The Accuracy and Clinical Success of Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

No Difference in Limb Alignment Between Kinematic and Mechanical Alignment Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Individualized alignment techniques have gained major interest in an effort to increase satisfaction among total knee arthroplasty patients. This study aimed to compare postoperative alignment between kinematic alignment (KA) and mechanical alignment (MA) and assess whether KA significantly deviates from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible.

METHODS

There were 234 patients who underwent robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty using an unrestricted KA and a strict MA technique (KA: 145, MA: 89). The lateral distal femoral angle, medial proximal tibia angle, and the resultant arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) were measured. The aHKA < 0 indicated varus alignment, while the aHKA > 0 indicated valgus knee alignment. The primary outcome was the frequency of cases that resulted in an aHKA of ± 4° of neutral (0°), as assessed on full-leg standing radiographs obtained at 6 weeks postoperatively. The secondary outcome was the change in coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type from preoperative to postoperative between the MA and KA groups.

RESULTS

The mean preoperative aHKA was similar between the 2 groups (P = .19). The KA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -1.4 ± 2.4°, while the MA group had a mean postoperative aHKA of -0.5 ± 2.1°. No significant difference in limb alignment was identified between KA and MA cases that resulted in hip-knee-ankle angle of ± 4° being neutral (91.7 versus 96.6%, P = .14). There were 97.2% of cases in the KA group that fell within the ± 5° range. The MA group was associated with a significantly higher rate of coronal plane alignment of the knee classification type change from preoperatively to postoperatively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Kinematic alignment achieved similar postoperative aHKA compared to MA, and thus did not significantly deviate from the principle of aligning the limb as close to neutral alignment as possible. Surgeons should feel comfortable starting to introduce individualized alignment techniques. Without being restricted by boundaries, postoperative alignment will be within 5 degrees of neutral 97% of the time.

Joint Replacement Technology in the Ambulatory Surgery Center: Current and Future Applications

Total joint replacement (TJR) surgery in the ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) has grown significantly over the past several years, along with the ability to improve the value of care. Standardization of high-quality, perioperative care is pivotal to the success of a TJR ASC program. As surgeons are experiencing increasing overhead with decreasing reimbursement, technology integration can provide major advantages. In this article, we will therefore highlight several examples of technologies that are changing the field and improving care in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative settings.

Functional positioning principles for image-based robotic-assisted TKA achieved a higher Forgotten Joint Score at 1 year compared to conventional TKA with restricted kinematic alignment

PURPOSE

Few comparative studies assessed the current concept of individualised alignment for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and their outcomes at mid-term. This study aimed to evaluate the functional outcomes at 1 year of primary TKA performed with a functional positioning technique based on an image-based robotic-assisted system, compared to conventional TKA performed with a restricted kinematic alignment technique.

METHODS

This retrospective comparative study included 100 primary TKAs performed with functional positioning principles using an image-based robotic-assisted system. A control group included 100 primary TKAs with the same posterior-stabilised implant as the robotic group but performed with manual instrumentation and restricted kinematic alignment technique. In the robotic group, the mean age was 69.2 years old ± 7.9; the mean body mass index was 29.7 kg/m2 ± 4.6. The demographic characteristics were similar between both groups. Kujala score, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Knee Society Score (KSS) knee and KSS function were collected 12 months postoperatively. Normally distributed continuous variables were compared using the Student t test. For non-normally distributed continuous variables, the Mann-Whitney test was used.

RESULTS

FJS was significantly higher in the robotic group (76.3 ± 13 vs. 68.6 ± 16.9 in the conventional group; p = 0.026). At a 1-year follow-up, there was no significant difference in the KSS knee and KSS function scores and the Kujala score between both groups. The mean KSS knee score was 90.8 ± 11.4 in the robotic group versus 89.4 ± 9.6 in the conventional group (p = 0.082). The mean KSS function score was 91.4 ± 12.3 versus 91.3 ± 12.6, respectively (p = 0.778).

CONCLUSION

Functional positioning principles using an image-based robotic-assisted system achieved a higher Forgotten Joint Score 1 year after TKA compared to restricted kinematic alignment. Personalised alignment and implant positioning are interesting paths to improve the functional outcomes after TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Intraoperative technology increases operating room times in primary total knee arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Optimization of patient outcomes and identification of factors to improve the surgical workflow are increasingly important. Operating room time is one modifiable factor that leads to greater hospital efficiency as well as improved outcomes such as shorter length of stay and fewer infections and readmissions. The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with operative time disparities in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 7659 consecutive primary TKA cases was conducted. Patient demographic data, discrete operating room (OR) times, use of technology (i.e. robotic-assisted surgery, computer navigation), surgeon experience and the level of training of the first assistant were collected. Multivariate regression analysis was used to determine the effect of hospital characteristics on operative times. Operative times of five minutes or greater were considered to be clinically significant.

RESULTS

While the use of technology (182.64 ± 39.85 vs 158.70 ± 37.45 min; B = 26.09; p < 0.0001) and greater surgeon experience (162.14 ± 39.87 vs 158.69 ± 33.18 min, B = 3.15, p = 0.002) were found to increase OR times, level of training of the first assist (161.65 vs 156.4 min; Β = - 0.264; p = 0.487) did not. Of the discrete OR times examined, incision time and total time under anesthesia were negatively impacted by the use of technology.

CONCLUSION

Use of technology was the only study variable found to significantly increase OR times. With increased operative times and limited evidence that technology improves long-term patient outcomes, surgeons should carefully consider the benefits and cost of technology in TKA.

Is it prime time for robotic-assisted TKAs? A systematic review of current studies

Introduction

Less-than-optimum positioning of femoral and tibial components and improper soft tissue tension, with abnormal loads and reduced range of motion, may cause lower patient satisfaction rates. To reduce surgeon-related variables during TKA, technology-assisted TKA was introduced, including computer navigation and robotic-assisted surgery (RATKA). Although several studies show promising short- and long-term functional and radiological outcomes of RATKA, there are still concerns related to its absolute superiority over conventional TKA.

Methods

This review aims to provide an updated insight into the most recent articles reporting on outcomes (functional, radiological, and complications) of RATKA through a systematic search of major databases. A comprehensive English literature search was performed by both authors through four databases (Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus). The full text of the final eligible studies was evaluated for inclusion, resulting in 13 studies that are included in this review.

Results

There were 2112 knees in the 13 studies, with a follow-up ranging from three months to 13 years; only three were randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and nine directly compared the results of RATKA with CTKA technique. Seven studies reported the operative time ranging from 76.8 to 156 min; six reported a longer operative time with RATKA. Length of hospital stay (LOS) was reported in six studies which ranged from 0.48 to 2.1 days; in four studies the LOS was shorter with RATKA. In seven of the nine studies comparing RATKA with CTKA, no difference in functional outcomes was found. Four out of six studies reported that the overall alignment had mechanical alignment within ±3° of neutral alignment in all RATKA patients with an HKA ranging from -0.3 to 1.8°. Only one study reported better radiological outcomes in the RATKA group. In six comparative studies, no difference was found in the incidence of complications between RATKA and CTKA.

Conclusion

Although robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty is a promising technology that provides better component alignment and superior early functional outcomes, the justification for its widespread adoption needs more robust evidence through well-designed and better long-term studies demonstrating superior, predictable, and durable clinical results compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty techniques.