Billing and Utilization Trends for Hand Surgery Indicate Worsening Barriers to Accessing Care

Billing and Utilization Trends in Reconstructive Microsurgery Indicate Worsening Access to Care

BACKGROUND

 Within the last 20-years, Medicare reimbursements for microsurgery have been declining, while physician expenses continue to increase. As a result, hospitals may increase charges to offset revenue losses, which may impose a financial barrier to care. This study aimed to characterize the billing trends in microsurgery and their implications on patient care.

METHODS

 The 2013 to 2020 Provider Utilization and Payment Data Physician and Other Practitioners Dataset was queried for 16 CPT codes. Service counts, hospital charges, and reimbursements were collected. The utilization, weighted mean reimbursements and charges, and charge-to-reimbursement ratios (CRRs) were calculated. The total and annual percent changes were also determined.

RESULTS

 In total, 13 CPT codes (81.3%) were included. The overall number of procedures decreased by 15.0%. The average reimbursement of all microsurgical procedures increased from $618 to $722 (16.7%). The mean charge increased from $3,200 to $4,340 (35.6%). As charges had a greater increase than reimbursement rates, the CRR increased by 15.4%. At the categorical level, all groups had increases in CRRs, except for bone graft (-49.4%) and other procedures (-3.5%). The CRR for free flap breast procedures had the largest percent increase (47.1%). Additionally, lymphangiotomy (28.6%) had the second largest increases.

CONCLUSION

 Our analysis of microsurgical procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2013 to 2020 showed that hospital charges are increasing at a faster rate than reimbursements. This may be in part due to increasing physician expenses, cost of advanced technology in microsurgical procedures, and inadequate reimbursement rates. Regardless, these increased markups may limit patients who are economically disadvantaged from accessing care. Policy makers should consider legislation aimed at updating Medicare reimbursement rates to reflect the increasing complexity and cost associated with microsurgical procedures, as well as regulating charge markups at the hospital level.

Trends in Hospital Billing for Mastectomy and Breast Reconstruction Procedures from 2013 to 2020

BACKGROUND

 With greater acceptance of postmastectomy breast reconstruction (PMBR) as a safe and reliable treatment option, the role of plastic surgeons in breast cancer management continues to rise. As Medicare reimbursements for surgical procedures decline, hospitals may increase charges. Excessive markups can negatively affect uninsured and underinsured patients. We aimed to analyze mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures to gain insights into recent trends in utilization and billing.

METHODS

 We queried the 2013 to 2020 Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data with 14 Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes to collect service count numbers, hospital charges, and reimbursements. We calculated utilization (service counts per million female Medicare enrollees), weighted mean charges and reimbursements, and charge-to-reimbursement ratios (CRRs). We calculated total and annual percentage changes for the included CPT codes.

RESULTS

 Among the 14 CPT codes, 12 CPT codes (85.7%) with nonzero service counts were included. Utilization of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures decreased from 1,889 to 1,288 (-31.8%) procedures per million female Medicare beneficiaries from 2013 to 2020. While the utilization of immediate implant placements (CPT 19340) increased by 36.2%, the utilization of delayed implant placements (CPT 19342) decreased by 15.1%. Reimbursements for the included CPT codes changed minimally over time (-2.9%) but charges increased by 28.9%. These changes resulted in CRRs increasing from 3.3 to 4.4 (+33.3%) from 2013 to 2020. Free flap reconstructions (CPT 19364) had the highest CRRs throughout the study period, increasing from 7.0 in 2013 to 10.3 in 2020 (+47.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

 Our analysis of mastectomy and breast reconstruction procedures billed to Medicare Part B from 2013 to 2020 showed increasingly excessive procedural charges. Rises in hospital charges and CRRs may limit uninsured and underinsured patients from accessing necessary care for breast cancer management. Legislations that monitor hospital markups for PMBR procedures may be considered by policymakers.

Decreasing Reimbursement of Pituitary Tumor Surgery: An Analysis of Medicare Data From 2010 to 2020

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Despite the extensive amount of research aimed at comparing patient outcomes between microscopic transsphenoidal surgery (MTSS) and endoscopic transsphenoidal surgery (ETSS) approaches, there has been relatively little recent investigation into the nationwide utilization and reimbursement trends of both techniques. This study aimed to identify trends in pituitary tumor surgery utilization, charges to Medicare, and reimbursement dependent on (1) MTSS/ETSS surgery type, (2) provider type (ie, neurosurgeon vs ear, nose, and throat), and (3) cosurgery status.

METHODS

This study used publicly available data from the Medicare Physician/Supplier Procedure Summary for the years 2010-2020. Linear regression was used to quantify temporal trends for submitted service counts, submitted charges, reimbursements, and reimbursement-to-charge across the 2010-2020 period.

RESULTS

Regarding service count trends from 2010 to 2020, our results demonstrate a significant increase in ETSS utilization ( = 1.55, CI = 0.99-2.12, P < .001), a significant decrease in MTSS utilization ( = -0.86, CI = -1.21 to -0.51, P < .001), a significant increase in services submitted by otolaryngologists ( = 0.59, CI = 0.24-0.93, P = .0040), and a significant increase in cosurgeries ( = 1.03, CI = 0.24-0.93, P = .0051). Importantly, our results also demonstrated a significant decrease in reimbursements for ETSS procedures ( = -12.74, CI = -22.38 to -3.09, P = .015) and for pituitary tumor surgeries submitted by neurosurgeons specifically ( = -41.56, CI = -51.67 to -31.63, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Our results demonstrated a significant increase in ETSS utilization and a significant decrease in MTSS utilization. We also noted a significant decrease in reimbursements for ETSS procedures and among procedures submitted by neurosurgeons specifically. We hope that our study highlights nationwide utilization and reimbursement patterns that may be useful for guiding future reimbursement-oriented policy development.

Implications of declining medicare reimbursement of hernia repair for surgeons and patients

In conclusion, billing trends reflect declining reimbursement and utilization of hernia repair, and increasing markup ratios may create a financial barrier to accessing hernia for uninsured and underinsured patients. As a new set of hernia repair CPT codes are used in practice, close attention should be paid to the downstream effects of billing practices in hernia repair on physician and patient alike.