A Preliminary Study of Personalized Head CT Scan in Pediatric Patients

Pediatric Brain Tumor Risk Associated with Head Computed Tomography: Systematic Literature Review

Computed tomography (CT) of the brain has changed diagnostic neuroradiology significantly over the past 50 years since it was firstly used back in 1971 to visualize suspected frontal lobe tumour. The safety of head CT is determined by the small amount of radiation and the low sensibility of brain tissue to cytotoxic damage due to ionizing radiation compared to other organs. However, some population groups may be at increased risk. Thus, children are more susceptible to radiation cancer than adults and lifelong attributive risk (LAR) can be more than 10 times higher for an infant than for a middle-aged adult. The authors have reviewed published studies that examined the prevalence and mortality of intracranial tumors in children undergoing head CT in comparison to unaffected individuals. Electronic search of publications in the PubMed database from 1966 to date was carried out. We have carried out intersectoral search for documents containing keywords or medical subject headings (MeSH) related to three wide categories: 1) computed tomography, 2) radiation-induced tumors, 3) risk, morbidity or epidemiology. Further search was performed in manual mode. Available epidemiological data generally confirmed correlation between head CT and tumor growth induction. Thus, current epidemiological data accept the opinion that the risk of tumor induction associated with head CT in children is very small (one tumor per 3,000–10,000 studies). The minimal estimated risk of tumor induction due to head CT in children is mostly offset by its diagnostic imaging benefits considering the clinical indications to minimize radiation dose. Understanding and quantitative risk assessment of carcinogenesis associated with CT imaging led to dose reduction in pediatric CT protocols. This trend should continue and should be implemented in all age groups. Although the decision to perform head CT is often undeniable (injury or hemorrhage), careful assessment of studies frequency is required, especially in patients who need disease monitoring. Cumulative effect in such cases may increase the minimal risk of carcinogenesis. Larger and advanced epidemiological studies are required to better understand these risks.

Pitfalls in the interpretation of pediatric head CTs: what the emergency radiologist needs to know

Pediatric radiology studies can be some of the most anxiety-inducing imaging examinations encountered in practice. This can be in part due to the wide range of normal anatomic appearances inherent to the pediatric population that create potential interpretive pitfalls for radiologists. The pediatric head is no exception; for instance, the inherent greater water content within the neonatal brain compared to older patients could easily be mistaken for cerebral edema, and anatomic variant calvarial sutures can be mistaken for skull fractures. This article reviews potential pitfalls emergency radiologists may encounter in practice when interpreting pediatric head CTs, including trauma, extra-axial fluid collections, intra-axial hemorrhage, and ventriculoperitoneal shunt complications.