Total Wrist Arthroplasty Versus Wrist Fusion: Utilization and Complication Rates as Reported by ABOS Part II Candidates

Single-Centre Experience Regarding the Use of Fibular Graft for Reconstruction after Resection of Grade III GCT of Distal Radius

Background: A giant cell tumour (GCT) is a locally invasive benign tumour of bone in young adults. Treatment includes surgical resection as first-line or denosumab pharmacotherapy in inoperable patients. However, surgical resection of distal radius GCT has produced debatable functional outcomes. Here we study the use of fibular grafts for reconstruction of surgically resected GCT of the distal radius. Methods: A total of 11 patients having Grade III GCT of the distal radius were recruited for a retrospective single-centred study. Five underwent arthrodesis with fibular shaft graft and six received arthroplasty with the proximal fibula. Functional outcomes at 6 weeks, 6 and 12 months were measured by Mayo wrist score (MWS) (>51% = good) and Revised Musculoskeletal tumor society (MSTS) score (>15 = good). Results: At 6 weeks, mean MSTS score and MWS were 23.64 and 58.64% respectively, and the length of the fibular graft was a predictor for both MSTS score (p = 0.014) and MWS (p = 0.006). At 6 months, the mean MSTS and MWS were 26.36 and 76.82%, respectively. At 6 months, the surgical procedure was a predictor in MSTS score (p = 0.02) while MWS was predicted by length of graft (p = 0.02). At 12 months, MSTS score was 28.73, and MWS remained 91.82%. Length of the fibular graft was an insignificant predictor, but a significant risk factor was surgical procedure for MWS (p = 0.04) at 12 months. No variable was found significant for MSTS score. Conclusions: Resection along with reconstruction of Grade III GCT of the radius with fibular graft was found an optimal treatment option. Also, use of the fibular head grafts and shorter length grafts are predictors for better outcomes after surgery. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

Total wrist fusion versus total wrist prosthesis: a comparative study

We present a comparative study of 41 total wrist fusions (TWFs) with contoured plate and 22 total wrist prostheses using the Universal 2™ model, with a mean follow-up of 6 years for the fusion and 6.5 years for the prosthesis. We evaluated grip strength, pain according to the visual analogue scale, functional results using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand and the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, degree of satisfaction and complications, with no significant differences being observed in any of these variables. The results allow us to conclude that total wrist prosthesis implanted in patients with low or moderate functional demands offers medium-term functional results similar to TWF without increasing the number of complications.Level of evidence: III.

Treatment trends in distal humerus fractures between ABOS part II candidates

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine how fellowship training influences the treatment of distal humerus fractures with either total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or open reduction internal fixation (ORIF).

METHODS

The American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Examination Database was queried for all orthopaedic surgeons who sat for the Part II examination between the years 2003-2019. Inclusion criteria were ORIF or TEA cases, selected by individual CPT codes for each procedure, and patients of at least age 65 years who sustained acute distal humerus fractures. Analysis was performed for each type of fellowship training completed, total number of procedures performed, the type of procedure performed, patient demographics, and any complications.

RESULTS

There were 149 TEAs and 1306 ORIFs performed for distal humerus fractures between the exam years of 2003-2019. The proportion of TEA to ORIF increased from 7.6% to 11.0%. Partitioned by fellowship training, Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons performed 69 (17.4%) TEAs and 328 (82.6%) ORIFs, Shoulder and Elbow surgeons performed 34 (29.6%) TEAs and 81 (70.4%) ORIFs, Sports Medicine surgeons performed 14 (5.1%) TEAs and 263 (94.6%) ORIFs, and Trauma surgeons performed 16 (4.2%) TEAs and 366 (95.8%) ORIFs. Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons treated the most distal humerus fractures (397, 27.3%), followed by Trauma surgeons (382, 26.3%).

CONCLUSION

Our data suggests that fellowship training does influence the surgical decision-making process for treating distal humerus fractures in elderly populations. Hand and Upper Extremity surgeons performed the greatest number of TEA for acute distal humerus fractures, followed by Shoulder and Elbow surgeons. Conversely, trauma surgeons performed the lowest proportion of TEA to ORIF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Complications of Hardware Removal

BACKGROUND

While hardware removal may improve patient function, the procedure carries risks of unexpected outcomes. Despite being among the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures, scant attention has been given to its complication profile.

METHODS

We queried the American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) de-identified database of Part II surgical case lists from 2013 through 2019 for American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) implant-removal codes (20680, 20670, 22850, 22852, 22855, 26320). Hardware removal procedures that were performed without any other concurrent procedure ("HR-only procedures") were examined for associated complications.

RESULTS

In the 7 years analyzed, 13,089 HR-only procedures were performed, representing 2.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.1% to 2.2%) of the total of 609,150 surgical procedures during that period. A complication was reported to have occurred in association with 1,256 procedures (9.6% [95% CI, 9.1% to 10.1%]), with surgical complications reported in association with 1,151 procedures (8.8% [95% CI, 8.3% to 9.3%]) and medical/anesthetic complications reported in association with 196 procedures (1.5% [95% CI, 1.3% to 1.7%]). Wound-healing delay/failure (2.1% [95% CI, 1.8% to 2.3%]) and infection (1.6% [95% CI, 1.4% to 1.8%]) were among the most commonly reported complications after HR-only procedures, but other serious events were reported as well, including unexpected reoperations (2.5% [95% CI, 2.2% to 2.7%]), unexpected readmissions (1.6% [95% CI, 1.4% to 1.8%]), continuing pain (95% CI, 1.2% [1.0% to 1.4%]), nerve injury (0.6% [95% CI, 0.4% to 0.7%]), bone fracture (0.5% [95% CI, 0.4% to 0.6%]), and life-threatening complications (0.4% [95% CI, 0.3% to 0.5%]).

CONCLUSIONS

Hardware removal is one of the most commonly performed orthopaedic procedures and was associated with an overall complication rate of 9.6% (95% CI, 9.1% to 10.1%) in a cohort of recently trained orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. Although specific complications such as infection, refractures, and nerve damage were reported to have relatively low rates of occurrence, and associated life-threatening complications occurred rarely, surgeons and patients should be aware that hardware removal carries a definite risk.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Complication Events After Spinal Surgery Performed by American Board of Orthopaedic Surgery (ABOS) Part II Candidates (2008-2017)

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate complications following spine surgery using American Board of Orthopaedic Surgeons (ABOS) Part II examination data from 2008 to 2017.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent research has demonstrated the importance of surgical experience and clinical volume in minimizing complications after spine surgery. This may be challenging for orthopedic spine surgeons who are just starting their practice.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of surgical cases submitted to the ABOS by candidates taking the Part II Spine examination between 2008 and 2017. Complications, including peri-operative mortality as reported by candidates to the ABOS, were tracked over time. Complications were classified as surgical or medical using a predefined algorithm. Multivariable Poisson regression analyses adjusting for confounders were used to assess rates of complications and mortality over time. All analyses controlled for biologic sex, age, surgical diagnosis, and surgical location.

RESULTS

A total of 37,539 spine surgical patients were analyzed, with an average of 3754 cases performed each year. Following adjusted Poisson analysis, we determined that cases in 2017 had an increased likelihood of complications when compared to those treated in 2008 (IRR 1.20; 95% CI 1.09, 1.32). Similar findings were encountered for surgical complications (IRR 1.20; 95% CI 1.07, 1.34). In contrast, spine surgical cases reported to the ABOS in 2017 had a 55% lower likelihood of mortality when compared to procedures performed in 2008 (IRR 0.45; 95% CI 0.24, 0.84; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis of ABOS Part II candidates demonstrates that reported complication rates may be increasing while mortality is decreasing. The etiologies behind these findings are likely multifactorial. Encouragingly, we believe that observed reductions in mortality suggest overall improvements in patient safety following spine surgery. At a minimum, our data provide benchmarks through which spine surgeons, hospitals, and residency or fellowship programs can evaluate performance.Level of Evidence: 4.

Acute Complications in Total Wrist Arthroplasty: A National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Review

Background  The study sought to assess the patient-based variables, surgical risk factors, and postoperative conditions associated with readmission after total wrist arthroplasty (TWA). Materials and Methods  All patients undergoing TWA were identified from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program dataset from 2005 to 2016. Patient demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical characteristics, and outcomes were examined to isolate predictors for readmission within 30 days postoperatively. Results  A total of 57 patients were identified to have undergone TWA. The average patients were 62.3 (13.8) years old, female (57.7%), and most were treated in the outpatient setting (67.3%). Comorbid conditions included smoking (17.3%), diabetes (15.4%), and chronic steroid therapy (15.4%). No complications were identified in the 30-day postoperative period. There was a trend for increasing utilization of TWA over the years included. Conclusion  TWA is a safe procedure with low complication rates in the acute postoperative period. Increasing utilization is likely a result of improved outcomes and cost-effectiveness of TWA. Level of Evidence  This is a Level II, prognostic study.

Relationship between hospital or surgeon volume and outcomes in joint arthroplasty: protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses

INTRODUCTION

Joint arthroplasty is a particularly complex orthopaedic surgical procedure performed on joints, including the hip, knee, shoulder, ankle, elbow, wrist and even digit joints. Increasing evidence from volume-outcomes research supports the finding that patients undergoing joint arthroplasty in high-volume hospitals or by high-volume surgeons achieve better outcomes, and minimum case load requirements have been established in some areas. However, the relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes in patients undergoing arthroplasty are not fully understood. Furthermore, whether elective arthroplasty should be restricted to high-volume hospitals or surgeons remains in dispute, and little is known regarding where the thresholds should be set for different types of joint arthroplasties.

METHODS AND ANALYSES

This is a protocol for a suite of systematic reviews and dose-response meta-analyses, which will be amended and updated in conjunction with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocols. Electronic databases, including PubMed and Embase, will be searched for observational studies examining the relationship between the hospital or surgeon volume and clinical outcomes in adult patients undergoing primary or revision of joint arthroplasty. We will use records management software for study selection and a predefined standardised file for data extraction and management. Quality will be assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the meta-analysis, subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis will be performed using Stata statistical software. Once the volume-outcome relationships are established, we will examine the potential non-linear relationships between hospital/surgeon volume and outcomes and detect whether thresholds or turning points exist.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval is not required, because these studies are based on aggregated published data. The results of this suite of systematic reviews and meta-analyses will be submitted to peer-reviewed journals for publication.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017056639.