Role of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in Hepatic Ischemic Reperfusion Injury

Remote ischemic preconditioning for reduction of ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy: A randomized sham-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces ischemia-reperfusion injury in patients undergoing hepatectomy. Moreover, there is evidence that the protective effects of remote ischemic preconditioning may be more pronounced in pre-damaged livers. The objective of this trial was to investigate the extent to which remote ischemic preconditioning can attenuate ischemia-reperfusion injury after hepatectomy and Pringle maneuver in patients with chronic liver disease.

METHODS

In this randomized, controlled, triple-blind monocenter trial, a total of 102 patients with chronic liver disease and planned hepatectomy were enrolled between December 2019 and March 2022. Eligible patients were randomized to the remote ischemic preconditioning or sham arms. Remote ischemic preconditioning was induced through 3 10-minute cycles of alternating ischemia and reperfusion of the upper extremity. The study was prospectively registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00018931).

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients were included in the study and were randomized (51 per arm). The median age was 69.5 years, approximately two-thirds of the patients were male (69/102, 67.7%), and the mean body mass index was 25.6 kg/m2. Most patients were classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists II (55/102, 53.9%) or III (45/102, 44.1%). The primary endpoint, the transaminases on the first postoperative day (alanine aminotransferase /aspartate aminotransferase: remote ischemic preconditioning arm: 250 (35-1721)/320 (42-1525) U/L versus sham control arm: 283 (32-792)/356 (20-1851) U/L, P = .820/0.639), clinical outcomes as well as remote ischemic preconditioning biomarker levels were comparable between both arms.

CONCLUSION

Remote ischemic preconditioning did not achieve a significant reduction in postoperative transaminase levels, nor did it affect clinical results and biomarkers.

Mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase 5 alleviates liver ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting TAK1/JNK/p38 pathway

Mitogen activated protein kinase phosphatase 5 (MKP5) is a member of the MKP family and has been implicated in diverse biological and pathological conditions. However, it is unknown what role MKP5 plays in liver ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury. In the present study, we used MKP5 global knockout (KO) and MKP5 overexpressing mice to establish a liver I/R injury model in vivo, and MKP5 knockdown or MKP5 overexpressing HepG2 cells to establish a hypoxia-reoxygenation (H/R) model in vitro. In this study we demonstrated that protein expression of MKP5 was significantly downregulated in liver tissue of mice after I/R injury, and HepG2 cells subjected to H/R injury. MKP5 KO or knockdown significantly increased liver injury, as demonstrated by elevated serum transaminases, hepatocyte necrosis, infiltrating inflammatory cells, secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, apoptosis, oxidative stress. Conversely, MKP5 overexpression significantly attenuated liver and cell injury. Furthermore, we showed that MKP5 exerted its protective effect by inhibiting c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK)/p38 activity, and its action was dependent on Transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) activity. According to our results, MKP5 inhibited the TAK1/JNK/p38 pathway to protect liver from I/R injury. Our study identifies a novel target for the diagnosis and treatment of liver I/R injury.

Ischemic Reperfusion Injury After Liver Transplantation: Is There a Place for Conservative Management?

Ischemic reperfusion injury (IRI) after liver transplantation is a common cause of early allograft dysfunction with high mortality. The purpose of this case report series is to highlight an unusual clinical course in which complete recovery can occur following the identification of severe hepatic IRI post-transplantation and the implications of this finding on management strategies in patients with IRI post-transplant. Here, we include three cases of severe IRI following liver transplantation that are putatively resolved without retransplantation or definitive therapeutic intervention. All patients recovered until their final follow-up visits to our institution and developed no significant complications from their injury throughout the course of patient care by our institution after discharge from the hospital.

Shaping of Hepatic Ischemia/Reperfusion Events: The Crucial Role of Mitochondria

Hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury (HIRI) is a major hurdle in many clinical scenarios, including liver resection and transplantation. Various studies and countless surgical events have led to the observation of a strong correlation between HIRI induced by liver transplantation and early allograft-dysfunction development. The detrimental impact of HIRI has driven the pursuit of new ways to alleviate its adverse effects. At the core of HIRI lies mitochondrial dysfunction. Various studies, from both animal models and in clinical settings, have clearly shown that mitochondrial function is severely hampered by HIRI and that its preservation or restoration is a key indicator of successful organ recovery. Several strategies have been thus implemented throughout the years, targeting mitochondrial function. This work briefly discusses some the most utilized approaches, ranging from surgical practices to pharmacological interventions and highlights how novel strategies can be investigated and implemented by intricately discussing the way mitochondrial function is affected by HIRI.

Methods of Attenuating Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury in Liver Transplantation for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent indications for liver transplantation. However, the transplantation is ultimately associated with the occurrence of ischemia-reperfusion injury (IRI). It affects not only the function of the graft but also significantly worsens the oncological results. Various methods have been used so far to manage IRI. These include the non-invasive approach (pharmacotherapy) and more advanced options encompassing various types of liver conditioning and machine perfusion. Strategies aimed at shortening ischemic times and better organ allocation pathways are still under development as well. This article presents the mechanisms responsible for IRI, its impact on treatment outcomes, and strategies to mitigate it. An extensive review of the relevant literature using MEDLINE (PubMed) and Scopus databases until September 2020 was conducted. Only full-text articles written in English were included. The following search terms were used: “ischemia reperfusion injury”, “liver transplantation”, “hepatocellular carcinoma”, “preconditioning”, “machine perfusion”.