Utility of exhaled nitric oxide to guide mild asthma treatment in atopic patients and its correlation with asthma control test score: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is used for the diagnosis and monitoring of asthma, although its utility to guide treatment and its correlation with other tools is still under discussion. We study the possibility to withdraw inhaled corticosteroid treatment in atopic patients with mild asthma based on the FeNO level, as well as to study its correlation with other clinical control tools.

METHODS

Prospective and randomized study including atopic patients aged 18 to 65 with mild asthma, stable, on low-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) treatment, who had their treatment withdrawn based on a FeNO level of 40 ppb. Patients were randomized into two groups: control group (treatment with ICS was withdrawn regardless of FeNO level) and experimental group (according to the FeNO levels, patients were assigned to one of two groups: FeNO > 40 ppb on treatment with budesonide 200 mcg every 12 h and SABA on demand; FeNO ≤ 40 ppb only with SABA on demand). Follow-up was conducted for one year, during which medical assessment was performed with FeNO measurements, asthma control test (ACT), lung function tests (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEF, and RV/TLC), and recording of the number of exacerbations.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients were included, with a mean age of 39.92 years (SD 13.99); 46 patients were assigned to the control group, and 46 patients to the experimental group. The number of exacerbations was similar between the groups (p = 0.301), while the time to the first exacerbation was significantly shorter in the control group (30.86 vs. 99.00 days), p < 0.001, 95% CI (43.332-92.954). Lung function tests (FEV1, FEV1/FVC, PEF, and RV/TLC) showed no differences between the groups (p > 0.05). Both FeNO and ACT showed significant changes in the groups in which ICS was withdrawn (p < 0.05 for both parameters). A significant negative correlation was observed between FeNO and ACT (r = -0.139, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

In atopic patients with mild asthma, withdrawal of ICS based on an FeNO of 40 ppb led to worsened symptoms but without changes in lung function tests or an increase in exacerbations. There was a negative correlation between FeNO values and symptomatic control measured by the ACT.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trial Number: 2012-000372-42. Start Date: 2012-07-23. Trial registered prospectively ( https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/search?query=2012-000372-42 ). This study adheres to CONSORT guidelines of randomised control trials.

Fractional nitric oxide measurement in exhaled air (FeNO): perspectives in the management of respiratory diseases

Exhaled nitric oxide (NO) production, upregulated by inflammatory cytokines and mediators in central and peripheral airways, can be easily and non-invasively detected in exhaled air in asthma and other respiratory conditions as a promising tool for disease monitoring. The American Thoracic Society and European Respiratory Society released recommendations that standardize the measurement of the fractional exhaled NO (FeNO). In asthma, increased FeNO reflects eosinophilic-mediated inflammatory pathways and, as a biomarker of T2 inflammation can be used to identify asthma T2 phenotype. In this setting its measurement has shown to be an important tool especially in the diagnostic process, in the assessment and evaluation of poor adherence or predicting positive response to inhaled corticosteroids treatment, in phenotyping severe asthma patients and as a biomarker to predict the response to biologic treatments. The discovery of the role of NO in the pathogenesis of different diseases affecting the airways and the possibility to estimate the predominant site of increased NO production has provided new insight on its regulatory role in the airways, making it suitable for a potential extended use in clinical practice for different pulmonary diseases, even though its role remains less clear than in asthma. Monitoring FeNO in pulmonary obstructive lung diseases including chronic bronchitis and emphysema, interstitial lung diseases, obstructive sleep apnea and other pulmonary diseases is still under debate but has opened up a window to the role NO may play in the management of these diseases. The use of FeNO is reliable, cost effective and recommendable in both adults and children, and should be implemented in the management of patients with asthma and other respiratory conditions.

A pathophysiological approach for FeNO: A biomarker for asthma

The present review is focused on literature concerning the relevance of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) in clinical practice from a pathophysiological point of view. There is increasing evidence that asthma is a heterogeneous pathological condition characterised by different phenotypes/endotypes related to specific biomarkers, including FeNO, helpful to predict therapeutic response in selected asthmatic populations. Nowadays FeNO, a non-invasive biomarker, appears to be useful to foresee asthma developing, to recognise specific asthma phenotypes, like the eosinophilic, to ameliorate asthma diagnosis and management in selected populations and to predict standard corticosteroid and biologic therapy efficacy. In addition, FeNO assessment may also be useful in patients with allergic rhinitis in order to detect the potential involvement of eosinophilic bronchial inflammation in "case finding" subjects at risk of asthma diagnosis. Therefore, it is possible to hypothesise a future with an appropriate use of FeNO by physicians dealing with worrisome clinical issues in specific asthma phenotypes.

Revisiting the role of exhaled nitric oxide in asthma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review focuses on the most recent studies investigating fractional nitric oxide concentration in exhaled breath (FeNO) as a useful biomarker for identifying specific phenotypes in asthma and as a tool for asthma diagnosis, monitoring and clinical decision-making.

RECENT FINDINGS

On the basis of the current literature, it has been highlighted that FeNO is a clinically relevant marker in various clinical aspects of asthma: FeNO is a predictor for developing asthma in persistent rhinitis or in infants with respiratory symptoms; FeNO contributes to identification of asthma phenotypes in both children and adults, also in relation to severity; FeNO is useful in monitoring the effectiveness of inhaled corticosteroids (including compliance) and biologic treatments like omalizumab; FeNO, in conjunction with symptom registration and lung function measurements, contributes to asthma diagnosis and optimizes asthma management.

SUMMARY

FeNO provides further information in distinguishing different phenotypes in asthma, allowing a much more appropriate control of the disease, especially in patients with difficult/severe asthma. In the future, it would be interesting to shed light on the hidden biological mechanisms responsible for low or normal FeNO values in symptomatic asthmatic patients.