Endovenous radiofrequency ablation vs laser ablation in patients with lower extremity varicose veins: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Endovenous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and laser ablation (LA) have been commonly used for treating lower extremity varicose veins (LEVVs). Their therapeutic effects have been widely recognized compared with conventional surgery. However, there have been some controversies regarding the choice between RFA and LA. The objective of our study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the early and long-term outcomes of RFA and LA.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify relevant literature on endovenous thermal ablation for primary LEVV up until June 2023. Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies involving RFA and LA for LEVV treatment were included. The primary endpoints were the occlusion rate of the great saphenous vein (GSV) and occurrence of venous thrombotic events. Secondary outcomes included nerve injury, hyperpigmentation, burns, recurrence of VVs, postoperative pain, and phlebitis. Data were analyzed using Review Manager 5.3 software.

RESULTS

A total of 29 studies met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 16 randomized controlled trials and 13 cohort studies. At 1 month, the occlusion rates of GSV were 98.35% for RFA and 98.04% for LA, whereas at 1 year, the rates were 93.13% for RFA and 94.18% for LA. Subgroup analyses revealed that RFA had higher GSV occlusion rates at 1 year since 2016 (93.27% vs 91.24%; odds ratio [OR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.83; P = .05). The incidence of postoperative venous thrombotic events was 0.78% for RFA and 0.87% for LA at 1 month (OR, 1.46; 95% CI, 0.77-2.74; P = .24). RFA showed a reduced risk of burns and ecchymosis (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48-0.87; P = .005), postprocedural pain (mean difference, -0.85; 95% CI, -1.06 to -0.64; P < .001), recurrence of VVs (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.36-0.92; P = .02), and paresthesia since 2016 (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.19-0.91; P = .03), but an increased risk of skin pigmentation (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.06-2.9; P = .03) compared with LA therapy. The rate of phlebitis was similar between RFA and LA (OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.33-2.27; P = .78).

CONCLUSIONS

RFA and LA demonstrated similar efficacy in terms of early and long-term occlusion rates of GSV and the incidence of thrombotic and phlebitis complications. However, since 2016, RFA has shown higher GSV occlusion rates compared with LA. Furthermore, RFA was associated with fewer complications such as paresthesia, burns and ecchymosis, and recurrence of VVs when compared with LA.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials Comparing Thermal Versus Non-Thermal Endovenous Ablation in Superficial Venous Incompetence

OBJECTIVE

The objective was to compare technical success, complications, and quality of life after thermal vs. non-thermal endovenous ablation for the treatment of superficial venous incompetence.

DATA SOURCES

Electronic bibliographic sources (Google Scholar, Pubmed, Cochrane Database, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase).

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted using terms to identify relevant studies to be included. The primary outcome was vein occlusion rate at up to four weeks and one to two years from procedure. Secondary outcome measures included peri-procedural pain, nerve injury, endothermal heat induced thrombosis, and quality of life.

RESULTS

Eight randomised controlled trials met the selection criteria. These comprised a total of 1 956 patients, of whom 1 042 underwent endovenous thermal ablation and 915 underwent endovenous non-thermal ablation. There was no statistically significant difference in occlusion rate at all time points. Relative risk at four weeks and one to two years was 0.99 (95% CI 0.96 - 1.02) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.88 - 1.01), respectively. Non-thermal ablation was tolerated better and had less risk of nerve injury. There was no statistically significant difference in risk of endothermal heat induced thrombosis (EHIT). There was improvement in quality of life scores post-procedure but there was no statistically significant difference in thermal vs. non-thermal ablation. The quality of evidence assessed using GRADE methodology showed high quality for occlusion rate at four weeks and one to two years, moderate quality for nerve injury and peri-procedural pain, and low quality for EHIT.

CONCLUSION

Vein occlusion rates after thermal vs. non-thermal endovenous ablation are similar. In the early post-operative period, non-thermal endovenous ablation demonstrated the advantages of less pain and less risk of nerve injury. Improvement in quality of life after both thermal and non-thermal endovenous ablation is similar.

Endovenous Laser Ablation-Phlebectomy-Sclerotherapy Hybrid Treatment for Venous Insufficiency: A Case Report

A hybrid treatment approach was used to successfully manage bilateral varicose veins in a 50-year-old female patient. The patient had venous insufficiency and presented with pain, swelling, and discoloration in her legs. The treatment plan consisted of two sessions of endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) to treat venous reflux, followed by two phlebectomies for residual bulging varicose veins. After a three-month follow-up, an ultrasound evaluation showed no venous reflux, indicating successful treatment. However, small reticular and spider veins remained, so the patient underwent four sessions of foam sclerotherapy using polidocanol as the sclerosant. On her three-month follow-up post-sclerotherapy, the patient reported significant improvement in symptoms, and ultrasound evaluation showed no venous reflux in major veins. The hybrid approach combining EVLA, sclerotherapy, and phlebectomy provided effective treatment for the patient, resulting in symptom improvement and positive cosmetic outcomes.

Customizing foam sclerotherapy of the great saphenous vein: A proposed algorithm to enhance technical efficacy

OBJECTIVES

The catheter-directed foam sclerotherapy (FS) and the suggested perivenous tumescent application for great saphenous vein (GSV) diameter reduction are suggested to improve technical and clinical results; yet, their use is reported rather indiscriminately. Our aim is to introduce an algorithm categorising the use of technical modalities accompanying ultrasound-guided FS of the GSV and present the technical efficacy of FS through a 5 F × 11  cm sheath placed at the knee level.

METHODS

Representative cases of GSV insufficiency were chosen to describe our methodology.

RESULTS

Sole sheath-directed FS can achieve complete GSV occlusion proximally at a level comparable to the catheter-directed technique. We apply perivenous 4°C cold tumescent to GSV >6 mm even in the standing position to ensure diameter reduction of the proximal GSV as close to the saphenofemoral junction. We use long catheters only to overcome large varicosities above the knee level that could otherwise compromise the adequate foam infusion from the sheath tip. When GSV insufficiency extends along the entire limb and severe skin lesions preclude the antegrade distal catheterisation, the sheath-directed FS in the thigh can be concomitantly combined with retrograde FS from catheterisation just below the knee.

CONCLUSIONS

A topology-oriented methodology with sheath-directed FS is technically feasible and avoids indiscriminate use of more complex modalities.

Non-randomized comparative study of three methods for great saphenous vein ablation associated with mini-phlebectomy; 48 months clinical and sonographic outcome

Background

Varicose veins are one of the earliest clinical features of superficial venous insufficiency (SVI) of the lower limbs that affects around 20–40% of the population with a lot of burden on patients’ quality of life (QoL) and health systems if left untreated. They are defined as subcutaneous veins in the lower extremities which are dilated to ≥3 mm in diameter in the upright position and retrograde flow of >0.5 s in duration. (VVs) could occur in the great saphenous vein (GSV) or small saphenous vein (SSV) and/or in any of their tributaries.

Methods

A prospective non-randomized comparative study for three methods of treatment of varicose veins was conducted. All symptomatic varicose veins with Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) Clinical classes of 2 or greater and demonstrated venous reflux with a duration of 0.5 s or greater on duplex ultrasound imaging GSV larger than 10 mm in diameter by duplex ultrasound were included.

Results

A total of 150 patients with 183 legs in all three groups are treated. The mean age of the patients in all groups was comparable (37.32) years, and a total of 87% were women. Demographic and preoperative clinical features, presentations, and anatomic characteristics were comparable in all groups. Disfigurement was the main presenting complaint in all. All postoperative complications were significantly higher in the group of surgery over 48 months of follow up the degree of satisfaction measured by VCSS score was highest among the RFA group followed by the EVLA group.

Conclusion

The results of our study suggest that the long-term results of endovenous thermal ablation methods (EVLA, RFA) are superior to open surgery for the management of varicose veins, with the RFA group showing better results in terms of improvement in QoL based on VCSS compared to the EVLA group.

•

Varicose veins are a very common disorder in all communities.

•

A very wide variety of treatment options are available.

•

The ideal method of treatment is still debatable.

•

Our research paper tries to answer the question of what is the most suitable method of treatment for varicose veins.

Understanding Chronic Venous Disease: A Critical Overview of Its Pathophysiology and Medical Management

Chronic venous disease (CVD) is a multifactorial condition affecting an important percentage of the global population. It ranges from mild clinical signs, such as telangiectasias or reticular veins, to severe manifestations, such as venous ulcerations. However, varicose veins (VVs) are the most common manifestation of CVD. The explicit mechanisms of the disease are not well-understood. It seems that genetics and a plethora of environmental agents play an important role in the development and progression of CVD. The exposure to these factors leads to altered hemodynamics of the venous system, described as ambulatory venous hypertension, therefore promoting microcirculatory changes, inflammatory responses, hypoxia, venous wall remodeling, and epigenetic variations, even with important systemic implications. Thus, a proper clinical management of patients with CVD is essential to prevent potential harms of the disease, which also entails a significant loss of the quality of life in these individuals. Hence, the aim of the present review is to collect the current knowledge of CVD, including its epidemiology, etiology, and risk factors, but emphasizing the pathophysiology and medical care of these patients, including clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and treatments. Furthermore, future directions will also be covered in this work in order to provide potential fields to explore in the context of CVD.

Early period results of radiofrequency ablation and cyanoacrylate embolization for great saphenous vein insufficiency

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the 6 months efficacy and safety of cyanoacrylate closure for the treatment of incompetent great saphenous veins (GSVs) in comparison with radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

METHODS

In this multicenter, retrospective, clinical trial, 398 symptomatic subjects with incompetent GSVs were assigned to either cyanoacrylate closure or RFA. The primary endpoint, complete closure of the target GSV, was determined using duplex ultrasound examination starting from one-, three-, and six-month visits.

RESULTS

All patients were followed for 6 months and there was no difference between the groups in terms of mean follow-up time. Hospital stay and return to work/activity were shorter in the cyanoacrylate ablation (CAA) group, and these differences between the groups were statistically significant. Ecchymosis was observed higher in the RFA group and was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, in which we examined the CAA and RFA methods, we found that both methods were effective and reliable; however, we found that patients in the CAA group had a more comfortable postoperative period and returned to work earlier.

Correlation between great saphenous length of treatment zone and diameter with improvement in symptoms after ablation

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to examine the relationship between the great saphenous vein (GSV) length of segment ablated and diameter with symptom improvement.

METHODS

Data from a multicenter, randomized, controlled prospective study of 242 patients undergoing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or cyanoacrylate closure (CAC) of the GSV were analyzed. The venous clinical severity score (VCSS) was measured at baseline and at 1, 3, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after ablation. The GSV diameter was evaluated for a correlation with VCSS at each time point. Using the median treatment length of 34 cm, the patients were divided into group I (treatment length ≥34 cm) vs group II (<34 cm) for analysis. The pretreatment VCSS and VCSS improvement (ΔVCSS) after treatment were evaluated with respect to the length of the ablated GSV segment. The postablation VCSS was compared between the pretreatment GSV diameters of <5.5 mm vs ≥5.5 mm.

RESULTS

The mean GSV length ablated by RFA was 35.3 ± 14 cm vs 32.6 ± 11 cm with CAC (P = NS). No significant difference was found in the VCSS (at baseline or follow-up) between RFA and CAC. The pooled data for all participants (n = 242) demonstrated a correlation between the treated GSV length and pretreatment VCSS and the ΔVCSS at 36 months (R = 0.23; P < .001). Greater VCSS improvement was seen in group I (≥34 cm ablated) than in group II (<34 cm ablated) at ≤36 months of follow-up (P = .003). At baseline, group I had had higher VCSSs (6.21 ± 2.75 vs 4.88 ± 2.33; P < .00001) and CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) and reflux scores. Of the 242 patients, 101 had had a GSV diameter <5.5 mm and 141 had had a GSV diameter of ≥5.5 mm. No significant differences were noted in the VCSSs, either at baseline or at follow-up, between the two groups. Within the study population, a poor correlation was found between the GSV diameter and baseline VCSS (R = -0.004; P = .95) and between the GSV diameter and ΔVCSS for ≤36 months (R = 0.04; P = .55).

CONCLUSIONS

Longer segments of GSV reflux appeared to correlate with symptom severity. We found a small to moderate correlation between the length of GSV segment ablated and symptom improvement. This might reflect the greater severity of symptoms at baseline in patients with longer segments with reflux. We found a poor correlation between the proximal GSV diameter and symptom improvement after ablation.

Prospective comparative study of different endovenous thermal ablation systems for treatment of great saphenous vein reflux

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to compare three different endovenous thermal ablation (EVTA) modalities in the treatment of great saphenous vein (GSV) incompetence.

METHODS

We performed a single-center, prospective, comparative cohort study that included consecutive patients undergoing EVTA of the GSV. Patients were treated with either segmental radiofrequency ablation (sRFA) or endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with a 1470-nm dual radial fiber or with a 1470-nm jacket-tip fiber. The clinical classification CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic), 10-cm visual analog scale scores for pain, Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs), and chronic venous insufficiency quality-of-life questionnaire (CIVIQ-20) scores were recorded. The primary outcome was clinical success, which was defined as the absence of reflux or recanalization of the GSV and procedure-related complications, assessed at 7 and 30 days and 1 year postoperatively. The secondary outcomes were the assessment of postoperative pain using the VAS and improvement in the VCSSs and CIVIQ-20 scores.

RESULTS

A total of 153 patients (160 limbs) had undergone sRFA (sRFA group; n = 53 limbs), 1470-nm radial fiber EVLA (EVLA-R group; n = 55 limbs), or 1470-nm jacket-tip fiber EVLA (EVLA-J group; n = 52 limbs). The patient demographics, CEAP clinical class, and intraoperative details were comparable among the three groups. The GSV occlusion rate at 1 year was 93% in the sRFA group, 93% in the EVLA-R group, and 95% in the EVLA-J group. No major complications were observed postoperatively. Endothermal heat-induced thrombosis was observed in 2 (4.4%), 1 (2.2%), and 2 (4.4%) patients in the sRFA, EVLA-R, and EVLA-J groups, respectively (P > .5). The VCSS showed greater improvement in the EVLA-R group at 1 week compared with that in the sRFA (P = .05) and EVLA-J (P = .002) groups. Changes in the CIVIQ-20 score were in favor of the EVLA-R group at 7 days (-14.3 ± 10.3 vs -7.9 ± 5.9; adjusted difference, 6.06; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.57-10.55; P = .01) and 30 days (-12 ± 8 vs -11.2 ± 7; adjusted difference, 5.5; 95% CI, 1.21-9.81; P = .02) postoperatively compared with the sRFA group and at 7 days compared with the EVLA-J group (-14.3 ± 10.3 vs -9.6 ± 7.9; adjusted difference, -4.4; 95% CI, -9.06 to 0.22; P = .05). Analyzing the different components of the CIVIQ-20, pain, and physical scores showed a greater reduction in the EVLA-R group in the early postoperative period compared with that in the sRFA and EVLA-J groups.

CONCLUSIONS

All three EVTA modalities showed equal effectiveness and safety for the treatment of GSV reflux. EVLA with the 1470-nm radial fiber showed better outcomes in terms of early postoperative VCSSs and pain and physical CIVIQ scores. The clinical and quality of life benefits were similar for all modalities at 1 year postoperatively.

Association between vein diameters, reflux characteristics, and clinical severity in patients with chronic venous insufficiency in Northwest China

OBJECTIVE

Our goal was to summarize the relationship between vein diameters, reflux characteristics, and clinical severity in consecutive patients with chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) in Northwest China.

METHODS

We evaluated 531 consecutive patients with CVI (249 women) who presented to the Department of Ultrasound of Xijing Hospital from September 2017 to July 2019. Reflux times and the mean diameters of the great saphenous, the small saphenous, and the calf perforator veins based on duplex ultrasound scans obtained in the standing position were recorded. Venous-specific assessment tools-the Heaviness, Achiness, Swelling, Throbbing, Itching (HASTI) score, the Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS), and the Clinical, Etiological, Anatomical, Pathophysiological (CEAP) class-were analyzed. Regression analysis was used to investigate the relationship between the clinical scores, vein diameters, and reflux times. A P value of less than .05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

We analyzed 531 consecutive patients with 728 limbs. The mean age was 55.24 ± 11.38 years; the mean body mass index (BMI) was 24.75 ± 3.49 kg/m². Three hundred thirty-four patients (62.9%) presented with unilateral limb findings and 197 (37.1%), with bilateral limb involvement. No significant changes were noted in age and BMI across CEAP classes (F = 2.322 and F = 3.917, respectively; P > .05 for both). Both the HASTI score (r² = 0.8741; P < .001) and the VCSS (r² = 0.9257; P < .001) correlated with the CEAP class. The HASTI score strongly correlated with the mean diameters of the great saphenous and small saphenous veins (r² = 0.9252, r² = 0.6304, respectively; P < .001 for both) similarly to VCSS (r² = 0.9396, r² = 0.7195, respectively; P < .001 for both). The HASTI score and VCSS correlated equally with the mean diameters of the calf perforator veins (r = 0.7773 and r = 0.7781, respectively; P < .001 for both). In those with C6, both great saphenous vein (F = 4.608; P < .001) and small saphenous vein reflux times (F = 14.97; P < .001) were significantly higher than those in C1. Both the HASTI score and VCSS strongly associated with the reflux times of the great saphenous (r² = 0.7706 and r² = 0.8181, respectively; P < .001 for both) and small saphenous veins (r² = 0.6470 and r² = 0.7865, respectively; P < .001 for both).

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis is one of the few epidemiologic studies of patients with CVI in Northwest China. Age and BMI did not correlate with CEAP class. Both the HASTI score and VCSS correlated strongly with the CEAP classification; vein diameters and reflux time in both the great saphenous vein and the small saphenous vein, indicating the validity of these outcome tools to venous hemodynamics and to CVI in general.

The Discord Outcome Analysis (DOA) as a Reporting Standard at Three Months and Five Years in Randomised Varicose Vein Treatment Trials

OBJECTIVES

Treatment success for chronic superficial venous insufficiency could be defined as an improvement in three domains: (i) disease specific quality of life, (ii) clinical severity, (iii) reflux. The aim was to report these at five years using a Venn diagram to profile the outcomes: a discord outcome analysis (DOA).

METHODS

Patients (n = 50 patients/legs in each treated group) were randomised to endovenous laser ablation (EVLA) with concurrent phlebectomies vs. ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy (UGFS). Outcomes were assessed using three domains: (i) Aberdeen varicose vein questionnaire (AVVQ), (ii) venous clinical severity score (VCSS), (iii) venous filling index (VFI) of air plethysmography. Change scores were calculated by subtracting the final score after treatment from the baseline score before treatment to quantify the improvement. This was followed by a DOA profile for each patient where a discord was defined as the percentage of patients with a numerical deterioration in one or two domains.

RESULTS

The median [interquartile range] follow up was 68 [64-72] months. Follow up in all three domains was EVLA: 45/50, UGFS: 42/50. On ultrasound examination, GSV occlusion at some point above the knee was 93% for EVLA and 64% for UGFS (p = .001). There was no significant difference in improvement between the two treatment groups in the VCSS and the VFI. However, the EVLA group had a statistically significant AVVQ improvement (p = .004). Using a DOA, only 76% EVLA versus 60% UGFS had success in all three domains. Using improvement thresholds, this reduced to 54% and 39%, respectively. The commonest discord pattern was an improvement in the VCSS and VFI but deterioration in the AVVQ.

CONCLUSIONS

A DOA demonstrated that the definition of success is reduced if deterioration in one or two domains is taken into account. A DOA should be considered as a reporting standard for comparative analyses.

Comparison of cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of varicose veins

OBJECTIVE

To review clinical outcomes of varicose vein patients treated with cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation at our institution.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients who underwent cyanoacrylate embolization and radiofrequency ablation during a three-year period. Patient records were reviewed to assess demographics, location and severity of disease, treatment details and outcome at short- and mid-term follow-ups. Outcome parameters included treatment success and complications.

RESULTS

Between January 2014 and December 2016, 335 patients with 476 veins were treated with either cyanoacrylate embolization (n = 148) or radiofrequency ablation (n = 328) at the Vancouver General Hospital Vascular Surgery Vein Clinic. The average age of patients were 57 ± 1 years with the majority being female (78%) and an average BMI of 24.8 ± 0.5. CEAP classes were 2 (49%), 3 (26%), 4a (22%) and >4b (3%). Of the veins treated with cyanoacrylate embolization, the vein types were as follows: 76% were great saphenous vein, 16% were small saphenous vein, 5% were anterior accessory great saphenous vein and 1.4% were perforator veins. The vein types for radiofrequency ablation were 88%, 9%, 3% and 0%, respectively. The average amount of cyanoacrylate embolization delivered for great saphenous vein treatment was 1.8 ± 0.1 ml with a treatment length of 43 ± 1 cm. Subgroup comparison was done for great saphenous vein segments. Treatment success was 100% in cyanoacrylate embolization and 99% in radiofrequency ablation. Superficial phlebitis was the most common complication noted at mid-term follow-up in 5% of cyanoacrylate embolization and 16% of radiofrequency ablation treatments (P < 0.05). One patient in each group had asymptomatic proximal thrombus extension treated with anticoagulation for 2-3 weeks. Three superficial infections from glue clumps were noted in the cyanoacrylate embolization group requiring excision and drainage. Five patients in the radiofrequency ablation group had persistent numbness and one wound complications at the access site.

CONCLUSION

Cyanoacrylate embolization offers equivalent success rates with lower mid-term complication rates as radiofrequency ablation.

Evidence for varicose vein treatment: an overview of systematic reviews

BACKGROUND

Varicose veins affect nearly 30% of the world's population. This condition is a social problem and needs interventions to improve quality of life and reduce risks. Recently, new and less invasive methods for varicose vein treatment have emerged. There is a need to define the best treatment options and to reduce the risks and costs. Since there are cosmetic implications, treatments for which effectiveness remains unproven present risks to consumers and higher costs for stakeholders. These risks and costs justify conducting an overview of systematic reviews to summarize the evidence.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Overview of systematic reviews within the Discipline of Evidence-Based Health, at Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP).

METHODS

Systematic reviews on clinical or surgical treatments for varicose veins were included, with no restrictions on language or publication date.

RESULTS

51 reviews fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Outcomes and comparators were described, and a narrative review was conducted. Overall, there was no evidence that compression stockings should be recommended for patients as the initial treatment or after surgical interventions. There was low to moderate evidence that minimally invasive therapies (endovenous laser therapy, radiofrequency ablation or foam sclerotherapy) are as safe and effective as conventional surgery (ligation and stripping). Among these systematic reviews, only 18 were judged to present high quality.

CONCLUSIONS

There was evidence of low to moderate quality that minimally invasive treatments, including foam sclerotherapy, laser and radiofrequency therapy are comparable to conventional surgery, regarding effectiveness and safety for treatment of varicose veins.

Review of Endovenous Thermal Ablation of the Great Saphenous Vein: Endovenous Laser Therapy Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

BACKGROUND

Endovenous thermal ablation is a popular treatment for varicose veins of the greater saphenous vein. Two common techniques of thermal ablation are endovenous laser therapy (EVLT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA).

OBJECTIVE

The authors compare EVLT and RFA in vein therapy.

METHODS

A review was conducted using PubMed. Studies comparing the treatment modalities were gathered and compared on the basis of 5 main standpoints, including: efficacy, side effects, serious complications, recurrence, and quality of life.

RESULTS

It was found that EVLT and RFA are both highly efficacious (>80%). Endovenous laser therapy seems to be slightly more efficacious than RFA in numerous studies but its significance is uncertain. Side effect profiles varied regarding postoperative pain and bruising because both were seen to be significantly less using RFA. Serious complications were found to be rare in both with no significant difference in incidence. Recanalization rate was observed to be higher using RFA with uncertainty in significance among various studies. Quality of life improved after both procedures with no significant difference among the 2.

CONCLUSION

Efficacy and recurrence rate seem to favor EVLT, whereas postoperative pain and bruising favor RFA. Further studies are needed to validate the significance of the differences found.

Latest Innovations in the Treatment of Venous Disease

Venous disease is more common than peripheral arterial disease. Pathophysiologically, venous disease can be associated with obstruction, reflux, or both. A common feature in chronic venous disease is ambulatory venous hypertension. Inflammatory and pro-thrombotic mechanisms can be activated. The current therapies, including compression, ablation, and recanalization are discussed.

Endovenous laser treatment of groin and popliteal varicose veins recurrence

Objectives Recurrent varicose veins following surgery is a common, complex and costly problem in vascular surgery. Treatment for RVV is technically more difficult to perform and patient satisfaction is poorer than after primary interventions. Nevertheless, traditional vein surgery has largely been replaced by percutaneous office-based procedures, and the patients with recurrent varicose veins have not benefited from the same advantages. In this paper, we propose an endovascular laser treatment that allows reducing the invasiveness and complications in case of SFJ and SPJ reflux after ligation and stripping of the great and small saphenous vein. Methods 8 SFJ and 1 SPJ stumps were treated by endovascular laser treatment in out-patient clinic. Endovascular laser treatment was performed with a 1470 nm diode laser and a 400 µc radial slim™ fiber. Intraoperative ultrasoud was used to guide the fiber position and the delivery of tumescent anesthesia. The gravity of chronic venous disease was determined according to the CEAP classification and the severity of symptoms was scored according to the revised Venous Clinical Severity Score (VCSS). Results The average linear endovenous energy density was 237 J/cm. Patients return to daily activities after a mean of 1.9 days after. The VCSS improved drastically from a mean of 8 pre-interventional to 1 at day 30 and until one year. During the follow-up period (mean 8 months, range: 5-17 months), all the stumps except one were occluded. All patients were very satisfied or satisfied with the method. No severe complications occurred. Conclusions Office-based endovascular laser treatment of groin and popliteal recurrent varicose veins with 1470 nm diode laser and radial-slim fiber is a safe and highly effective option, with a high success rate in the early post-operative period.