1
|
Fan CY, Lin CW, Sung CW, Huang EPC. Therapeutic potential of physical stabilization in VATS pain control: a randomized controlled trial. Updates Surg 2024:10.1007/s13304-024-01999-w. [PMID: 39277837 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-024-01999-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/17/2024]
Abstract
Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) has been widely used for low invasiveness and shorter recovery time. However, patients receiving VATS still experienced moderate-to-severe pain even under both regional and systemic analgesia. Little is known on the effect of non-pharmaceutical method with physical stabilization for post-VATS pain control. The study aims to investigate the feasibility of physical stabilization as a surrogate method for pain control. The single-blinded, randomized-controlled trial recruited the patients into physical stabilization group and standard care group after VATS. The patients in the intervention group tied a thoracic belt for all day, while the control group did not. Both groups had intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IVPCA) and on-demand oral analgesics. The primary outcome was the visual analogue scale for pain at the 6th, 24th and 48th hour post-VATS and at the hospital discharge. There were 18 patients assigned to the interventional group and 18 patients assigned to the control group. Four patients in the control group were dropped out from the study. Physical stabilization was found to enhance the analgesic effect post-operative 24-48 h compared to standard care (Difference of VAS: 1.11 ± 0.68 v.s. 0.5 ± 0.86, p = 0.031). It had no effect on the dose of IVPCA or the use of oral analgesic agents. No complications direct to the thoracic belt or adverse outcome from the surgery were found in the study. Physical stabilization with thoracic belt to patients receiving VATS benefits to pain control, especially between the 24th and 48th hour post-VATS. Clinical Trial Registry number: NCT04735614.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cheng-Yi Fan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wei Lin
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Wei Sung
- Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Edward Pei-Chuan Huang
- Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Hsin-Chu Branch, Hsinchu, 300, Taiwan.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
- Department of Emergency Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ortiz PR, Lorenz E, Meyer F, Croner R, Lünse S, Hunger R, Mantke R, Benz-Weisser A, Zarras K, Huenerbein M, Paasch C. The effect of an abdominal binder on postoperative outcome after open incisional hernia repair in sublay technique: a multicenter, randomized pilot trial (ABIHR-II). Hernia 2023; 27:1263-1271. [PMID: 37466732 PMCID: PMC10533646 DOI: 10.1007/s10029-023-02838-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/05/2023] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Although the evidence is minimal, an abdominal binder is commonly prescribed after open incisional hernia repair (IHR) to reduce pain. This study aimed to investigate this common postoperative treatment. METHODS The ABIHR-II trial was a national prospective, randomized, multicenter non-AMG/MPG pilot study with two groups of patients (wearing an abdominal binder (AB) for 2 weeks during daytime vs. not wearing an AB following open IHR with the sublay technique). Patient enrollment took place from July 2020 to February 2022. The primary endpoint was pain at rest on the 14th postoperative day (POD) using the visual analog scale (VAS). The use of analgesics was not systematically recorded. Mixed-effects linear regression models were used. RESULTS A total of 51 individuals were recruited (25 women, 26 men; mean age 61.4 years; mean body mass index 30.65 kg/m2). The per-protocol analysis included 40 cases (AB group, n = 21; No-AB group, n = 19). Neither group showed a significant difference in terms of pain at rest, limited mobility, general well-being, and seroma formation and rate. Patients among the AB group had a significantly lower rate of surgical site infection (SSI) on the 14th POD (AB group 4.8% (n = 1) vs. No-AB group 27.8% (n = 5), p = 0.004). CONCLUSION Wearing an AB did not have an impact on pain and seroma formation rate but it may reduce the rate of postoperative SSI within the first 14 days after surgery. Further trials are mandatory to confirm these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P. R. Ortiz
- Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of General, Abdominal and Cancer Surgery, Helios Klinikum Berlin-Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - E. Lorenz
- Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - F. Meyer
- Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - R. Croner
- Department of General, Abdominal, Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Otto-Von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S. Lünse
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - R. Hunger
- Faculty of Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - R. Mantke
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
- Faculty of Medicine, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
- Faculty of Health Sciences Brandenburg, Brandenburg Medical School Theodor Fontane, Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| | - A. Benz-Weisser
- Department of General, Abdominal Vascular and Transplant Surgery, Westpfalz-Klinikum GmbH, Kaiserslautern, Germany
| | - K. Zarras
- Department of Abdominal Minimally Invasive and Cancer Surgery, Marien Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | - M. Huenerbein
- Charité Universitätsmedizin-Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Surgery, Oberhavel Clinic Oranienburg, Oranienburg, Germany
| | - C. Paasch
- Department of General and Abdominal Surgery, Clinic for General and Abdominal Surgery, University Hospital Brandenburg an der Havel, Hochstrasse 29, 14770 Brandenburg an der Havel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hootsmans N, Parmiter S, Connors K, Badve SB, Snyder E, Turcotte JJ, Jayaraman SS, Zahiri HR. Outcomes of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program to limit perioperative opioid use in outpatient minimally invasive GI and hernia surgeries. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:7192-7198. [PMID: 37353653 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10217-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/12/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perioperative pain management is important for patient satisfaction while returning to homeostasis in the safest way possible. Studies show that patients don't require as much opioids as once thought. The benefits of ERAS pathways extend beyond enhancement of patients' perioperative experience, and include reducing opioid prescriptions in the face of the ongoing nationwide opioid crisis and evidence of prescription opioids as a contributor. METHODS We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing same day minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures for GI and hernia disease using a minimal-opioid ERAS protocol at two community hospitals between January 2020 and May 2022. We included elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) for acute appendicitis without perforation, and minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) inguinal and ventral hernia repair or abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR). Primary outcome was postoperative opioid use. RESULTS A total of 509 patients were included, undergoing procedures of MIS hernia repair (52.5%), LC (43.6%), and LA (7.9%). Only 9.4% of patients received opioid prescriptions at discharge, with no difference between groups. Among the patients receiving a prescription at discharge, there was a significant difference in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) prescribed (25.0 ± 0.0 in the LA group, 65.0 ± 41.4 in the LC group, 100.6 ± 46.2 in the MIS hernia/AWR group; P = 0.015). Nine percent of patients called with pain management concerns postoperatively. ASA score ≥ 3 was associated with increased odds for postoperative opioid prescription (OR 2.084; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrate that an opioid-sparing ERAS program effectively manages pain for patients undergoing multiple outpatient MIS GI/hernia procedures, and suggests generalizability across a diverse range of operations. Therefore, the use of ERAS may safely and effectively expand beyond inpatient MIS and open surgeries that target reduced length of stay to also minimize opioids for outpatient procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Norbert Hootsmans
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA.
| | - Sara Parmiter
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Kevin Connors
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Shivani B Badve
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Elise Snyder
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | - Justin J Turcotte
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
| | | | - H Reza Zahiri
- Luminis Health Anne Arundel Medical Center, 2001 Medical Pkwy, Annapolis, MD, USA
- Luminis Health Doctors Community Medical Center, Lanham, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ossola P, Coletta D, Mascioli F. Abdominal Binder After Surgery: A Letter to Editor. Surg Innov 2023; 30:543. [PMID: 36592454 DOI: 10.1177/15533506221149246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Paolo Ossola
- Department of Surgery, Presidio Sanitario Gradenigo, Italy
- Department of Surgery P. Valdoni, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | - Diego Coletta
- Department of Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Italy
- Department of Surgical Science, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Deerenberg EB, Henriksen NA, Antoniou GA, Antoniou SA, Bramer WM, Fischer JP, Fortelny RH, Gök H, Harris HW, Hope W, Horne CM, Jensen TK, Köckerling F, Kretschmer A, López-Cano M, Malcher F, Shao JM, Slieker JC, de Smet GHJ, Stabilini C, Torkington J, Muysoms FE. Updated guideline for closure of abdominal wall incisions from the European and American Hernia Societies. Br J Surg 2022; 109:1239-1250. [PMID: 36026550 PMCID: PMC10364727 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znac302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 37.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2022] [Revised: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Incisional hernia is a frequent complication of abdominal wall incision. Surgical technique is an important risk factor for the development of incisional hernia. The aim of these updated guidelines was to provide recommendations to decrease the incidence of incisional hernia. METHODS A systematic literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was performed on 22 January 2022. The Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network instrument was used to evaluate systematic reviews and meta-analyses, RCTs, and cohort studies. The GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) was used to appraise the certainty of the evidence. The guidelines group consisted of surgical specialists, a biomedical information specialist, certified guideline methodologist, and patient representative. RESULTS Thirty-nine papers were included covering seven key questions, and weak recommendations were made for all of these. Laparoscopic surgery and non-midline incisions are suggested to be preferred when safe and feasible. In laparoscopic surgery, suturing the fascial defect of trocar sites of 10 mm and larger is advised, especially after single-incision laparoscopic surgery and at the umbilicus. For closure of an elective midline laparotomy, a continuous small-bites suturing technique with a slowly absorbable suture is suggested. Prophylactic mesh augmentation after elective midline laparotomy can be considered to reduce the risk of incisional hernia; a permanent synthetic mesh in either the onlay or retromuscular position is advised. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines may help surgeons in selecting the optimal approach and location of abdominal wall incisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva B Deerenberg
- Department of Surgery, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Nadia A Henriksen
- Department of Hepatic and Digestive diseases, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - George A Antoniou
- Department of Vascular Surgery, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Stavros A Antoniou
- Mediterranean Hospital of Cyprus, Limassol, Cyprus.,Medical School, European University Cyprus, Nicosia, Cyprus
| | - Wichor M Bramer
- Medical Library, Erasmus MC, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John P Fischer
- Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Health System, Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Rene H Fortelny
- Certified Hernia Center, Wilhelminenspital, Veinna, Austria.,Paracelsus Medical, University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Hakan Gök
- Hernia Istanbul®, Hernia Surgery Centre, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Hobart W Harris
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - William Hope
- Department of Surgery, Novant/New Hanover Regional Medical Center, Wilmington, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charlotte M Horne
- Department of Surgery, Penn State Health Department, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Thomas K Jensen
- Department of Hepatic and Digestive diseases, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ferdinand Köckerling
- Hernia Center, Vivantes Humboldt-Hospital, Academic Teaching Hospital of Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alexander Kretschmer
- Klinikum der Ludwig-Maximillians-Universität München, Munchen, Germany.,Janssen Oncology, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Manuel López-Cano
- Abdominal Wall Surgery Unit, Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Unviversitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Flavio Malcher
- Department of Surgery, NYU Langone Health/NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jenny M Shao
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Gijs H J de Smet
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cesare Stabilini
- Department of Surgery, Policlinico San Martino IRCCS and Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Jared Torkington
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - Filip E Muysoms
- Department of Surgery, Maria Middelares Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hoskins C, Dempsey A, Brou L. A Mixed-Methods Study of the Effect of Abdominal Binders on Opioid Use and Postoperative Pain After Cesarean Birth. Nurs Womens Health 2022; 26:30-37. [PMID: 35032465 DOI: 10.1016/j.nwh.2021.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/01/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare levels of postoperative oxycodone use and incisional pain between two randomized groups-an intervention and a control. DESIGN Mixed-methods design; quantitative data achieved via a randomized controlled trial, with qualitative data collected on binder use. The primary variable was oxycodone (in milligrams) required during the first 48 hours after birth, and the secondary variable was incisional pain levels measured on Postoperative Days 1 and 2. SETTING Acute-care community hospital in Wheat Ridge, Colorado, and an acute care urban hospital in Denver, Colorado. PARTICIPANTS A total of 220 individuals in the postpartum period after having cesarean birth. INTERVENTIONS/MEASUREMENTS Participants were randomized to the intervention group (binder) or the control group (no binder). Data were collected on opioid usage for the first 48 hours. Participants in both groups were asked to rate their incisional pain on Postoperative Day 1 (24 hours after birth) and Postoperative Day 2 (48 hours after birth). Participants in the binder group were also asked to provide feedback on their experience wearing the binder. RESULTS A total of 196 participants completed the study. The overall amount of oxycodone taken by individuals in the binder group was lower than that in the control group, but the difference was not statistically significant (p = .10). Pain scores in the binder group were significantly lower on Day 2 compared with the control group (p = .002). The majority of individuals in the binder group provided positive feedback about their experience wearing the binder. CONCLUSION Individuals routinely receive medications to assist with pain management postoperatively. Because of growing concerns related to the nation's opioid addiction crisis, there is interest in using multimodal treatments to achieve adequate pain control for individuals postoperatively. Abdominal binders are a low-cost intervention to assist with pain management and, given the results of this study, seem like a reasonable option to consider.
Collapse
|
7
|
Schaaf S, Schwab R, Güsgen C, Vilz TO, Willms A. Recommendations on Postoperative Activities After Abdominal Operations and Incisional Hernia Repair-A National and International Survey. Front Surg 2021; 8:713138. [PMID: 34660675 PMCID: PMC8511488 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.713138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/21/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: There is no conclusive data on postoperative recommendations after abdominal and hernia surgery, and there is significant variation in the literature on that question. Thus, this study evaluates the status quo of recommendations of postoperative activity restriction after abdominal surgery. Materials and Methods: A national (German) and international survey of general surgeons on postoperative recommendations after abdominal and hernia surgery was pooled and analyzed. Results: A total of 74.6% recommended postoperative reduced activity for 2 weeks or less after laparoscopy. For midline laparotomy, 48.8% considered a reduced activity of 4 weeks or less to be sufficient. A majority from the national survey recommended more than 4 weeks instead (60.2%), whereas only 31.5% from the international survey did so (p = 0.000). In the pooled analysis, 258 of 450 (57.3%) rated 4 weeks or less suitable. However, the recommendations differed significantly between the surveys (4 weeks or less: a national survey, 47.1% vs. international survey, 64.6%; p = 0.000). Conclusion: There was substantial variation in the given recommendations. However, we found no evidence against immediate mobilization, reduced physical activity, and lifting for up to 2 weeks after laparoscopic surgery and for up to 4 weeks after open abdominal surgery and open incisional/ventral hernia repair in uncomplicated and standard cases. There might be individual and socioeconomic benefits to allow patients to return to their whole personal level of activity and work without putting them at risk of complications. Due to lack of evidence, both retrospective and prospective, controlled studies are in need to develop reliable recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Schaaf
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Robert Schwab
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Christoph Güsgen
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| | - Tim O. Vilz
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vasular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Arnulf Willms
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, German Armed Forces Central Hospital Koblenz, Koblenz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|