Primary angiosarcoma of aorta: A systematic review

Ruptured aortic aneurysm with previous endovascular aneurysm repair in a patient with high-grade angiosarcoma

Ruptured aortic aneurysms after endovascular repair is rare, particularly in the absence of type I or type III endoleaks. In such cases, a thorough investigation into the causes is imperative, including the consideration of an underlying malignancy. We report a case involving a 78-year-old woman who experienced abdominal aortic aneurysm rupture 4 years after aortic endograft treatment. We explanted the endograft and performed aortobi-iliac bypass. Initial aortic thrombus pathological analysis revealed atherosclerosis. However, the patient returned 4 months later with multiple lesions suggestive of metastases, and a reevaluation of the pathology slides uncovered a diagnosis of angiosarcoma.

Aortic Sarcoma Patients with Bone Metastasis

BACKGROUND

Metastases to the bone of aortic sarcoma include osteolytic and nonosteolytic lesions. This study aims to review the clinical symptoms, the sites, and diagnostic methods of bone metastases and to compare the osteolytic and nonosteolytic metastases of patients with aortic sarcoma.

METHODS

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed and scientific journals published from 1972 to 2022. Database included reports of aortic sarcomas with bone metastasis published in English and in French. Characteristics of patients were analyzed with chi-square test or Fisher's exact test between lytic and sclerotic bone metastases.

RESULTS

In 29 patients with bone destruction, the symptoms of low back pain and claudication were observed in 10 (34.5%) and 9 cases (31%), respectively. Acute ischemia of the legs and arms accounted for 7 cases (24.1%). There were 4 cases with hypertension (13.8%) and 5 cases with chest pain or abdominal pain or epigastric pain (17.2%). Metastases to the vertebrae, pelvis, and femur were observed in 14 (48.3%), 12 (41.4%), and 11 cases (37.9%), respectively. Osteolytic lesions were detected at the time of diagnosis in 16/29 (55.2%) cases. In 27 aortic sarcoma patients with sclerotic bone metastases, symptoms of hypertension were observed in 10 (37.0%), of back pain in 7 (25.9%), of chest pain or abdominal pain in 5 cases (18.5%). Acute ischemia of the leg occurred in 6 cases (22.2%). Metastases to the vertebrae, bone, pelvis, and femur were observed in 10 (37.0%), 9 (33.3%), 7 (25.9%), and 6 cases (22.2%), respectively. The sign of claudication and methods for detected bone destruction by X-rays were the difference between osteolytic and nonosteolytic metastases of aortic sarcoma (P = 0.019; P = 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Back pain is a common symptom of aortic sarcoma with bone metastasis. The sign of intermittent claudication is the difference between osteolytic and nonosteolytic metastases of aortic sarcoma. Bone destruction occurred in all bones, but mainly in vertebrae, pelvis, and femur. Methods for detection of bone destruction are mainly by X-rays or computed tomography (CT). Bone destruction was an important sign to detect aortic sarcoma. Sclerotic bone metastases occurred mainly in vertebrae, pelvis, bone, and femur. The detection of sclerotic bone metastases is based on magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography/CT, and autopsy.

Primary thoracic aorta angiosarcoma presenting with thromboembolism and progressive claudication despite anticoagulation

Primary aortic angiosarcomas (PAA) are rare angiosarcomas, frequently diagnosed in advanced stages due to initial misdiagnosis. This case describes a 66-year-old woman, initially presenting with a distal thoracic aorta thrombus and symptomatic bilateral popliteal emboli. Despite initial management and therapeutic anticoagulation, she experienced progressive lower limb claudication and 12 months following initial presentation she re-presented with an obstructing distal thoracic aorta mass and metastatic disease. Histopathology confirmed metastatic epithelioid angiosarcoma. Despite urgent palliative radiotherapy, she died 6 weeks after diagnosis from complications of tumour thromboembolism. Suspicion for PAA should be raised in the case of thrombus in atypical segments (e.g. thoracic aorta) or progressive course despite anticoagulation. Multimodal imaging including MRI and FDG-PET is useful to distinguish from benign aetiologies.

Primary angiosarcoma arising in the sinus of Valsalva: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Primary angiosarcoma of the aorta, particularly within the sinus of Valsalva, is uncommon, with no documented instances of primary angiosarcoma. The absence of apparent clinical manifestations in this severe condition makes it challenging to diagnose, often resulting in a poor prognosis.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old patient underwent procedures for fistula closure and coronary artery bypass grafting, which resulted in the rupture of an aneurysm within the sinus of Valsalva. Computed tomography examination 5 years after the procedure suggested no pathological abnormalities. Nevertheless, the patient required repeat surgery at 67 years due to the observed expansion of the sinus of Valsalva aneurysm noted during a clinical evaluation, prompted by elevated levels of inflammatory markers. Exploration of the residual aneurysmal locus within the sinus of Valsalva revealed an intraluminal thrombus devoid of any demonstrable hemodynamic access into the aneurysmal sac. Histopathological assessment of the aneurysmal wall confirmed a definitive diagnosis of primary angiosarcoma within the sinus of Valsalva. After surgery, the patient exhibited pyrexia. Magnetic resonance imaging substantiated multifocal osseous metastases, corroborated by histological analysis following a bone biopsy, confirming a diagnosis of angiosarcoma. Therefore, adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel was initiated. After 1 year, a sustained state of disease stability was noted.

DISCUSSION

In this case, the need for surgical intervention, based on an expanded sinus of Valsalva aneurysm, culminated in the unanticipated detection of primary angiosarcoma.

CONCLUSION

Neoplastic etiologies may plausibly underlie the pathogenesis of aneurysm formation in cases where the etiology remains obscure in the early stages of therapeutic intervention.

Angiosarcoma of the aorta diagnosed via endoscopic ultrasound

A 54-year-old man consulted for low back pain of 5 weeks of evolution, refractory to regular analgesics, and significant weight loss. The PET-CT revealed a retroperitoneal mass in contact with the anterior wall of the abdominal aorta. After consulting with the Endoscopy Unit, an endoscopic ultrasound-guided FNAP was performed due to the accessibility of the lesion and the less invasive nature of these procedures. The anatomopathological result was angiosarcoma of the aorta.

Angiosarcoma after endovascular aneurysm repair: case report and literature review

INTRODUCTION

Epithelioid angiosarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma with a poor prognosis. We report two cases of patients who presented with a history of lower back pain, inflammatory signs and weight loss 5 and 6 years after endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) of an elective infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Imaging suggested graft infection but tissue samples revealed an epithelioid angiosarcoma. The objective is to report the clinical presentation, investigative modalities and immunohistochemical findings of an angiosarcoma after EVAR.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two cases are described of an angiosarcoma of the aorta after EVAR. A literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science was performed in English about angiosarcoma after EVAR published between 2007 and 2021. Relevant reports were selected and analysed.

RESULTS

Fifteen case reports were identified, including the current two cases. Time to tumour detection after EVAR ranged from 6 to 120 months with a mean interval of 68 months. Most patients underwent endovascular repair of an AAA (13/15). Males (13 male/2 female patients) were predominant with a median age of 72 years (IQR 68-78 years). Over half of the patients had metastases at the time of diagnosis (9/15), most frequently in bones and liver.

CONCLUSION

Diagnosis of angiosarcoma after EVAR remains challenging due to indistinctive clinical and radiological findings mimicking graft infection or endoleak. Angiosarcoma should be included in the differential diagnosis in patients previously treated with EVAR presenting with unintended weight loss, abdominal back pain and contrast enhancement of the aortic wall.AbbreviationsAAAabdominal aortic aneurysmCTAcomputed tomography angiographyCRPc-reactive proteinEVARendovascular aortic repairESRerythrocyte sedimentation rateFDGfluoro-deoxyglucoseMRImagnetic resonance imagingMeSHmedical subject headings.