Learning Laparoscopic Surgery Skills With a 4K Ultra-High Definition 2D vs a Three-Dimensional HD Laparoscopic System: Results From a Prospective Randomized Trial

3D vs. 2D-4 K: Performance and self-perception of laparoscopic novices in a randomized prospective teaching intervention using standard tasks and box trainers

OBJECTIVE

The use of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopy in surgical practice and training has been an area of research and discussion. Studies have suggested that 3D vision can improve speed and precision compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) displays, while other authors found no benefits on the learning curves of laparoscopic novices. Modern two-dimensional laparoscopy with a resolution of 3840 × 2160 pixels (2D-4 K) seems to improve laparoscopic view and helps learners orient without stereopsis. However, evidence comparing these systems for laparoscopic training is limited. Therefore, the impact of viewing mode (2D-4 K vs. 3D) on learning and task proficiency remains unclear.

DESIGN

We performed a two-hour teaching intervention on basic laparoscopic skills for novices. In this parallel group randomized study, we randomly assigned learners to 2D-4 K or 3D teaching and performed tasks of increasing difficulty and complexity using standard laparoscopy box trainers. Before the last and most challenging task, learners had to crossover to the other laparoscopy setup. Our hypothesis was that learners would be faster and more precise when using a 3D setup. The primary endpoint was task proficiency measured by speed and failure rate. Secondary outcomes were performance using the viewing mode of the other group without familiarization, self-perception, and career aspirations before and after the teaching intervention, expressed on a Likert scale.

SETTING

The study was performed by the Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery at the German Armed Forces Hospital Ulm, which is an academic teaching hospital of the University of Ulm.

PARTICIPANTS

Thirty-eight laparoscopic novices, including medical students and junior residents, participated voluntarily in this teaching intervention. Group allocation was performed via the virtual coin flip method. Apparently, participants and tutors were not blinded to group assignment. No formal approval by the ethics committee was needed for this noninvasive study in compliance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki as discussed with the ethics committee of the University of Ulm.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight laparoscopy novices were randomized in the study. The 3D group (n = 19) was significantly faster than the 2D-4 K group (n = 19) (p = .008) in a standard box trainer model, with 134.45 ± 41.45 s vs. 174.99 ± 54.03 s for task 1 and 195.97 ± 49.78 s vs. 276.56 ± 139.20 s for task 2, and the effect was consistent throughout the learning curve. The failure rate was not significantly affected by the viewing mode. After crossover to the other laparoscopy system, precision and time were not significantly different between the groups. Learners rated the difficulty of laparoscopy lower on a Likert scale after having two hours of basic laparoscopy training. The study was funded by the hospital's teaching budget.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic novices can benefit from a 3D laparoscopy training setup. Exclusive 3D training prior to a complex task on a 2D-4 K setup does not negatively affect the learner's performance.

Transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from three-dimensional high-definition and ultra-high definition endovision system to two-dimensional high-definition endovision system: an ex-vivo randomized study

Three-dimensional high-definition (3D HD) and ultra-high-definition (4 K HD) endovision systems are rapidly adopted in academic setting. However, transferability of laparoscopic skills acquired from these systems to two-dimensional high-definition (2D HD) endovision system is not known. Forty stereo-enabled surgical residents were randomized into two groups. They performed three standardized surgical tasks, Task 1(Peg transfer), Task 2(Precision touch on uneven surface) and Task 3(Surgical knotting on rubber tube) for 15 repetitions using either 3D HD or 4 K HD. Both groups then performed the same tasks using 2D HD for 5 repetitions. Their performances were evaluated for execution time (speed) and error scores (safety). The residents in 3D HD group performed all three tasks significantly faster than residents in 4 K HD group with comparable error scores. The time taken to complete the tasks on 2D HD were comparable between residents trained in 3D HD and 4 K HD in two out of three tasks (p = 0.027, P = 0.115, p = 0.368 in task 1, 2 and 3 respectively). However, in two out of three tasks, residents trained on 3D HD committed significantly more errors than residents trained on 4 K HD (p < 0.0001, p < 0.001 in task 1 and task 2 respectively). Skill acquired on 4 K HD seems transferable to 2D HD environment. Participants trained in 3D HD made more errors while performing the tasks in 2D HD. It may be prudent to offer additional training on 2D HD to residents trained on 3D HD for safer laparoscopic surgical practice.

Feeling of pulsations in artificial arteries with a real time haptic feedback laparoscopic grasper: a validation study

INTRODUCTION

Despite the advancements in technology and organized training for surgeons in laparoscopic surgery, the persistent challenge of not being able to feel the resistance and characteristics of the tissue, including pulsations, remains unmet. A recently developed grasper (Optigrip®) with real time haptic feedback, based on photonic technology, aims to address this issue by restoring the tactile sensation for surgeons. The key question is whether pulsations can be detected and at what minimal size level they become clinical significant.

METHODS

To simulate arterial conditions during laparoscopic procedures, four different silicone tubes were created, representing the most prevalent arteries. These tubes were connected to a validated pressure system, generating a natural pulse ranging between 80 and 120 mm Hg. One control tube without pressure was added. The surgeons had to grasp these tubes blindly with the conventional grasper or the haptic feedback grasper in a randomized order. They then indicated whether they felt the pressure or not and the percentage of correct answers was calculated.

RESULTS

The haptic grasper successfully detected 96% of all pulsations, while the conventional grasper could only detect 6%. When considering the size of the arteries, the Optigrip® identified pulsations in 100% the 4 and 5 mm arteries and 92% of the smallest arteries. The conventional grasper was only able to feel the smallest arteries in 8%. These differences were highly significant (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the newly developed haptic feedback grasper enables detection of arterial pulsations during laparoscopy, filling an important absence in tactile perception within laparoscopic surgery.

Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Laparoscopic surgery underwent great improvements during the last few years. This review aims to compare the performance of Trainee Surgeons using 2D versus 3D/4 K laparoscopy. A systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane's Library and Scopus. The following words and key phrases have been searched: "Two-dimensional vision", "Three-dimensional vision", "2D and 3D laparoscopy", "Trainee surgeons". This systematic review was reported according to the PRISMA statement 2020. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42022328045. Twenty-two randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two observational studies were included in the systematic review. Two trials were carried out in a clinical setting, and twenty-two trials were performed in a simulated setting. In studies involving the use of a box trainer, the number of errors in the 2D laparoscopic group was significantly higher than in the 3D laparoscopic group during the performance of FLS skill tasks: peg transfer (MD: -0.82; 95% CI - 1.17 to - 0.47; p < 0.00001), cutting (MD: - 1.09; 95% CI - 1.50 to - 0.69 p < 0.00001), suturing (MD: - 0.48; 95% CI - 0.83 to - 0.13 p = 0.007), However, in clinical studies, there was no significant difference in the time taken for laparoscopic total hysterectomy (MD: 8.71; 95% CI - 13.55 to 30.98; p = 0.44) and vaginal cuff closure (MD: 2.00; 95% CI - 0.72 to - 4.72; p = 0.15) between 2D group and 3D group. 3D laparoscopy facilitates learning for novice surgeons and shows improvements in their laparoscopic performance.

A multicenter survey of effects and challenges of an 8K ultra-high-definition endoscopy system compared to existing endoscopy systems for endoscopic surgery

INTRODUCTION

8K ultra-high-definition (UHD) images enabling clearer recognition of anatomical structures could contribute to further development of surgical techniques and advanced applications in endoscopic surgery fields. This study aimed to clarify effects and challenges of endoscopic surgery with 8K UHD endoscopy compared to existing endoscopy systems.

METHODS

In this multicenter, cross-sectional, questionnaire survey, data were collected from surgical participants who newly used and observed 8K UHD endoscopy in patients undergoing surgery from February 2020 to February 2021. Survey items included sense of presence, reality, depth perception, visibility of tissue, eyestrain, and degree of satisfaction for operators and observers, and weight, operability, focus adjustment, physical fatigue, eyestrain, and satisfaction for camera assistants. Participants rated each 8K UHD endoscopic surgery on a one-to-five scale (definitively inferior, relatively inferior, equivalent, relatively superior, definitively superior) compared to the existing endoscopy system of each facility.

RESULTS

Overall, questionnaire responses from 139 participants assessing 8K UHD endoscopic surgery were collected from surgeries performed in 46 patients. Respective ratings of operators and observers included sense of presence: "superior or relatively superior", 97.8% and 91.5%; reality: "superior or relatively superior", 76.1% and 72.3%; and visibility of tissue: "superior or relatively superior", 93.5% and 87.2%. Weight was rated as "inferior or relatively inferior" by 73.9% of camera assistants and focus adjustment as "inferior" by 60.9% of them.

CONCLUSIONS

8K UHD endoscopic surgery enabled identification of surgical anatomies more clearly, provided a sense of presence and reality, and might improve educational effect. Technological development is expected to reduce the burden of camera assistants.

Performance of three-dimensional and ultra-high-definition (4K) technology in laparoscopic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The technology in the field of laparoscopy is rapidly evolving and is primarily focussed on increasing the quality of image and depth perception in the form of 4K and three-dimensional (3D) technology. There has been no conclusion yet regarding the better technology.

Methods

A systematic search was performed independently by two authors across MEDLINE, Google Scholar and Embase using the PRISMA guidelines. All randomised control trials comparing 3D and 4K technologies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted using random-effects statistics for time taken for different tasks across the studies.

Results

The search strategy revealed a total of 1835 articles, out of which nine studies were included. Three studies showed no superiority of 3D over 4K, while the remaining six did. Meta-analysis for the time taken for peg transfer favoured 3D over 4K (overall effect: Z = 2.12; P = 0.03). Forest plots for time taken for suturing (Z = 1.3; P = 0.19) and knot tying (Z = 1.7; P = 0.09) also favoured 3D over 4K; the results however were statistically insignificant. Path length was reported by two studies and was found to be lesser in the 3D group. Two studies measured the workload by NASA/Surg-TLX score, which was lower in the 3D group. Visual side effects were found to be higher in the 3D group.

Conclusion

3D technology is likely to result in a shorter operative time and better efficiency of movement as compared to the 4K technology by the virtue of its better depth perception.

Must Clinics Replace 2D by 3D Environments for an Efficient Training of Laparoscopic Novices? A Critical Analysis of the Learning Curve for Basic Skills

Background and Aims

Published studies repeatedly demonstrate an advantage of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery over two-dimensional (2D) systems but with quite heterogeneous results. This raises the question whether clinics must replace 2D technologies to ensure effective training of future surgeons.

Methods

We recruited 45 students with no experience in laparoscopic surgery and comparable characteristics in terms of vision and frequency of video game usage. The students were randomly allocated to 3D (n = 23) or 2D (n = 22) groups and performed 10 runs of a laparoscopic “peg transfer” task in the Luebeck Toolbox. A repeated-measures ANOVA for operation times and a generalized linear mixed model for error rates were calculated. The main effects of laparoscopic condition and run, as well as the interaction term between the two, were examined.

Results

No statistically significant differences in operation times and error rates were observed between 2D and 3D groups (p = 0.10 and p = 0.72, respectively). The learning curve showed a significant reduction in operation time and error rates (both p's < 0.001). No significant interactions between group and run were detected (operation time: p = 0.342, error rates: p = 0.83). With respect to both endpoints studied, the learning curves reached their plateau at the 7th run.

Conclusion

The result of our study with laparoscopic novices revealed no significant difference between 2D and 3D technology with respect to performance time and the error rate in a simple standardized test. In the future, surgeons may thus still be trained in both techniques.

Learning Pattern of Two-Dimensional, Three-Dimensional, and Ultra-High-Definition Endovision System on Standardized Phantom Tasks: An Ex Vivo Randomized Study

Introduction: Three-dimensional (3D), high-definition (HD), and ultra-high-definition (4K HD) are recent additions over regular HD technology for laparoscopic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate the learning pattern of these systems on standardized phantom tasks. Methodology: Forty-five stereo-enabled resident doctors were randomly assigned into three groups. They performed three validated tasks, precision touch on flat surface, precision touch on uneven surface, surgical knot on rubber tube using either two-dimensional (2D) HD, 3D HD, or 4K HD Endovision systems. Each task was repeated 20 times. Data from four consecutive repetitions were pooled to make five blocks. Split group analysis by comparing the consecutive blocks in execution time and errors were made to see the learning pattern. A significant difference was accepted as continuous learning while no significant difference was accepted as learning stabilization. Result: Operating time was stabilized in two tasks after third block in 2D HD, one task after fourth block in 4K HD. There was continuous learning in all tasks with 3D HD. The 3D HD group was significantly faster than 2D HD and 4K HD in most of the tasks on fifth block. The error scores were similar between the consecutive blocks in 4K HD. It was stabilized after second block in 2D HD group and third block on 3D HD. Conclusion: The 3D HD Endovision system has more potential of faster execution of a task, but need more practice to reach similar safety profile. The 4K HD reached the safety plateau with minimal repetitions.