Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fractures: A Prospective Descriptive Study

Radiographic and clinical outcomes of muenster and sugar tong splints for distal radius fractures: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

Non-operative management is typically indicated for extra-articular distal radius fractures. Conservative treatments such as Sugar tong splints (STs) and Muenster splints (MUs) are commonly used. However, there is limited research and outcome data comparing the two splint types. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of treatment using STs and MUs.

METHODS

In this retrospective comparative study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the radiographic and clinical outcomes of STs and MUs for the treatment of distal radius fractures. The study included 64 patients who underwent closed reduction (CR) in the emergency room and were treated with either STs or MUs splints (STs group: n = 38, MUs group: n = 26). Initial X-rays, post-CR X-rays, and last outpatient follow-up X-rays were evaluated. Radial height (RH), ulnar variance (UV), radial inclination (RI), and volar tilt (VT) were measured by a blinded investigator. The Quick DASH form was applied to measure patients' satisfaction after treatments.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics, initial radiographic measurements, or radiographic measurements immediately after CR between the two groups. However, the overall radiological values deteriorated to some degree in both groups compared to the post-CR images. Furthermore, using a paired test, the STs group showed significant differences in RH and RI, and the MUs group showed significant differences in RH and UV between the last follow-up and post-CR images.

CONCLUSIONS

The study concluded that there was no difference in clinical outcomes between the two splint types. However, both STs and MUs groups showed reduced radiographic parameters, and the MUs group showed a significant reduction of RH and UV in the treatment of distal radius fractures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV; Retrospective Comparison; Treatment Study.

[Conservative treatment of distal radial fractures]

OBJECTIVE

Distal fracture of the radius is common in all age groups. Under careful consideration of individual indications and contraindications, conservative treatment with reduction and immobilization can have significant advantages over the frequently applied surgical approach, particularly in older patients.

THERAPEUTIC GOAL

Immobilization after closed reduction enables satisfactory wrist function to be achieved according to individual patient expectations.

INDICATIONS

A. Patients with a. significant comorbidities, b. high surgical risk from an anesthesiology perspective (ASA > 3), c. low functional requirements, d. low cosmetic expectations regarding residual visible deformity. B. Young patients with an extension fracture and additional a. < 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. < 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. < 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction.

CONTRAINDICATIONS

A. Patient age < 65 years with an extension fracture and additional a. > 10° dorsal tilt in the case of extraarticular fractures after closed reduction, b. > 5 mm radial shortening after closed reduction, c. > 2 mm intraarticular displacement after closed reduction. B. Flexion fracture for which ligamentotaxis for closed reduction is not possible. C. Open distal radial fracture. D. Fracture dislocations. E. Impairments of peripheral circulation, motor or sensory function of the hand after reduction.

TECHNIQUE

After puncturing the fracture hematoma and infiltrating the fracture gap with local anesthetic, the forearm is suspended using Chinese finger traps on the thumb and middle finger. Constant traction in the longitudinal axis of the forearm is ensured by a weight applied via a wide cushioned cuff to the distal upper arm. Reduction then is enabled with the additional reductive effect of ligamentotaxis. After minimal cushioning of the forearm with cotton wool and crepe bandage, a dorsal gypsum longuette is applied. After the plaster bandage has hardened, peripheral circulation, motor function, and sensitivity are checked. The reduction is controlled by X‑ray and documented.

POSTPROCEDURAL MANAGEMENT

A. General procedures to reduce swelling; sufficient analgesics should be prescribed. B. The circular plaster cast is applied once swelling has subsided sufficiently, generally after 2-3 days. C. The duration of cast wearing should be planned at 5 weeks.

RESULTS

A total of 73 patients (55 women and 18 men) aged 65-88 years were followed up for 12 months to investigate functional outcomes after surgical and conservative therapy. While surgical patients had better functional scores up to 12 weeks after treatment begin, there was no longer a significant difference in the 6‑ and 12-month follow-up results. The measured grip strength was consistently better in the surgically treated group. Clinically visible deformities were present in 78% of the conservatively treated patients; however, the patients were satisfied with the functional or cosmetic results. No deformities were seen in the surgically treated patients. All fractures were completely healed after 6 months. The rate of complications was significantly higher in the surgery group, with 13 complications compared to 5 in the conservative treatment group.

The hematoma block is not enough as method of anesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Two out of three wrist fractures seen in the emergency are displaced but most can be treated conservatively after closed reduction. Patient-reported pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures varies widely and the best method to decrease the perceived pain has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to assess the pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures after using the hematoma block as method of anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional clinical study including all patients who presented an acute fracture of the distal radius requiring closed reduction and immobilization during a six-month period in two University Hospitals. Demographic data, fracture classification, perceived pain using a visual analog scale at different times of reduction and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Ninety-four consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 61 years. Mean pain score at initial assessment was 6 points. After the hematoma block, the perceived pain during the reduction manoeuvre improved to 5.1 points at the wrist, but increased to 7.3 points at the fingers. Pain decreased to 4.9 points during cast placement and reached 1.4 point after sling placement. The reported pain was higher in women at all times. There were no significant differences according to the according to the type of fracture. No neurological or skin complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The hematoma block is only a mild effective method to reduce the wrist pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures. This technique decreases slightly the perceived pain in the wrist and does not reduce the pain in the fingers. Other reduction methods or other analgesic techniques may be more effective options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study. Cross-sectional study - Level IV.

[Translated article] The haematoma block is not enough as method of anaesthesia in reduction of displaced distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

Two out of three wrist fractures seen in an emergency department are displaced but most can be treated conservatively after closed reduction. Patient-reported pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures varies widely and the best method to decrease the perceived pain has not been well established. The purpose of this study was to assess pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures after using haematoma block as method of anaesthesia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Cross-sectional clinical study including all patients who presented an acute fracture of the distal radius requiring closed reduction and immobilisation during a six-month period in two University Hospitals. Demographic data, fracture classification, perceived pain using a visual analogue scale at different times of reduction and complications were registered.

RESULTS

Ninety-four consecutive patients were included. Mean age was 61 years. Mean pain score at initial assessment was 6 points. After the haematoma block, the perceived pain during the reduction manoeuvre improved to 5.1 points at the wrist, but increased to 7.3 points at the fingers. Pain decreased to 4.9 points during cast placement and reached 1.4 point after sling placement. The reported pain was higher in women at all times. There were no significant differences according to the according to the type of fracture. No neurological or skin complications were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Haematoma block is only a mildly effective method to reduce wrist pain during closed reduction of distal radius fractures. This technique slightly decreases the perceived pain in the wrist and does not reduce the pain in the fingers. Other reduction methods or other analgesic techniques may be more effective options.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic study. Cross-sectional study - Level IV.

Objective Outcome Measures Continue to Improve from 6 to 12 Months after Conservatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly-A Prospective Evaluation of 50 Patients

Distal radius fractures (DRF) in the elderly population above 65 years represent 18% of all fractures and are thereby the second most frequent fracture in the elderly. Fracture dislocation and comminution are often used to determine whether non-operative or operative treatment is indicated. The purpose of this prospective case series of minimally displaced DRF treated with a dorsal cast was to assess the complication rate and patient-reported outcome measures. This single-centre, single-blinded, prospective case series followed 50 conservatively treated DRF patients for one year. Primary outcomes were complications and Quick Disability of Arm Shoulder and Hand (qDASH) score. Secondary outcomes were range of motion (ROM), grip strength and pain, and Patient-Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation (PRWHE). Results showed only minor complications with a return to prior ROM, qDASH, and pain after 12 months and improvement in outcomes after 6-12 months. In conclusion, the majority of DRF patients who were treated non-operatively with five-week dorsal casting recover fully after minimally displaced DRF. This standard approach is thus considered safe, and the present results provide a reference for other studies.

The efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery in treating distal radius fractures: systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To compare the efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery with routine surgery in the treatment of distal radius fractures to evaluate whether 3D printing technology has more advantages. Materials & methods: To retrieve all published studies that compared the efficacy of 3D printing-assisted surgery with routine surgery for distal radius fractures. Operation time, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, blood loss and other outcomes were assessed. Results: The results suggested that 3D printing-assisted surgery was better than routine surgery in the fields of operation time, frequency of intraoperative fluoroscopy, and blood loss. Conclusion: In the treatment of distal radius fractures, 3D printing-assisted surgery may be superior to routine surgery.