1
|
Zheng R, Ghabi E, He J. Robotic Parenchymal-Sparing Pancreatectomy: A Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4369. [PMID: 37686648 PMCID: PMC10486530 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15174369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2023] [Revised: 08/29/2023] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Parenchymal-sparing approaches to pancreatectomy are technically challenging procedures but allow for preserving a normal pancreas and decreasing the rate of postoperative pancreatic insufficiency. The robotic platform is increasingly being used for these procedures. We sought to evaluate robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy and assess its complication profile and efficacy. METHODS This systematic review consisted of all studies on robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy (central pancreatectomy, duodenum-preserving partial pancreatic head resection, enucleation, and uncinate resection) published between January 2001 and December 2022 in PubMed and Embase. RESULTS A total of 23 studies were included in this review (n = 788). Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy is being performed worldwide for benign or indolent pancreatic lesions. When compared to the open approach, robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomies led to a longer average operative time, shorter length of stay, and higher estimated intraoperative blood loss. Postoperative pancreatic fistula is common, but severe complications requiring intervention are exceedingly rare. Long-term complications such as endocrine and exocrine insufficiency are nearly nonexistent. CONCLUSIONS Robotic parenchymal-sparing pancreatectomy appears to have a higher risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula but is rarely associated with severe or long-term complications. Careful patient selection is required to maximize benefits and minimize morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Zheng
- Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Concors SJ, Katz MHG, Ikoma N. Minimally Invasive Pancreatectomy: Robotic and Laparoscopic Developments. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:327-342. [PMID: 36925189 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/15/2023]
Abstract
Minimally invasive pancreatectomy is increasingly used. Although offering potential advantages over open approaches, minimally invasive pancreatectomy has many challenges to maintain high-quality of oncologic resection. Multiple patient and surgical factors should be considered in planning laparoscopic or robotic resection, including the learning curve required to produce proficiency. For pancreaticoduodenectomy, distal pancreatectomy, and other pancreatic resections, a safe, margin-negative resection remains the goal. National and societal guidelines for the adoption of minimally invasive pancreatectomy are ongoing and will continue to be important as these techniques are further adopted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seth J Concors
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, FCT 17.6022, Houston, TX 77030, USA. https://twitter.com/SethConcorsMD
| | - Matthew H G Katz
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, FCT 17.6022, Houston, TX 77030, USA. https://twitter.com/MKatzMD
| | - Naruhiko Ikoma
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1400 Pressler, FCT 17.6022, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Levi Sandri GB, Abu Hilal M, Dokmak S, Edwin B, Hackert T, Keck T, Khatkov I, Besselink MG, Boggi U. Figures do matter: A literature review of 4587 robotic pancreatic resections and their implications on training. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2023; 30:21-35. [PMID: 35751504 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of robotic assistance in minimally invasive pancreatic resection is quickly growing. METHODS We present a systematic review of the literature regarding all types of robotic pancreatic resection (RPR). Our aim is to show for which procedures there is enough experience to permit safe training and provide an estimation of how many centers could serve as teaching institutions. RESULTS Sixty-four studies reporting on 4587 RPRs were analyzed. A total of 2598 pancreatoduodenectomies (PD) were reported by 28 centers from Europe (6/28; 21.4%), the Americas (11/28; 39.3%), and Asia (11/28; 39.3%). Six studies reported >100 robot PD (1694/2598; 65.2%). A total of 1618 distal pancreatectomies (DP) were reported by 29 centers from Europe (10/29; 34.5%), the Americas (10/29; 34.5%), and Asia (9/29; 31%). Five studies reported >100 robotic DP (748/1618; 46.2%). A total of 154 central pancreatectomies were reported by six centers from Europe (1/6; 16.7%), the Americas (2/6; 33.3%), and Asia (3/6; 50%). Only 49 total pancreatectomies were reported. Finally, 168 enucleations were reported in seven studies (with a mean of 15.4 cases per study). A single center reported on 60 enucleations (35.7%). Results of each type of robotic procedure are also presented. CONCLUSIONS Experience with RPR is still quite limited. Despite high case volume not being sufficient to warrant optimal training opportunities, it is certainly a key component of every successful training program and is a major criterion for fellowship accreditation. From this review, it appears that only PD and DP can currently be taught at few institutions worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammed Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza - Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, DMU DIGEST, AP-HP, Hôpital Beaujon, Clichy, France
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital and Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Tobias Keck
- Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Igor Khatkov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marc G Besselink
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Department of Translational Research and New Surgical and Medical Technologies, Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang W, Gao Y, Zhao Z, Kang Y, Xu Y, An L. Intraoperative Ultrasound Guided Robotic Pancreatic Enucleation, Does a Distance of 3mm Still Matters? Surg Innov 2022:15533506221092496. [PMID: 35848425 DOI: 10.1177/15533506221092496] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Background: A minimal distance of 3 mm to main pancreatic duct (MPD) was generally considered to be necessary for pancreatic enucleation (PE). This study was designed to report the safety and feasibility of PE for tumors located in 3 mm to MPD Under the intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) guidance.Methods: The data of patients who received IOUS guided robotic PE from January 2018 to May 2019 in the second department of hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery were reviewed in this study. According to the distance to MPD (less than 3 mm or not), patients were divided in 2 groups, and the short-term operative outcomes were compared.Statistics: Students' t-test and Mann-Whitney U test were used for comparing continuous variables, and Chi-squared test was used for comparing categorical variables.Results: And a total of 56 patients were analyzed, and a minimal distance less than 3 mm between the tumor and pancreatic duct measured by IOUS was found in 12 patients. The tumors and MPD were clearly revealed intraoperatively in all the cases. The operative duration was significantly longer in patients with tumors located in 3 mm from MPD (143.25 ± 40.89 min vs 107.14 ± 37.73 min, t = 2.756, P=.014). There was no significant difference between the rate of post-operative pancreatic fistula and other complications in the different groups (χ2 =.924, P=.48).Discussion and conclusion: robotic PE could be safely performed under IOUS guidance for benign or low-grade malignant tumors located less than 3 mm to the MPD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenbo Tang
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanxing Gao
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Zhiming Zhao
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yuhao Kang
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Yong Xu
- Faculty of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, the First Medical Center, 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.,Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery of Chinese PLA, Beijing, China.,Key Laboratory of Digital Hepatobiliary Surgery PLA, Beijing, China
| | - Lichun An
- Department of Diagnostic Ultrasound, the First Medical Center of 104607Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Beane JD, Borrebach JD, Billderback A, Onuma AE, Adam MA, Zureikat AH, Pitt HA. Small pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: Resect or enucleate? Am J Surg 2021; 222:29-34. [DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2020] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
|
6
|
Serra F, Bonaduce I, De Ruvo N, Cautero N, Gelmini R. Short-term and long term morbidity in robotic pancreatic surgery: a systematic review. Gland Surg 2021; 10:1767-1779. [PMID: 34164320 DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Background Pancreatic cancer is one of the most aggressive and lethal tumours in Western society. Pancreatic surgery can be considered a challenge for open and laparoscopic surgeons, even if the accuracy of gland dissection, due to the close relationship between pancreas, the portal vein, and mesenteric vessels, besides the reconstructive phase (in pancreaticoduodenectomy), lead to significant difficulties for laparoscopic technique. Minimally invasive pancreatic surgery changed utterly with the development of robotic surgery. However, this review aims to make more clarity on the influence of robotic surgery on long-term morbidity. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus to identify and analyze studies published from November 2011 to September 2020 concerning robotic pancreatic surgery. The following terms were used to perform the search: "long term morbidity robotic pancreatic surgery". Results Eighteen articles included in the study were published between November 2011 and September 2020. The review included 2041 patients who underwent robotic pancreatic surgery, mainly for a malignant tumour. The two most common robotic surgical procedures adopted were the robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) and the robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD). In two studies, patients were divided into groups; on the one hand, those who underwent a robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy (RPD), on the other hand, those who underwent robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP). The remaining items included surgical approach such as robotic middle pancreatectomy (RMP), robotic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy, robotic-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic dissection (RALPD), robotic enucleation of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours. Conclusions Comparison between robotic surgery and open surgery lead to evidence of different advantages of the robotic approach. A multidisciplinary team and a surgical centre at high volume are essential for better postoperative morbidity and mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Serra
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Isabella Bonaduce
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola De Ruvo
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Cautero
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Roberta Gelmini
- Department of Surgery, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia - Policlinico of Modena, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Bencini L, Urciuoli I, Trafeli M, Paolini C, Moraldi L, Tribuzi A, Pacciani S, Coratti A. Robotic pancreatic surgery: minimally invasive approach to challenging operations. Minerva Surg 2021; 76:138-145. [PMID: 33908238 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-5691.21.08435-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery is still associated with high perioperative morbidity and mortality. The purpose of this study was to present the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted pancreatic surgery, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (RAPD), distal pancreatectomy (RDP) with or without splenectomy, enucleation (REN), and atypical resection (RAR), for benign, borderline, and malignant lesions at a high-volume center. METHODS A single-center, prospective database was used to retrospectively analyze the early outcomes of robotic pancreatic procedures completed between 2014 and 2020. Out of 124 attempted operations, 3 patients received palliative robotic surgery (2.4%). Of the remaining 121, 14 (11.6%) were converted to open surgery. The robotic procedures included 107 patients: 56 underwent RAPD, 31 underwent RDP (28 with and 3 without splenectomy), 16 underwent REN, and 4 underwent RAR (2 central and 2 total pancreatectomies). RESULTS The preoperative baseline characteristics and comorbidities were consistent with those of a Western population. The overall incidence of complications was 43.9%, with the more severe (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) occurring after RAPD (19.6%). We collected 7 (13.1%) postoperative pancreatic fistulae after RAPD, 5 (16.1%) after RADP, and 2 (12.5%) after REN. The two central pancreatectomies developed a biochemical leak without sequelae. Three patients (2.8%) died within 90 days after surgery. Early refeeding was achieved in those who did not experience severe complications, while the median hospital stay was 8 days. The median number of harvested lymph nodes was 22, with non-R1 microscopic residual tumors found. CONCLUSIONS Robotic pancreatic surgery is a safe and oncologically adequate technique to manage benign and malignant diseases arising from the head, body, and tail of the pancreas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lapo Bencini
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy -
| | - Irene Urciuoli
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Martina Trafeli
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Claudia Paolini
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Angela Tribuzi
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Sabrina Pacciani
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Department of Oncology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Magistri P, Boggi U, Esposito A, Carrano FM, Pesi B, Ballarin R, De Pastena M, Menonna F, Moraldi L, Melis M, Coratti A, Newman E, Napoli N, Ramera M, Di Benedetto F. Robotic vs open distal pancreatectomy: A multi-institutional matched comparison analysis. JOURNAL OF HEPATO-BILIARY-PANCREATIC SCIENCES 2020; 28:1098-1106. [PMID: 33314791 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2020] [Revised: 11/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic surgery is still a challenge even in high-volume centers. Clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (CR-POPF) represents the greatest contributor to major morbidity and mortality, especially following pancreatic distal resection. In this study, we compared robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP) to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) in terms of CR-POPF development and analyzed oncologic efficacy of RDP in the subgroup of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). METHODS We collected data from five high-volume centers for pancreatic surgery and performed a matched comparison analysis to compare short and long-term outcomes after ODP or RDP. Patients were matched with a 2:1 ratio according to age, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score, body mass index (BMI), final pathology, and TNM (Tumour, Node, Metastasis) staging system VIII ed. RESULTS Two hundred and forty-six patients who underwent 82 RDPs and 164 ODPs were included. No differences were found in the incidence of CR-POPF. In the PDAC group, median DFS and OS were 10.8 months and 14.8 months in the ODP group and 10.4 months and 15 months in the RDP group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Robotic distal pancreatectomy is a safe surgical strategy for PDAC and incidence of CR-POPF is equivalent between RDP and ODP. RDP should be considered equivalent to ODP in terms of oncological efficacy when performed in high-volume and proficient centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Esposito
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesco Maria Carrano
- Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.,Department of General, Emergency and Transplant Surgery, Ospedale di Circolo e "Fondazione Macchi,", ASST Sette Laghi, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pesi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Roberto Ballarin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo De Pastena
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Francesca Menonna
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Luca Moraldi
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncological and Robotic General Surgery, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elliot Newman
- Department of Surgery, NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - Niccolò Napoli
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Marco Ramera
- Department of General and Pancreatic Surgery, The Pancreas Institute, University of Verona Hospital Trust, Verona, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Benedetto F, Tarantino G, Magistri P. Chasing the right path: tips, tricks and challenges of robotic approach to posterior segments. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:512-514. [PMID: 31673542 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.04.07] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantino
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kabir T, Tan ZZX, Syn N, Chung AYF, Ooi LLPJ, Goh BKP. Minimally-invasive versus open enucleation for pancreatic tumours: A propensity-score adjusted analysis. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019; 23:258-264. [PMID: 31501815 PMCID: PMC6728251 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.3.258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims This study aims to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of minimally-invasive enucleation (MIEn) of the pancreas versus open enucleation (OEn). Methods This is a retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent pancreatic enucleation at a single institution. Results Seven patients underwent MIEn, of which 3 were robotic and 4 were laparoscopic. After propensity-adjusted analysis, the only significant difference was a reduced rate of readmissions within 30 days in the MIEn group versus the OEn group [0 vs 4 (30.8%), p=0.0464]. There were no conversions to open in the MIEn group, and median operation time was similar in both groups. There was no difference in median EBL in both groups, and none of the patients in our series required blood transfusions. The overall morbidity rate was 45.0% and the major complication (Clavien-Dindo>2) rate was 15%; which was similar between both groups. Seven (35%) patients had a Grade B/C POPF, and there was no significant difference between the two groups for this. The MIEn group had a shorter median length of stay compared to OEn [5 days (range, 3–24) vs 8.5 days (range, 5–42)] this was not significant on propensity-adjusted analysis (p=0.3195). There was no post-operative 90-day/in-hospital mortality in all 20 patients. Conclusions Our experience demonstrates that MIEn was associated with similar perioperative outcomes and fewer readmissions compared to OEn.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tousif Kabir
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Zoe Z X Tan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Nicholas Syn
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, Singapore
| | - Alexander Y F Chung
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - London L P J Ooi
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Open and minimally invasive pancreatic neoplasms enucleation: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 2019; 33:3192-3199. [PMID: 31363894 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-019-06967-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2019] [Accepted: 07/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pancreatic enucleation (pEN) as parenchyma-sparing procedure for small pancreatic neoplasms is quickly becoming the most common surgical option in such setting. Nowadays, pEN is frequently carried out through a minimally invasive approach either laparoscopic or robotic. Its impact on overall perioperative complications and pancreatic fistula (POPF) is still under evaluation. The scope of our systematic review is to assess pEN's perioperative outcomes and to evaluate the effect of the minimally invasive techniques over POPF and other surgical complications. METHODS We performed a systematic literature search (time-frame January 1999-September 2018), considering exclusively those studies which included at least 5 cases of either open or minimally invasive pEN. Data regarding postoperative outcome and POPF were extracted and analyzed. We defined postoperative morbidities by the Clavien-Dindo classification while POPF according to the International Study Group of Pancreatic Fistula (ISGPF) definition. RESULTS Sixty-three studies met the criteria selected, accounting for a study population of 2485 patients. 27.7% had a minimally invasive pEN. The overall postoperative morbidity rate was 46.1% with 11.9% rated as severe (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3). Mortality rate was 0.69%. The minimally invasive approach to pEN led to a statistically significant reduction of both the overall POPF rate (28.7% vs. 45.9%, p < 0.001), and clinically significant B-C POPF (p < 0.027). The postoperative overall morbidity rate was clearly in favor of the minimally invasive approach (27.6% vs. 55.2%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Our review confirms that pEN is a safe and feasible technique for the treatment of small benign or low-grade pancreatic neoplasms and it can be implemented with an acceptable morbidity rate along with low mortality. The minimally invasive approach is gaining widespread acceptance due to its supposed non-inferiority compared with the traditional open approach. In our review, it showed to be even better in terms of POPF incidence rate and short-term postoperative outcome. Still, such data need to be corroborated by randomized clinical trials.
Collapse
|
12
|
Magistri P, Pecchi A, Franceschini E, Pesi B, Guadagni S, Catellani B, Assirati G, Guidetti C, Guerrini GP, Tarantino G, Ballarin R, Codeluppi M, Morelli L, Coratti A, Di Benedetto F. Not just minor resections: robotic approach for cystic echinococcosis of the liver. Infection 2019; 47:973-979. [PMID: 31236898 DOI: 10.1007/s15010-019-01333-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 06/06/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Human echinococcosis is among the 17 neglected tropical diseases recognized by the World Health Organization. It is responsible for over $3 billion of health costs every year being endemic in large areas worldwide, and liver is affected in 70% of the cases. Surgery associated to medical treatment is the gold standard and robotic approach may be a valuable tool to achieve safe, parenchyma sparing resections. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed the outcomes of patients that underwent robotic radical surgical treatment for hydatid liver disease, from prospectively maintained databases of three Italian centers. RESULTS 15 patients were included in this study, median age 51 years (24-76). 1 right hepatectomy, 2 left lateral sectionectomies, 5 segmentectomies (including 1 caudatectomy), 3 wedge resections and 5 cyst-pericystectomies were performed. Median estimated blood loss was of 100 ml (50-550 ml), and median operative time including docking was 210 min (95-590 min), with no need for conversion to open. Median hospital stay was 4 days, with only one readmission for fever. Only one patient experienced recurrence in a different liver segment. CONCLUSIONS In our experience, robotic approach for cystic echinococcosis of the liver proved to be a safe and effective strategy also in the so-called "difficult segments", with short post-operative stay and quick return to daily activities, along with the absence of surgical site recurrences. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest report of robotic approach to hydatid liver disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Annarita Pecchi
- Department of Radiology, "Policlinico" University Hospital of Modena, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Erica Franceschini
- Department of Infectious Diseases, "Policlinico" University Hospital of Modena, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Benedetta Pesi
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Careggi, 50139, Florence, FI, Italy
| | - Simone Guadagni
- Department of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Cristiano Guidetti
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantino
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Roberto Ballarin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Mauro Codeluppi
- Department of Infectious Diseases, "Policlinico" University Hospital of Modena, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Luca Morelli
- Department of Translational and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, 56124, Pisa, Italy
| | - Andrea Coratti
- Division of Oncologic Surgery and Robotics, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Careggi, 50139, Florence, FI, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Via del Pozzo 71, 41124, Modena, MO, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Di Benedetto F, Ballarin R, Magistri P. Robotic distal pancreatectomy: can results overcome cost-effectiveness prejudices? Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:304-306. [PMID: 31245421 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.01.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Roberto Ballarin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Magistri P, Tarantino G, Assirati G, Olivieri T, Catellani B, Guerrini GP, Ballarin R, Di Benedetto F. Robotic liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review. Int J Med Robot 2019; 15:e2004. [PMID: 31039281 DOI: 10.1002/rcs.2004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Revised: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a leading cause of death in patients with cirrhosis. This review attempts to clarify the role of robotic surgery for HCC in terms of oncologic outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic literature search was performed according to the PRISMA statement including papers comparing open, robotic, and laparoscopic approach for liver surgery. If more than one study was reported by the same institute, only the most recent or the highest quality study was included. RESULTS The literature search yielded 302 articles; titles and abstracts were reviewed for inclusion. Ten papers were finally included in this review for a total of 307 patients who underwent robotic resection for HCC. CONCLUSIONS Robotic liver resection for HCC is effective in terms of oncological results as compared with open and laparoscopic approach when performed in experienced centers and is accurate in terms of R0 rates and disease-free surgical margin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Magistri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Tarantino
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Giacomo Assirati
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Tiziana Olivieri
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Barbara Catellani
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Gian Piero Guerrini
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Roberto Ballarin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, University of Modena and Reggio-Emilia, Modena, MO, Italy
| |
Collapse
|