1
|
Benameur H, Bensaleh S, Alidrissi N, Jaafar A, Chahbouni M. Modified Technique of Single-Bone Forearm in the Treatment of Deformities. Cureus 2022; 14:e26361. [PMID: 35903567 PMCID: PMC9327792 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.26361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
The single-bone forearm is a salvage technique for massive loss of bone due to serious trauma, malignant tumors, infections or congenital deformity. It is also described to treat the sequelae of hereditary multiple exostoses disease that affects the distal end of the ulna. We present the case of a 29-year-old patient, operated for sequelae of hereditary multiple exostoses disease of the left forearm by a modified single-bone forearm technique. The patient, right-handed, operated on twice in childhood for a hereditary multiple exostoses disease of the left forearm: incomplete excision of the exostosis of the distal end of the ulna and lengthening of this last on external fixator, without improvement. The patient presented for a deformation of the left forearm with shortening compared to the right side. Significant limitation of prono-supination (pronation 15°, supination 20°). Elbow flexion at 110° and extension with deficit of 15°. Wrist flexion at 50° and extension at 50°, radial inclination at 25° and ulnar at 30°. The pain score was 3 according to the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), especially on effort. Dash score was 31,82/100. We chose the forearm technique with a single bone. The immediate postoperative result found a realignment of the forearm, without neurological or vascular damages. Consolidation was obtained in four months. At five months, the patient recovered elbow flexion at 110° and full extension, wrist flexion at 45° and extension at 50°. Radial inclination at 20° and ulnar at 25°. The single-bone forearm technique has been described, not only for the treatment of hereditary multiple exostoses disease, but also for serious trauma or tumors with massive loss of bone. The technique generally consists of an osteotomy of the radius as well as the ulna, fixing the radius to the ulna creating a synostosis, with or without resection of part of one or both bones of the forearm. The most described complications of single-bone forearm procedure are pain, complications related to soft tissue secondary to the previous injury, and infections. The one-bone forearm remain a salvage technique for massive loss of bone of the forearm, or large deformities due to congenital malformations. This technique could allow the excision of massive bone and keep only a part of the ulna and the radius, with function maintenance and aesthetic forearm preservation.
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu ZB, Li Q, Liu WX, Li XH, Ma K, Huo YB, Wang JG, Wang QH, Yu YD. Comparison of Clinical Effects of the Modified Masquelet Technique and Kirschner Wire External Fixation-Assisted Autogenous Bone Transplantation in the Treatment of Segmental Metacarpophalangeal Bone Defects. Int J Gen Med 2022; 15:1619-1635. [PMID: 35210833 PMCID: PMC8858955 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s343617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The present study aims to explore the (1) clinical effects of the modified Masquelet technique, whose improved Masquelet technique innovates the in vitro plasticity of the bone cement module and prefabricated hollow design, and the Kirschner wire external fixation-assisted autologous bone transplantation technique in the treatment of segmental metacarpophalangeal bone defects and (2) the differences between the two techniques. Methods The clinical data of 32 patients with segmental metacarpophalangeal bone defects (15 patients treated with the modified Masquelet technique and 17 patients treated with the self-made Kirschner wire external fixation technique) admitted to our department between January 2012 and January 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The postoperative bone healing time, hand function, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results The two groups were comparable; there were no significant differences in age, sex, length of bone defect, and time from injury to operation between the two groups (P > 0.05). All patients were followed up with for 6–24 months (average = 13.7 months), and all patients with segmental metacarpophalangeal bone defects achieved fracture healing. The postoperative hospital stay, fracture healing time, functionary scores of the affected limb, and incidence of severe complications were better in the modified group than in the external fixation group (P < 0.05). Conclusion Compared with the Kirschner wire external fixation stent assisted autologous bone transplantation, the improved Masquelet technique has the advantages of simple operation, fast healing, accurate effect, wide indications, and less complications, making it more worthy of clinical promotion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeng-Bing Liu
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
- Correspondence: Zeng-Bing Liu, Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, No. 485 of Xinhua West Road, Taocheng District, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China, Tel +86 318 2173010, Email
| | - Qiang Li
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Wen-Xia Liu
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Xin-Hai Li
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Kai Ma
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Yu-Bao Huo
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Jin-Guang Wang
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing-He Wang
- Department of Hand and Foot Surgeries, The No. 4 People’s Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, 053000, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ya-Dong Yu
- Department of Hand Surgeries, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, 050000, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|