Concomitant Tricuspid Valve Surgery Is Not Associated With Increased Operative Risk During Robotic Mitral Valve Surgery

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of robotic mitral valve surgery with and without concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent robotic mitral surgery between March 2010 and September 2022 were included. Patients were grouped according to the presence of concomitant tricuspid interventions. The groups were compared for baseline factors, operative parameters, and early postoperative outcomes. Age- and gender-matched groups were also compared for outcomes.

RESULTS

The study included 285 robotic mitral surgery patients. There were 59 patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid interventions. In the concomitant tricuspid surgery group, cardiopulmonary bypass time (150.1 vs 128.4 min, P < 0.001) and cross-clamp time (99.2 vs 82.4 min, P < 0.001) were longer. Prolonged intubation was more frequent in the concomitant tricuspid intervention group (5.2% vs 0.5%, P = 0.029). The groups did not differ in terms of mortality, permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement, or other morbidities. Perioperative outcomes were similar after matched group analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Operative mortality and early adverse outcomes did not increase with the addition of tricuspid intervention in our cohort of robotic mitral surgery patients. The robotic approach for mitral disease and coexisting tricuspid disease may offer safe results without an increased risk of postoperative PPM requirement.

Minimally Invasive Approaches Are Safe for Concomitant Mitral and Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Objective:

The need for concomitant tricuspid surgery during mitral valve surgery is associated with higher operative risk. We hypothesized that concomitant tricuspid surgery through a minimally invasive thoracotomy (MICS) is associated with noninferior risk compared with a sternotomy.

Methods:

All patients undergoing mitral valve surgery at a single institution (2010 to 2020) were evaluated. After excluding endocarditis, emergent operations, and concomitant aortic valve or coronary artery bypass grafting procedures, patients were stratified by MICS versus sternotomy. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the risk-adjusted association between concomitant tricuspid valve procedure and Society of Thoracic Surgeons major morbidity or mortality. An interaction term evaluated the impact of approach on concomitant tricuspid surgery.

Results:

A total of 772 patients underwent mitral valve surgery, including 138 (17.9%) with concomitant tricuspid valve operation. Of the total cohort, 243 patients (31.5%) underwent the MICS approach. Concomitant tricuspid operation was performed in 104 sternotomy patients (19.7%) compared with 34 MICS patients (14.0%, P = 0.056). After risk adjustment, patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid valve surgery via sternotomy had nearly 2 times greater odds of morbidity and mortality relative to those undergoing isolated mitral surgery via sternotomy (adjOR = 1.86, P = 0.049), while patients who underwent concomitant tricuspid surgery via the MICS approach had no increased risk of the composite outcome (adjOR = 0.66, P = 0.543), relative to isolated mitral surgery via MICS approach.

Conclusions:

Concomitant tricuspid surgery at the time of mitral valve surgery carries additional risk in a broad patient population. A minimally invasive approach appears to be safe for selected patients requiring concomitant tricuspid valve surgery.

Transmitral Septal Myectomy and Mitral Valve Surgery via Right Mini-Thoracotomy

Background Transmitral myectomy for symptomatic hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy is possible with existence of substantial mitral valve disease. We present herein our experience of minimally invasive transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve surgery through right anterior mini-thoracotomy in the past 4 years at our institution.

Methods Between March 2017 and October 2020, 14 patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy and mitral valve disease required minimally invasive transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve reconstruction or replacement at our institution. Mean age of patients was 54.2 ± 11.4 and 42.9% (n = 6) were female. Twelve patients (85.1%) were in New York Heart Association class III to IV and 6 patients (42.9%) presented with persistent atrial fibrillation. Clinical data were prospectively entered into our institutional database.

Results Cardiopulmonary bypass time accounted for 140.2 ± 32.6 minutes and the myocardial ischemic time was 78.5 ± 12.4 minutes. Thirty-day mortality and overall mortality were zero. Peak ventricular outflow gradient decreased from 75.2 ± 12.7 to 9.4 ± 2.3 mm Hg (p < 0.0001). Simultaneously, mitral valve reconstruction and replacement were performed in 11 (78.6%) and 3 (21.4%) patients, respectively. No systolic anterior motion was seen in patients with mitral valve repair. No conversion to full sternotomy and/or rethoracotomy was noted. During a mean follow-up period of 24 ± 13 months, no patient required reoperation, no recurrence mitral regurgitation, and left ventricular outflow tract obstruction.

Conclusion Transmitral septal myectomy combined with mitral valve surgery through right anterior mini-thoracotomy can be performed safely with excellent surgical outcomes.

Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery without caval occlusion: Short and midterm results

OBJECTIVE

The use of minimally invasive or transcatheter interventions rather than standard full sternotomy operations to treat tricuspid valve (TV) disease is increasing. The debate however is still open regarding venous drainage management during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and wheatear or not superior and inferior vena cava should be occluded during the opening of the right atrium to avoid air entrance in the venous line. The aim of the present study is to report operative outcomes and midterm follow-up results of minimally invasive TV surgery performed without caval occlusion.

METHODS

A retrospective outcome evaluation from institutional records was performed with prospective data entry. Considered were consecutive patients who underwent right mini-thoracotomy TV surgery isolated or combined with mitral valve surgery during the period from June 2013 to February 2020. A telephone and echocardiographic follow-up was performed.

RESULTS

During the study period, 68 consecutive patients underwent minimally invasive TV surgery without occlusion of cava veins. The mean age was 69 ± 14 years and 48 (70%) were female. All operations were performed safely without air-lock during CPB. A perioperative cerebral stroke occurred in one patient. The survival at a 5- and 8-year follow-up was 100% and 79%, respectively. No severe tricuspid regurgitation was evident at echocardiographic follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that performing tricuspid surgery without caval occlusion is safe. The air was captured by the active vacuum drainage system without causing damage. Midterm follow-up data confirm that a minimally invasive approach does not alter the quality of surgery.