Arthroscopic Resection of Dorsal Wrist Ganglion: Results and Rate of Recurrence Over a Minimum Follow-up of 4 Years

Minimal invasions: is wrist arthroscopy supported by evidence? A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Wrist arthroscopy is used increasingly, but its benefits and harms are unclear. This systematic review aimed to identify all published randomized controlled trials on wrist arthroscopy and synthesize the evidence of the benefits and harms of wrist arthroscopic procedures.

METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and Embase for randomized controlled trials comparing wrist-arthroscopic surgery with corresponding open surgery, placebo surgery, a non-surgical treatment, or no treatment. We estimated the treatment effect with a random effect meta-analysis using patient reported outcome measure (PROM) as primary outcome where several studies assessed the same intervention.

RESULTS

Of 7 included studies, none compared wrist arthroscopic procedures with no treatment or placebo surgery. 3 trials compared arthroscopically assisted reduction with fluoroscopic reduction of intra-articular distal radius fractures. The certainty of evidence was low to very low for all comparisons. The benefit of arthroscopy was clinically unimportant (smaller than what patients may consider meaningful) at all time points. 2 studies compared arthroscopic and open resection of wrist ganglia, finding no significant difference in recurrence rates. 1 study estimated the benefit of arthroscopic joint debridement and irrigation in intra-articular distal radius fractures, showing no clinically relevant benefit. 1 study compared arthroscopic triangular fibrocartilage complex repair with splinting in distal radioulnar joint instability in people with distal radius fractures, finding no evidence of benefits for repair at the long-term follow-up but the study was unblinded, and the estimates imprecise.

CONCLUSION

The current limited evidence from RCTs does not support benefits of wrist arthroscopy compared with open or non-surgical interventions.

Immobilization of the Wrist After Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Excision: A Systematic Review and Survey of Current Practice

BACKGROUND

Postoperative care after dorsal wrist ganglion (DWG) excision is highly varied. The effect of immobilization of the wrist on patient outcomes has not yet been examined.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature was performed to determine whether wrist immobilization after DWG surgical excision is beneficial. A survey of hand surgeons in Canada was performed to sample existing practice variations in current immobilization protocols after DWG excision.

RESULTS

A systematic review yielded 11 studies that rigidly immobilized the wrist (n = 5 open excision, n = 5 arthroscopic excision, n = 1 open or arthroscopic excision), 10 studies that used dressings to partially limit wrist motion (n = 5 open, n = 5 arthroscopic), 1 study (open) that did either of the above, and 2 studies (arthroscopic) that did not restrict wrist motion postoperatively. This ranged from 48 hours to 2 weeks in open DWG excision and 5 days to 3 weeks in arthroscopic DWG excision. The survey of Canadian hand surgeons had a similarly divided result of those who chose to immobilize the wrist fully (41%), partially (14%), or not at all (55%). Most surgeons surveyed who immobilized the wrist postoperatively did so for 1 to 2 weeks.

CONCLUSION

The systematic review and survey of Canadian hand surgeons reveal that hand surgeons are divided regarding the need to immobilize the wrist after DWG excision. In terms of functional outcome, there is no compelling data to suggest 1 strategy is superior. The time frame for immobilization when undertaken was short at 2 weeks or less.The systematic review is registered in the PROSPERO database (PROSPERO 2016:CRD42016050877).

Minimizing Costs for Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Treatment: A Cost-Minimization Analysis

PURPOSE

Dorsal wrist ganglions are treated commonly with aspiration, or open or arthroscopic excision in operating room (OR) or procedure room (PR) settings. As it remains unclear which treatment strategy is most cost-effective in yielding cyst resolution, our purpose was to perform a formal cost-minimization analysis from the societal perspective in this context.

METHODS

A microsimulation decision analytic model evaluating 5 treatment strategies for dorsal wrist ganglions was developed, ending in either resolution or a single failed open revision surgical excision. Strategies included immediate open excision in the OR, immediate open excision in the PR, immediate arthroscopic excision in the OR, or 1 or 2 aspirations before each of the surgical options. Recurrence and complications rates were pooled from the literature for each treatment type. One-way sensitivity and threshold analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The most cost-minimal strategy was 2 aspiration attempts before open surgical excision in the PR setting ($1,603 ± 1,595 per resolved case), followed by 2 aspirations before open excision in the OR ($1,969 ± 2,165 per resolved case). Immediate arthroscopic excision was the costliest strategy ($6,539 ± 264 per resolved case). Single aspiration preoperatively was more cost-minimal than any form of immediate surgery ($2,918 ± 306 and $4,188 ± 306 per resolved case performed in the PR and OR, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

From the societal perspective, performing 2 aspirations before surgical excision in the PR setting was the most cost-minimal treatment strategy, although in reference to surgeons who do not perform this procedure in the PR setting, open excision in the OR was nearly as cost-effective. As patient preferences may preclude routinely performing 2 aspirations, performing at least 1 aspiration before surgical excision improves the cost-effectiveness of dorsal wrist ganglions treatment.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Decision Analysis II.

Recurrence Rates of Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Cysts After Arthroscopic Versus Open Surgical Excision: A Retrospective Comparison

BACKGROUND

This study directly compares the recurrence rates of dorsal wrist ganglion cysts in patients treated via open surgical excision versus arthroscopic surgical excision. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between recurrence rates with these 2 surgical options.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients with a dorsal ganglion cyst undergoing either open or arthroscopic surgical excision at a single academic center with 3 fellowship-trained attending hand surgeons from 2012 to 2017. Charts were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes and were reviewed using postoperative office notes for preoperative and postoperative symptoms, episodes of recurrence, time at which recurrence occurred, subsequent operations, and outcome at final follow-up.

RESULTS

The charts of 172 patients undergoing either arthroscopic or open dorsal ganglion excision were reviewed. Nine of 54 (16.7%) arthroscopic excisions resulted in cyst recurrence, while 8 of 118 (6.8%) open excisions resulted in cyst recurrence (P = .044). Two of 9 (22%) recurrences after arthroscopic ganglion excision versus 2 of 8 (25%) recurrences after open ganglion excision underwent repeat surgical intervention. Time to recurrence, as well as final follow-up, was not statistically different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Dorsal wrist ganglion cysts are the most common benign soft tissue mass of the upper extremity, but it remains unknown whether arthroscopic or open surgical excision leads to lower recurrence rate. Scant literature exists directly comparing these 2 methods of surgical excision. This study suggests that open excision of dorsal wrist ganglia leads to a lower recurrence rate than does arthroscopic excision.

Two-Year Clinical Outcomes after Arthroscopic Re-Excision of Recurrent Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Cyst

OBJECTIVES

Arthroscopic excision of dorsal wrist ganglion (DWG) cysts has recently become an alternative to open surgery, with the advantage of lower recurrence. However, in recurrent cases, whether re-excision using an arthroscopic approach would achieve favorable outcomes has not been determined. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of function evaluation and recurrence rate after arthroscopic excision of recurrent DWG cysts.

METHODS

A total of 11 consecutive patients with clinically diagnosed recurrent DWG cysts were retrospectively reviewed between November 2017 and March 2020. Extensive re-excision of the ganglion cyst and its surrounding pathological capsule was performed using an arthroscopic approach. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was routinely performed before surgery to identify the location and limits of the cyst. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. A second recurrence was recorded if a mass reappeared at the same site with a positive transillumination test. Pain during activity was evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS). The active range of motion (ROM) of the wrist was measured using a goniometer, and the hand grip strength was measured using a digital dynamometer. Comparative analysis between the pre- and postoperative indexes was performed using Student's t-test.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up period of 29.3 months (range, 24-34 months), no second recurrence of the cyst was recorded. The VAS score improved from 1.4 to 0.3 (t = 3.833, p = 0.003), and residual pain was reported by three patients (VAS score = 1 for each). Active wrist flexion increased from 73.6° to 78.2° (t = 2.887, p = 0.016). No significant changes were found in active wrist extension or hand grip strength (p > 0.05). No major complications occurred during the study.

CONCLUSION

Arthroscopic excision of a recurrent DWG cyst yielded satisfactory results with no second recurrence, significant pain relief, and good wrist function at a minimum of 2-year follow-up. Clear identification of the location and limits of the ganglion based on preoperative MRI could be helpful to achieve complete excision and therefore prevent a second recurrence.

Prospective Evaluation of Push-up Performance and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Open Dorsal Wrist Ganglion Excision in the Active-Duty Military Population

Background  Dorsal wrist ganglia (DWG) are a common wrist pathology that affects the military population. This study prospectively evaluates push-up performance, functional measures, and patient-reported outcomes 6 months after open DWG excision in active-duty patients. Methods  Twenty-seven active-duty patients were enrolled and 18 had complete follow-up. Included patients had DWG diagnosis, unilateral involvement, and no previous surgery. The number of push-ups performed within 2 minutes was measured preoperatively and at 6 months. Range of motion (ROM), grip strength, Pain Catastrophization Scale (PCS), Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) score, Mayo Wrist Score, and visual analog scale (VAS) pain score were measured preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months. Results  Push-up performance did not significantly change overall. Wrist flexion, extension, and radial deviation returned to preoperative ranges. Wrist ulnar deviation significantly increased from preoperative range. Grip strength deficit between operative and unaffected extremities significantly improved to 0.7 kg at 6 months from preoperative deficit of 2.7 kg. Mean scores significantly improved for the validated outcome measures-PCS from 6.3 to 0.67, VAS pain scores from 1.37 to 0.18, DASH scores from 12.8 to 4.3, and Mayo Wrist Scores from 80.3 to 89.4. No surgical complications or recurrences were reported. Conclusions  Findings suggest that almost half of active patients may improve push-up performance after DWG excision at 6 months. Significant improvements were seen in wrist pain, ROM, grip strength, and all patient-reported outcomes, which is useful when counseling patients undergoing excision.

Efficacy of corticosteroid injections in the treatment of 85 ganglion cysts of the dorsal aspect of the wrist

INTRODUCTION

Ganglion cysts of the dorsal aspect of the wrist are a benign pathology frequently encountered in consultations for hand surgery. Their treatment, irrespective of the type, presents a risk of recurrence and there is no consensus on the management to adopt. Medical treatments such as corticosteroid injections have recurrence rates between 8 and 74%. Surgical treatments seem to have better results, with less disparate failure rates, at around 15%.

HYPOTHESIS

The objective of this retrospective study was to determine the effectiveness of the aspiration and injection of corticosteroids under ultrasound guidance in the treatment of 85 ganglion cysts of the dorsal aspect of the wrist.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively included 99 patients suffering from a non-occult ganglion cyst of the dorsal aspect of the wrist, who had received a referral for aspiration, and subsequent injection of corticosteroids between January 2015 and December 2020. Data collection was carried out by the analysis of files on the institution's software, and by a phone call. Data such as age, sex, pre- and post-treatment QuickDASH score, as well as recurrence and second-line treatments were collected.

RESULTS

The average age of our cohort was 31, with a 65% female predominance. The recurrence rate after a first injection was 73.2% with a mean follow-up of 34 months. The QuickDASH score improved significantly by 26.2 points out of 100 in non-injected patients, and by 18.6 points out of 100 after injection, whether the cyst recurred or not.

CONCLUSION

With 73.2% recurrence, corticosteroid injections do not appear to be effective in treating dorsal ganglion cysts of the wrist. They lead to an improvement in the functional score of the wrist, but not significantly compared to treatment abstinence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Treatment of dorsal wrist ganglion cyst by establishing midcarpal volar portal using the “Kiss-in” method

Introduction

This paper introduces the treatment and clinical outcome of the dorsal wrist ganglion cyst utilizing the Kiss-in method to establish a midcarpal volar portal.

Materials and methods

Patients with dorsal ganglia of the wrist (n = 12, 6 females, 6 males) underwent arthroscopic surgery using the Kiss-in method at our hospital between September 2018 and January 2021. All patients underwent preoperative radiological investigations, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; 12 cases) or ultrasonography (12 cases). The mean age of patients was 30.7 years (range: 19–46 years). The time lost from work, the wrist motion and strength, the presence of scarring, residual symptoms, complications, and recurrence were recorded at a mean follow-up of 24 months.

Results

Eleven patients showed a good prognosis with active motion recovery. One patient showed the recurrence of ganglion, and the second arthroscopic resection was performed 5 months after the first surgery for this patient. After the surgery, the patient fully recovered.

Conclusions

Establishing the midcarpal volar portal by the Kiss-in method is safe. The dorsal ganglion cyst resection through the established midcarpal volar portal is a promising approach, allowing better visualization and a broader range motion of the arthroscope.

Dorsal Wrist Ganglia: Influence of Arthroscopic Dorsal Capsulodesis – A Pilot Study

Background Dorsal wrist ganglia are the commonest soft tissue tumor in the upper extremity. Management with arthroscopic excision yields good results and few complications, but recurrence is still a matter of concern.

Purpose To address the influence of dorsal capsulodesis in postoperative results.

Patients and Methods Two groups with eight patients each were evaluated: group A – simple arthroscopic resection (SAR), and group B – arthroscopic resection combined with dorsal capsulodesis (ARDC).

Results The mean age of group A was of 36.10 ±  7.96 (range: 28–53) years, and that of group B was of 34.17 ±  29.60 (range 18–44) years. The duration of the follow-up was of 30.67 ±  13.90 (range: 13.45–53.55) months and 29.60 ±  16.80 (range 12.68–62.13) months, respectively. Both groups achieved a a significant decrease in the postoperative score on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) (of around 2/10), and the scores on the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire were below 5/100. All the functional parameters (range of motion and strength) were above 80% on the contralateral side, with no differences between groups. More than 75% of the patients were completely satisfied. Group A (37.5%) had a significantly higher recurrence rate than that of group B (12.5%).

Conclusions In conclusion, SAR and ARDC provided good clinical results, with no significant differences. Dorsal capsulodesis resulted in an important decrease in the recurrence rate.

Level of Evidence Level III (Retrospective Comparative Study).

Volar Ganglion Cyst and Echo-Guided Assistance for the Arthroscopic Removal

The ganglion of the wrist is very common but with uncertain prognosis. The arthroscopic resection seems to improve the result compared with open procedure, in decreasing recurrence and morbidity. Volar ganglions are close to the radial artery, the flexor pollicis longus tendon, and even the median nerve. Ultrasonography combined with arthroscopy offers incomparable safety for the resection of volar ganglions. The technical steps of this combined procedure are described, and the first published series are discussed.

The triple technique: A simple and effective outpatient procedure for the dorsal wrist ganglion

BACKGROUND

Dorsal ganglia are the most common types of wrist ganglia. Though largely asymptomatic, they can cause pain, stiffness and require treatment. The different methods described for the management have high recurrence rates even up to 70%. We describe a new method which combines 3 of these methods thus aiming to achieve the best from each of the techniques.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was undertaken to include patients requiring surgery for dorsal ganglion. The method involved a combination of aspiration, steroid instillation and tranfixation with silk suture for 3 weeks. Various demographic parameters, operative variables and functional criteria like QuickDASH Score and Numerical Pain Rating scale (NPRS) were used. The patients were followed up for atleast 24 months. Overall satisfaction rate was also recorded.

RESULTS

83 patients were included with a mean age of 31.7 ± 12.4 years. The mean duration of surgery was 12.0 ± 4.9 min and follow up was 29.8 ± 7.1 months. 15 patients had complex multilobulated ganglia. The most common indication for surgery was cosmesis. 4 complications were encountered of which 2 were superficial infections, 1 whitish discoloration locally and 1 case of persistent pain. We achieved a success rate of 95.2% with only 4 recurrences with a mean reduction in size to be 82.2 ± 5.8%. NPRS and QuickDASH scores improved significantly. Mean satisfaction rate was 89% and 84.3% wished to have the surgery again for a similar complaint. The loss of work was 2.5 ± 1.4 days.

CONCLUSIONS

Triple Technique is an effective and safe technique with <5% recurrence at 2 years.

Arthroscopic resection of wrist ganglia: About 30 cases

INTRODUCTION

The synovial wrist ganglion is a particularly common pathology of which the first "complication" is recidivism. The main objective of our study was to determine the rate of recurrence of this pathology in a series of arthroscopic patients. The secondary objective was to assess patient satisfaction well after the operation.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Our study was observational and retrospective and involved 30 patients (17 dorsal and 13 palmar cases) aged 41 years on average. The patients underwent an arthroscopic procedure for a palmar or dorsal ganglion of the wrist between March 2007 and April 2013. The data were collected by re-reading the files and conducting telephone interviews. Each patient answered a questionnaire about the operation, after-treatment, and their satisfaction well after the surgery. At the end of the interview, we calculated the Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 4.6 years. A recurrence was noted in 4 (13%) cases, at an average delay of 9 months (6 months-1 year). There were only 2 patients (6.7%) that experienced the complication of complex regional pain syndrome type 1. Twenty-eight (93%) patients experienced improvement in postoperative pain. For 27 (90%) patients, firm-handed activities could be practised without limitation. The average time to resumption of activities of daily living was 27.1 days (1-240 days), resumption of firm-handed activities was 56 days (15-360 days), and return to work was 47.5 days (1-360 days). The mean PRWE score was 6.9/50 (0-34) for pain and 1.38/50 (0-8) for function.

CONCLUSION

The 13% recurrence rate is on the average of what is observed in the literature. Later satisfaction with the intervention is very good, and complications remain rare.Studies tend to show a lower rate of complications and recurrence following arthroscopic treatment, but to date, no randomized comparative series between the two methods has yet revealed any significant difference in these two points. A study of this type on a large scale could make it possible to highlight one of these treatment approaches.