Focus on the target: Angiographic features of the fistulous point and prognosis of transvenous embolization of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula

Clinical features, treatment, and outcomes of cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas: a cohort study of 141 patients

PURPOSE

The cavernous sinus (CS) region is a common region of dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF). Over time, treatment strategies are gradually changing. In this study, we present our center's experience in managing CS-DAVF over the past 20 years.

METHODS

Medical records of patients diagnosed with CS-DAVF between 2002 and 2021 were collected for analysis. Patients meeting the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were included. This study summarized and analyzed their clinical characteristics, CS-DAVF angioarchitecture, treatment strategies, and outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 141 patients (mean age 55 years, 46 males) were included in this study. Ocular/orbital symptoms were the most frequently reported initial symptoms, with 84 (59.6%) patients experiencing these symptoms first. Presentation with ocular/orbital symptoms as the first symptom was associated with thrombosis of the inferior petrosal sinus (p = 0.032). Presentation with headache/dizziness and tinnitus/intracranial murmur as the first symptom was associated with sphenoparietal sinus/superficial middle cerebral vein drainage (p = 0.011). Among the patients, 131 (92.9%) patients received endovascular treatment, with 114 (87.0%) undergoing transvenous embolization. Onyx (92.4%) and coil (74.8%) were the most used embolic materials. 17 (13.0%) of the patients who received endovascular treatment suffered intraoperative or postoperative complications, and 11 (64.7%) patients fully recovered within 6 months after discharge.

CONCLUSION

Ocular/orbital symptoms were the most common first symptom of CS-DAVF. The mode of venous drainage played a significant role in determining the first symptoms. Transvenous embolization using Onyx or a combination of Onyx and coils was the primary treatment modality.

Access to cavernous dAVF via occluded superior petrosal Sinus

There are multiple treatment alternatives for cavernous dAVFs, with transvenous routes being most common. Among these routes, occluded inferior petrosal sinus is well-described, and, apart from being imaginative and elegant, it is also safe and effective. Herein we describe the application of this method to reach the fistulous pouch of a cavernous dAVF via an occluded superior petrosal sinus.

Transfemoral trans-facial vein-superior ophthalmic vein to embolize cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas

Cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CS-DAVF) is an abnormal communication between the CS and dural arteries from the internal carotid artery and external carotid artery. CS-DAVFs are not uncommon. The preferred treatment for most CS-DAVFs is transvenous embolization (TVE), which can achieve a high cure rate with few complications. The trans-inferior petrous sinus (IPS) route from the internal jugular vein to the CS is the favorite and most direct route to perform TVE in the great majority of CS-DAVFs. However, when the trans-IPS route fails and if the facial vein (FV) is patent and dilated, transfemoral trans-FV-superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) embolization of the CS-DAVF can be attempted. However, the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVFs is often challenging, and there is insufficient knowledge about it. Therefore, an updated review of the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVFs is necessary, and this review includes our experience. The images in this review are from our institute without the dispute of copyright. Issues regarding the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAV were discussed, including the FV anatomy and variation, various TVE routes to access CS-DAVF, the procedure of the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVF, difficulty, and solution of the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVF, and complications and prognosis of transfemoral trans-FV-SOV to embolize CS-DAVF. By reviewing the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVFs, we found that this route provides a valuable alternative to the other transvenous routes. A good prognosis can be obtained with the transfemoral trans-FV-SOV route to embolize CS-DAVFs in select cases.

What is the most effective method to treat indirect carotid-cavernous fistula?

To review the most relevant treatment options for indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas (iCCF), cohorts of 20 patients or more published after 2000 were analyzed. Clinical and radiological outcomes, as well as embolization techniques and material, had to be clarified in the study to be considered. Statistical analysis was based on calculating the relative percentage of therapeutic methods or embolic material, followed by calculating parametric and nonparametric correlations. Some 22 studies and 1550 patients were included. Transvenous embolization (TVE) was used in 53% of the patients and was strongly associated with coiling (rw = 0.66, p = 0.0.0012; rs = 0.53, p = 0.0138), transarterial embolization (TAE) was preferred in 11% of the patients and was strongly linked to liquid embolics (rw = 0.44, p = 0.0434;rs = 0.64, p = 0.0018). A combination of TAE and TVE treatment was used in 7% and a combination of embolic materials in 13% of the patients. None of the endovascular techniques or embolization materials showed significant superiority over the others in clinical outcome and obliteration rate. Radiosurgery in 22% and mechanical compression in 5% of patients showed a lower obliteration rate (rw =  - 0.48, p = 0.0254; rs =  - 0.45, p = 0.0371). The clinical outcomes were comparable to endovascular treatment (EVT). The remaining 2% of the patients were treated by open surgery or a combination of EVT and radiosurgery. Transvenous coiling is the preferred EVT method for iCCF. However, comparable results may be accomplished with TAE using liquid. Radiosurgery may achieve a lower percentage of fistula occlusion, but the clinical results are equal to EVT.

The Vascular Architecture of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula and Its Impact on Endovascular Treatment Approach Selection and Outcome

BACKGROUND

A cavernous sinus (CS) dural arteriovenous fistula (DAVF) is a form of abnormal arteriovenous communication that can be treated with endovascular embolization. Establishing an optimal access route should be based on vascular architecture. We reviewed 64 patients with CS-DAVF who underwent endovascular embolization and report the endovascular treatment approach selection and outcome.

METHODS

Clinical data were obtained from 64 patients with CS-DAVF who had been surgically treated at the authors' hospital between 2009 and 2022. Patients' medical records, imaging data, and follow-up outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All 64 patients (15 male, 49 female; mean age, 50 years) underwent CS-DAVF embolization. The most common symptoms were exophthalmos (39.1%), chemosis (35.9%), and headache (28.1%). On digital subtraction angiography images, 34.4% of the DAVFs were unilateral, and 82.8% were fed by both the external carotid artery and internal carotid artery. Of the patients' inferior petrosal sinuses (IPSs), 54.7% were nonopacified. The most common intravascular approaches included trans-IPS (37.5%) and trans-artery (28.1%) approaches. More than half of the CS-DAVFs were embolized by both coils and Onyx (62.5%). A total of 85.9% of the fistulas were completely embolized, and the follow-up rate was 76.6%. The modified Rankin Scale score was 0.9 ± 1.0.

CONCLUSIONS

The vascular architecture of CS-DAVF is closely related to endovascular treatment approach selection and outcome. Combined with the modified IPS recanalization technique, the trans-IPS approach is the safest and most effective approach. Dual microcatheter and balloon assistance techniques ensure the safety and completeness of embolization.

Transfemoral transvenous embolization through the vein of Trolard and superficial middle cerebral vein for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula with isolated cortical vein drainage: A case report and literature review

Background:

Endovascular treatment may be challenging for cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistulas (CSDAVFs) with prominent leptomeningeal drainage without other accessible routes. We report a case of CSDAVF with isolated cortical venous successfully drainage treated by percutaneous transvenous embolization through the vein of Trolard and superficial middle cerebral vein (SMCV). We also review the literature of CSDAVFs treated by transvenous embolization through SMCV with or without combined surgical approach.

Case Description:

A 46-year-old woman presented with ocular symptoms and delayed treatment was encountered due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Cerebral angiography showed a CSDAVF (Barrow type D, Borden II, and Cognard II a + b) with isolated cortical vein drainage. Percutaneous transvenous access to the fistula through the inferior petrosal sinus was attempted but failed. Transvenous embolization through the vein of Trolard and SMCV was further attempted, and satisfactory occlusion of the fistula was achieved with detachable coils. This access route was chosen because of the occlusion of other access routes and can obliterate the need for more invasive approach, that is, combined surgical and endovascular approach. Cerebral angiography obtained 6 months following the procedure, confirmed complete angiographic obliteration of the fistula. The patient made an uneventful recovery.

Conclusion:

To avoid invasive combined surgical and endovascular approach, transvenous embolization through the vein of Trolard and SMCV may be another accessible option for treating CSDAVF with isolated cortical venous drainage.

Transvenous Approaches to Embolization of Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae of the Cavernous Sinus

Dural arteriovenous fistulae of the cavernous sinus (CS) (previously often referred to indirect carotid cavernous fistulas) are rare vascular shunts involving meningeal branches and osseous branches of the external or internal carotid arteries and the CS. They typically present with ocular symptoms including pain, conjunctival injection, and proptosis. Left untreated there may be a risk of vision loss, and fistulas with cortical venous reflux through either the deep or superficial venous system may cause intracranial venous congestion or hemorrhage. Endovascular embolization is the standard treatment, and while transarterial routes may appear possible, transarterial embolization has considerable risks of ischemic complications. Conversely, transvenous routes achieve a high rate of fistula occlusion with a low risk of peri-procedural morbidity. Procedural success depends on identification of the venous outflows from the fistula and localization of the fistulous point, to select the best route of access to the CS, including the inferior petrosal sinus (IPS), intercavernous sinus, or superior ophthalmic vein, among others. Even if the IPS is not visualized, it may be possible to recanalize it to gain access to the CS. Embolization can be performed with a combination of coils, fibered coils, and liquid embolic agents, focusing on occlusion of the fistulous point or blocking high-risk venous outflow pathways. In this review we will highlight procedural pearls and potential pitfalls and our typical approach to these lesions based on illustrative examples.

Embolization of Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula (CSDAVF) via transvenous approaches: Practice, experience summary and literature review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of embolization via transvenous approaches in patients diagnosed with Cavernous Sinus Dural Arteriovenous Fistula (CSDAVF). We also hope to further summarize our preliminary experiences with transvenous approaches.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from patients who were diagnosed with CSDAVF and were treated with embolization via transvenous approaches from June 2014 to November 2020 at Beijing Tiantan Hospital. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of this treatment using radiological results and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included in this study. Complete occlusion was obtained in 76 (89.4%) patients. Sub-total occlusion was obtained in eight (9.4%) patients. Partial occlusion was obtained in one (1.2%) patient. There was no recurrence. Seventy-six patients (91.5%) were cured, and seven patients showed symptom improvement (8.5%). There were no cases of worsening symptoms following embolization, and only ten (12.0%) cases had mild complications.

CONCLUSION

There was a high occlusion rate and a low complication rate in our study. Thus, completing embolization of CSDAVF via transvenous approaches may be safe and effective. However, this operation is more difficult than those via transarterial approaches. Transvenous embolization should therefore be performed in an experienced medical center.

Endovascular treatment of the cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula: current status and considerations

A cavernous sinus dural arteriovenous fistula (CS-DAVF) is an abnormal arteriovenous communication involving the dura mater within or near the CS wall. The dural arteries from the internal carotid artery and external carotid artery supply the CS-DAVF, and the superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) and inferior petrous sinus (IPS) are frequent venous drainers. In CS-DAVF cases, high-risk lesions require treatment. Endovascular treatment (EVT) has been the first-line option for CS-DAVFs. To our knowledge, a review of the EVT of CS-DAVFs is lacking. Therefore, in this paper, we review the available literature on this issue. In addition, some illustrative cases are also provided to more concisely expound the EVT of CS-DAVFs. According to the recent literature, transvenous embolization via the IPS is considered the most effective method for EVT of CS-DAVFs. In addition, the transorbital approach is another reasonable choice. Other venous approaches can also be tried. Because of the low cure rate, transarterial embolization for CS-DAVFs is limited to only highly selected patients. In the EVT of CS-DAVFs, various agents have been used, including coil, Onyx, and n-butyl cyanoacrylate, with coil being the preferred one. In addition, when EVT cannot obliterate the CS-DAVF, stereotactic radiotherapy may be considered. In general, despite various complications, EVT is a feasible and effective method to manage CS-DAVFs by way of various access routes and can yield a good prognosis.

Unilateral Venous Approach to Contralateral or Bilateral Carotid Cavernous Shunts

BACKGROUND

Cavernous carotid fistulas (CCF) are anatomically complex vascular lesions. Treatment via the venous approach has been previously described and is highly dependent on the patency of the drainage pathways. The use of a unilateral approach to contralateral or bilateral shunts is technically challenging and not commonly described. We present our experience with the unilateral across-the-midline approach to both cavernous sinuses to treat shunts according to anatomic compartments to achieve anatomic cure.

METHODS

Patients included in this study presented with either bilateral or unilateral shunts with unilateral venous drainage. We used a transarterial guiding catheter for road mapping and control angiography. A venous triaxial system was used to achieve support for distal navigation across the midline via the coronary sinus to the contralateral cavernous sinus. Coils were favored for embolization, with occasional complementary liquid embolic material.

RESULTS

Five patients underwent complete occlusion in a single session. One patient required additional complementary transarterial embolization. Despite a successful unilateral approach to bilateral cavernous sinuses, 1 patient needed an additional ipsilateral transophthalmic venous approach to obliterate the anterior compartment of the cavernous sinus. No complications were encountered. Complete angiographic cure was observed in all patients by the end of the final procedures, with persistent occlusion in their follow-up imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful inspection of the venous anatomy and fistulization sites is critical when treating unilateral or bilateral carotid cavernous shunts. The contralateral venous route can serve as a safe approach when visualized. Crossing the midline via the anterior or posterior coronary sinuses is feasible and efficacious.