Outcomes of endovascular occlusion and stenting in the treatment of carotid blowout

Brain abscesses following carotid blowout syndrome: a case report

We report a case of intracranial abscesses development in a patient with head and neck cancer after emergent treatment of carotid blowout syndrome with coil embolization. Our patient is a 60-year-old male who presented with hemoptysis and hematemesis, which raised concerns for impending carotid blowout syndrome. Endovascular occlusion was successfully achieved, and the patient was discharged in stable condition. Ten days later, the patient reported headaches and right facial pain, and magnetic resonance imaging revealed multiple intracranial abscesses. Broad-spectrum intravenous antibiotics were administered, leading to a variable response with some abscesses decreasing in size and others increasing. Seven weeks from discharge, the patient had no neurological deficits, and all abscesses had decreased in size.

Safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion to prevent carotid blowout syndrome at the distal internal carotid artery in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a comparison with endovascular occlusion

Background

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) frequently occurs at the distal internal carotid artery (distal-ICA) in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and remedial treatments run a high risk for neurologic complications. A case-control study was conducted to evaluate the safety and efficacy of protective stent insertion at the distal-ICA to prevent CBS in NPC patients, with a comparison to endovascular coil occlusion.

Methods

A total of 28 consecutive NPC patients at high risk of CBS from June 2019 to December 2021 in Shanghai Sixth People's Hospital (a tertiary institution) were retrospectively included and divided into a stent protection group and occlusion group. Technique feasibility, treatment outcomes and neurological deficiency were compared between the two groups by two-sample test. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared patients' survival rates at mid-term follow-up.

Results

Stent insertion was performed in 15 patients and ICA occlusion in 13 patients. The technical success rate was 100% in both groups. Procedure-related ischemic stroke was identified in 2 patients (15.4%) in the occlusion group, compared with none in the stent protection group. Bleeding was encountered in one patient in the stent protection group and one patient in the occlusion group, each. During a median follow-up of 10.5 (range, 2-31) months, 3 patients (20%) showed asymptomatic in-stent occlusion in the stent protection group. Notably, the median survival time was significantly longer in the stent protection group than in the occlusion group (23.3 vs. 15.8 months, P=0.04).

Conclusions

Protective stenting the distal-ICA was similarly effective in preventing CBS in NPC patients but was safer than endovascular occlusion of ICA.

A Treatment Approach for Carotid Blowout Syndrome and Soft Tissue Reconstruction after Radiotherapy in Patients with Oral Cancer: A Report of 2 Cases

BACKGROUND

This retrospective case series study aims to demonstrate a salvage technique for the treatment of carotid blow-out syndrome (CBS) in irradiated head and neck cancer patients with a vessel-depleted neck.

METHODS

Between October 2017 and October 2021, two patients (N = 2) with CBS were treated at our institution in a multidisciplinary approach together with the Department of Vascular Surgery. Patients were characterized based on diagnoses, treatment procedures, and the subsequent postoperative course.

RESULTS

Surgical emergency intervention was performed in both cases. The transition zone from the common carotid artery (CCA) to the internal carotid artery (ICA) was resected and reconstructed with a xenogic (case 1) or autogenic (case 2) interposition (end-to-end anastomosis). To allow reconstruction of the vascular defect, an additional autologous vein graft was anastomosed to the interposition graft in an end-to-side technique, allowing arterial anastomosis for a free microvascular flap without re-clamping of the ICA. Because of the intraoperative ICA reconstruction, none of the patients suffered a neurological deficit.

CONCLUSIONS

The techniques presented in the form of two case reports allow for acute bleeding control, cerebral perfusion, and the creation of a vascular anastomosis option in the vessel-depleted neck.

Carotid Blowout Syndrome in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Management of Patients At Risk for CBS

OBJECTIVES

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is an acute, rare life-threatening hemorrhage that occurs in patients with a history of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. The primary objective of this review was to identify risk factors and assess treatment and survival outcomes following CBS.

METHODS

A systematic review of published literature was performed. Information including risk factors, treatment, and outcomes of CBS were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 49 articles and 2220 patients were included in the systematic review. Risk factors for developing CBS included a history of radiation therapy, wound complications, and advanced tumor stage. The initial management of CBS included establishing a stable airway, gaining hemostasis, and repletion of blood loss. Endovascular and surgical procedures treat CBS with infrequent rates of rebleeding and periprocedural complications. Short-term survival following treatment of CBS shows high survival rates when considering CBS-related complications and underlying disease, however, long-term survival related to the underlying disease demonstrated high mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying patients at risk for CBS enables practitioners to counsel patients on life-saving interventions and expected outcomes following treatment of CBS. Treatment of CBS is associated with high short-term survival, although long-term survival related to underlying disease is low.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 133:576-587, 2023.

Management of Double Carotid Blow Out with Definitive Repair After Temporizing Stent Graft Placement

Carotid blowout syndrome is a life-threatening complication for patients with head and neck cancer. Temporizing stent graft procedures improve short-term survival and can be the definitive treatment for various reasons, including a poor oncologic prognosis, unsuitability for definitive reconstruction, or a lack of operative options. A second carotid blowout will often be fatal. Preventing such events requires multidisciplinary strategic planning because of a hostile reoperative field. We have described a case of a 44-year-old man with a history of laryngeal cancer who had experienced a carotid blowout. Treated with a stent graft, the patient had experienced a second event 6 weeks later. Treatment involved excision and suture ligation with rotational muscle flap coverage.

Air-containing necrosis as the imaging predictor for imminent carotid blowout in patients with head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a devastating complication of head and neck cancer (HNC). In this study, we describe radiological features that can predict imminent (<6 months) carotid blowout in patients with HNC.

METHODS

Cross-sectional CT or MRI were interpreted from 25 treated HNC patients with acute CBS and 50 treated HNC patients without CBS (controls). The tumor size and the distance from the tumor to the carotid trunk was measured. The following imaging findings of the tumor were also recorded: carotid trunk involvement, enhancement pattern, and the presence of air-containing necrosis. The odds ratios of imminent CBS for each imaging finding were estimated using a multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Compared to the controls, the CBS group had larger tumors (49 ± 18 mm vs. 38 ± 18 mm, p = 0.017), tumors closer to the carotid trunk (0.5 ± 1.7 mm vs. 8.2 ± 14.2 mm, p < 0.001), a higher prevalence of 360° involvement (60% vs. 18%, p < 0.001), more heterogeneous enhancement patterns (84% vs. 50% p < 0.001), and more air-containing necrosis (40% vs. 2% p < 0.001). After multivariable adjustment, the presence of air-containing necrosis remained a significant risk factor for imminent CBS (OR: 20.1, 95% CI: 1.98-204.00; p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

The presence of air-containing necrosis is associated with a higher risk of imminent CBS. This characteristic imaging finding should be evaluated in the follow-up CT or MRI of HNC patients for early warning.

Management of postradiation late hemorrhage following treatment for HPV-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Acute oropharyngeal hemorrhage is a serious complication for patients with oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC), particularly in patients with a history of radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

Retrospective case series from at a tertiary care center for treated patients with HPV-positive OPSCC presenting with oropharyngeal hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Median time from completion of chemoradiation to first hemorrhagic event was 186 days (range 66-1466 days). Seven patients (58%) required intervention to secure their airway. All patients were evaluated for endovascular intervention, six (50%) were embolized. Eight patients (67%) had a second hemorrhagic event; median time to second bleed was 22 days (range 3-90 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute oropharyngeal hemorrhage is a sequelae following treatment for HPV-positive OPSCC. The majority of bleeds occurred within a year of completion of treatment. While more research is needed to determine optimal treatment paradigms, endovascular intervention should be considered, even if noninvasive imaging does not demonstrate active bleeding.

Comparison of Treatment Modalities in Postirradiation Carotid Blowout Syndrome: A Multicenter Retrospective Review

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is not uncommon in our locality, where head and neck cancers, especially nasopharyngeal carcinoma, are prevalent. Traditionally, CBS has resulted in high morbidity and mortality. The treatment paradigm has evolved from open surgery to endovascular interventions, and each treatment modality has its merits and drawbacks. In the present study, we investigated the outcomes of different treatment modalities for postirradiation CBS.

METHODS

We performed a 10-year multicenter retrospective review of the outcomes after endovascular trapping, flow diverters, and bypass surgery from 2009 to 2019.

RESULTS

A total of 53 patients with 60 blowouts were included in the present study. Of the 60 blowout cases, 25 were in the flow diverter group, 27 in the endovascular trapping group, and 8 in the bypass group. The mean survival was 32.2 months, with patient age affecting overall survival (P = 0.002). The stroke rate affected the 3- and 6-month functional outcomes (odds ratio, 7.388 and 6.353; P = 0.008 and P = 0.014, respectively). Of the 24 cases in the flow diverter group, 96% had achieved immediate hemostasis, with a rebleeding rate of 20% (P = 0.009). No rebleeding had occurred with endovascular trapping or bypass. The stroke rate in the endovascular trapping, flow diverter, and bypass groups was 25.9%, 20%, and 12.5%, respectively (P = 0.696).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results have shown that endovascular trapping is the first-line treatment of CBS. For patients with contraindications to endovascular trapping, the flow diverter is an alternative. For patients who have undergone flow diversion alone, definitive treatment such as bypass surgery might be indicated for selected patients to minimize the risk of rebleeding. After endovascular trapping, surgical bypass might be considered for selected patients with a higher risk of stroke.

Extracranial vertebral artery to middle cerebral artery bypass in therapeutic internal carotid artery occlusion for epipharyngeal carcinoma: A technical case report

Background:

Vertebral artery (VA) to middle cerebral artery (MCA) bypass is a rarely selected technique because a complex expanded dissection is required, and often, a better donor artery than VA exists. A good indication for VA-MCA bypass is the treatment of head-and-neck malignancies with the sacrifice of the internal carotid artery (ICA) or for carotid artery rupture.

Methods:

A 23-year-old man with epipharyngeal carcinoma, treated by ligating the carotid artery with a VAMCA bypass before chemoradiotherapy, was reported. Radiographic findings showed that the bone of the carotid canal was dissolved, and the right ICA was engulfed by the tumor. As epipharyngeal carcinoma is hypersensitive to radiation, in cases where the tumor rapidly disappears, ICA may dangle in the pharynx and rupture may occur. In addition, to irradiate sufficiently, the ICA may become an obstacle. Hence, we decided to perform carotid ligation with a VA-MCA bypass before radiation and chemotherapy for the primary lesion. We selected the V3 portion of the VA as the donor on the ipsilateral side, as it can supply high-flow cerebral blood flow, which is not influenced by carcinoma and less influenced by irradiation for the epipharynx.

Results:

The VA-MCA bypass was completed without complications followed by endovascular occlusion of the ICA. Induction chemotherapy was initiated for the patient 2 weeks after surgery. The patient achieved a complete response following chemoradiotherapy.

Conclusion:

ICA ligation with VA-MCA high-flow bypass earlier than chemoradiotherapy is useful for epipharyngeal carcinoma as it prevents carotid artery rupture and allows radical intervention.

Comprehensive Treatment Strategy for Internal Carotid Artery Blowout Syndrome Caused by Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate a treatment strategy for internal carotid artery blowout syndrome caused by nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of a case series was performed.

SETTING

Carotid blowout syndrome is a catastrophic complication caused by malignant tumor of the skull base.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis based on 69 patients with internal carotid artery blowout syndrome admitted to our center between April 2018 and January 2020 was performed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: an EBBA (internal carotid artery embolization + bypass based on American Society of Intervention and Therapeutic Neuroradiology/Society of Interventional Radiology [ASITN/SIR]) group and an embolization/stent group. The follow-up time was 6 to 9 months.

RESULTS

In the EBBA group, 41 patients (41/49, 83.7%) survived. Forty patients had a satisfactory quality of life after 3 months. No death occurred within 3 months. Nonoperative death occurred in 8 cases (8/49, 16.3%). The rate of mortality and disability was 18.4% (9/49). In the embolization/stent group, 16 patients (16/20, 80%) survived. Nonoperative death occurred in 4 cases (4/20, 20%), 3 of which occurred within 1 to 3 months. Four cases reported Modified Rankin Scale ≥2 after 3 months. The rate of mortality and disability was 40% (8/20).

CONCLUSION

A comprehensive revascularization strategy for internal carotid artery (ICA) embolization and intracranial and extracranial bypass grafting based on ASITN/SIR score for ICA blowout syndrome patients not only can prolong the patient survival but also greatly improve the survival probability and quality of life as well as reduce their rate of mortality or disability.

Endovascular Internal Trapping by Low-Concentration N-butyl-2-Cyanoacrylate for a Ruptured Giant Common Carotid Artery Pseudoaneurysm

Treating carotid blowout syndrome following rupture of giant pseudoaneurysms is difficult because the destroyed parent artery precludes conventional treatment. We present a patient with a ruptured giant pseudoaneurysm that we occluded using a modified internal trapping technique with low-concentration N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (NBCA) and a minimum number of coils. An 80-year-old man with a history of chemoradiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer presented with several episodes of active bleeding from the subsequent tracheostomy site. Radiological examination revealed a giant right common carotid artery (CCA) pseudoaneurysm. Endovascular internal trapping was performed using both NBCA and coils under proximal flow control. We slowly injected 9 ml of low-concentration NBCA, which subsequently filled the entire pseudoaneurysm. We then injected an additional 2 ml of NBCA into the proximal CCA to achieve complete obliteration. No re-bleeding was observed during the 6-month follow-up. Endovascular internal trapping using low-concentration NBCA was feasible to treat a giant CCA pseudoaneurysm. The injected low-concentration NBCA filled the entire pseudoaneurysm without the risk of catheter entrapment.

Carotid Blowout Management in the Endovascular Era

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a potential complication of head and neck cancer, and its therapy is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Recent advances in endovascular techniques have improved patient outcomes. In this study, we report outcomes of emergent endovascular intervention for CBS.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained neurovascular database and identified 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS from 2008-2019 at our institution. Data collection was performed on patient demographics, type of cancer, previous cancer treatments, type of CBS, location of bleed, diagnostic workup, endovascular treatment, and procedural outcomes and complications.

RESULTS

A total of 38 consecutive endovascular procedures for CBS were performed from 2008-2019 at our single academic institution. Technical success was achieved in 100% of endovascular procedures. Procedural stroke occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, procedural mortality occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, recurrent CBS occurred in 4 (10.5%) procedures, and fatal rehemorrhage occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure. Regarding secondary outcomes, delayed stroke/transient ischemic attack occurred in 1 (2.6%) procedure, whereas there were no cases of delayed infectious complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The endovascular treatment of CBS is safe and effective with relatively low rates of morbidity and mortality compared with other currently available treatment modalities. However, the overall rate of complications demands attention and sheds light on the need for further improvement in management.

Bleeding Complications After Transoral Robotic Surgery: A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative hemorrhage is the most common complication of transoral robotic surgery (TORS), the severity of which can range from minor bleeding treated with observation to catastrophic hemorrhage leading to death. To date, little is known about the incidence, risk factors, and management of post-TORS hemorrhage.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic Review and Metanlysis.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature using the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions was performed and examined TORS, postoperative hemorrhage, and the use of prophylactic transcervical arterial ligation (TAL).

RESULTS

A total of 13 articles were included in the analysis. To date, there have been 332 cases of hemorrhage following a total of 5748 TORS. The pooled median post-TORS hemorrhage rate was 6.47%. The overall incidence of minor and major hemorrhage was 5.29% and 2.90%. Patients with prior radiation (relative risk [RR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.00-2.12), large tumors (RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.48-2.99), and those requiring perioperative coagulation (RR = 2.25, 95% CI = 1.54-3.28) had significantly higher relative risks of hemorrhage. There was no significant difference in the relative risk of overall hemorrhage with TAL. Looking at major hemorrhage, patients undergoing TAL had a large but insignificant relative risk reduction in post-TORS hemorrhage (RR = 0.40, 95% CI = 0.15-1.07).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of post-TORS hemorrhage is low (5.78%), and for major hemorrhage requiring emergent embolization, TAL, or tracheotomy to control hemorrhage it is even lower (2.90%). Large tumors, perioperative anticoagulation, and prior radiation were associated with significantly increased risk of post-TORS hemorrhage. TAL does not reduce the overall incidence of post-TORS hemorrhage but may lead to fewer severe hemorrhages.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III Laryngoscope, 131:95-105, 2021.

Intervening in the Acute Phase of Postradiation Carotid Blowout Syndrome

Introduction  Acute carotid blowout syndrome (aCBS) is a severe complication of head and neck cancer (HNC). It can be defined as a rupture of the extracranial carotid arteries, or one of their branches, that causes life-threatening hemorrhage, and which nowadays can be treated with urgent endovascular intervention.

Objective  We retrospectively evaluate the endovascular management of aCBS and its outcome in years of survival.

Methods  Retrospectively, we describe our experience with endovascular control of aCBS in patients treated for HNC. We review the characteristics, pathology, endovascular treatment and morbidity and assess the gain in life years.

Results  Nine individuals were included in this study. Four patients had been previously diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), one with paranasal SCC, one with nasopharyngeal carcinoma and three with oral or maxillary adenocarcinoma. All subjects underwent radiotherapy and surgical excision to different extents. Twelve endovascular procedures were performed for injuries to the internal carotid artery ( n  = 3; 25%), external carotid artery ( n  = 1; 7%) or one of their branches ( n  = 8; 67%). Deconstructive methods were used in nine procedures, and three procedures were mainly reconstructive with deployment of covered stents. Total control of bleeding was achieved in all individuals with no intraprocedural complications.

Conclusion  Endovascular therapy is an effective alternative for the management of exsanguinating CBS. In our series, this palliative therapy increased the overall patient survival by an estimated 9 months.

Carotid blowout syndrome: modern trends in management

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) refers to rupture of the carotid artery and is an uncommon complication of head and neck cancer that can be rapidly fatal without prompt diagnosis and intervention. CBS develops when a damaged arterial wall cannot sustain its integrity against the patient’s blood pressure, mainly in patients who have undergone surgical procedures and radiotherapy due to cancer of the head and neck, or have been reirradiated for a recurrent or second primary tumor in the neck. Among patients irradiated prior to surgery, CBS is usually a result of wound breakdown, pharyngocutaneous fistula and infection. This complication has often been fatal in the past, but at the present time, early diagnosis and modern technology applied to its management have decreased morbidity and mortality rates. In addition to analysis of the causes and consequences of CBS, the purpose of this paper is to critically review methods for early diagnosis of this complication and establish individualized treatment based on endovascular procedures for each patient.

Safety and effectiveness of endovascular embolization or stent-graft reconstruction for treatment of acute carotid blowout syndrome in patients with head and neck cancer: Case series and systematic review of observational studies

BACKGROUND

Indications for treatment and outcomes after endovascular management of carotid blowout syndrome for patients with head and neck cancer are not well defined. We investigated the safety and effectiveness of endovascular embolization and stent-graft reconstruction.

METHODS

A literature review was performed for studies published between 2001 and 2015 with relevance to treatment outcomes. Our institutional database was examined to identify patients treated with endovascular techniques.

RESULTS

A total of 266 patients were included. Rates of procedural stroke were higher after embolization of internal carotid artery (ICA)/common carotid artery (CCA) compared to stent graft (embolization 10.3%; stent graft 2.5%; P < .02). Stent graft of ICA/CCA was associated with higher rates of recurrent bleeding (embolization 9.1%; stent graft 31.9%; P < .01).

CONCLUSION

Both embolization and stent grafts are safe therapeutic options for acute carotid blowout syndrome. Embolization for ICA/CCA carotid blowout syndrome was associated with higher risks of procedural stroke and lower recurrent bleeding compared to stent grafts.

Endovascular treatment of carotid blowout syndrome

BACKGROUND

Carotid blowout syndrome (CBS) is a life-threatening complication of head and neck cancer and radiation therapy. Endovascular techniques have emerged as preferable alternatives to surgical ligation for treatment of CBS. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to study periprocedural complications and outcomes of CBS patients treated with coil embolization and covered stents.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search identified studies that reported outcomes of endovascular treatment of CBS published from 2000 to April 2016. Outcomes included technical success, postoperative rebleeding, survival time, and perioperative complications. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twenty-five noncomparative studies with 559 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Technical success rate was 100% in both coiling and covered stenting groups. Median survival time was 3 months (range, 0-96 months) for all CBS patients. Overall perioperative mortality was 11% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5%-17%). Postoperative rebleeding rate was 27% (95% CI, 19%-367%). Perioperative stroke and infection rates were 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%) and 1% (95% CI, 0%-5%), respectively. At last follow-up, 39% of patients were alive (95% CI, 29%-48%).

CONCLUSIONS

Coil embolization and stent grafts may both be safe treatment options for CBS with few perioperative complications and high rates of technical success, but prognosis after treatment remains poor. In general, noncomparative studies do not demonstrate differences between the two techniques with respect to periprocedural complications and patient outcomes.

Contemporary management of carotid blowout syndrome utilizing endovascular techniques

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

To illustrate complex interdisciplinary decision making and the utility of modern endovascular techniques in the management of patients with carotid blowout syndrome (CBS).

STUDY DESIGNS

Retrospective chart review.

METHODS

Patients treated with endovascular strategies and/or surgical modalities were included. Control of hemorrhage, neurological, and survival outcomes were studied.

RESULTS

Between 2004 and 2014, 33 patients had 38 hemorrhagic events related to head and neck cancer that were managed with endovascular means. Of these, 23 were localized to the external carotid artery (ECA) branches and five localized to the ECA main trunk; nine were related to the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA), and one event was related to the innominate artery. Seven events related to the CCA/ICA or innominate artery were managed with endovascular sacrifice, whereas three cases were managed with a flow-preserving approach (covered stent). Only one patient developed permanent hemiparesis. In two of the three cases where the flow-preserving approach was used, the covered stent eventually became exposed via the overlying soft tissue defect, and definitive management using carotid revascularization or resection was employed to prevent further hemorrhage. In cases of soft tissue necrosis, vascularized tissues were used to cover the great vessels as applicable.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of modern endovascular approaches for management of acute CBS yields optimal results and should be employed in a coordinated manner by the head and neck surgeon and the neurointerventionalist.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4. Laryngoscope, 2016 127:383-390, 2017.