Impact of socioeconomic disparities on major lower extremity revascularization complications

Social Determinants of Health Factors and Loss-To-Follow-Up in the Field of Vascular Surgery

BACKGROUND

It is estimated that 22-57% of vascular patients are lost to follow-up (LTF) which is of concern as the Society of Vascular Surgery recommends annual patient follow-up. The purpose of this report was to identify social determinants of health factors (SDoH) and their relationship to LTF in vascular patients.

METHODS

The methods employed were a systematic literature review of 29 empirical articles and a retrospective quality improvement report with 27 endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) patients at the University of Chicago.

RESULTS

The systematic literature review resulted in 2,931 articles which were reduced to 29 articles meeting the inclusion criteria. Demographic variables were more frequently cited than SDoH factors, but the most common were smoking, transportation, and socioeconomic status/insurance. Additionally, 176 EVAR and TEVAR patients were called resulting in 27 patients who completed a SDoH questionnaire. Twenty-six percent indicated they had missed at least 1 appointment with the top reasons being work or family responsibilities. Due to limited patient size no statistical analyses were performed, but frequencies of responses to SDoH questions were reported to augment the existing limited literature and guide future research into variables such as one's ability to pay for basics like food or mortgage.

CONCLUSIONS

SDoH factors are important yet understudied aspects of endovascular repairs that require more research to understand their impact on vascular surgery follow-up rates and outcomes. Additional research is needed as lack of consideration of such factors may impact the generalizability of existing research and such knowledge may help in informing clinician treatment plans.

The outcomes of lower extremity revascularization: What role do race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status play?

Lower extremity peripheral artery disease and the resultant complications disproportionately affect underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups, as well as those with low socioeconomic status (SES). Revascularization, including both open surgical and endovascular techniques, is a mainstay of therapy for symptomatic peripheral artery disease; it is required to maximize limb salvage in chronic limb-threatening ischemia and used to improve function and quality of life in patients with claudication. The outcomes of lower extremity revascularization in Black and Hispanic patients, as well as patients with low SES, are not widely known and this knowledge gap formed the basis for this review. The preponderance of evidence suggests that Black, Hispanic, and low-SES patients have inferior limb-related outcomes after revascularization compared with White patients. Based solely on the limited published evidence in the revascularization literature, the specific reasons for these disparities are not clear. The high prevalence of comorbidities and risks factors, as well as the advanced presentation of peripheral artery disease in Black, Hispanic, and low-SES patients, appear to contribute to the inferior limb outcomes post revascularization seen in these groups, but do not account for all of the disparities. Undoubtedly, a complex interplay of social determinants underlies these disparities in care and outcomes at individual, community, and societal levels. Additional understanding of the underpinnings and mechanisms of inferior outcomes in these populations in the specific context of lower extremity revascularization is needed, as this would allow us to identify targets for intervention to improve post-revascularization outcomes in these at-risk populations.