1
|
White C, Kendall G, Millington T, Corcoran B, Paul C, Scott RJ, Ackland S. Evaluation of early fluoropyrimidine toxicity in solid organ cancer patients: a retrospective observational study in Australia. Intern Med J 2024; 54:1506-1514. [PMID: 38963005 DOI: 10.1111/imj.16463] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/01/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite common global usage, fluoropyrimidine (FP; 5-flurouracil and capecitabine)-related chemotherapy toxicity is poorly reported in the literature, with serious toxicity ranging from 10% to 40% and early toxicity (within 60 days of exposure) quoted at 14%. Data reflecting the incidence of Grades 3-5 FP-related toxicity in Australian cancer patients is scant, despite the significant impact of toxicity on patients (hospitalisations, intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and even death). AIMS This retrospective audit evaluated Grades 3-5 toxicities in a contemporaneous cohort of 500 patients receiving FP chemotherapies within the Hunter-New England Local Health District from June 2020 to June 2022. Data were extracted from public hospital records and oncology-specific e-records to determine rates of toxicity and associated hospitalisations, intensive care admissions and deaths that occurred within 60 days of first exposure to FP chemotherapy-containing regimens. RESULTS One hundred and fifty incidents of Grades 3-4 toxicity in the first 60 days led to 87 patients presenting to hospital (87/500, 17.4%). The most common serious toxicities were diarrhoea (39.3%), nausea and vomiting (22.7%) and febrile neutropaenia (10%). Four patients were admitted to the ICU, and four patients died of toxicity. Within the first 60 days, 22.2% of patients required treatment delays, 21.4% required dose reductions, and 7.8% of patients ceased treatment because of toxicities. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Our experience reflects international reports and is likely generalisable to the Australian population. These data are a basis to understand the potential benefits of precision medicine strategies such as pharmacogenomic screening to improve patient tolerability and the cost-effectiveness of FP chemotherapy prescribing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra White
- University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Maitland Hospital, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Guy Kendall
- Medical Oncology, Maitland Hospital, Maitland, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tegan Millington
- Information and Computer Technology Services, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- District Cancer Services, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Bern Corcoran
- District Cancer Services, Hunter New England Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Paul
- University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rodney J Scott
- University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Pathology North John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen Ackland
- University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
- Medical Oncology, Lake Macquarie Private Hospital, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Challoob MA, Mohammed NS. Assessing the Hepatotoxic Effects of Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy in Male Iraqi Colorectal Cancer Patients. Cureus 2024; 16:e58126. [PMID: 38741871 PMCID: PMC11088962 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/12/2024] [Indexed: 05/16/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one the most frequently occurring cancer types among various populations. Fluoropyrimidine is the backbone of first-line chemotherapy, the oral capecitabine, or intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in various combinations and schedules the chemotherapy regime in the treatment of a wide variety of gastrointestinal cancers. The enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) functions as the rate-limiting step in the metabolism of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapies, and patients with complete or partial DPD deficiency are at increased risk of severe and fatal toxicity during treatment with fluorouracil. AIM This study aimed to examine the chemotoxicity of the 5-FU drug on hepatocytes in male Iraqi CRC patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS This research is a cross-sectional study conducted between November 2022 and April 2023. The study included 80 male participants who had undergone surgical intervention for stage III CRC under the care of the Misan Health Directorate, Misan Center for Tumors Treatment, located in Misan, Iraq. Based on their subsequent surgical treatment, the participants were divided into two groups. The first group, comprising 45 males aged between 41 and 71 years, experienced a relapse despite receiving adjuvant therapy, which involved a singular cycle of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (5-FU). The second group consisted of 35 male patients with CRC, aged between 40 and 57 years, who did not experience a relapse post-adjuvant therapy. Their adjuvant therapy involved a single round of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy with 5-FU. Relapse in patients was determined by assessing the white blood cell count (WBC). RESULTS Liver enzymes were significantly increased after 5-FU treatment, while the concentration of albumin was significantly decreased. CONCLUSION The findings of our study clearly indicate that 5-FU induced hepatic injury, lowering the hepatocyte function with elevated levels of hepatic enzymes and low concentration of albumin in the blood, which is an important predictive marker of chemotherapy toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhtada A Challoob
- Department of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, IRQ
- College of Pharmacy, University of Misan, Misan, IRQ
| | - Nawar S Mohammed
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Baghdad, College of Medicine, Baghdad, IRQ
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fariman SA, Jahangard Rafsanjani Z, Hasanzad M, Niksalehi K, Nikfar S. Upfront DPYD Genotype-Guided Treatment for Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced and Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis. Value Health Reg Issues 2023; 37:71-80. [PMID: 37329861 DOI: 10.1016/j.vhri.2023.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2022] [Revised: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 04/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Fluoropyrimidines are the most widely used chemotherapy drugs for advanced and metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). Individuals with certain DPYD gene variants are exposed to an increased risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicities. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of preemptive DPYD genotyping to guide fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC. METHODS Overall survival of DPYD wild-type patients who received a standard dose and variant carriers treated with a reduced dose were analyzed by parametric survival models. A decision tree and a partitioned survival analysis model with a lifetime horizon were designed, taking the Iranian healthcare perspective. Input parameters were extracted from the literature or expert opinion. To address parameter uncertainty, scenario and sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS Compared with no screening, the genotype-guided treatment strategy was cost-saving ($41.7). Nevertheless, due to a possible reduction in the survival of patients receiving reduced-dose regimens, it was associated with fewer quality-adjusted life-years (9.45 vs 9.28). In sensitivity analyses, the prevalence of DPYD variants had the most significant impact on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. The genotyping strategy would remain cost-saving, as long as the genotyping cost is < $49 per test. In a scenario in which we assumed equal efficacy for the 2 strategies, genotyping was the dominant strategy, associated with less costs (∼$1) and more quality-adjusted life-years (0.1292). CONCLUSIONS DPYD genotyping to guide fluoropyrimidine treatment in patients with advanced or metastatic CRC is cost-saving from the perspective of the Iranian health system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soroush Ahmadi Fariman
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | | | - Mandana Hasanzad
- Medical Genomics Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran; Personalized Medicine Research Center, Endocrinology and Metabolism Clinical Sciences Institute, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Kimia Niksalehi
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Shekoufeh Nikfar
- Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Challoob MA, Mohammed NS. The Evaluation of Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Enzyme Level in the Serum of Colorectal Cancer Iraqi Males on Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy (Capecitabine). Cureus 2023; 15:e44534. [PMID: 37790008 PMCID: PMC10544661 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 10/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The cornerstone of systemic chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) revolves around fluoropyrimidines. This class encompasses 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), which is administered intravenously, along with its oral prodrug counterpart, capecitabine. Central to the metabolism of both 5-FU and capecitabine is the pivotal enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Operating at the rate-limiting juncture, DPD assumes a critical role. Notably, a deficiency in DPD significantly elevates the risk quotient for encountering unfavorable outcomes linked to the administration of fluoropyrimidines. This study seeks to assess the significance of DPD enzyme levels in the serum of Iraqi colorectal cancer male patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, specifically with capecitabine. It adopts a case-control design and comprises 80 male participants. Those males are divided into two distinct groups. Group 1 comprises 45 male patients diagnosed with CRC who have experienced relapse subsequent to undergoing chemotherapy based on fluoropyrimidine (capecitabine). Their ages span from 41 to 71 years, and they were treated at the Misan Health Directorate/Misan Center for Tumor Treatment. Group 2 encompasses 35 male patients diagnosed with CRC who underwent fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (capecitabine) without encountering relapse. Their ages range from 40 to 57 years. All participants were provided with comprehensive information regarding the research, and data collection occurred through a structured questionnaire. Subsequent to capecitabine-based treatment, serum samples were collected from CRC patients (stage III). The findings from this research indicate a notable elevation in DPD enzyme activity. Furthermore, a significant reduction in enzyme activity was observed among patients who experienced relapse, in contrast to those who remained non-relapsed. The results indicate that individuals with an insufficiency in DPD are notably more vulnerable to experiencing severe and potentially life-threatening side effects upon exposure to the commonly utilized chemotherapy drug, 5-FU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nawar S Mohammed
- Department of Biochemistry, College of Medicine, University of Baghdad, Baghdad, IRQ
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kieran R, Mitchell T, Fazari AA, Chinoy A, Moloney C, McCaffrey J. DPD deficiency in an Irish oncology centre: Prevalence and clinical implications. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023:10781552231192107. [PMID: 37559385 DOI: 10.1177/10781552231192107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine are metabolised by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). Up to 9% of people have low levels of a working DPD enzyme and are at risk of severe toxicity from 5FU/capecitabine. In April 2020, the EMEA recommended patients undergo prospective screening for DPD deficiency before starting treatment, and this was introduced in our hospital. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed records of all patients receiving 5FU/capecitabine in a tertiary Irish cancer centre from May 2020 to April 2021 (n = 197), and those starting first-line treatment in May 2019-April 2020 (n = 97). Our primary outcome was to estimate the prevalence of DPYD variant genes by prospective genotypic screening, with secondary outcomes including variant prevalence by prospective and reactive screening in patients receiving first-line treatment, and 5FU toxicity/tolerability in those with detected variants. RESULTS In those treated 2020-2021, cancer subtypes included colorectal (n = 120, 61%), breast (n = 34, 17%), and biliary/pancreatic cancers (n = 21, 11%). Median patient age was 62 (range 25-86 years); 40% (n = 79) of patients were screened overall, with a prospective-screening deficiency prevalence of 6.8% (n = 3 of 44). Three patients had pathogenic DPYD-variants detected by prospective screening and tolerated treatment with 50% up-front dose reduction of 5FU, two had variants of uncertain significance detected by reactive screening. DISCUSSION Other Irish studies estimated prevalence at 11-12%. As the number of variants detected was small, and screening rates were incomplete, our study may have underestimated prevalence. CONCLUSIONS Approximately 6.8% of Irish patients may carry DPD deficiencies, prospective screening is essential to reduce the risk of life-threatening toxicity in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruth Kieran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Taylor Mitchell
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Afrah Al Fazari
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Aleena Chinoy
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Carolyn Moloney
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - John McCaffrey
- Department of Medical Oncology, Mater Misericordiae University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- School of Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Koleva-Kolarova R, Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Mölken MRV, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Wordsworth S, Tsiachristas A. Budget impact and transferability of cost-effectiveness of DPYD testing in metastatic breast cancer in three health systems. Per Med 2023; 20:357-374. [PMID: 37577962 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2022-0133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/15/2023]
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness and budget impact of introducing extended DPYD testing prior to fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients in the UK, The Netherlands and Hungary were examined. DPYD testing with ToxNav© was cost-effective in all three countries. In the UK and The Netherlands, the ToxNav strategy led to more quality-adjusted life years and fewer costs to the health systems compared with no genetic testing and standard dosing of capecitabine/5-fluorouracil. In Hungary, the ToxNav strategy produced more quality-adjusted life years at a higher cost compared with no testing and standard dose. The ToxNav strategy was found to offer budget savings in the UK and in The Netherlands, while in Hungary it resulted in additional budget costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - László Szilberhorn
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Koleva-Kolarova R, Vellekoop H, Huygens S, Versteegh M, Mölken MRV, Szilberhorn L, Zelei T, Nagy B, Wordsworth S, Tsiachristas A. Cost-effectiveness of extended DPYD testing before fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer in the UK. Per Med 2023; 20:339-355. [PMID: 37665240 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2022-0099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/05/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ToxNav©, a multivariant genetic test, to screen for DPYD followed by personalized chemotherapy dosing for metastatic breast cancer in the UK compared with no testing followed by standard dose, standard of care. In the main analysis, ToxNav was dominant over standard of care, producing 0.19 additional quality-adjusted life years and savings of £78,000 per patient over a lifetime. The mean additional quality-adjusted life years per person from 1000 simulations was 0.23 savings (95% CI: 0.22-0.24) at £99,000 (95% CI: £95-102,000). Varying input parameters independently by range of 20% was unlikely to change the results in the main analysis. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed ~97% probability of the ToxNav strategy to be dominant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Heleen Vellekoop
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Simone Huygens
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maureen Rutten-van Mölken
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - László Szilberhorn
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Eötvös Loránd University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Tamás Zelei
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Balázs Nagy
- Syreon Research Institute, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Health Economics Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Oxford Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sukkarieh HH, AlSagoor T, Alnuhait M, Bustami R, Bryson S, Adem FMK, Abdalla H, Karbani G. Awareness and attitudes of oncology specialists toward dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase testing in Saudi Arabia. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 2023; 6:e1704. [PMID: 36806724 PMCID: PMC9939998 DOI: 10.1002/cnr2.1704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/13/2021] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidines (FP) are among the most common class of prescribed anti-neoplastic drugs. This class has severe to moderate toxicity in around 10%-40% of those who take 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine for the treatment of cancer. In practice many patients with severe toxicities from FP use had dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme deficiency. Several studies have proposed DPD screening before treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine or other drugs belonging to the FP group. This study aims to assess the level of awareness and attitudes of oncology specialists in Saudi Arabia toward genetic screening for DPD prior to giving FP. This highlights the importance of health guidelines required for implementation in our health care system, as a framework to adopt testing as a regular practice in clinical care. Based on the findings in this study, guidelines have been suggested for the Middle East North Africa region. METHODS A cross-sectional survey study was conducted during 2021 targeting oncologists and clinical pharmacists working in the oncology departments across Saudi Arabia. RESULTS A total of 130 oncologists and pharmacists completed the questionnaire representing a response rate of 87%. Most of the respondents indicated that they prescribe FP in clinical practice, but 41% of respondents reported that they have never ordered a specific molecular test during their practice. Only 20% of respondents reported that they often screen for DPD deficiency prior to prescribing FP. Significantly higher rates of awareness of potential dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) mutation were observed among respondents in governmental hospitals (81.1% vs. 47.4% in private hospitals), and among those with more years of practice (80.6% if 5 or more years of practice vs. 59.3% if less than 5 years of practice). Also, higher rates of observing the impact of DPD testing were present among respondents with a PharmD (35% vs. 11% for oncologists and 18% for other professions) and among those with 5 or more years of practice (24.6% vs. 7.7% among those with less than 5 years). CONCLUSION While in some institutions there is a high level of awareness among oncology specialists in Saudi Arabia regarding the effect of the potentially serious DPD enzyme deficiency as a result of gene mutations, screening for these mutations prior to prescribing FP is not a routine practice in hospitals across the country. The findings of this study should promote personalized medicine with recognition of interpatient variability via DPD testing to manage the risks of FP prescribing more effectively in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hatouf H. Sukkarieh
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
- College of BusinessAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Turki AlSagoor
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
- Saudi Food and Drug Authority (SFDA)RiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Mohammed Alnuhait
- College of Pharmacy, Department of Clinical PharmacyUmm Al Qura UniversityMakkahSaudi Arabia
| | - Rami Bustami
- College of BusinessAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Scott Bryson
- Institute of Pharmacy & Biomedical SciencesUniversity of StrathclydeGlasgowScotland
| | | | - Hana Abdalla
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| | - Gulsan Karbani
- College of MedicineAlfaisal UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lešnjaković L, Ganoci L, Bilić I, Šimičević L, Mucalo I, Pleština S, Božina N. DPYD genotyping and predicting fluoropyrimidine toxicity: where do we stand? Pharmacogenomics 2023; 24:93-106. [PMID: 36636997 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2022-0135] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are antineoplastic drugs widely used in the treatment of various solid tumors. Nearly 30% of patients treated with FP chemotherapy experience severe FP-related toxicity, and in some cases, toxicity can be fatal. Patients with reduced activity of DPD, the main enzyme responsible for the breakdown of FP, are at an increased risk of experiencing severe FP-related toxicity. While European regulatory agencies and clinical societies recommend pre-treatment DPD deficiency screening for patients starting treatment with FPs, this is not the case with American ones. Pharmacogenomic guidelines issued by several pharmacogenetic organizations worldwide recommend testing four DPD gene (DPYD) risk variants, but these can predict only a proportion of toxicity cases. New evidence on additional common DPYD polymorphisms, as well as identification and functional characterization of rare DPYD variants, could partially address the missing heritability of DPD deficiency and FP-related toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucija Lešnjaković
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Lana Ganoci
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Therapy Individualization, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ivan Bilić
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.,School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Livija Šimičević
- Division of Pharmacogenomics and Therapy Individualization, Department of Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Iva Mucalo
- Centre for Applied Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stjepko Pleština
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.,School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Nada Božina
- Department of Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Morris SA, Alsaidi AT, Verbyla A, Cruz A, Macfarlane C, Bauer J, Patel JN. Cost Effectiveness of Pharmacogenetic Testing for Drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) Guidelines: A Systematic Review. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:1318-1328. [PMID: 36149409 PMCID: PMC9828439 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2754] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the evidence on cost-effectiveness of pharmacogenetic (PGx)-guided treatment for drugs with Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium (CPIC) guidelines. A systematic review was conducted using multiple biomedical literature databases from inception to June 2021. Full articles comparing PGx-guided with nonguided treatment were included for data extraction. Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) was used to assess robustness of each study (0-100). Data are reported using descriptive statistics. Of 108 studies evaluating 39 drugs, 77 (71%) showed PGx testing was cost-effective (CE) (N = 48) or cost-saving (CS) (N = 29); 21 (20%) were not CE; 10 (9%) were uncertain. Clopidogrel had the most articles (N = 23), of which 22 demonstrated CE or CS, followed by warfarin (N = 16), of which 7 demonstrated CE or CS. Of 26 studies evaluating human leukocyte antigen (HLA) testing for abacavir (N = 8), allopurinol (N = 10), or carbamazepine/phenytoin (N = 8), 15 demonstrated CE or CS. Nine of 11 antidepressant articles demonstrated CE or CS. The median QHES score reflected high-quality studies (91; range 48-100). Most studies evaluating cost-effectiveness favored PGx testing. Limited data exist on cost-effectiveness of preemptive and multigene testing across disease states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah A. Morris
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and PharmacogenomicsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Allison Verbyla
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Adilen Cruz
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | | | - Joseph Bauer
- Health Economics and Outcomes Research, Department of BiostatisticsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| | - Jai N. Patel
- Department of Cancer Pharmacology and PharmacogenomicsLevine Cancer Institute, Atrium HealthCharlotteNorth CarolinaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
White C, Scott R, Paul CL, Ackland SP. Pharmacogenomics in the era of personalised medicine. Med J Aust 2022; 217:510-513. [PMID: 36259142 PMCID: PMC9827847 DOI: 10.5694/mja2.51759] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 07/14/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra White
- Maitland HospitalMaitlandNSW,University of NewcastleNewcastleNSW
| | - Rodney Scott
- University of NewcastleNewcastleNSW,Pathology NorthNewcastleNSW
| | - Christine L Paul
- University of NewcastleNewcastleNSW,Priority Research Centre for Health BehaviourUniversity of NewcastleNewcastleNSW
| | - Stephen P Ackland
- Lake Macquarie Private HospitalGatesheadNSW,Hunter Cancer Research AllianceNewcastleNSW
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Brooks GA, Tapp S, Daly AT, Busam JA, Tosteson ANA. Cost-effectiveness of DPYD Genotyping Prior to Fluoropyrimidine-based Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Colon Cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer 2022; 21:e189-e195. [PMID: 35668003 PMCID: PMC10496767 DOI: 10.1016/j.clcc.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy substantially reduces recurrence and mortality after resection of stage 3 colon cancer. While standard doses of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine are safe for most patients, the risk of severe toxicity is increased for the approximately 6% of patients with dihydropyimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency caused by pathogenic DPYD gene variants. Pre-treatment screening for pathogenic DPYD gene variants reduces severe toxicity but has not been widely adopted in the United States. METHODS We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis of DPYD genotyping prior to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for stage 3 colon cancer, covering the c.1129-5923C>G (HapB3), c.1679T>G (*13), c.1905+1G>A (*2A), and c.2846A>T gene variants. We used a Markov model with a 5-year horizon, taking a United States healthcare perspective. Simulated patients with pathogenic DPYD gene variants received reduced-dose fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for DPYD genotyping. RESULTS Compared with no screening for DPD deficiency, DPYD genotyping increased per-patient costs by $78 and improved survival by 0.0038 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), leading to an ICER of $20,506/QALY. In 1-way sensitivity analyses, The ICER exceeded $50,000 per QALY when the cost of the DPYD genotyping assay was greater than $286. In probabilistic sensitivity analysis using a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY DPYD genotyping was preferred to no screening in 96.2% of iterations. CONCLUSION Among patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy for stage 3 colon cancer, screening for DPD deficiency with DPYD genotyping is a cost-effective strategy for preventing infrequent but severe and sometimes fatal toxicities of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriel A Brooks
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH.
| | - Stephanie Tapp
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| | - Allan T Daly
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Anna N A Tosteson
- Dartmouth Cancer Center, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center/Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH; The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, NH
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chaudhari VS, Hole KC, Issa AM. Evaluating the quality of the economic evidence in colorectal cancer genomics studies. Per Med 2022; 19:361-375. [PMID: 35786999 DOI: 10.2217/pme-2021-0006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The increase in the use of genome-based screening and diagnostic tests adds to the overall costs of oncologic care for colorectal cancer. This, in turn, has resulted in an increase in published economic analyses. Aim: To perform a systematic literature review of the available economic evidence evaluating the value of genomic testing for colorectal cancer and appraise the quality of the economic studies conducted to date. Methods: A systematic review of the literature for economic studies of colorectal cancer genomics from January 2006 through October 2020, and evaluation of study quality using the Quality of Health Economic Studies (QHES) instrument was conducted. The validated QHES was then applied to a final set of articles that met eligibility criteria. Results: Our search of the literature initially yielded 12,859 records. A final set of 49 articles met our inclusion criteria. The QHES score ranged from 24 to 100, with an average score of 82. Most of the studies (n = 40, 82%) scored above 75 and were considered of good quality. Conclusion: Our analysis revealed that most of the economic analyses of colorectal cancer genomic molecular diagnostics in the literature may be of good quality. There is, however, some variation in methodological rigor between the articles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek S Chaudhari
- Personalized Precision Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, Springfield, PA 19064, USA.,Health Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Kanchan C Hole
- Personalized Precision Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, Springfield, PA 19064, USA
| | - Amalia M Issa
- Personalized Precision Medicine & Targeted Therapeutics, Springfield, PA 19064, USA.,Health Policy, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.,Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, QC, H3S 1Z1, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Varughese LA, Bhupathiraju M, Hoffecker G, Terek S, Harr M, Hakonarson H, Cambareri C, Marini J, Landgraf J, Chen J, Kanter G, Lau-Min KS, Massa RC, Damjanov N, Reddy NJ, Oyer RA, Teitelbaum UR, Tuteja S. Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers (IMPACT-GI): Study Protocol for a Pragmatic Implementation Trial for Establishing DPYD and UGT1A1 Screening to Guide Chemotherapy Dosing. Front Oncol 2022; 12:859846. [PMID: 35865463 PMCID: PMC9295185 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.859846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fluoropyrimidines (fluorouracil [5-FU], capecitabine) and irinotecan are commonly prescribed chemotherapy agents for gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. Pharmacogenetic (PGx) testing for germline DPYD and UGT1A1 variants associated with reduced enzyme activity holds the potential to identify patients at high risk for severe chemotherapy-induced toxicity. Slow adoption of PGx testing in routine clinical care is due to implementation barriers, including long test turnaround times, lack of integration in the electronic health record (EHR), and ambiguity in test cost coverage. We sought to establish PGx testing in our health system following the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework as a guide. Our implementation study aims to address barriers to PGx testing. Methods The Implementing Pharmacogenetic Testing in Gastrointestinal Cancers (IMPACT-GI) study is a non-randomized, pragmatic, open-label implementation study at three sites within a major academic health system. Eligible patients with a GI malignancy indicated for treatment with 5-FU, capecitabine, or irinotecan will undergo PGx testing prior to chemotherapy initiation. Specimens will be sent to an academic clinical laboratory followed by return of results in the EHR with appropriate clinical decision support for the care team. We hypothesize that the availability of a rapid turnaround PGx test with specific dosing recommendations will increase PGx test utilization to guide pharmacotherapy decisions and improve patient safety outcomes. Primary implementation endpoints are feasibility, fidelity, and penetrance. Exploratory analyses for clinical effectiveness of genotyping will include assessing grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicity using available clinical data, patient-reported outcomes, and quality of life measures. Conclusion We describe the formative work conducted to prepare our health system for DPYD and UGT1A1 testing. Our prospective implementation study will evaluate the clinical implementation of this testing program and create the infrastructure necessary to ensure sustainability of PGx testing in our health system. The results of this study may help other institutions interested in implementing PGx testing in oncology care. Clinical Trial Registration https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04736472, identifier [NCT04736472].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa A. Varughese
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Madhuri Bhupathiraju
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Glenda Hoffecker
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Shannon Terek
- Center for Applied Genomics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Margaret Harr
- Center for Applied Genomics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Hakon Hakonarson
- Center for Applied Genomics, The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Christine Cambareri
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jessica Marini
- Department of Pharmacy, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jeffrey Landgraf
- Information Services Applications, Penn Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Jinbo Chen
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Genevieve Kanter
- Division of Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Kelsey S. Lau-Min
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Ryan C. Massa
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Nevena Damjanov
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Nandi J. Reddy
- Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Lancaster General Health, Penn Medicine, Lancaster, PA, United States
| | - Randall A. Oyer
- Ann B. Barshinger Cancer Institute, Lancaster General Health, Penn Medicine, Lancaster, PA, United States
| | - Ursina R. Teitelbaum
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sony Tuteja
- Division of Translational Medicine and Human Genetics, Department of Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
- *Correspondence: Sony Tuteja,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Diasio RB, Offer SM. Testing for Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency to Individualize 5-Fluorouracil Therapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:3207. [PMID: 35804978 PMCID: PMC9264755 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Severe adverse events (toxicity) related to the use of the commonly used chemotherapeutic drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) affect one in three patients and are the primary reason cited for premature discontinuation of therapy. Deficiency of the 5-FU catabolic enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD, encoded by DPYD) has been recognized for the past 3 decades as a pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with high risk of 5-FU toxicity. An appreciable fraction of patients with DPD deficiency that receive 5-FU-based chemotherapy die as a result of toxicity. In this manuscript, we review recent progress in identifying actionable markers of DPD deficiency and the current status of integrating those markers into the clinical decision-making process. The limitations of currently available tests, as well as the regulatory status of pre-therapeutic DPYD testing, are also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert B. Diasio
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA;
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - Steven M. Offer
- Department of Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA;
- Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
White C, Scott RJ, Paul C, Ziolkowski A, Mossman D, Fox SB, Michael M, Ackland S. Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency and Implementation of Upfront DPYD Genotyping. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2022; 112:791-802. [PMID: 35607723 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.2667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines (FP; 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, and tegafur) are a commonly prescribed class of antimetabolite chemotherapies, used for various solid organ malignancies in over 2 million patients globally per annum. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), encoded by the DPYD gene, is the critical enzyme implicated in FP metabolism. DPYD variant genotypes can result in decreased DPD production, leading to the development of severe toxicities resulting in hospitalization, intensive care admission, and even death. Management of toxicity incurs financial burden on both patients and healthcare systems alike. Upfront DPYD genotyping to identify variant carriers allows an opportunity to identify patients who are at high risk to suffer from serious toxicities and allow prospective dose adjustment of FP treatment. This approach has been shown to reduce patient morbidity, as well as improve the cost-effectiveness of managing FP treatment. Upfront DPYD genotyping has been recently endorsed by several countries in Europe and the United Kingdom. This review summarizes current knowledge about DPD deficiency and upfront DPYD genotyping, including clinical and cost-effectiveness outcomes, with the intent of supporting implementation of an upfront DPYD genotyping service with individualized dose-personalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra White
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Rodney J Scott
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Biomedical Science and Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Molecular Genetics, Pathology North John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Christine Paul
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Andrew Ziolkowski
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Pathology North John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - David Mossman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, Pathology North John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Stephen B Fox
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Michael Michael
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stephen Ackland
- School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Medical Research Institute, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia.,Hunter Cancer Centre, Lake Macquarie Private Hospital, Gateshead, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Tsiachristas A, Vallance G, Koleva-Kolarova R, Taylor H, Solomons L, Rizzo G, Chaytor C, Miah J, Wordsworth S, Hassan AB. Can upfront DPYD extended variant testing reduce toxicity and associated hospital costs of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy? A propensity score matched analysis of 2022 UK patients. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:458. [PMID: 35473510 PMCID: PMC9044697 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2021] [Accepted: 04/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim To independently assess the impact of mandatory testing using an extended DPYD variant panel (ToxNav®) and consequent dose adjustment of Capecitabine/5-FU on recorded quantitative toxicity, symptoms of depression, and hospital costs. Methods We used propensity score matching (PSM) to match 466 patients tested with ToxNav® with 1556 patients from a historical cohort, and performed regression analysis to estimate the impact of ToxNav®on toxicity, depression, and hospital costs. Results ToxNav® appeared to reduce the likelihood of experiencing moderate (OR: 0.59; 95%CI: 0.45–0.77) and severe anaemia (OR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.33–0.90), and experience of pain for more than 4 days a week (OR: 0.50; 95%CI: 0.30–0.83), while it increased the likelihood of mild neutropenia (OR: 1.73; 95%CI: 1.27–2.35). It also reduced the cost of chemotherapy by 12% (95%CI: 3–31) or £9765, the cost of non-elective hospitalisation by 23% (95%CI: 8–36) or £2331, and the cost of critical care by 21% (95%CI: 2–36) or £1219 per patient. For the DPYD variant associated with critical risk of toxicity (rs3918290), the improved non-elective hospital costs were > £20,000, whereas variants associated with hand-foot syndrome toxicity had no detectable cost improvement. Conclusion Upfront testing of DPYD variants appears to reduce the toxicity burden of Capecitabine and 5-FU in cancer patients and can lead to substantial hospital cost savings, only if the dose management of the drugs in response to variants detected is standardised and regulated. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09576-3.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK.
| | | | - Rositsa Koleva-Kolarova
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Junel Miah
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Sarah Wordsworth
- Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Richard Doll Building, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7LF, UK
| | - A Bassim Hassan
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust, Oxford, UK.,Sir William Dunn School of Pathology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wang L, Howlett S, Essapen S. Treating patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy since the onset of routine prospective testing-The experience of a large oncology center in the United Kingdom. Semin Oncol 2021; 49:170-177. [PMID: 35027218 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2021] [Revised: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is used across many tumor types and settings. The incidence of severe adverse events (SAEs) is around 20%. Mortality is 0.5%-1%. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) plays a key role in fluoropyrimidine inactivation. Key DPYD mutations are linked to a high risk of SAEs. Pretreatment DPD screening was mandated by EMA guidelines in April 2020 and widely adopted thereafter. Uncertainty remains regarding optimal dosing practice. METHODS We retrospectively examined records of all 23 patients with DPYD mutation who started chemotherapy between April and November 2020. Our center tests for the mutations considered clinically actionable by Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium and uses the Gene Activity Score (GAS) to guide dose reduction. RESULTS Most patients started on a 50% dose. One started on 100% and experienced mild diarrhea after cycle 2; DPD was tested belatedly, subsequent cycles were reduced to 50% and he remained well. Three patients receiving chemo-radiotherapy started on 76% dose; 50% was felt to be subtherapeutic. One of them had no toxicities; another had grade 2 nausea and a hospital attendance with non-neutropenic fever; the third was admitted for 6 weeks with pancolitis. Seven patients did not have toxicities above grade 1 and no hospital attendances. Five patients had further dose reductions. None had dose escalation. CONCLUSION As our experience shows, patients with DPD deficiency are heterogeneous. Worryingly, SAEs occur despite dose reduction according to GAS. Others had minimal toxicity and may be under-dosed by GAS. There are clearly many factors at play other than the 4 DPYD variants. The DPD result must be available and inform first cycle dosing. Dose should be cautiously titrated up if tolerated; this was not done at our center due to clinician caution. Further research is needed to guide this. Patients should be reviewed frequently, counselled regarding their DPD status, and empowered to seek advice promptly when they feel unwell.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lei Wang
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom.
| | - Sarah Howlett
- Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, Surrey, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Gmeiner WH. A narrative review of genetic factors affecting fluoropyrimidine toxicity. PRECISION CANCER MEDICINE 2021; 4:38. [PMID: 34901834 PMCID: PMC8664072 DOI: 10.21037/pcm-21-17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our objective is to document progress in developing personalized therapy with fluoropyrimidine drugs (FPs) to improve outcomes for cancer patients and to identify areas requiring further investigation. BACKGROUND FPs including 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), are among the most widely used drugs for treating colorectal cancer (CRC) and other gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. While FPs confer a survival benefit for CRC patients, serious systemic toxicities, including neutropenia, occur in ~30% of patients with lethality in 0.5-1% of patients. While serious systemic toxicities may occur in any patient, patients with polymorphisms in DPYD, which encodes the rate-limiting enzyme for pyrimidine degradation are at very high risk. Other genetic factors affecting risk for 5-FU toxicity, including miR-27a, are under investigation. METHODS Literature used to inform the text of this article was selected from PubMed.gov from the National Library of Medicine while regulatory documents were identified via Google search. CONCLUSIONS Clinical studies to date have validated four DPYD polymorphisms (DPYD*2A, DPYD*13, c.2846A>T, HapB3) associated with serious toxicities in patients treated with 5-FU. Genetic screening for these is being implemented in the Netherlands and the UK and has been shown to be a cost-effective way to improve outcomes. Factors other than DPYD polymorphisms (e.g., miR-27a, TYMS, ENOSF1, p53) also affect 5-FU toxicity. Functional testing for deficient pyrimidine catabolism {defined as [U] >16 ng/mL or [UH2]:[U] <10} is being implemented in France and has demonstrated utility in identifying patients with elevated risk for 5-FU toxicity. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) from plasma levels of 5-FU during first cycle treatment also is being used to improve outcomes and pharmacokinetic-based dosing is being used to increase the percent of patients within optimal area under the curve (AUC) (18-28 mg*h/L) values. Patients maintained in the optimal AUC range experienced significantly reduced systemic toxicities. As understanding the genetic basis for increased risk of 5-FU toxicity becomes more refined, the development of functional-based methods to optimize treatment is likely to become more widespread.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William H Gmeiner
- Department of Cancer Biology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
García-Alfonso P, Saiz-Rodríguez M, Mondéjar R, Salazar J, Páez D, Borobia AM, Safont MJ, García-García I, Colomer R, García-González X, Herrero MJ, López-Fernández LA, Abad-Santos F. Consensus of experts from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology for the genotyping of DPYD in cancer patients who are candidates for treatment with fluoropyrimidines. Clin Transl Oncol 2021; 24:483-494. [PMID: 34773566 PMCID: PMC8885558 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-021-02708-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) and oral fluoropyrimidines, such as capecitabine, are widely used in the treatment of cancer, especially gastrointestinal tumors and breast cancer, but their administration can produce serious and even lethal toxicity. This toxicity is often related to the partial or complete deficiency of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme, which causes a reduction in clearance and a longer half-life of 5-FU. It is advisable to determine if a DPD deficiency exists before administering these drugs by genotyping DPYD gene polymorphisms. The objective of this consensus of experts, in which representatives from the Spanish Pharmacogenetics and Pharmacogenomics Society and the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology participated, is to establish clear recommendations for the implementation of genotype and/or phenotype testing for DPD deficiency in patients who are candidates to receive fluoropyrimidines. The genotyping of DPYD previous to treatment classifies individuals as normal, intermediate, or poor metabolizers. Normal metabolizers do not require changes in the initial dose, intermediate metabolizers should start treatment with fluoropyrimidines at doses reduced to 50%, and poor metabolizers are contraindicated for fluoropyrimidines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P García-Alfonso
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), C/Doctor Esquerdo, 46, 28007, Madrid, Spain.
| | - M Saiz-Rodríguez
- Research Unit, Fundación Burgos por la Investigación de la Salud (FBIS), Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Burgos, Spain
| | - R Mondéjar
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), Madrid, Spain
| | - J Salazar
- Research Institute of Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Páez
- Medical Oncology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), Barcelona, España
| | - A M Borobia
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Safont
- Medical Oncology Service, Consorcio Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Universidad de Valencia, CIBERONC, Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), Valencia, Spain
| | - I García-García
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Madrid, Spain
| | - R Colomer
- Medical Oncology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa y Cátedra de Medicina Personalizada de Precisión de la Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica (SEOM), Madrid, Spain
| | - X García-González
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Madrid, Spain
| | - M J Herrero
- Pharmacogenetics Platform, IIS La Fe-Hospital La Fe and Pharmacology Department, Universidad de Valencia, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Valencia, Spain
| | - L A López-Fernández
- Hospital Pharmacy Service, Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañón, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), Madrid, Spain
| | - F Abad-Santos
- Clinical Pharmacology Service, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Sociedad Española de Farmacogenética y Farmacogenómica (SEFF), C/Diego de León, 62., 28006, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Hutchcraft ML, Lin N, Zhang S, Sears C, Zacholski K, Belcher EA, Durbin EB, Villano JL, Cavnar MJ, Arnold SM, Ueland FR, Kolesar JM. Real-World Evaluation of Universal Germline Screening for Cancer Treatment-Relevant Pharmacogenes. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:4524. [PMID: 34572750 PMCID: PMC8468204 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the frequency of clinically actionable treatment-relevant germline pharmacogenomic variants in patients with cancer and assess the real-world clinical utility of universal screening using whole-exome sequencing in this population. Cancer patients underwent research-grade germline whole-exome sequencing as a component of sequencing for somatic variants. Analysis in a clinical bioinformatics pipeline identified clinically actionable pharmacogenomic variants. Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium guidelines defined clinical actionability. We assessed clinical utility by reviewing electronic health records to determine the frequency of patients receiving pharmacogenomically actionable anti-cancer agents and associated outcomes. This observational study evaluated 291 patients with cancer. More than 90% carried any clinically relevant pharmacogenetic variant. At least one disease-relevant variant impacting anti-cancer agents was identified in 26.5% (77/291). Nine patients with toxicity-associated pharmacogenomic variants were treated with a relevant medication: seven UGT1A1 intermediate metabolizers were treated with irinotecan, one intermediate DPYD metabolizer was treated with 5-fluorouracil, and one TPMT poor metabolizer was treated with mercaptopurine. These individuals were more likely to experience treatment-associated toxicities than their wild-type counterparts (p = 0.0567). One UGT1A1 heterozygote died after a single dose of irinotecan due to irinotecan-related adverse effects. Identifying germline pharmacogenomic variants was feasible using whole-exome sequencing. Actionable pharmacogenetic variants are common and relevant to patients undergoing cancer treatment. Universal pharmacogenomic screening can be performed using whole-exome sequencing data originally obtained for quality control purposes and could be considered for patients who are candidates for irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, capecitabine, and mercaptopurine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan L. Hutchcraft
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (M.L.H.); (F.R.U.)
| | - Nan Lin
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
| | - Shulin Zhang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.Z.); (C.S.)
| | - Catherine Sears
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (S.Z.); (C.S.)
| | - Kyle Zacholski
- Department of Pharmacy, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, VA 23298, USA;
| | - Elizabeth A. Belcher
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
| | - Eric B. Durbin
- Division of Biomedical Informatics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
- Kentucky Cancer Registry, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA
| | - John L. Villano
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.L.V.); (S.M.A.)
| | - Michael J. Cavnar
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
| | - Susanne M. Arnold
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (J.L.V.); (S.M.A.)
| | - Frederick R. Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (M.L.H.); (F.R.U.)
| | - Jill M. Kolesar
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky Markey Cancer Center, Lexington, KY 40536, USA; (M.L.H.); (F.R.U.)
- Department of Pharmacy Practice and Science, University of Kentucky College of Pharmacy, Lexington, KY 40536, USA;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dragojlovic N, Kopac N, Borle K, Tandun R, Salmasi S, Ellis U, Birch P, Adam S, Friedman JM, Elliott AM, Lynd LD. Utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries: A scoping review. Health Policy 2021; 125:877-887. [PMID: 33962789 DOI: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Ongoing rapid growth in the need for genetic services has the potential to severely strain the capacity of the clinical genetics workforce to deliver this care. Unfortunately, assessments of the scale of this health policy challenge and potential solutions are hampered by the lack of a consolidated evidence base on the growth in genetic service utilization. To enable health policy research and strategic planning by health systems in this area, we conducted a scoping review of the literature on the utilization and uptake of clinical genetics services in high-income countries published between 2010 and 2018. One-hundred-and-ninety-five unique studies were included in the review. Most focused on cancer (85/195; 44%) and prenatal care (50/195; 26%), which are consistently the two areas with the greatest volume of genetic service utilization in both the United States and other high-income countries. Utilization and uptake rates varied considerably and were influenced by contextual factors including health system characteristics, provider knowledge, and patient preferences. Moreover, growth in genetic service utilization appears to be driven to a significant degree by technological advances and the integration of new tests into clinical care. Our review highlights both the policy challenge posed by the rapid growth in the utilization of genetic services and the variability in this trend across clinical indications and health systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nick Dragojlovic
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Nicola Kopac
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Kennedy Borle
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rachel Tandun
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Shahrzad Salmasi
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Ursula Ellis
- Woodward Library, University of British Columbia, 2198 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Patricia Birch
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Shelin Adam
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Jan M Friedman
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | | | - Alison M Elliott
- Department of Medical Genetics, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, C201 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada; BC Children's Hospital Research Institute, 938 West 28th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 4H4, Canada; BC Women's Hospital Research Institute, H214 - 4500 Oak Street, Vancouver, BC, V6H 3N1, Canada
| | - Larry D Lynd
- Collaboration for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, 2405 Wesbrook Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z3, Canada; Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcomes Sciences, Providence Health Research Institute, 588-1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pillay S, Terreblanche O, Devar J, Wadee A. Unusual case of colorectal carcinoma with sarcoid-like mediastinal adenopathy and near-fatal DPD deficiency. SOUTH AFRICAN JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.4102/sajo.v5i0.160] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
|
24
|
Schneider JJ, Galettis P, Martin JH. Overcoming barriers to implementing precision dosing with 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2021; 87:317-325. [PMID: 33386659 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.14723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2020] [Revised: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite advances in targeted cancer therapy, the fluoropyrimidines 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and capecitabine continue to play an important role in oncology. Historically, dosing of these drugs has been based on body surface area. This approach has been demonstrated to be an imprecise way to determine the optimal dose for a patient. Evidence in the literature has demonstrated that precision dosing approaches, such as DPD enzyme activity testing and, in the case of intravenous 5FU, pharmacokinetic-guided dosing, can reduce toxicity and yield better patient outcomes. However, despite the evidence, there has not been uniform adoption of these approaches in the clinical setting. When a drug such as 5FU has been used clinically for many decades, it may be difficult to change clinical practice. With the aim of facilitating change of practice, issues and barriers to implementing precision dosing approaches for 5FU and capecitabine are identified and discussed with possible solutions proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer J Schneider
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, Level 3 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Peter Galettis
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, Level 3 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jennifer H Martin
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacology, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia.,Centre for Drug Repurposing and Medicines Research, Level 3 Hunter Medical Research Institute, Kookaburra Circuit, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Di Paolo A, Cremolini C, Bocci G. Universal Pretreatment DPYD Genotyping in Fluoropyrimidine Candidates: Still Controversial but With Clear Instructions for Practitioners, at Last! JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:801-802. [PMID: 33301696 DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00903] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Antonello Di Paolo
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Chiara Cremolini
- Dipartimento di Ricerca Traslazionale e delle Nuove Tecnologie in Medicina e Chirurgia, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Guido Bocci
- Dipartimento di Medicina Clinica e Sperimentale, Università di Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Simões AR, Fernández-Rozadilla C, Maroñas O, Carracedo Á. The Road so Far in Colorectal Cancer Pharmacogenomics: Are We Closer to Individualised Treatment? J Pers Med 2020; 10:E237. [PMID: 33228198 PMCID: PMC7711884 DOI: 10.3390/jpm10040237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent decades, survival rates in colorectal cancer have improved greatly due to pharmacological treatment. However, many patients end up developing adverse drug reactions that can be severe or even life threatening, and that affect their quality of life. These remain a limitation, as they may force dose reduction or treatment discontinuation, diminishing treatment efficacy. From candidate gene approaches to genome-wide analysis, pharmacogenomic knowledge has advanced greatly, yet there is still huge and unexploited potential in the use of novel technologies such as next-generation sequencing strategies. This review summarises the road of colorectal cancer pharmacogenomics so far, presents considerations and directions to be taken for further works and discusses the path towards implementation into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Rita Simões
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.S.); (O.M.); (Á.C.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Ceres Fernández-Rozadilla
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.S.); (O.M.); (Á.C.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Olalla Maroñas
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.S.); (O.M.); (Á.C.)
| | - Ángel Carracedo
- Grupo de Medicina Xenómica, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (A.R.S.); (O.M.); (Á.C.)
- Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica; SERGAS, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
- Consorcio Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Raras—CIBERER, 28029 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Beyerlin K, Jimenez R, Zangardi M, Fell GG, Edmonds C, Johnson A, Bossuyt V, Specht M, Mulvey TM, Moy B, Ellisen LW, Isakoff SJ, Bardia A, Spring LM. The adjuvant use of capecitabine for residual disease following pre-operative chemotherapy for breast cancer: Challenges applying CREATE-X to a US population. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2020; 27:1883-1890. [PMID: 33153384 DOI: 10.1177/1078155220971751] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The CREATE-X study, conducted in Japan and South Korea, established capecitabine as an adjuvant treatment option for patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) who have residual disease (RD) following neoadjuvant anthracycline or taxane-based chemotherapy. However, there are no reports on the tolerability and outcomes of adjuvant capecitabine in the US setting following publication of the CREATE-X data. METHODS We retrospectively collected treatment and tolerability data from the medical records of the first 23 TNBC patients who received adjuvant capecitabine for RD post neoadjuvant chemotherapy at our institution. Disease-free survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS The median starting dosage of capecitabine was 1871 mg/m2/day, most commonly divided into two daily doses on days 1-14 of each 21 day cycle. 34.8% of patients completed the treatment as prescribed. Side effects associated with treatment were common with 69.6% of patients experiencing hand-foot syndrome, 39.1% of patients experiencing diarrhea, and 13.0% of patients requiring hospitalization for side effects. Of 23 patients treated with adjuvant capecitabine, 34.8% completed the planned dose, 30.4% completed with dose reduction, and 34.8% discontinued early. At a median follow-up time of 14 months, the median disease-free survival was 22 months, with 30.4% of patients experiencing recurrence. CONCLUSION Tolerability was poor overall compared to the CREATE-X cohort. Administering adjuvant capecitabine for TNBC patients with residual disease in the United States is challenging given differences in tolerability. More research is needed to understand how poor tolerability will affect the efficacy of this approach in the US population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rachel Jimenez
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | | | - Christine Edmonds
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Veerle Bossuyt
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Michelle Specht
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Therese M Mulvey
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Beverly Moy
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Leif W Ellisen
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Steven J Isakoff
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aditya Bardia
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Laura M Spring
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Wörmann B, Bokemeyer C, Burmeister T, Köhne CH, Schwab M, Arnold D, Blohmer JU, Borner M, Brucker S, Cascorbi I, Decker T, de Wit M, Dietz A, Einsele H, Eisterer W, Folprecht G, Hilbe W, Hoffmann J, Knauf W, Kunzmann V, Largiadèr CR, Lorenzen S, Lüftner D, Moehler M, Nöthen MM, Pox C, Reinacher-Schick A, Scharl A, Schlegelberger B, Seufferlein T, Sinn M, Stroth M, Tamm I, Trümper L, Wilhelm M, Wöll E, Hofheinz RD. Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Testing prior to Treatment with 5-Fluorouracil, Capecitabine, and Tegafur: A Consensus Paper. Oncol Res Treat 2020; 43:628-636. [PMID: 33099551 DOI: 10.1159/000510258] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND 5-Fluorouracil (FU) is one of the most commonly used cytostatic drugs in the systemic treatment of cancer. Treatment with FU may cause severe or life-threatening side effects and the treatment-related mortality rate is 0.2-1.0%. SUMMARY Among other risk factors associated with increased toxicity, a genetic deficiency in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), an enzyme responsible for the metabolism of FU, is well known. This is due to variants in the DPD gene (DPYD). Up to 9% of European patients carry a DPD gene variant that decreases enzyme activity, and DPD is completely lacking in approximately 0.5% of patients. Here we describe the clinical and genetic background and summarize recommendations for the genetic testing and tailoring of treatment with 5-FU derivatives. The statement was developed as a consensus statement organized by the German Society for Hematology and Medical Oncology in cooperation with 13 medical associations from Austria, Germany, and Switzerland. Key Messages: (i) Patients should be tested for the 4 most common genetic DPYD variants before treatment with drugs containing FU. (ii) Testing forms the basis for a differentiated, risk-adapted algorithm with recommendations for treatment with FU-containing drugs. (iii) Testing may optionally be supplemented by therapeutic drug monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernhard Wörmann
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie, Berlin, Germany, .,Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, Germany,
| | - Carsten Bokemeyer
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Burmeister
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Matthias Schwab
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch-Institut für Klinische Pharmakologie, Stuttgart, Germany.,Departments of Clinical Pharmacology, and of Biochemistry and Pharmacy, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.,Cluster of Excellence iFIT (EXC 2180) "Image-Guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Dirk Arnold
- Asklepios Tumorzentrum Hamburg, AK Altona, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Markus Borner
- Onkologisches Zentrum, Oncocare, Engeriedspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sara Brucker
- Department für Frauengesundheit, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ingolf Cascorbi
- Institut für Experimentelle und Klinische Pharmakologie, Universitätsklinikum Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Maike de Wit
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Vivantes Klinikum Neukölln, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Dietz
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Hermann Einsele
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Eisterer
- Abteilung für Innere Medizin und Onkologie, Klinikum Klagenfurt, Klagenfurt am Wörthersee, Austria
| | - Gunnar Folprecht
- Medizinische Klinik I, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Hilbe
- Medizinische Abteilung am Wilhelminenspital, Wien, Austria
| | - Jürgen Hoffmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Knauf
- Centrum für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Bethanien-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Volker Kunzmann
- Medizinische Klinik II, Universitätsklinikum Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Carlo R Largiadèr
- Universitätsinstitut für Klinische Chemie, Inselspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hämatologie, Onkologie und Tumorimmunologie, Berlin, Germany
| | - Markus Moehler
- I. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Markus M Nöthen
- Institut für Humangenetik, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Christian Pox
- Medizinische Klinik, Krankenhaus St. Joseph-Stift, Bremen, Germany
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Hämatologie, Onkologie und Palliativmedizin, Katholisches Klinikum, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Germany
| | - Anton Scharl
- Frauenkliniken Amberg-Tirschenreuth-Weiden, Amberg, Germany
| | | | | | - Marianne Sinn
- II. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | | | - Ingo Tamm
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Kurfürstendamm, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lorenz Trümper
- Klinik für Hämatologie und Medizinische Onkologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Martin Wilhelm
- Klinik für Innere Medizin 5, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany
| | - Ewald Wöll
- Klinik für Innere Medizin, Klinikum St. Vinzenz, Zams, Austria
| | - Ralf-Dieter Hofheinz
- Interdisziplinäres Tumorzentrum, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Correia Pinheiro L, Durand J, Dogné JM. An Application of Machine Learning in Pharmacovigilance: Estimating Likely Patient Genotype From Phenotypical Manifestations of Fluoropyrimidine Toxicity. Clin Pharmacol Ther 2020; 107:944-947. [PMID: 31955411 PMCID: PMC7158217 DOI: 10.1002/cpt.1789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2019] [Accepted: 01/03/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD)‐deficient patients might only become aware of their genotype after exposure to dihydropyrimidines, if testing is performed. Case reports to pharmacovigilance databases might only contain phenotypical manifestations of DPD, without information on the genotype. This poses a difficulty in estimating the cases due to DPD. Auto machine learning models were developed to train patterns of phenotypical manifestations of toxicity, which were then used as a surrogate to estimate the number of cases of DPD‐related toxicity. Results indicate that between 8,878 (7.0%) and 16,549 (13.1%) patients have a profile similar to DPD deficient status. Results of the analysis of variable importance match the known end‐organ damage of DPD‐related toxicity, however, accuracies in the range of 90% suggest presence of overfitting, thus, results need to be interpreted carefully. This study shows the potential for use of machine learning in the regulatory context but additional studies are required to better understand regulatory applicability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie Durand
- European Medicines Agency, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jean-Michel Dogné
- University of Namur, Namur, Belgium.,Belgian Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Merloni F, Ranallo N, Scortichini L, Giampieri R, Berardi R. Tailored therapy in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines: focus on the role of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase. CANCER DRUG RESISTANCE (ALHAMBRA, CALIF.) 2019; 2:787-802. [PMID: 35582578 PMCID: PMC8992529 DOI: 10.20517/cdr.2018.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2018] [Revised: 03/01/2019] [Accepted: 06/04/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines are widely used in the treatment of solid tumors, mainly gastrointestinal, head and neck and breast cancer. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is the rate-limiting enzyme for catabolism of 5-FU and it is encoded by DPYD gene. To date, many known polymorphisms cause DPD deficiency and subsequent increase of 5-FU toxicity. In addition, reduced inactivation of 5-FU could lead to increased 5-FU intracellular concentration and augmented efficacy of this drugs. Therefore DPD expression, particularly intratumoral, has been investigated as predictive and prognostic marker in 5-FU treated patients. There also seems to be a tendency to support the correlation between DPD expression and response/survival in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine even if definitive conclusions cannot be drawn considering that some studies are conflicting. Therefore, the debate on intratumoral DPD expression as a potential predictor and prognostic marker in patients treated with fluoropyrimidines is still open. Four DPD-polymorphisms are the most relevant for their frequency in population and clinical relevance. Many studies demonstrate that treating a carrier of one of these polymorphisms with a full dose of fluoropyrimidine can expose patient to a severe, even life-threatening, toxicity. Severe toxicity is reduced if this kind of patients received a dose-adjustment after being genotyped. CPIC (Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium) is an International Consortium creating guidelines for facilitating use of pharmacogenetic tests for patient care and helps clinicians ensuring a safer drug delivery to the patient. Using predictive DPD deficiency tests in patients receiving 5FU-based chemotherapy, in particular for colorectal cancer, has proven to be a cost-effective strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filippo Merloni
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60121, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Ranallo
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60121, Italy
| | - Laura Scortichini
- Scuola di Specializzazione in Oncologia, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona 60121, Italy
| | - Riccardo Giampieri
- Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona 60126, Italy
| | - Rossana Berardi
- Clinica Oncologica, Università Politecnica delle Marche, AOU Ospedali Riuniti, Ancona 60126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Lampropoulou DI, Laschos K, Amylidi AL, Angelaki A, Soupos N, Boumpoucheropoulos S, Papadopoulou E, Nanou E, Zidianakis V, Nasioulas G, Fildissis G, Aravantinos G. Fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity and DPD deficiency.. A case report of early onset, lethal capecitabine-induced toxicity and mini review of the literature. Uridine triacetate: Efficacy and safety as an antidote. Is it accessible outside USA? J Oncol Pharm Pract 2019; 26:747-753. [PMID: 31382864 DOI: 10.1177/1078155219865597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidine-based regimens are among the most commonly used chemotherapy combinations for the treatment of solid tumors. Several genetic polymorphisms that are implicated with fluoropyrimidine anabolism and catabolism have been associated with the development of life-threatening toxicities. Uridine triacetate is an FDA-approved antidote for 5-fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose and early-onset, life-threatening toxicity within 96 h of last chemotherapy dose. To date, it is not accessible for Greek patients as per the current summary of product characteristic's time restrictions. We report and discuss the course and outcome of capecitabine toxicity in a 66-year-old female colorectal cancer patient with heterozygous dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency. This paper highlights the difficulty in timely access of this lifesaving medication for Greek and possibly other European patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitra Ioanna Lampropoulou
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Konstantinos Laschos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Anna-Lea Amylidi
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Ariadni Angelaki
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos Soupos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Sotirios Boumpoucheropoulos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | | | - Evgenia Nanou
- Faculty of Nursing, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Intensive Care Unit, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Vasilios Zidianakis
- Faculty of Nursing, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Intensive Care Unit, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | | | - George Fildissis
- Faculty of Nursing, Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.,Intensive Care Unit, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| | - Gerasimos Aravantinos
- Second Department of Medical Oncology, General Oncology Hospital of Kifissia "Agioi Anargiroi", Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Fragoulakis V, Roncato R, Fratte CD, Ecca F, Bartsakoulia M, Innocenti F, Toffoli G, Cecchin E, Patrinos GP, Mitropoulou C. Estimating the Effectiveness of DPYD Genotyping in Italian Individuals Suffering from Cancer Based on the Cost of Chemotherapy-Induced Toxicity. Am J Hum Genet 2019; 104:1158-1168. [PMID: 31155283 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Fluoropyrimidines (FLs) have been widely used for more than 60 years against a range of solid tumors and still remains the cornerstone for the treatment of colorectal, gastric, and breast cancer. Here, we performed an economic analysis to estimate the cost of DPYD-guided toxicity management and the clinical benefit expressed as quality adjusted life years (QALYs) in a large group of 571 individuals of Italian origin suffering from cancer and treated with a fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapy. Individuals suffering from cancer with a histologically confirmed diagnosis of cancer, who received a fluoropyrimidines-based treatment, were retrospectively genotyped in the DPYD gene. Effectiveness was measured as survival of individuals from chemotherapy, while study data on safety and efficacy as well as on resource utilization associated with each adverse drug reaction were used to measure costs to treat these adverse drug reactions. A generalized linear regression model was used to estimate cost differences for both study groups. DPYD extensive metabolizers (528 individuals) had greater effectiveness and lesser cost, representing a cost-saving option over DPYD intermediate and poor metabolizers (43 individuals) with mean QALYs of 4.18 (95%CI: 3.16-5.55) versus 3.02 (95%CI: 1.94-4.25), respectively. Our economic analysis showed that there are some indications for differences in survival between the two groups (p > 0.05), while the cost of DPYD extensive metabolizers was significantly lower (p < 0.01) compared with those belonging to the group of intermediate/poor metabolizers. These findings suggest that DPYD-guided fluoropyrimidines treatment represent a cost-saving choice for individuals suffering from cancer in the Italian healthcare setting.
Collapse
|
33
|
Henricks LM, Lunenburg CATC, de Man FM, Meulendijks D, Frederix GWJ, Kienhuis E, Creemers GJ, Baars A, Dezentjé VO, Imholz ALT, Jeurissen FJF, Portielje JEA, Jansen RLH, Hamberg P, Ten Tije AJ, Droogendijk HJ, Koopman M, Nieboer P, van de Poel MHW, Mandigers CMPW, Rosing H, Beijnen JH, van Werkhoven E, van Kuilenburg ABP, van Schaik RHN, Mathijssen RHJ, Swen JJ, Gelderblom H, Cats A, Guchelaar HJ, Schellens JHM. A cost analysis of upfront DPYD genotype-guided dose individualisation in fluoropyrimidine-based anticancer therapy. Eur J Cancer 2018; 107:60-67. [PMID: 30544060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 11/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Fluoropyrimidine therapy including capecitabine or 5-fluorouracil can result in severe treatment-related toxicity in up to 30% of patients. Toxicity is often related to reduced activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase, the main metabolic fluoropyrimidine enzyme, primarily caused by genetic DPYD polymorphisms. In a large prospective study, it was concluded that upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation is able to improve safety of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy. In our current analysis, we evaluated whether this strategy is cost saving. METHODS A cost-minimisation analysis from a health-care payer perspective was performed as part of the prospective clinical trial (NCT02324452) in which patients prior to start of fluoropyrimidine-based therapy were screened for the DPYD variants DPYD*2A, c.2846A>T, c.1679T>G and c.1236G>A and received an initial dose reduction of 25% (c.2846A>T, c.1236G>A) or 50% (DPYD*2A, c.1679T>G). Data on treatment, toxicity, hospitalisation and other toxicity-related interventions were collected. The model compared prospective screening for these DPYD variants with no DPYD screening. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. RESULTS Expected total costs of the screening strategy were €2599 per patient compared with €2650 for non-screening, resulting in a net cost saving of €51 per patient. Results of the probabilistic sensitivity and one-way sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the screening strategy was very likely to be cost saving or worst case cost-neutral. CONCLUSIONS Upfront DPYD-guided dose individualisation, improving patient safety, is cost saving or cost-neutral but is not expected to yield additional costs. These results endorse implementing DPYD screening before start of fluoropyrimidine treatment as standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda M Henricks
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Carin A T C Lunenburg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Femke M de Man
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Didier Meulendijks
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Dutch Medicines Evaluation Board (CBG-MEB), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Geert W J Frederix
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Emma Kienhuis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Geert-Jan Creemers
- Department of Medical Oncology, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Arnold Baars
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital Gelderse Vallei, Ede, the Netherlands
| | - Vincent O Dezentjé
- Department of Internal Medicine, Reinier de Graaf Hospital, Delft, the Netherlands; Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Frank J F Jeurissen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Haaglanden Medical Center, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna E A Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands; Department of Internal Medicine, Haga Hospital, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Rob L H Jansen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Paul Hamberg
- Department of Internal Medicine, Franciscus Gasthuis and Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Albert J Ten Tije
- Department of Internal Medicine, Amphia Hospital, Breda, the Netherlands
| | - Helga J Droogendijk
- Department of Internal Medicine, Bravis Hospital, Roosendaal, the Netherlands
| | - Miriam Koopman
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Nieboer
- Department of Internal Medicine, Wilhelmina Hospital Assen, Assen, the Netherlands
| | | | | | - Hilde Rosing
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jos H Beijnen
- Department of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik van Werkhoven
- Department of Biometrics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - André B P van Kuilenburg
- Laboratory Genetic Metabolic Diseases, Department of Clinical Chemistry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Gastroenterology & Metabolism, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H N van Schaik
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ron H J Mathijssen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Jesse J Swen
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Hans Gelderblom
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Annemieke Cats
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Henk-Jan Guchelaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jan H M Schellens
- Division of Pharmacology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|