Nonunion and Reoperation Following Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Arthrodesis and Associated Patient Factors

Three predictive scores compared in a retrospective multicenter study of nonunion tibial shaft fracture

BACKGROUND

Delayed union, malunion, and nonunion are serious complications in the healing of fractures. Predicting the risk of nonunion before or after surgery is challenging.

AIM

To compare the most prevalent predictive scores of nonunion used in clinical practice to determine the most accurate score for predicting nonunion.

METHODS

We collected data from patients with tibial shaft fractures undergoing surgery from January 2016 to December 2020 in three different trauma hospitals. In this retrospective multicenter study, we considered only fractures treated with intramedullary nailing. We calculated the tibia FRACTure prediction healING days (FRACTING) score, Nonunion Risk Determination score, and Leeds-Genoa Nonunion Index (LEG-NUI) score at the time of definitive fixation.

RESULTS

Of the 130 patients enrolled, 89 (68.4%) healed within 9 months and were classified as union. The remaining patients (n = 41, 31.5%) healed after more than 9 months or underwent other surgical procedures and were classified as nonunion. After calculation of the three scores, LEG-NUI and FRACTING were the most accurate at predicting healing.

CONCLUSION

LEG-NUI and FRACTING showed the best performances by accurately predicting union and nonunion.

[Two-Stage Reconstruction in Bony Finger Joint Defects - Long-Term Results]

BACKGROUND

Bony defects in finger injuries and infections impose high demands on their treatment due to the close anatomic relationships. Ideally, the injuries are entirely treated in emergency care. Due to the mechanism of the accident, contaminated and compromised soft tissues are often present and set limits to single-stage treatment. We present the long-term subjective and functional results after two-stage reconstruction of bony finger joint defect injuries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a period of 15 years, a total of 40 patients with 43 fingers were treated due to a defect injury in the phalanges. Initially, the finger was stabilised with Kirschner wires after debridement. After consolidation of the soft tissue, the bone was reconstructed in a subsequent operation by interposition of an iliac crest graft. Complications occurred in 9 patients. Twenty-five patients with 27 fingers were followed up for 10.3 years. Range of motion, length of the affected finger, and grip force, each in relation to the contralateral extremity, were recorded. In addition to a subjective assessment of the global result, the daily function was determined by means of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire.

RESULTS

Significant differences compared with the contralateral extremity (p<0.05) were found in length (70 mm; 91.0%) and total mobility of the affected finger (95°; 46.0%), hand span when the thumb was involved (202.5 mm; 93.4%), and power grip when one of the fingers was injured (30 kg; 84.1%). The DASH score was 4.2 points (0-55.8). Subjectively, 88% of patients were satisfied with the treatment outcome.

CONCLUSION

In case of contaminated and compromised soft tissues, the two-stage treatment of bony defect injuries in finger joints by arthrodesis of the joint is a reliable treatment strategy. In the long run, it results in a very satisfactory function of the hand in everyday life although significant differences have been measured compared with the contralateral extremity.

Sex-Based Difference in Bone Healing: A Review of Recent Pre-clinical Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Recent literature has sought to understand differences in fusion failure, specifically considering how patient sex may play a role. Overall, there exists inconclusive data regarding any sex-based differences in bone healing.

RECENT FINDINGS

In vitro studies examining the roles of sex hormones, 5-LO, IGF-1, VEGF, osteoclasts, and OPCs seem to show sexually dimorphic actions. Additionally, donor characteristics and stem cell environment seem to also determine osteogenic potential. Building on this biomolecular basis, in vivo work investigates the aforementioned elements. Broadly, males tend to have a more robust healing compared to females. Taking these findings together, differences in sex hormones levels, their timing and action, and composition of the inflammatory milieu underlie variations in bone healing by sex. Clinically, a robust understanding of bone healing mechanics can inform care of the transgender patient. Transgender patients undergoing hormone therapy present a clinically nuanced scenario for which limited long-term data exist. Such advances would help inform treatment for sports-related injury due to hormonal changes in biomechanics and treatment of transgender youth. While recent advances provide more clarity, conclusive answers remain elusive.