Risk factors associated with 30-day hospital readmission after carotid endarterectomy

Qualitative Analysis of Length of Stay and Readmission after Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Length of stay (LOS) and readmissions are common measures to evaluate quality of health care. The objective of this study was to evaluate factors related to hospital LOS and readmission within 90 days following carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients who have not had a stroke.

METHODS

Using a single institution database, patients who underwent CEA for carotid stenosis between 2014 and 2019 were identified. Asymptomatic carotid stenosis (no history of any stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 6 months prior to CEA), and patients who had a TIA without stroke were included. Demographic and perioperative factors were collected. Primary outcomes analyzed were increased LOS (>1 day) and readmission within 90 days after surgery.

RESULTS

There were 125 patients identified who underwent CEA for 133 carotid stenosis, and 8 patients had bilateral CEA; of which 36.8% were asymptomatic carotid stenosis with the remaining being operated on for TIA without any stroke. The mean age was 68 years old and 36.1% of cases were female. The median postoperative LOS was 2 days. Increased LOS occurred in 81 cases (60.9%). Increased LOS, compared to no increased LOS, occurred more often in patients with diabetes (48.1% vs. 30.8%, P = 0.047), in those with operations starting after 12:00 pm (45.7% vs. 21.2%, P = 0.004) and those with any minor complications such as neck swelling, neck pain, and urinary retention (30.9% vs. 15.4%, P = 0.044). Readmission within 90 days after CEA occurred in 24 (18%) of cases. Readmission within 90 days, compared to no readmission within 90 days, occurred more often in patients with a history of coronary artery disease (58.3% vs. 27.5%, P = 0.004), congestive heart failure (37.5% vs. 11%, P = 0.001), and atrial fibrillation (29.2% vs. 8.3%, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

More than half of patients undergoing CEA for carotid stenosis were discharged after postoperative day 1. Interventions on modifiable clinical risk factors, such as morning CEA scheduling and management of comorbidities, may decrease LOS and 90-day readmission rates.

Effect of Chronic Antiplatelet and Anticoagulant Medication in Neck Haematoma and Perioperative Outomes After Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVES

A retrospective analysis of neck haematoma, stroke and mortality after symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy (CEA) was conducted, in order to determine the most appropriate perioperative medication for these patients. Thirty-day outcomes of moderate and severe neck bleeding were also investigated.

METHODS

Patients undergoing CEA in a Vascular Surgery department were analysed (2015-2019). Pre-procedure antithrombotic medication (from the 5-days prior to surgery) was identified. End point predictors were identified by univariate and multivariable analyses and adjusted for confounders.

RESULTS

A total of 304 CEA were included. Almost half of the included patients (49.67%) were under low-dose aspirin, 17.55% other single antiplatelet agent, 12.59% dual antiplatelet therapy, 8.61% anticoagulation and 10.92% no antithrombotic therapy. There was 8.22% rate of important haematoma, including 4.93% severe (requiring surgical exploration) hematomas and a 30-day all-stroke incidence of 2.94% in symptomatic and 1.79% asymptomatic patients (p=.51). When compared to aspirin, severe haematoma was more prevalent with single clopidogrel or triflusal (RR 4.25, p=.11), dual antiplatelet group (RR 11.84, p=.002) and anticoagulation (RR 8.604, p=.02). Dual antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer post-operative stroke protection compared to single aspirin in either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients. Non-significant higher intra-hospital mortality was noted in no medication, dual antiplatelet and anticoagulation groups in contrast to aspirin. Severe neck bleeding was associated with increased congestive heart failure (9.26-fold, p=.03) and longer hospital stay (11.20±24.69 days versus 3.18±4.79 with no bleeding, p<.001), with a tendency for higher hospital readmission at 30-days (4.66-fold, p=.13). Mortality and stroke rates were similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Double antiaggregation and anticoagulation did not confer better perioperative outcomes after elective CEA in our study. These regimens were associated with increased risk of neck haematoma, especially severe bleeding, with similar rates of neurologic events in both symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and no mortality benefit. Monotherapy with aspirin appears to be the safest perioperative antithrombotic regimen for elective CEA.

Post-Hospital Availability of Instrumental Support May Influence Patients' Readiness for Discharge

PURPOSE OF STUDY

Evaluate the relationship between unplanned acute care utilization after discharge from an index hospital admission and registered nurse and patient perceptions of available instrumental support the patient would have after discharge.

PRIMARY PRACTICE SETTING

Three hospitals in a large regional hospital system in the southeastern United States.

METHODOLOGY AND SAMPLE

Retrospective, secondary quantitative analysis of 13,361 patient records (mean age 58.4 years; 51% female) from index hospitalizations evaluating patient and nurse responses to 2 questions that specifically address instrumental support on both the patient and nurse versions of the Readiness for Hospital Discharge Survey (RHDS) and subsequent unexpected care received (emergency department [ED] visit, observation stay, hospital readmission) in the acute care setting within 60 days of discharge. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between RHDS scores and unplanned care received.

RESULTS

Patients who required hospital-based acute care within 60 days after discharge had lower average RN-RHDS scores than those who did not require hospital-based acute care.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CASE MANAGEMENT PRACTICE

Including a nursing assessment of potential postdischarge expected instrumental support may be helpful in identifying patients who are at a higher risk of experiencing postdischarge acute care utilization. Monitoring ED visits and observation stays in addition to readmissions will facilitate capturing significantly more points of care received after discharge and provide additional information regarding postdischarge care utilization.