CA-549 Serum Levels in Breast Cancer Monitoring

CA 549 and SP2 in postoperative breast cancer patients. Comparison with CA 15.3, CEA and TPA

The levels of CA 549 and SP2 were measured in 430 subjects: 100 healthy blood donors, 130 patients with benign diseases and 200 postoperative breast cancer patients. In the latter group, the serum levels of CA 15.3, CEA and TPA were also measured. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Mann Whitney and McNemar tests were used for statistical analysis. The upper normal limits were established on the basis of the values obtained in the healthy blood donors group, the benign diseases group and R.O.C. analysis of the breast cancer group. They were: CA 549 = 13 U/ml, SP2 = 14 U/ml, CA 15.3 = 35 U/ml, CEA = 5 ng/ml and TPA = 110 U/ml. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in the breast cancer group were, respectively: CA 549 = 78.1%, 97.1% and 88%; SP2 = 21.9%, 90.4% and 57.5%; CEA = 66.7%, 95.2% and 81.5%; CA 15.3 = 80.2%, 98.1% and 89.5%, and TPA = 73.9%, 78.8% and 76.5%. Statistical analysis showed significant differences only between CA 15.3, the marker which gave the best results, and SP2 (p<0.001). There were no significant differences with the association of two or three tumor markers.

Genomic and proteomic biomarkers for cancer: a multitude of opportunities

Biomarkers are molecular indicators of a biological status, and as biochemical species can be assayed to evaluate the presence of cancer and therapeutic interventions. Through a variety of mechanisms cancer cells provide the biomarker material for their own detection. Biomarkers may be detectable in the blood, other body fluids, or tissues. The expectation is that the level of an informative biomarker is related to the specific type of disease present in the body. Biomarkers have potential both as diagnostic indicators and monitors of the effectiveness of clinical interventions. Biomarkers are also able to stratify cancer patients to the most appropriate treatment. Effective biomarkers for the early detection of cancer should provide a patient with a better outcome which in turn will translate into more efficient delivery of healthcare. Technologies for the early detection of cancer have resulted in reductions in disease-associated mortalities from cancers that are otherwise deadly if allowed to progress. Such screening technologies have proven that early detection will decrease the morbidity and mortality from cancer. An emerging theme in biomarker research is the expectation that panels of biomarker analytes rather than single markers will be needed to have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for the presymptomatic detection of cancer. Biomarkers may provide prognostic information of disease enabling interventions using targeted therapeutic agents as well as course-corrections in cancer treatment. Novel genomic, proteomic and metabolomic technologies are being used to discover and validate tumor biomarkers individually and in panels.

Breast cancer screening and biomarkers

Annual screening mammograms have been shown to be cost-effective and are credited for the decline in mortality of breast cancer. New technologies including breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may further improve early breast cancer detection in asymptomatic women. Serum tumor markers such as CA 15-3, carcinoembyonic antigen (CEA), and CA 27-29 are ordered in the clinic mainly for disease surveillance, and not useful for detection of localized cancer. This review will discuss blood-based markers and breast-based markers, such as nipple/ductal fluid, with an emphasis on biomarkers for early detection of breast cancer. In the future, it is likely that a combination approach to simultaneously measure multiple markers would be most successful in detecting early breast cancer. Ideally, such a biomarker panel should be able to detect breast cancer in asymptomatic patients, even in the setting of normal mammogram and physical examination results.

CEA, MCA, CA 15.3 and CA 549 and their combinations in expressing and monitoring metastatic breast cancer: a prospective comparative study

Serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), mucin-like carcinoma-associated antigen (MCA), CA 15.3 and CA 549 were concurrently assayed in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Overall sensitivity in detecting metastatic breast cancer (201 pts) was CEA 45%, MCA 59%, CA 15.3 71% and CA 549 72% (P < 0.01). Sensitivity increased by only 6% to 8% when two or more antigens were simultaneously considered. An overall sensitivity of correlation with objective response (n = 71) was observed in the range of 53-67% (P = n.s.) in patients with abnormal baseline marker values, and in the range of 42-87% (P < 0.05) in patients with normal baseline values. The combination of two or more markers did not improve sensitivity, but decreased specificity of correlation with objective response. In conclusion, CA 15.3 and CA 549 have individually higher sensitivity in detecting metastatic breast cancer. No clinical advantage was observed for using two or more markers concurrently over CA 15.3 or CA 549 alone in the monitoring of metastatic breast cancer.