"Age Is Just a Number": Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 75

Hand Trauma in Emergency Department Management in Older Adults ≥ 80 Years Old: A Twenty-Year Retrospective Analysis

The prevalence of hand injuries increases with age, with elderly patients being more prone to hand lesions due to a combination of factors, such as reduced bone density and muscle strength, impaired sensation, and cognitive impairment. Despite the high incidence of hand injuries in the elderly population, few studies have addressed the management and outcomes of hand lesions in this age group. This study aimed to analyze the characteristics and management of hand lesions in patients over 80 years old. The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients over 80 years old who reached their Emergency Department with hand lesions between 2001 and 2020. Data on demographics, injury characteristics, and management were collected and analyzed. A total of 991 patients with hand lesions were included in the study, with a mean age of 84.9 years. The most common causes of injuries were domestic accidents (32.6%) and traffic accidents (12.8%). The most frequent types of hand lesions were fractures (23.5%) and superficial wounds (20.5%). Overall, 23.4% underwent surgical treatment for their hand issue, and 22.1% had associated injuries, among which, the most common were head trauma and other bone fractures. In conclusion, hand lesions in patients over 80 years old are frequent and pose significant challenges in diagnosis and management. Particular attention should be paid to associated injuries and limit indications to surgery when strictly necessary.

Comparison of the cast and volar locking plate in the treatment of intra-articular distal radius fractures in elderly patients over 75 years of age

Background

We aimed to compare radiologically and clinically closed reduction circular casting (CRCC) and volar locking plate (VLP) treatment options in elderly patients over 75 years with intraarticular distal radius fracture (DRF).

Material and method

Elderly patients aged ≥75 years with at least one year of follow-up from the clinic archive who underwent conservative (CRCC) and surgical (VLP) treatment for AO type C DRF were retrospectively included in the study. Thirty-seven patients treated conservatively with CRCC and 31 treated surgically with VLP were compared as two groups. Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QDASH) and Visual Analog scores (VAS) were evaluated functionally. In addition, a rapid assessment of physical activity (RAPA) score evaluation was performed since these patients were elderly. In addition, radiologic findings, wrist range of motion, and complications were evaluated.

Results

There was no difference between the CRCC and VLP groups regarding QDASH, VAS, and RAPA scores at the last follow up. Radiologically, there were significant differences between the groups regarding radial height, volar tilt, radial inclination and joint stepping. (respectively p= <0.001, p= <0.001, p= <0.001, p= <0.001).

Conclusion

In elderly patients over 75 years of age with intra-articular DRF, surgical treatment with VLP results in better radiologic results compared to conservative treatment with CRCC, although both treatment options lead to similar results in terms of functional outcomes.

Can elderly patients regain their preoperative functional level after distal radius fracture type A? Results from a fracture register study using PROM

Introduction

Although distal radius fractures (DRFs) are the most common fractures of the human body, there are still ongoing debates concerning the treatment for type A fractures, especially in elderly patients. In spite of good clinical outcomes, it remains unclear whether elderly patients, especially, could regain the preoperative functional level of the wrist. Therefore, we have quantified wrist function within a retrospective study design using patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and we have analyzed the influence of age between control and patient collective and young vs. old, respectively.

Patients and methods

The retrospective study included all patients with a surgically treated DRF type A and a control group of healthy patients, age and gender matched. The function of the wrist was examined by using a self-assessment questionnaire called the Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) according to the patient-related outcome measurements PROM.

Results

We could enroll 110 patients and controls, and the average follow-up was 66 months. Subgroup matching induced similar age group distribution: in both groups, 7 individuals &lt;30 years, 67 between 31 and 64 years, 29 between 65 and 79 years, and 7 individuals &gt;80 years, were enrolled, respectively. In the fracture group, women were significantly older than men (59 ± 15 vs. 47 ± 17 (M ± SD). There was no significant difference between the control and the patient groups (96 ± 6 vs. 95 ± 7). The function was significantly different between controls and patients &lt;30 years (100 ± 1 vs. 98 ± 2). In the control group, there was a functional difference in the age group &lt;30 compared with 65–79 and &gt;80 and in the age group 30–64 compared with 65–79 and &gt;80. In the control group, the function was found to be significantly decreasing with advancing age, whereas in the patient group, this influence was absent. A correlation analysis showed a worse function with increasing age in the control group and therefore a negative correlation. In the fracture group, a similar result could not be obtained.

Discussion

Age has a relevant influence on wrist function. Although the wrist function decreases significantly with aging, in the patient group, this influence is absent, and the functional results after surgery are excellent. Even elderly patients can regain their preoperative functional level.

Is the Postoperative Outcome after Intraarticular Distal Radius Fracture Influenced by Age and Gender? A PROM Study

BACKGROUND

Although the most common fracture of the human body, so far, only few data concerning gender-specific outcomes after distal radius fracture exist. Typically, elderly women suffer from DRF due to a low-energy fall because of osteoporosis. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome after a surgically treated intraarticular DRF with the help of patient-reported outcome measurement (PROM) and with special regard to gender and age impact.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

It is a retrospective case-control study in which all patients with an intraarticular DRF were enrolled. The control group was composed of healthy volunteers. Munich Wrist Questionnaire (MWQ) was used as Patient Related Outcome Measurement (PROM) for analyzing the outcome. Moreover, age, gender, handedness, fracture classification and follow-up interval were detected. The functional outcome of the fracture group was compared to a healthy control group. Analyses of gender, age and handedness-specific results compared to the healthy control groups were performed as well.

RESULTS

197 patients with distal radius fracture could be enrolled in the study (134 were female and 63 were male). Women (mean age 62 years) were significantly older than men (mean age 50 years). The control group comprised 110 healthy subjects, 71 females (mean age 56 years) and 39 males (mean age 53 years). The whole fracture group had significantly lower MWQ scores compared to the control group (p < 0.001). The male fracture group (90.6 ± 12.4) and the female fracture group (90.8 ± 11.4) had a significantly worse outcome compared to the corresponding control group (p < 0.001 male and p = 0.034 female). Although significantly younger, the male patients had a similar outcome compared to the female patients.

DISCUSSION

Even elderly patients can reach the preoperative level after operative treatment of an intraarticular distal radius fracture. Although significantly younger than the female patients, men have significantly worse functional outcomes compared to their control and cannot perform better than the significantly older female patients. Gender might influence the outcome as well; however, age seems to have a greater impact on the outcome than gender.

Predictors of Management of Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Aged >65 Years

BACKGROUND

Treatment of distal radius fractures (DRFs) in patients aged >65 years is controversial. The purpose of this study was to identify what patient and fracture characteristics may influence the decision to pursue surgical versus nonsurgical treatment in patients aged >65 years sustaining a DRF.

METHODS

We queried our institutional DRF database for patients aged >65 years who presented to a single academic, tertiary center hand clinic over a 5-year period. In all, 164 patients treated operatively were identified, and 162 patients treated nonoperatively during the same time period were selected for comparison (total N = 326). Demographic variables and fracture-specific variables were recorded. Patient and fracture characteristics between the groups were compared to determine which variables were associated with each treatment modality (operative or nonoperative).

RESULTS

The average age in our cohort was 72 (SD: 11) years, and 274 patients (67%) were women. The average Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) was 4.1 (SD: 2.1). The CCI is a validated tool that predicts 1-year mortality based on patient age and a list of 22 weighted comorbidities. Factors associated with operative treatment in our population were largely related to the severity of the injury and included increasing dorsal tilt (odds ratio [OR], 1.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-1.12; P < .001) and AO Classification type C fractures (OR, 5.42; 95% CI, 2.35-11.61; P < .001). Increasing CCI was the only factor independently associated with nonoperative management (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.72-0.997; P = .046).

CONCLUSION

Fracture severity is a strong driver in the decision to pursue operative management in patients aged >65 years, whereas increasing CCI predicts nonoperative treatment.

Posttraumatic Arthritis After Combined Plating of Distal Radius Fractures AO Type C: A 7-Year Follow-up of 97 Cases

BACKGROUND

Volar locking plate fixation is the most common method of operative fixation of distal radius fractures (DRFs). For more complex cases, combined plating is an option for stabilizing intra-articular fragments. The prevalence of posttraumatic arthritis (PA) after an intra-articular DRF, and its relation to patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to study the prevalence of PA and its correlation to clinical outcome measures.

METHODS

We evaluated 97 consecutive patients with intra-articular DRF, operated with combined plating, 7 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was the prevalence of radiographic PA. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, hand grip strength, wrist range of motion (ROM), Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) score. Radiographic examination was performed between 1 and 7 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The prevalence of PA was 29% at the 7-year follow-up. No correlation was found between PA and ROM, hand grip strength, PRWE, QuickDASH, VAS pain scores, or radiographic reduction. Median wrist ROM and grip strength were significantly inferior compared with the uninjured side. Hardware removal was performed in 51.5% of cases. There were 2 cases of tendon ruptures.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined plating can yield a good clinical outcome 7 years postoperatively and a low prevalence of PA. The presence of PA did not correlate to clinical outcome measures or to the accuracy of anatomical reduction 1 year postoperatively. The frequency of tendon ruptures was acceptable, but the high frequency of hardware removal is a concern.