Outcomes of Mini-Open Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients With Unrecordable Preoperative Nerve Conduction Potentials at a Minimum of 5 Years

Most Carpal Tunnel Releases Address Moderate or Severe Median Neuropathy

BACKGROUND

The role of surgery in normal or very mild median neuropathy can be questioned given that surgery in the absence of pathophysiology may offer only nonspecific effects that can be achieved without surgery, which raises ethical concerns. It's also important to avoid misdiagnosis: given that mild median neuropathy is prevalent and generally well-accommodated, notable symptoms from mild median neuropathy can signal unhelpful thoughts and feelings of distress that are a more pressing health priority.

METHODS

We identified 38 studies that categorized electrodiagnostic (EDX) measured median neuropathy severity among people being evaluated for carpal tunnel syndrome. We converted the different EDX grades used into one general grading classification. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the ratio of moderate/severe to mild/normal EDX findings between tests ordered by a surgeon or a nonoperative clinician.

RESULTS

The median (interquartile range) ratio of moderate/severe to mild/normal EDX findings of median neuropathy at the carpal tunnel was 1.2 (0.91 to 1.8) among tests ordered by nonoperative clinicians and 3.3 (1.5 to 5.3) among tests ordered by surgeons (P = .0023). Only 4.1% of the patients who had EDX testing ordered by a surgeon had no measurable neuropathy. There were zero patients with normal EDX findings in 10 of the 17 (59%) studies in surgeon practices and in 10 of the 21 (48%) in the practices of nonoperative clinicians.

CONCLUSIONS

The observation that in case series documenting EDX severities of median neuropathy, surgeons are mostly treating and operating on moderate to severe pathophysiology, emphasizes that while mild median neuropathy is highly prevalent it is uncommonly considered for surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, Prognostic study.

Clinical Results of Carpal Tunnel Release Using Ultrasound Guidance in Over 100 Patients at Two to Six Years

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to determine the clinical results of carpal tunnel release using ultrasound guidance (CTR-US) at a minimum of 2 years postprocedure.

Methods

The study consisted of 102 patients (162 hands) treated with CTR-US by the same physician between June 2017 and October 2020 for whom minimum 2-year follow-up data were available. Questionnaires were sent to gather long-term information, with additional phone calls for clarification if needed. Outcomes included Boston Carpal Tunnel Questionnaire symptom severity (BCTQ-SSS) and functional status (BCTQ-FSS) scores; Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) scores; global satisfaction scores; and subsequent surgeries.

Results

The 102 patients included 68 females and 34 males with a mean age of 56.9 years at the time of surgery. Fifty-five (53.9%) patients had simultaneous bilateral procedures, 42 (41.2%) had unilateral procedures, and 5 (4.9%) had staged bilateral procedures. Significant improvements in BCTQ-SSS, BCTQ-FSS, and QuickDASH scores persisted at a mean final follow-up of 46 months (range 2-6 years). At final follow-up, 91.2% of patients reported satisfaction with the procedure. No outcomes were significantly different between those treated with simultaneous bilateral versus unilateral procedures. No revision surgeries were reported.

Conclusions

CTR-US is a safe and effective procedure that results in significant improvements that persist up to 6 years postprocedure. Long-term results of simultaneous bilateral and unilateral procedures are similar.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic IV.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Electrodiagnostic Severity is Not Associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity

Background: The primary objective of this study was to determine the association between preoperative electrodiagnostic study (EDS) parameters and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments in patients with EDS-confirmed carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Methods: A retrospective study of 45 patients with EDS-confirmed CTS was conducted. Patients completed the PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Explanatory variables included EDS disease severity (mild, moderate and severe), sensory peak latency, sensory amplitude, motor latency, motor amplitude, the presence of nonrecordable sensory latency and the presence of nonrecordable sensory amplitude. Explanatory variables also included patient-related factors, such as age, sex and diabetes mellitus. Associations between variables were assessed using simple linear regression, analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student's t-test. Results: In our cohort, the EDS severity was mild in 38%, moderate in 42% and severe in 20% of patients. The mean PROMIS Upper Extremity score was 44.4, the mean PROMIS Pain Interference score was 53.5 and the mean PROMIS Pain Intensity score was 49.9. Bivariate analysis demonstrated no association between EDS severity overall or any EDS parameter individually and PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Diabetes mellitus was associated with poorer PROMIS Upper Extremity scores. Conclusions: EDS severity is not associated with PROMIS Upper Extremity, PROMIS Pain Interference and PROMIS Pain Intensity. Carpal tunnel release is commonly indicated for pain and dysfunction, but validated measures of pain and dysfunction do not correlate with EDS severity. Level of Evidence: Level III (Diagnostic).

A Systematic Review of the Outcomes of Carpal Ligament Release in Severe Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

PURPOSE

Indications for surgical treatment of severe carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) are controversial. The aim of this study was to review the outcomes reported in the literature of carpal tunnel release in patients with severe CTS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the outcomes of carpal tunnel release in patients with severe CTS was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Outcome measures included change in symptoms, sensation (2-point discrimination, light touch), thenar atrophy, strength (power and pinch grip), electrophysiology, median nerve morphology, and patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes are reported by ranges of the percentage of patients/hands improved in the included studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight papers were selected, representing 2,531 patients and 2,712 hands. Demographic information on age and sex were available for a total of 1,542 patients. Mean age ranged from 49.8 to 83 years and 72% were female. All studies that assessed patient-reported outcome measures before and after surgery reported significant improvements. Complete resolution of paresthesia occurred in 55%-98% of hands across different studies. Resolution of numbness occurred in between 39% and 94% of hands. Pain completely resolved in 64%-100% and weakness in 60%-75% of hands. Two-point discrimination and light touch improved postoperatively. Power grip, key, tripod, index-thumb pulp pinch, and thumb opposition increased. Motor and sensory amplitudes, distal motor latencies, and sensory conduction velocities improved. Patient-reported outcomes indicated symptomatic improvement and reduced disability.

CONCLUSIONS

Symptomatic improvement following carpal tunnel release in patients with severe CTS can occur. Patients should be counseled about the unpredictability of the outcomes and factors that might affect outcomes.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic IV.

Long-Term Outcomes and Mortality Following Carpal Tunnel Release in Patients Older Than 80 Years of Age

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were 1) to assess the long-term patient-reported outcomes of carpal tunnel release (CTR) in patients 80 years of age or older, and 2) to determine the long-term mortality rate of this population after CTR.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of 96 patients who underwent CTR at 80 years of age or older from July 2008 to June 2013. Mortality was assessed by medical records, the Social Security Death Index, and telephone contact. Living patients were contacted for long-term follow-up, and functional outcomes and patient satisfaction were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean age of the 96 patients at time of CTR was 84.1 years, including 89 octogenarian patients and 7 nonagenarian patients, and 67% were female. At an average of 9 years from surgery, the mortality rate of our cohort was 53% (51 of 96 patients). Five patients died within 1 year after CTR; no factor associated with early mortality after CTR was identified in the bivariate analysis. Telephone follow-up at an average of 9 years after CTR was available for 15 patients. Mean Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire symptom severity score was 1.6 points, mean Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire functional status score was 1.8 points, mean Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score was 27.9, and mean satisfaction was 7.1. Eighty percent of patients reported that they would rechoose CTR.

CONCLUSIONS

There are long-term benefits from CTR in patients 80 years of age or older. The mortality rate of this cohort mirrors that of the general population, and CTR is justified in this elderly age group both for the magnitude and duration of treatment effect.

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: What You Should Know

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery continues to evolve. Carpal tunnel syndrome remains a primarily clinical diagnosis, although ultrasound has supplemented electrodiagnostic testing as a confirmatory tool. Magnetic resonance imaging of the carpal tunnel has also showed some promise as an alternative method for the examination of the median nerve. Open CTR surgery remains the traditional, and most popular, method of CTR. Wide-Awake, with Local Anesthesia only, and No Tourniquet CTR has emerged as a means to decrease cost and improve pain control and convenience for patients. Endoscopic CTR is increasing in popularity due to its more rapid recovery. The safety profile of endoscopic CTR has improved, and recent studies show similar rates of major complications between open and endoscopic techniques. Nonsurgeon operated ultrasound-guided techniques for release of the transverse carpal ligament have emerged. While promising in early studies, the current evidence in their favor is limited in terms of patient numbers and direct comparison with other techniques. The outcomes of CTR continue to be excellent. Recent research has demonstrated that nerve conduction continues to recover postoperatively over a longer period of time than previously believed. Patient psychological factors play a significant role in outcomes after surgery but do not appear to limit the improvement provided by intervention.