral centers. 89 of them (17%) were on ATT. We defined postoperative complication rates, including bleeding, as our primary outcome. Mortality was higher in the ATT group. Morbidity was higher in the ATT group as well; however, the difference was not statistically significant. 12 patients (2%) experienced intraoperative blood loss over 500 ml and ten (2%) had postoperative bleeding complications. Two patients (< 1%) experienced both intraoperative and postoperative bleeding. On multivariate analysis, ATT was not significantly associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Antithrombotic therapy is not an independently associated factor of severe postoperative complications (including bleeding) or mortality. However, these patients still represent a challenging group and must be carefully managed to avoid postoperative bleeding complications.

Impact of Antithrombotic Agents on Postpancreatectomy Hemorrhage: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective multicenter study aimed to evaluate the risk of postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH) in patients receiving antithrombotic agents (ATAs). PPH is the most severe complication after pancreatectomy. However, there is little known about the strength of the association between ATA use, PPH, and other clinical outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

Between 2007 and 2016, 1,297 patients underwent pancreatectomy at 2 surgical centers. ATA use included aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, warfarin, direct oral anticoagulants, and intravenous unfractionated heparin. The ATA group was composed of 144 patients who were taking ATAs before surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients developed PPH. The patients in the ATA group showed higher frequency (8.3% vs 2.0%, p < 0.001) of PPH compared with the control group (n = 1,153). In multivariate analysis, ATA use was an independent adverse risk factor for PPH (odds ratio [OR] 3.58, 95% CI 1.29-9.91, p = 0.014). Stratification by preoperative ATA therapy revealed a significant risk of PPH Grade C in patients receiving combined AT therapy. The median onset of late hemorrhage (>24 hours post-surgery) in the ATA group was later than in the control group (17.5 vs 8.5 days, p = 0.032), and the incidence tended to be higher in patients who restarted ATAs postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

History of ATA use is a significant risk factor for PPH, and postoperative resumption of ATAs appears to be associated with an increased risk of PPH. Patients receiving combined antithrombotic therapy may be at particularly high risk for PPH.

Impact of antithrombotic therapy on the outcomes with focus on bleeding and thromboembolic events in patients undergoing pancreticoduodenectomy

BACKGROUND

We investigated perioperative outcomes of pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in patients receiving antithrombotic therapy (ATT) with a focus on the incidence of perioperative bleeding and thromboembolic complications.

METHODS

A total of 77 patients who underwent PD at our institution between 2013 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical findings and surgical outcomes including bleeding and thromboembolic complications were compared in patients with or without ATT. Interruption of ATT and perioperative heparin bridging were based on our hospital protocol.

RESULTS

Among ATT (30) and non-ATT (47) groups, ATT group had a significantly higher age and history of cardiocerebrovascular diseases. No significant difference was observed in intraoperative and post-pancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) between the groups. ATT group was associated with a significantly higher rate of post-operative complications, Clavien-Dindo classification ≥II and thromboembolic events. Operative mortality in ATT and non-ATT groups was 2 (6.7%) and 1 (2.1%), respectively. There was no significant association between ATT and excessive intraoperative blood loss (≥1000 mL), PPH (≥grade B) and thromboembolic complications (Clavien-Dindo classification ≥II).

CONCLUSION

In patients with ATT, PD is a feasible procedure with no major impact on intraoperative bleeding or PPH.

Postoperative bleeding complications after endoscopic inguinal hernia repair in patients receiving anticoagulation agents, antiplatelet agents, or both

INTRODUCTION

In patients receiving chronic anticoagulation agents, antiplatelet agents, or both, perioperative antithrombotic therapy for inguinal hernia repair requires an understanding of potential side-effects-specifically, the postoperative bleeding risks. In the present study, we evaluated postoperative bleeding complications after transabdominal preperitoneal patch plasty (TAPP) in patients undergoing antithrombotic therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 413 patients who had undergone TAPP between February 2013 and June 2017. Individuals in the antithrombotic group received one of three regimens of perioperative antithrombotic therapy. The clinical indications for chronic anticoagulation agents (ie bridging therapy with unfractionated heparin), antiplatelet agents (ie continuation of aspirin), or both were followed. The antithrombotic group was compared to the control group in terms of surgical outcomes. We primarily focused on the incidence of postoperative bleeding complications.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients received antithrombotic therapy. We observed significant differences between the groups in terms of mean age, ASA physical status, and length of postoperative stay. In contrast, postoperative complications were not significantly different between the antithrombotic and control groups (4.8% vs 5.5%, P = 0.818). In addition, a significantly greater postoperative bleeding rate was not observed in the antithrombotic group than in the control group (1.2% vs 0.6%, P = 0.566). Likewise, other complications were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Antithrombotic therapy is not a risk factor for postoperative bleeding complications in patients who have undergone TAPP, suggesting its safety and efficacy in this patient population. Indeed, this group has the same incidence rates of morbidity and postoperative bleeding complications as patients who have not undergone antithrombotic therapy.

Outcomes following pancreatic surgery using three different thromboprophylaxis regimens

BACKGROUND

Postpancreatectomy haemorrhage (PPH) and venous thromboembolism (VTE) are serious complications following pancreatic surgery. The aim was to assess the timing, occurrence and predictors of PPH and VTE.

METHODS

Elective pancreatic resections undertaken in a single university hospital between November 2013 and September 2017 were assessed. Three intervals were reviewed, each with a different routine regimen of nadroparin: 2850 units once daily (single dose) administered in hospital only, or 5700 units once daily (double dose) or 2850 units twice daily (split dose) administered in hospital and continued for 6 weeks after surgery. Clinically relevant PPH (CR-PPH) was classified according to International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery criteria. VTE was defined according to a number of key diagnostic criteria within 6 weeks of surgery. Cox regression analyses were performed to test the hypotheses that the double-dose group would experience more PPH than the other two groups, the single-dose group would experience more VTE than the other two groups, and the split-dose group would experience the fewest adverse events (PPH or VTE).

RESULTS

In total, 240 patients were included, 80 per group. The double-dose group experienced significantly more CR-PPH (hazard ratio (HR) 2·14, 95 per cent c.i. 1·16 to 3·94; P = 0·015). More relaparotomies due to CR-PPH were performed in the double-dose group (16 versus 3·8 per cent; P = 0·002). The single-dose group did not experience more VTE (HR 1·41, 0·43 to 4·62; P = 0·570). The split dose was not associated with fewer adverse events (HR 0·77, 0·41 to 1·46; P = 0·422). Double-dose low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), high BMI and pancreatic fistula were independent predictors of CR-PPH.

CONCLUSION

A double dose of LMWH prophylaxis continued for 6 weeks after pancreatic resection was associated with a twofold higher rate of CR-PPH, resulting in four times more relaparotomies. Patients receiving a single daily dose of LMWH in hospital only did not experience a higher rate of VTE.