Minimal Access Tricuspid Valve Surgery

Tricuspid valve diseases are a heterogeneous group of pathologies that typically have poor prognoses when treated medically and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality with traditional surgical techniques. Minimal access tricuspid valve surgery may mitigate some of the surgical risks associated with the standard sternotomy approach by limiting pain, reducing blood loss, lowering the risk of wound infections, and shortening hospital stays. In certain patient populations, this may allow for a prompt intervention that could limit the pathologic effects of these diseases. Herein, we review the literature on minimal access tricuspid valve surgery focusing on perioperative planning, technique, and outcomes of minimal access endoscopic and robotic surgery for isolated tricuspid valve disease.

Sternotomy Wound Infiltration With Liposomal Versus Plain Bupivacaine for Postoperative Analgesia After Elective Cardiac Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Poor pain control after cardiac surgery can be associated with postoperative complications, longer recovery, and development of chronic pain. The authors hypothesized that adding liposomal bupivacaine (LB) to plain bupivacaine (PB) will provide better and long-lasting analgesia when used for wound infiltration in median sternotomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, and double-blinded clinical trial.

SETTING

Single institution, tertiary care university hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients who underwent elective cardiac surgery through median sternotomy.

INTERVENTIONS

A single surgeon performed wound infiltration of LB plus PB or PB into the sternotomy wound, chest, and mediastinal tube sites.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients were followed up for 72 hours for pain scores, opioid consumption, and adverse events. Sixty patients completed the study for analysis (LB group [n = 29], PB group [n = 31]). Patient characteristics, procedural variables, and pain scores measured at specific intervals from 4 hours until 72 hours postoperatively did not reveal any significant differences between the groups. Mixed-model regression showed that the trend of mean pain scores at movement in the LB group was significantly (p = 0.01) lower compared with the PB group. Opioid consumption over 72 hours was not significantly different between the 2 groups (oral morphine equivalents; median [interquartile range], 139 [73, 212] mg in LB v 105 [54, 188] mg in PB, p = 0.29). Recovery characteristics and adverse events were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

LB added to PB for sternotomy wound infiltration during elective cardiac surgery did not significantly improve the quality of postoperative analgesia.

Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery

Tricuspid valve disease carries a very unfavorable prognosis when medically treated. Despite that, surgical intervention is still underperformed for tricuspid valve disease due to the reported high morbidity and mortality from a sternotomy approach. This had led to a shift towards maximizing medical therapy for right ventricular failure and, as a result, a more significant delay in surgical referrals with surgical risks when patients are finally referred. Tricuspid valve patients usually have other co-morbidities resulting from their systemic venous congestion and low flow cardiac output. Minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery provides less tissue injury and, as a result, less trauma during surgery. This provides a hope for both patients and treating doctors to be more open for providing this procedure with less complications. Isolated minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery is still not performed as widely as expected. This can be partly due to the adverse outcomes historically labelled to tricuspid valve surgery or by the long journey of learning the surgical team would need to commit to with a minimal access approach. In this article we will review the perioperative pathway, and outcomes of isolated minimally invasive tricuspid valve surgery in the available English literature.

Optimal Management of Patients Treated With Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery in the Era of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery and Fast-Track Protocols: A Narrative Review

OBJECTIVES

Use of minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) is increasing, but to exert its maximum effect on patient outcomes, MICS must be coupled with improved perioperative management, including the Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) and fast-track protocols. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of ERAS and fast track in this context.

DESIGN

NARRATIVE REVIEW: The authors performed a narrative review that included patients treated with MICS and patients treated with the ERAS/fast-track protocols in the MEDLINE/PubMed database. The keywords ERAS and fast-track were combined with the following key words: minimally invasive cardiac surgery OR robotic cardiac surgery OR minimally invasive mitral surgery OR minimally invasive aortic surgery.

RESULTS

Overall, the authors selected six studies in which either the ERAS or fast-track protocol was applied. The reported adherence to ERAS protocols was high, and neither protocol-related complications nor in-hospital mortality occurred. Patients managed based on ERAS had significantly lower postoperative pain scores, fewer rates of blood transfusions, and shorter hospital and intensive care unit stays compared with those who received standard management. All ERAS patients were managed safely, with early extubation. Similarly, fast-track cardiac surgery, with immediate postprocedure extubation and early transfer to the ward, was shown to be safe, with no increased morbidity or mortality.

CONCLUSION

Use of standardized ERAS and fast-track protocols seems to be feasible and safe in the context of MICS, with improved outcomes. Both ERAS and fast track allow for a faster return to full functional status while minimizing perioperative complications.