Evaluation of Different Pain-Control Procedures for Post-cardiac Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Efficacy of perioperative pain management in paediatric cardiac surgery: a protocol for a network meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Congenital heart disease is a common birth defect, but advancements in diagnosis and treatment have improved survival rates. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes have emerged in paediatric cardiac surgery. Multimodal pain management, as a vital part of ERAS programmes, has been found to be effective in reducing pain and improving outcomes in cardiac surgery patients. Traditional methods of pain control using high-dose opioids can lead to complications, so nonopioid analgesics and regional anaesthesia techniques are being used to reduce the consumption. However, there is a significant variability in pain management practices in paediatric cardiac surgery. A network meta-analysis (NMA) is needed to comprehensively compare the effects of different analgesic interventions in this population.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A comprehensive electronic literature database search will be performed using electronic databases, mainly including PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. All randomised controlled trials associated with perioperative pain management for paediatric cardiac surgery will be included. The primary outcome will be visual analogue score or numeric rating scale of pain and total opioid consumption (or equivalent) 24 hours after postoperative tracheal extubation. The Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool will be employed to assess the quality of included articles. A random-effects pairwise meta-analysis will be performed to report the head-to-head comparison. Following the assessment of individual articles, an NMA will be conducted using a Bayesian framework with random-effects' models.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethics approval is not necessary because this study will be based on publications. The results of this study will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42023477520.

Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Traditional multimodal analgesic strategies have several contraindications in cardiac surgery patients, forcing clinicians to use alternative options. Superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks, anesthetizing the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves, are being explored as a straightforward method to treat pain after sternotomy. We sought to evaluate the literature on the effects of superficial parasternal blocks on pain control after cardiac surgery.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and Web of Science databases for RCTs evaluating superficial parasternal intercostal plane blocks in adult patients undergoing cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy published from inception to 11 March 2022. The prespecified primary outcome was opioid consumption at 12 hr. The risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool, and the quality of evidence was evaluated using the grading of recommendations, assessments, development, and evaluations. Outcomes were analyzed with a random-effects model. All subgroups were prespecified.

RESULTS

We reviewed 1,275 citations. Eleven RCTs, comprising 756 patients, fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Only one study reported the prespecified primary outcome, precluding the possibility of meta-analysis. This study reported a reduction in opioid consumption (-11.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% confidence interval [CI], -8.2 to -14.1) There was a reduction in opioid consumption at 24 hr (-7.2 mg iv morphine equivalents; 95% CI,  -5.6 to -8.7; five trials; 436 participants; moderate certainty evidence). All five studies measuring complications reported that none were detected, which included a sample of 196 blocks.

CONCLUSION

The literature suggests a potential benefit of using superficial parasternal blocks to improve acute postoperative pain control after cardiac surgery via midline sternotomy. Future studies specifying dosing regimens and adjuncts are required.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42022306914); first submitted 22 March 2022.

Effects of ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia in cardiac surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The objective of this systematic review and network meta-analysis was to compare the effects of single-shot ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia techniques on postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing open cardiac surgery.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis involved cardiac surgical patients (age > 18 y) requiring median sternotomy. We searched PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Scopus, and Web of Science. The effects of the single-shot ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia technique were compared with those of placebo and no intervention. We conducted a risk assessment of bias for eligible studies and assessed the overall quality of evidence for each outcome.

RESULTS

The primary outcome was opioid consumption during the first 24 h after surgery. The secondary outcomes were pain after extubation at 12 and 24 h, postoperative nausea and vomiting, extubation time, intensive care unit discharge time, and length of hospital stay. Fifteen studies with 849 patients were included. The regional anesthesia techniques included pecto-intercostal fascial block, transversus thoracis muscle plane block, erector spinae plane (ESP) block, and pectoralis nerve block I. All the regional anesthesia techniques included significantly reduced postoperative opioid consumption at 24 h, expressed as morphine milligram equivalents (MME). The ESP block was the most effective treatment (-22.93 MME [-34.29;-11.56]).

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, we concluded that fascial plane blocks were better than placebo when evaluating 24 h MMEs. However, it is still challenging to determine which is better, given the paucity of studies available in the literature. More randomized controlled trials are required to determine which regional anesthesia technique is better.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO; CRD42022315497.

Parasternal Intercostal Nerve Blocks in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery: Evidence Update and Technical Considerations

In the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery era, parasternal intercostal nerve block has been proposed to improve pain control and reduce opioid use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. However current literature has reported conflicting evidence about the effect of this multimodal pain management, as procedural variations might pose a significant bias on outcomes evaluation. In this setting, the infiltration of the parasternal plane into 2 intercostal spaces, second and fifth, with a local anesthetic spread under or above the costal plane with ultrasound guidance, seem to be standardized in theory, but significant differences might be observed in clinical practice. This narrative review summarizes and defines the optimal techniques for parasternal plane blocks in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, considering both pectointercostal fascial block and transversus thoracic plane block. A total of 10 randomized trials have been published, in adjunct to observational studies, which are heterogeneous in terms of techniques, methods, and outcomes. Parasternal block has been shown to reduce perioperative opioid consumption and provide a more favorable analgesic profile, with reduced postoperative opioid-related side effects. A trend toward reduced intensive care unit stay or duration of mechanical ventilation should be confirmed by adequately powered randomized trials or registry studies. Differences in operative technique might impact outcomes and, therefore, standardization of the procedure plays a pivotal role before reporting specific outcomes. Parasternal plane blocks might significantly improve outcomes of cardiac surgery with full median sternotomy, and should be introduced comprehensively in Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols.