Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Stonko DP, Betzold RD, Azar FK, Edwards J, Abdou H, Elansary NN, Gerling KA, White J, Feliciano DV, DuBose JJ, Morrison JJ. Postoperative antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation use does not impact complication or reintervention rates after vein repair of arterial injury: A PROOVIT study. Vascular 2023;31:777-783. [PMID: 35430941 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221082371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]

For:	Stonko DP, Betzold RD, Azar FK, Edwards J, Abdou H, Elansary NN, Gerling KA, White J, Feliciano DV, DuBose JJ, Morrison JJ. Postoperative antiplatelet and/or anticoagulation use does not impact complication or reintervention rates after vein repair of arterial injury: A PROOVIT study. Vascular 2023;31:777-783. [PMID: 35430941 DOI: 10.1177/17085381221082371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]

Number	Cited by Other Article(s)
1	Timing and choice of systemic anticoagulation in the setting of extremity arterial injury repair. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023;49:473-485. [PMID: 36203031 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02092-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Abstract PURPOSE The role of perioperative anticoagulation in the setting of peripheral arterial injury remains unclear. We hypothesized that early initiation of anticoagulation is associated with a reduced amputation rate without increasing bleeding complications. METHODS Using the 2016-2019 ACS-TQIP database, adult patients with upper and lower extremity vascular injuries who underwent open arterial repair and received anticoagulation were included. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (≤ 24 h) and (2) late prophylaxis (> 24 h) following arterial repair. The primary outcomes were the rates of limb amputation and bleeding complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of timing and type of anticoagulation on the rates of limb amputation and bleeding complications. RESULTS 4379 patients were included, and 83.9% were males. 68.1% of patients received early anticoagulation, whereas 31.9% received late thromboprophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was used in 62.0% of patients, and unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered in 34.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that late initiation of thromboprophylaxis (OR = 1.69 [1.16-2.45], p = 0.006) and use of UFH (OR = 2.61 [1.80-3.79], p < 0.001) were associated with increased rate of amputation. Early initiation of anticoagulation (OR = 2.16 [1.63-2.85], p < 0.001) was associated with increased risk of bleeding complications requiring blood transfusions. Similarly, the use of UFH was associated with a higher rate of bleeding events compared to LWMH (OR = 2.61, [1.80-3.79], p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Patients with the operative repair of arterial injuries receiving early perioperative anticoagulation demonstrated an improved limb salvage outcome than those who received late thromboprophylaxis. Our data also suggest that early initiation of prophylaxis may be associated with increased bleeding risk, which may be attenuated using LMWH compared to UFH. Collapse Key Words Amputation Arterial injury Bleeding VTE anticoagulation Collapse MESH Headings Collapse Grants Collapse Affiliation(s) Collapse

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Timing and choice of systemic anticoagulation in the setting of extremity arterial injury repair. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2023;49:473-485. [PMID: 36203031 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-022-02092-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]

Abstract

PURPOSE

The role of perioperative anticoagulation in the setting of peripheral arterial injury remains unclear. We hypothesized that early initiation of anticoagulation is associated with a reduced amputation rate without increasing bleeding complications.

METHODS

Using the 2016-2019 ACS-TQIP database, adult patients with upper and lower extremity vascular injuries who underwent open arterial repair and received anticoagulation were included. Patients were divided into two groups: (1) early venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (≤ 24 h) and (2) late prophylaxis (> 24 h) following arterial repair. The primary outcomes were the rates of limb amputation and bleeding complications. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the impact of timing and type of anticoagulation on the rates of limb amputation and bleeding complications.

RESULTS

4379 patients were included, and 83.9% were males. 68.1% of patients received early anticoagulation, whereas 31.9% received late thromboprophylaxis. Low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was used in 62.0% of patients, and unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered in 34.3% of patients. Multivariable analysis showed that late initiation of thromboprophylaxis (OR = 1.69 [1.16-2.45], p = 0.006) and use of UFH (OR = 2.61 [1.80-3.79], p < 0.001) were associated with increased rate of amputation. Early initiation of anticoagulation (OR = 2.16 [1.63-2.85], p < 0.001) was associated with increased risk of bleeding complications requiring blood transfusions. Similarly, the use of UFH was associated with a higher rate of bleeding events compared to LWMH (OR = 2.61, [1.80-3.79], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with the operative repair of arterial injuries receiving early perioperative anticoagulation demonstrated an improved limb salvage outcome than those who received late thromboprophylaxis. Our data also suggest that early initiation of prophylaxis may be associated with increased bleeding risk, which may be attenuated using LMWH compared to UFH.

Collapse