Rescue of inadvertent superior sagittal sinus occlusion during middle meningeal artery embolization

Impact of Embolisate Penetration, Type, and Technique on Results After Standalone Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) has emerged as a promising modality for chronic/subacute subdural hematoma treatment; however, consensus regarding embolization technique and embolisate has not been achieved. We thus sought to compare the efficacy of distinct MMAE techniques and embolisate.

METHODS

An institutional registry was reviewed to identify patients undergoing standalone MMAE for symptomatic chronic/subacute subdural hematoma. Surgical rescue rate and time preceding 50% hematoma resolution were evaluated across 3 technical groups: aggressive penetration (AP), nonaggressive penetration with proximal coil embolization (NP-PC), and nonaggressive penetration alone (NP). Effect sizes were adjusted for demographic, neurological and radiological features through multivariable logistic and Cox regression.

RESULTS

Among 117 procedures, 33.3% achieved AP, 36.8% had NP-PC, and 29.9% had NP. The rate of surgical rescue was 2.6% after AP, 9.3% for NP-PC, and 11.4% for NP. In patients not undergoing rescue surgery, 82.4% achieved hematoma resolution ≥50% at a median imaging follow-up of 56 days; AP or NP-PC were each statistically significantly associated with enhanced hematoma resolution as compared with NP (P = .02). Similarly, sensitivity analysis within medium-size hematoma and antiplatelet/anticoagulation-at-admission subgroups revealed a superiority of resolution after AP or NP-PC. A unique, comparative secondary analysis of liquid embolisate (Onyx vs n-butyl cyanoacrylate) revealed no impact on rate of surgical rescue or hematoma resolution.

CONCLUSION

AP was associated with the lowest rate of surgical rescue, while both AP and NP-PC were associated with improved rates of hematoma resolution.

Simple coiling of middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematoma: An inverse probability of treatment weighting matched cohort study

BACKGROUND

Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has gained much attention in recent years. However, unintended embolization may occur when employing liquid embolic agents or particles. We present our clinical experience in simple coiling of MMAE to manage CSDH.

METHODS

Patients underwent either surgical evacuation or MMAE with simple coiling for CSDH were reviewed. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed at admission, 1-month, and 6-month intervals. Two treatment groups were matched with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients were included, with 27 patients in MMAE group and 87 patients in surgery group. In MMAE group, significant reductions were observed in hematoma width (admission vs. 1-month, 2.04 [1.44-2.60] cm vs. 0.62 [0.37-0.95] cm, p < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of surgical rescue rate (0.77 95%CI 0.13-4.47, p = 0.77), hematoma reduction (>50%) (0.21 95%CI 0.04-1.07, p = 0.06), and midline shift improvement rate (3.22, 95%CI 0.84-12.4, p = 0.09) had no substantial disparities between two groups at 1-month follow-up. In addition, no significant difference was noted between two groups in terms of hematoma reduction (>50%) at 6-month follow-up (aOR 1.09 95%CI 0.32-3.70, p = 0.89). No procedure-related complications were found in MMA embolization group.

CONCLUSION

Simple coiling for MMA had comparable outcomes with surgical evacuation for CSDH. Our findings suggest that simple coiling can be an alternative choice for liquid agents or particles in MMA embolization for CSDH with acceptable safety.

Extensive Roles and Technical Advances of Middle Meningeal Artery Embolization for Chronic Subdural Hematoma

Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common pathology that typically affects the elderly in Japan, an aging society. Burr-hole irrigation is the standard treatment, but middle meningeal artery (MMA) embolization is a minimally invasive alternative. MMA embolization for CSDH has frequently been reported in recent years, and many technical innovations to improve clinical outcomes have been described. Embolic materials reaching more distally are found to avoid recurrences after MMA embolization. As a result, various studies have described the superiority of embolizing the anterior and posterior branches of the MMA, the advantages of embolic materials reaching beyond the midline, and a high degree of distal penetration using a "sugar rush technique" in which 5% soluble glucose is injected through an intermediate catheter during MMA embolization. Radiographically, reports have described the importance of a "bright falx" sign obtained by infiltrating embolic material beyond the midline and post-embolization enhancement of the dura, capsular membrane, septations, and subdural hematoma fluid as indicators of the spread of embolic materials. This review provides an overview of the current status and future challenges in MMA embolization for CSDH, focusing on technical aspects to improve clinical outcomes.