Prism adaptation treatment for spatial neglect post brain tumour removal: A case report

Prism adaptation treatment improves spatial neglect after severe traumatic brain injury: A case series

BACKROUND

Spatial neglect (SN) after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common, hindering rehabilitation progress and functional outcomes. Most research has focused on SN treatment after stroke with few published instances of post-TBI SN treated using prism adaptation treatment (PAT) in inpatient rehabilitation.

OBJECTIVE

This case series characterizes the dose, after-effect, and treatment response of PAT in patients with SN after severe TBI.

METHODS

Six patients exhibiting severe (n = 2), moderate (n = 2), or mild (n = 2) SN after severe TBI received 5 to 10 PAT sessions during their inpatient rehabilitation stay. Functional improvement in SN was measured by the Catherine Bergego Scale (CBS).

RESULTS

Patients presented with a mean initial CBS score of 16.8 (range: 8.8-24.3). Prism after-effect was present after PAT. Following 5-10 sessions, the mean CBS score improved by 11.6 points to 5.2 (range: 7.8-21.8); the change in initial versus final CBS scores was significant (P = 0.031).

CONCLUSION

This study is the first to demonstrate prism after-effect and functional SN improvement in individual patients with TBI. Patients showed a clinically meaningful improvement in mild, moderate, and severe SN following 5 to 10 PAT sessions. Additional studies are needed to assess tolerability, benefit, and optimal PAT dose for SN after TBI.

Spatial Neglect and Anosognosia After Right Brain Stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Up to 80% of survivors of right brain stroke leave acute care without being diagnosed with a major invisible disability. Studies indicate that a generic cognitive neurologic evaluation does not reliably detect spatial neglect, nor does it identify unawareness of deficit after right brain stroke; this article reviews the symptoms, clinical presentation, and management of these two cognitive disorders occurring after right brain stroke.

RECENT FINDINGS

Stroke and occupational therapy practice guidelines stress a quality standard for spatial neglect assessment and treatment to reduce adverse outcomes for patients, their families, and society. Neurologists may attribute poor outcomes associated with spatial neglect to stroke severity. However, people with spatial neglect are half as likely to return to home and community, have one-third the community mobility, and require 3 times as much caregiver supervision compared with similar stroke survivors. Multiple randomized trials support a feasible first-line rehabilitation approach for spatial neglect: prism adaptation therapy; more than 20 studies reported that this treatment improves daily life independence. Evidence-based treatment of anosognosia is not as developed; however, treatment for this problem is also available.

SUMMARY

This article guides neurologists' assessment of right brain cognitive disorders and describes how to efficiently assemble and direct a treatment team to address spatial neglect and unawareness of deficit.

Prism Adaptation Treatment Improves Inpatient Rehabilitation Outcome in Individuals With Spatial Neglect: A Retrospective Matched Control Study

Objective

To determine whether prism adaptation treatment (PAT) integrated into the standard of care improves rehabilitation outcome in patients with spatial neglect (SN).

Design

Retrospective matched control study based on information extracted from June 2017-September 2019.

Setting

Inpatient rehabilitation.

Participants

Patients from 14 rehabilitation hospitals scoring >0 on the Catherine Bergego Scale (N=312). The median age was 69.5 years, including 152 (49%) female patients and 275 (88%) patients with stroke.

Interventions

Patients were matched 1:1 by age (±5 years), FIM score at admission (±2 points), and SN severity using the Catherine Bergego Scale (±2 points) and classified into 2 groups: treated (8-12 daily sessions of PAT) vs untreated (no PAT).

Main Outcome Measures

FIM and its minimal clinically important difference (MCID) were the primary outcome variables. Secondary outcome was home discharge.

Results

Analysis included the 312 matched patients (156 per group). FIM scores at discharge were analyzed using repeated-measures analyses of variance. The treated group showed reliably higher scores than the untreated group in Total FIM, F=5.57, P=.020, partial η²=0.035, and Cognitive FIM, F=19.20, P<.001, partial η²=0.110, but not Motor FIM, F=0.35, P=.553, partial η²=0.002. We used conditional logistic regression to examine the odds ratio of reaching MCID in each FIM score and of returning home after discharge. No reliable difference was found between groups in reaching MCID or home discharge.

Conclusions

Patients with SN receiving PAT had better functional and cognitive outcomes, suggesting that integrating PAT into the standard of care is beneficial. However, receiving PAT may not determine home discharge.