Outpatient management of chronic expanding subdural hematomas with endovascular embolization to minimize inpatient admissions during the COVID-19 viral pandemic

Developing a fast-track discharge protocol for patients with cerebral aneurysms treated via neuroendovascular techniques

INTRODUCTION

As we emerge from the current pandemic, hospitals, staff, and resources will need to continue to adjust to meet ongoing healthcare demands. Lessons learned during past shortages can be used to optimize peri-procedural protocols to safely improve the utilization of hospital resources.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients who underwent elective endovascular intracranial aneurysm treatment was performed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with patients who were able to be discharged within 24 h of elective procedures. Rates of complications (particularly readmission) were determined.

RESULTS

330 patients underwent elective endovascular aneurysm treatment with 86 (26.1%) discharged within 24 h. Factors associated with earlier discharge included procedure years (2019-2021) and male sex. Patients were more likely to be discharged later (after 24 h) if they underwent stent-coil embolization or flow-diversion. There was no association between discharge timing and likelihood of readmission.

DISCUSSION

Our review highlights the safety of earlier discharge and allowed us to prepare a fast-track protocol for same-day discharge in these patients. This protocol will be studied prospectively in the next phase of this study. As we gain more comfort with emerging, minimally invasive endovascular therapies, we hope to safely achieve same-day discharge on a protocolized and routine basis, reducing the demand of elective aneurysm treatments on our healthcare system.

CONCLUSION

We retrospectively demonstrate that early discharge following elective aneurysm treatment is safe in our cohort and provide a fast-track pathway based on these findings for other centers developing similar protocols.

Safety and efficacy comparison of embolic agents for middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization in terms of both clinical and radiographic outcomes, when performed with different embolic agents.

METHODS

A systematic literature review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of embolic agents on outcomes for middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. The use of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) with or without (±) coils, N-butyl cyanoacrylate (n-BCA) ± coils, and Onyx alone were separately evaluated. Primary outcome measures were recurrence, the need for surgical rescue and in-hospital periprocedural complications.

RESULTS

Thirty-one studies were identified with a total of 1,134 patients, with 786 receiving PVA, 167 receiving n-BCA, and 181 patients receiving Onyx. There was no difference in the recurrence rate (5.5% for PVA, 4.5% for n-BCA, and 6.5% for Onyx, with P=0.71) or need for surgical rescue (5.0% for PVA, 4.0% for n-BCA, and 6.9% for Onyx, with P=0.89) based on the embolic agent. Procedural complications also did not differ between embolic agents (1.8% for PVA, 3.6% for n-BCA, and 1.6% for Onyx, with P=0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Rates of recurrence, need for surgical rescue, and periprocedural complication following MMA embolization are not impacted by the type of embolic agent utilized. Ongoing clinical trials may be used to further investigate these findings.

Awake transradial middle meningeal artery embolization and twist drill craniostomy for chronic subdural hematomas in the elderly: case series and technical note

BACKGROUND

Due to prohibitive perioperative risk factors, optimal treatment for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDH) in the elderly remains unclear. Minimally invasive techniques are a viable option and include bedside subdural evacuation port system (SEPS), as well as prevention of recurrence with middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization. We present a case series of elderly patients undergoing combined transradial MMA embolization and bed-side craniostomy as primary treatment for cSDH.

METHODS

Patients 70 years and older from 2019 to 2020 that underwent single setting, awake transradial MMA embolization with concurrent SEPS placement under local anesthesia were included. Those with prior treatments, interventions performed under general anesthesia, or with less than 60-day follow-up were excluded. Descriptive analyses of baseline characteristics, radiologic parameters, comorbidities, and outcome measures were completed.

RESULTS

Twenty elderly patients (mean age of 81.0 years) with multiple comorbidities underwent 28 MMA embolization+SEPS procedures as primary treatment for cSDH. Mean cSDH thickness was 1.8cm±0.6 cm with 7.3±3.9 mm midline shift. All patients tolerated the procedure well. 1/20 (5.0%) patients died within 30 days of the procedure. A majority of patients were discharged to home (12/20; 60.0%). There was an average of 3.6-month follow-up and one patient (5.0%) developed recurrence in the follow-up period requiring further intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

In select elderly patients with high perioperative risk factors, primary treatment of cSDH using awake transradial MMA embolization+SEPS placement is a minimally invasive, feasible, and safe option. Further comparative studies are warranted to evaluate efficacy of the treatment.

Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization in the Management of Chronic Subdural Hematoma: a Comprehensive Review of Current Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a common intracranial hemorrhagic disorder with a high incidence rate among the elderly. While small, asymptomatic cSDH may resolve spontaneously, surgical intervention has been the treatment of choice for larger, symptomatic cases. Surgical evacuation of cSDH may be associated with high rates of recurrence, and even asymptomatic cSDH cases tend to progress. Over the last few years, middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization has proven to be a safe non-invasive treatment of choice with favorable outcomes and a low recurrence rate. The ensuing paper discusses current treatment modalities for cSDH and reviews existing literature on the anatomy of MMA and its embolization as a treatment option for cSDH.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies show that traumatic head injury leading to subdural hemorrhage can induce neovascularization that may initiate a cycle of recurrent subdural hematoma. Distal branches of MMA supply blood to the dural layers. Several studies have revealed that embolization of the MMA can stop the neovascularization process and blood flow. In addition, patients who underwent MMA embolization had a significantly quicker brain re-expansion and lower recurrence rate. Although the management of cSDH is still very much a dilemma, recent research findings bring MMA embolization to light as a promising treatment alternative and adjunctive therapy.

Middle meningeal artery embolisation: The review of a new treatment for chronic subdural hematomas

Background

This is a literature review aiming to provide an update about the recent findings related to the efficacy of middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) in the treatment of chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs), comparison with conventional therapy and deduction of the current recommendations and indications.

Methods

The literature is reviewed using a search through the PubMed index using keywords. Studies are then screened, skimmed, and thoroughly read. 32 studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and are included in the study.

Results

Five indications for the application of MMA embolization (MMAE) are deducted from the literature. The usage as a preventive measure after surgical treatment of symptomatic cSDHs in patients with a high risk of recurrence and the usage as a standalone procedure has been the most common reasons for indication of this procedure. Rates of failures for the aforementioned indications have been 6.8% and 3.8%, respectively.

Conclusion

The safety of MMAE as a procedure is regarded as a general theme in the literature and can be considered for future applications. Usage of this procedure in clinical trials with more patient segregation and timeframe assessment relative to surgical intervention are recommendations of this literature review.

Middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas. A systematic review of the literature focused on indications, technical aspects, and future possible perspectives

Background:

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases that affect elderly and fragile patients and as a consequence, management can be challenging. Surgery represents the standard treatment; however, alternative options are under investigation. Middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is considered a minimally invasive treatment although with poor evidence. In this review, we tried to summarize the findings about MMA embolization as a treatment for a CSDH to provide a useful guidance for clinical practice and for future speculative aspects.

Methods:

Literature review on PubMed until March 2021 was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Statement. We conducted a research on PubMed with a various combinations of the keywords “CSDH” and “middle meningeal artery” and “embolization,” “refractory subdural hematoma,” and then we reviewed the references of the relevant studies as additional source of eligible articles.

Results:

Among the 35 studies eligible for this review, 22 were case series, 11 were case reports, one was a technical note, and 1 was a randomized trial. A total of 746 patients were found in the literature. Failure rate of MMA embolization was between 3.9 and 8.9% of the cases according the indication to treat CSDH (upfront vs. after surgery).

Conclusion:

The global impression deriving from the data available and the literature is that MMA embolization is a safe procedure with very low complications and with a low failure rate, both when associated with surgery or in case of a standalone treatment.