Usefulness of contrast-enhanced and TOF MR angiography for follow-up after low-profile stent-assisted coil embolization of intracranial aneurysms

High-resolution vessel wall imaging for quantitatively and qualitatively evaluating in-stent stenosis of intracranial aneurysms

Background

It is critical to accurately and noninvasively evaluate the stented parent artery of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) with endovascular treatment.

Objective

To investigate high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of in-stent stenosis (ISS) in IAs treated with stent placement (SP).

Methods

Fifty-five patients (58 aneurysms) underwent HR-VWI, contrast-enhanced (CE)-HR-VWI, CE-MR angiography (MRA), time-of-flight (TOF)-MRA, and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) six months after SP, and the reliability of quantitative stent lumen measurements was evaluated by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. Agreement and correlation of quantitative evaluation were estimated by comparing the four MR imaging modalities with DSA. The diagnostic performance for >0%, ≥25%, and ≥50% of ISS degrees and overall diagnostic accuracy for the ISS degrees of the four MR imaging modalities were calculated to qualitative evaluation.

Results

The reliability of CE-HR-VWI and HR-VWI for ISS quantitative measurements was excellent (ICC 0.955-0.989). The agreement and correlation of CE-HR-VWI, HR-VWI versus DSA for ISS quantitative measurements were better than those of CE-MRA and TOF-MRA (p < 0.05). The diagnostic performance for distinguishing the degree of ISS >0%, ≥25%, and ≥50% by CE-HR-VWI and HR-VWI was superior to CE-MRA and TOF-MRA, and their overall diagnostic accuracy was 96.55 and 94.83%, respectively. HR-VWI and CE-HR-VWI were not statistically significant in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of ISS performance (p > 0.05).

Conclusion

HR-VWI and CE-HR-VWI have similar performance and value in the quantitative and qualitative evaluation of ISS, and HR-VWI without contrast media could be used as an ideal long-term follow-up approach after SP treatment for IAs.

Imaging follow-up strategy after endovascular treatment of Intracranial aneurysms: A literature review and guideline recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular coil embolization is the primary treatment modality for intracranial aneurysms. However, its long-term durability remains of concern, with a considerable proportion of cases requiring aneurysm reopening and retreatment. Therefore, establishing optimal follow-up imaging protocols is necessary to ensure a durable occlusion. This study aimed to develop guidelines for follow-up imaging strategies after endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A committee comprising members of the Korean Neuroendovascular Society and other relevant societies was formed. A literature review and analyses of the major published guidelines were conducted to gather evidence. A panel of 40 experts convened to achieve a consensus on the recommendations using the modified Delphi method.

RESULTS

The panel members reached the following consensus: 1. Schedule the initial follow-up imaging within 3-6 months of treatment. 2. Noninvasive imaging modalities, such as three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) or contrast-enhanced MRA, are alternatives to digital subtraction angiography (DSA) during the first follow-up. 3. Schedule mid-term follow-up imaging at 1, 2, 4, and 6 years after the initial treatment. 4. If noninvasive imaging reveals unstable changes in the treated aneurysms, DSA should be considered. 5. Consider late-term follow-up imaging every 3-5 years for lifelong monitoring of patients with unstable changes or at high risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

The guidelines aim to provide physicians with the information to make informed decisions and provide patients with high-quality care. However, owing to a lack of specific recommendations and scientific data, these guidelines are based on expert consensus and should be considered in conjunction with individual patient characteristics and circumstances.

Diagnostic Performance of High-Resolution Vessel Wall MR Imaging Combined with TOF-MRA in the Follow-up of Intracranial Vertebrobasilar Dissecting Aneurysms after Reconstructive Endovascular Treatment

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Few studies have reported the utility of high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging in the follow-up of endovascularly treated vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging combined with TOF-MRA in the follow-up of intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms after reconstructive endovascular treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms with reconstructive endovascular treatment and followed up with TOF-MRA, high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging, and DSA were included. With DSA as the criterion standard, the diagnostic performance of TOF-MRA, high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging, and high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging combined with TOF-MRA in the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion status and parent artery patency was assessed. Visualization of the stented artery on TOF-MRA and high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging was rated on a 5-point scale.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients with 29 aneurysms were included. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of TOF-MRA, high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging, and high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging combined with TOF-MRA for diagnosing aneurysm remnants were 80.0%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 82.4%; 53.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 66.7%; and 93.3%, 100.0%, 100.0%, and 93.3%, respectively. For the visualization of the stented artery, the mean score of high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging was significantly higher than that of TOF-MRA (4.88 [SD, 0.32] versus 2.53 [SD, 1.25], P < .001). In the evaluation of parent artery patency (normal or pathologic), whereas TOF-MRA had a sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of 100.0%, 8.0%, 14.8%, and 100.0%, respectively, high-resolution vessel wall MR imaging was completely consistent with the DSA.

CONCLUSIONS

High-resolution vessel wall MR imaging combined with TOF-MRA at 3T showed good diagnostic performance in the follow-up of intracranial vertebrobasilar dissecting aneurysms after reconstructive endovascular treatment.

Magnetic Resonance Angiography after Flow Diversion: The use of complementary MRA techniques to monitor aneurysm occlusion as well as device and arterial branch patency after flow diverter placement

BACKGROUND

Few studies have been performed to evaluate flow diversion with MRA. They have shown better success for MRA to assess the aneurysm response but limited success for the stent patency. Further, the patency of arterial branches on MRA remains to be explored.

METHODS

31 consecutive cases of carotid aneurysms treated with flow diversion were retrospectively evaluated with noncontrast time of flight (TOF), contrast enhanced TOF (CTOF) and cine MRA (TWIST) independently by two investigators for aneurysm occlusion, stent patency and arterial branch patency. DSA served as the gold standard technique.

RESULTS

There were 6 males and 25 females in the age range of years (mean ±SD). Stent patency, aneurysm occlusion and branch patency, mostly revealed substantial to perfect interobserver agreement (k >0.60). The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for the stent patency on source images of TOF were 0.99,0.84, 0.42 and 0.99 and on CTOF were 0.99, 0.89, 0.50 and 0.99 respectively.Sensitivity for the aneurysm response on the three MRAs ranged from 0.88 to 0.93,specificity from 0.64 to 0.75, positive predictive value from 0.69 to 0.79 and negative predictive value from 0.86 to 0.90. Sensitivity for the arterial branch patency among the three MRAs, ranged from 0.55 to 0.93, specificity from 0.61 to 0.68, positive predictive value from 0.79 to 0.93 and negative predictive value from 0.22 to 0.90.

CONCLUSIONS

Aneurysm occlusion, stent patency and arterial branch patency in flow diversion can be successfully evaluated with the combination of three MRA techniques.

Usefulness of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition sequence in subtraction-based magnetic resonance angiography for follow-up of the Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for cerebral aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Although time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is widely used, it has limited usefulness for follow-up after stent-assisted coil embolization. Contrast-enhanced MRA (CE-MRA) and ultrashort echo time MRA have been suggested as alternative methods for visualization after this procedure.

PURPOSE

To compare efficacy and usefulness of pointwise encoding time reduction with radial acquisition (PETRA) sequence in subtraction-based MRA (qMRA), TOF-MRA, and CE-MRA during the follow-up after Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 23 patients with 24 aneurysms who underwent Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms. All patients were evaluated with PETRA qMRA, TOF-MRA, and CE-MRA at the same follow-up session. The flow within stents, occlusion status, and presence of pseudo-stenosis were evaluated; inter-observer and intermodality agreements for the three methods were also graded.

RESULTS

The mean score for flow visualization within the stents was significantly higher for PETRA qMRA and CE-MRA than for TOF-MRA (although no significant difference was found between PETRA qMRA and CE-MRA). Good inter-observer agreement was observed for each modality. PETRA qMRA and CE-MRA were more consistent with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) than TOF-MRA for aneurysm occlusion status. The intermodality agreement was better between PETRA qMRA and DSA, and between CE-MRA and DSA, than between DSA and TOF-MRA. Pseudo-stenosis was most frequently observed in TOF-MRA, followed by CE-MRA and PETRA qMRA.

CONCLUSION

PETRA qMRA is useful for evaluating the parent artery patency and occlusion status of aneurysms after Neuroform Atlas stent-assisted coil embolization.

The implications of magnetic resonance angiography artifacts caused by different types of intracranial flow diverters

BACKGROUND

Serial cerebral angiographic imaging is necessary to ensure cerebral aneurysm occlusion after flow diverter placement. Time-of-flight (TOF)-magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is used for this purpose due to its lack of radiation, contrast media and complications. The comparative diagnostic yield of TOF-MRA for different flow diverters has not been previously analyzed.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of TOF-MRA in cerebral aneurysms treated w divertersith different flow diverters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Flow-diverted patients whose cerebral follow-up MRA and digital subtraction angiograms (DSA) were obtained within 6 weeks were retrospectively identified. The DSA (as gold standard) and MRA images of these patients were compared by two readers (blinded to both patient data and endovascular procedure data) for residual aneurysms and the status of the parent artery for each type of flow diverter. In a second group of patients, magnetic susceptibility artifacts were manually measured and compared for different FDs.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients (85 aneurysms) were included in group one, and 86 patients (95 aneurysms) were included in group 2. TOF-MRA and DSA showed almost perfect agreement for residual aneurysms (κ = 0.88, p < 0.001) (positive predictive value (PPV) = 1.00, specificity = 1.00, negative predictive value (NPV) = 0.89, sensitivity = 0.89). Intermodality agreement (κ = 0.97 vs. κ = 0.74, p < 0.005) and sensitivity (0.97 vs. 0.77, NPV: 0.96 vs. 0.77) were highest with nitinol stents. MRA and DSA showed no agreement for occluded or stenotic parent vessels (κ = 0.13, p = 0.015, specificity = 0.44, NPV = 1.00, sensitivity = 1.00). Specificity was lower in chromium-cobalt based FDs than in nitinol devices (specificity = 0.08 vs. 0.60). Chromium-cobalt stents generated the largest artifacts (p < 0.005). The size of the device-related artifact, in millimeters, increased in respective order, for the Silk, Derivo, Pipeline and Surpass devices.

CONCLUSION

Unlike DSA, TOF-MRA is susceptible to dissimilarities between flow diverters. MRA is not well-suited for research studies comparing different flow diverters. Nitinol FDs appear to be advantageous for TOF-MRA follow-up so as not to miss small aneurysm remnants or clinically relevant parent artery stenosis.

Application of 3D T1-SPACE combined with 3D-TOF sequence for follow-up evaluation of stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysm

OBJECTIVES

To assess 3D T1-SPACE combined with 3D-TOF sequence for follow-up evaluation of stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysm.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between Oct 2018 and May 2019, we enrolled 25 patients with intracranial aneurysm who underwent stent-assisted coil embolization. All patients were followed up for 6 to10 months after endovascular treatment (EVT) using 3D-TOF MRA, 3D T1-SPACE and DSA to evaluate aneurysm occlusion and parent artery patency.

RESULTS

With regards to aneurysm occlusion, the specificity of 3D-TOF MRA was 86.9% (20/23) and the accuracy was 84% (21/25). There was no statistical significance (P ​= ​0.409) compared with the DSA. The parent artery by 3D-TOF MRA showed that there were 14 patients with grade 3, 8 patients with grade 2 and 3 patients with grade 1. However, 3D T1-SPACE showed that all 25 patients were grade 4, and were clearly displayed without metal artifacts. The comparison of the two MR techniques demonstrated that 3D T1-SPACE was superior to 3D-TOF MRA in the evaluation of parent artery (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

3D T1-SPACE sequence provides better image quality and higher accuracy for evaluating stented parent arteries compared to TOF-MRA. This study also shows that 3D-TOF MRA has a merit to evaluate aneurysm occlusion. The combination of these two modalities can be used as an optional follow-up evaluation after EVT of intracranial aneurysms.

Knowledge framework and emerging trends in intracranial aneurysm magnetic resonance angiography: a scientometric analysis from 2004 to 2020

Background

As magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been increasingly used in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) as a non-invasive technique, the knowledge framework and areas of research interest in intracranial aneurysms magnetic resonance angiography (IAMRA) change approximately every 10 years. However, few studies have quantitatively analyzed the published literature in this field. In the present study, we used scientometrics to survey the knowledge field, development trends, and research focus of IAMRA with the aim of providing a reference for further study.

Methods

We collected articles on IAMRA published from 2004 (Jan 1, 2004) to 2020 (May 24, 2020). Web of Science Core Collection databases (WoSCCd) including the Science Citation Index Expanded were searched. An experienced staff member from the Department of Radiology at Southern Medical University, assisted in screening articles for relevant articles. We used ArcGIS (a mapping and location analytics platform) to perform geographic visualization. Excel 2016 was used to analyze the literature data, including number of publications, impact factor (IF), and publication year. CiteSpace V was used to conduct a series of literature feature clustering, including author co-citation analysis, reference co-citation analysis (RCA), and burst keywords analysis.

Results

A total of 1,272 articles on IAMRA published between 2004 and 2020 were included. Of 257 journals, American Journal of Neuroradiology (IF 2018: 3.256) published the most IAMRA articles (109 publications, 8.57%), followed by Journal of Neurosurgery (IF 2018: 4.131, 51 publications, 4.16%), and Neuroradiology (IF 2018: 2.504, 51 publications, 4.01%). Of 56 countries, the USA published the most, with 347 articles [27.28%, IF: 3.14 (average IF of all journals in the country)], followed by Japan (242 articles, 19.03%, IF: 2.38), Germany (135 articles, 10.61%, IF: 3.21), and China (101 articles, 7.94%, IF: 2.86). A total of 1387 institutions published articles, with the Mayo Clinic publishing the most (33 articles, 2.59%), followed by Shanghai Jiao Tong University (25 article, 1.97%), Seoul National University (23 articles, 1.81%), and University Medical Center Utrecht (19 articles, 1.49%). Of 399 authors, Rinkel ranked first with 19 articles, followed by Li MH (18 articles), Uchino A (15 articles), and Saito N (13 articles). Cluster RCA showed that the first cluster was "#0 growth", followed by "#1 Guglielmi detachable coils". Timeline views showed that the time span of "#0 growth" was the closest to today. The modularity value was 0.6971, and the mean silhouette value was 0.5477. According to the burst keyword analysis, "risk factors associated to rupture" was the topic with the strongest burst since 2017. Studies conducted in several countries suggested that age is inversely related to the risk of rupture, which implies the importance of MRA follow-up for patients of different age.

Conclusions

From 2004 to 2020, the number of published IAMRA-related articles gradually increased. The USA and Western Europe lead in the field, with a concentration of cutting-edge talents and high-level scientific research institutions. A synthesis of the clustering results of RCA and burst keyword analysis indicated that unruptured IA growth, stent-assisted coil embolization, and risk factors associated to rupture were the current hotspots in IAMRA research.

The sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA compared with DSA in the follow-up of treated intracranial aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF-MRA) is widely used in detecting intracranial aneurysms (IA), but it is limited and controversial for use during follow-up to assess the outcome of interventional coiling or clipping surgery.

METHODS

To evaluate the specificity and sensitivity of using TOF-MRA as an imaging follow-up for IA with different treatments. A total of 280 patients with 326 treated IA underwent simultaneous TOF-MRA and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) as follow-up imaging on the same day. All images were independently reviewed by two neurosurgeons and two radiologists. The consensus evaluation of intra-arterial DSA as a reference test was used to evaluate the result of aneurysm occlusions. The aneurysmal embolization status was assessed with two ratings involving complete or incomplete occlusions. We calculated the sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of three-dimensional-TOF-MRA to investigate the diagnostic performance.

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA for diagnosing the remnant were 83.3% and 95.2%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of interventional therapy was 90.0% and 94.2%, respectively, while the clipping group showed sensitivity and specificity of 50.0% and 100%, respectively. For additional groups, involving coil only, stent-assisted, and flow diverter, the analysis of interventional therapy showed sensitivities and specificities of 100.0% and 90.1%, 66.7% and 95.1%, and 91.7% and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

TOF-MRA can be used as a first-line noninvasive imaging modality during follow-up, especially for the patients treated with a pipeline embolization device and coils only. But it may not be enough for clipped aneurysms.

Usefulness of 3D T1-SPACE in Combination With 3D-TOF MRA for Follow-Up Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms Treated With Pipeline Embolization Devices

Object: Follow-up evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated by flow-diverting stents using MRI is challenging due to the presence of imaging artifacts. This study evaluated 3D T1-SPACE in combination with 3D-TOF sequence for follow-up evaluation of intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline embolization devices.

Methods: Forty patients with 53 intracranial aneurysms who were treated with Pipeline Embolization Devices from October 2018 to July 2019 were enrolled in this study. All patients were evaluated for aneurysm occlusion and stent patency 4 to 7 months post-treatment using 3D T1-SPACE sequence, 3D-TOF MRA, and DSA examinations.

Results: With regards to aneurysm occlusion, the intermodality (DSA and 3D-TOF MRA) agreement was good (κ = 0.755). The specificity of 3D-TOF MRA was 94.4% (34/36), the sensitivity was 76.5% (13/17), the total coincidence rate was 88.7% (47/53). With regards to the patency of the stented arteries after PED treatment, 3D T1-SPACE sequence was more accurate compared to 3D-TOF MRA (Z = −6.283, P < 0.001), with a no-artifact rate of 95.7% (44/46).

Conclusions: 3D T1-SPACE sequence provides better image quality and higher accuracy for evaluating stented parent arteries compared to TOF-MRA. 3D-TOF MRA may be valuable in the evaluation of aneurysm occlusion. The combination of these two modalities may be used for long-term follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Pipeline Embolization Devices.

Follow-up non-contrast MRA after treatment of intracranial aneurysms using microcoils with prominent metallic artifact: a comparative study of TOF-MRA and Silent MRA

PURPOSE

Some of the detachable microcoils are associated with the prominent metallic artifact. We have applied Silent MRA to reduce the artifact. In this study, we present a retrospective study in which Silent MRA is used for cases showing prominent metallic artifact on conventional TOF-MRA due to a detachable bare platinum microcoil (Barricade coil).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifteen patients, who had undergone endosaccular embolization using Barricade coil and other detachable microcoils up to 3 days previously, were scanned with TOF-MRA and silent MRA at the same time. The treatment DSA and follow-up MRA images were graded by two experienced neuroradiologists, focusing on the visibility of residual aneurysm and parent arterial lumen.

RESULTS

DSA images showed residual aneurysm (RA) in four, residual neck (RN) in six, and complete occlusion (CO) in five patients. TOF-MRA images showed RN in five, CO in four, mild defect (MD) in one, severe defect (SD) in three, and complete defect in two. In contrast, on Silent MRA, the grades were RA in two, RN in five, CO in five, and MD in three.

CONCLUSION

Barricade coils are associated with prominent metallic artifact on TOF-MRA. Silent MRA is useful for follow-up MRA after embolization using Barricade coils. The metallic artifacts were compared between TOF-MRA and Silent MRA in patients treated by using Barricade coils. Barricade coils are associated with more metallic artifact on TOF-MRA than Silent MRA. Silent MRA is useful for follow-up MRA after embolization using Barricade coils.

Application of zero echo time MR angiography in follow-up of intracranial aneurysm remnant and in-stent lumen after embolization: a comparison study with digital subtraction angiography

Background

Intracranial aneurysm with endovascular treatment needs to be followed-up with a proper imaging method.

Purpose

To evaluate the performance of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) with zero echo time at 1.5-T in assessing the intracranial aneurysm remnant and in-stent lumen as compared with time-of-flight MRA, with digital subtraction angiography as the gold standard.

Material and Methods

A total of 46 patients (17 men; mean age = 56.6±13.7 years) with 54 aneurysms who underwent coil embolization with or without stent were enrolled in this study. The presence of aneurysm remnant and the visualization of in-stent lumen were evaluated. The agreement of remnant identification between MRA with zero echo time and time-of-flight MRA with digital subtraction angiography was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa analysis. The performance of in-stent lumen visualization between MRA with zero echo time and time-of-flight MR angiography was compared with Chi-square test.

Results

Of 54 aneurysms, 27 were found to have remnants by digital subtraction angiography. The kappa value in identification of remnant of aneurysm was 0.852 between MRA with zero echo time and digital subtraction angiography and 0.741 between time-of-flight MRA and digital subtraction angiography. In detecting remnant of aneurysm, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 96.3%, 88.9%, 89.7%, and 96.0% for MRA with zero echo time and 91.7%, 83.3%, 81.5%, and 92.6% for time-of-flight MRA, respectively. In visualizing in-stent lumen, MRA with zero echo time had better performance than time-of-flight MRA ( P < 0.001).

Conclusion

MR angiography with zero echo time might be a better non-invasive approach in assessing remnant of aneurysms and in-stent lumen as compared with time-of-flight MRA.

Usefulness of Noncontrast-Enhanced Silent Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA) for Treated Intracranial Aneurysm Follow-up in Comparison with Time-of-Flight MRA

BACKGROUND

Flow visualization in time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography (TOF MRA) is limited for treated intracranial aneurysms owing to magnetic susceptibility and radiofrequency shielding.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical usefulness of noncontrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) using a silent scan (silent MRA) as a follow-up imaging modality in patients with treated intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

A total of 119 patients with 126 treated aneurysms underwent silent MRA and TOF MRA during the same scan session. Two neuroradiologists independently assessed overall image quality and visualization of the treated site using a 5-point Likert scale to compare the 2 image sets. We used receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis to investigate the diagnostic performance of the 2 MRA methods in evaluating aneurysm occlusion. Interobserver reliability was also assessed using weighted kappa statistics.

RESULTS

The overall image quality scores of silent MRA and TOF MRA were 4.04 ± 0.22 and 4.64 ± 0.48, respectively (P &lt; .001), and interobserver agreement was substantial (P &lt; .001). For the treated site, the score of flow visualization on silent MRA was higher than that on TOF MRA, 3.94 ± 0.94 vs 2.59 ± 1.37 (P &lt; .001), with substantial interobserver agreement (P &lt; .001). ROC curve analysis showed that silent MRA was superior to TOF MRA in diagnostic performance (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.962; 95% CI: 0.931-0.982 vs AUC = 0.843; 95% CI: 0.792-0.886; P &lt; .001).

CONCLUSION

Silent MRA can be useful to evaluate treated intracranial aneurysms during follow-up without radiation exposure and use of contrast material. It is characterized by higher diagnostic performance and superior visualization for the treated site.

MRA versus DSA for the follow-up imaging of intracranial aneurysms treated using endovascular techniques: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Treated aneurysms must be followed over time to ensure durable occlusion, as more than 20% of endovascularly treated aneurysms recur. While digital subtraction angiography (DSA) remains the gold standard, magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is attractive as a non-invasive follow-up technique. Two different MRA techniques have traditionally been used: time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced (CE) MRA. We analysed data from studies comparing MRA techniques with DSA for the follow-up of aneurysms undergoing endovascular treatment. Subgroup analysis of stent-assisted coiling (SAC) and flow diversion (FD) techniques was completed.

METHODS

Comprehensive searches using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases were performed and updated to November 2018. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using aneurysm occlusion status as defined by the Raymond-Roy occlusion grading scale.

RESULTS

The literature search yielded 1579 unique titles. Forty-three studies were included. For TOF-MRA, sensitivity and specificity of all aneurysms undergoing endovascular therapy were 88% and 94%, respectively. For CE-MRA, the sensitivity and specificity were 88% and 96%, respectively. For SAC and FD techniques, sensitivity and specificity of TOF-MRA were 86% and 95%, respectively. CE-MRA had sensitivity and specificity of 90% and 92%.

CONCLUSION

MRA is a reliable modality for the follow-up of aneurysms treated using endovascular techniques. While the data are limited, MRA techniques can also be used to reliably follow patients undergoing FD and SAC. However, clinical factors must be used to optimize follow-up regimens for individual patients.

Usefulness of Vessel Wall MR Imaging for Follow-Up after Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Intracranial Aneurysms

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Follow-up with MRA for intracranial aneurysms after stent-assisted coiling is complicated by imaging artifacts. We evaluated the usefulness of an alternative method: vessel wall MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of medical records of 47 patients who underwent 3D TOF-MRA, vessel wall MRI, and DSA after stent-assisted coiling between March 2016 and January 2018. We evaluated the mean value of the signal intensity in the stented artery and the contralateral normal artery on vessel wall MRI. The quality of visualization was further compared between TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI. Furthermore, we evaluated the diagnostic accuracy and concordance rate of TOF-MRA and vessel wall MRI for assessing the patency of the stented parent artery. DSA was used as a reference test.

RESULTS

The mean signal intensities of the stented and normal arteries on vessel wall MRI were not significantly different (P = .133). The mean scores for the visualization of the stented parent artery on vessel wall MRI were significantly superior to those of TOF-MRA images (P < .001). Vessel wall MRI reached an excellent positive predictive value (100%). However, TOF-MRA had a poor positive predictive value (11%; 95% CI, 9%-12%). The likelihood ratios of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA were 27.36 (P < .001) and 2.98 (P = .225), respectively. The concordance rate of vessel wall MRI and TOF-MRA with DSA for evaluating the state of the stented artery was 100% (κ = 1) and 28% (κ = 0.038), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Vessel wall MRI may be useful in evaluating the patency of stented arteries after stent-assisted coil embolization for intracranial aneurysms.