The Clinical Value of Cyfra 21-1 Estimation for Lung Cancer Patients

The Prognostic Value of Preoperative Serum Tumor Markers in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Varies With Radiological Features and Histological Types

Objectives

To assess the association between common-used serum tumor markers and recurrence of lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma separately and determine the prognostic value of serum tumor markers in lung adenocarcinoma featured as ground glass opacities.

Methods

A total of 2,654 non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing surgical resection between January 2008 and September 2014 were analyzed. The serum levels of carcinoma embryonic antigen (CEA), cytokeratin 19 fragment (CYFRA21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), carbohydrate antigen 125 (CA125), carbohydrate antigen 153 (CA153) and carbohydrate antigen 199 (CA199) were tested preoperatively. Survival analyses were performed with COX proportional hazard regression.

Results

Among patients with lung adenocarcinoma, elevated preoperative serum CEA(HR=1.246, 95%CI:1.043-1.488, P=0.015), CYFRA21-1(HR=1.209, 95%CI:1.015-1.441, P=0.034) and CA125(HR=1.361, 95%CI:1.053-1.757, P=0.018) were significantly associated with poorer recurrence free survival (RFS). Elevated preoperative serum CA199 predicted worse RFS in patients diagnosed with lung squamous cell carcinoma (HR=1.833, 95%CI: 1.216-2.762, P=0.004). Preoperative serum CYFRA21-1(HR=1.256, 95%CI:1.044-1.512, P=0.016) and CA125(HR=1.373, 95%CI: 1.050-1.795, P=0.020) were independent prognostic factors for patients with adenocarcinoma presenting as solid nodules while serum CEA (HR=2.160,95%CI:1.311-3.558, P=0.003) and CA125(HR=2.475,95%CI:1.163-5.266, P=0.019) were independent prognostic factors for patients with adenocarcinoma featured as ground glass opacities.

Conclusions

The prognostic significances of preoperative serum tumor markers in non-small cell lung cancer were associated with radiological features and histological types.

Tumor markers in detection of lung cancer

The expression of biomarkers by lung cancers is useful in the diagnosis and clinical management of patients with lung cancer. Biomarkers provide insight into histogenesis, interrelationships, and biological behavior of lung tumors. This chapter presents data on lung cancer detection, involving some of the most studied and interesting lung cancer biomarkers to date-CYFRA 21-1, NSE, ProGRP, SCC, CEA, Tumor M2-PK, as well as markers in clinical application such as CRP, LDH, tumor-suppressor genes and oncogenes, CA125, CgA, NCAM, and TPA. Biomarker profiles in combination with fuzzy logic techniques have also been addressed. Serum markers used alone or in combination with other indices might play an important role in monitoring response to therapy in early detection of tumor reactivation in new treatment strategies as well as in secondary prevention.

CYFRA 21-1 is a prognostic determinant in non-small-cell lung cancer: results of a meta-analysis in 2063 patients

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic significance of a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (a cytokeratin 19 fragment) adjusted for the effects of well-known co-variables in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This meta-analysis based on individual updated data gathered comprehensive databases from published or unpublished controlled studies dealing with the prognostic effect of serum CYFRA 21-1 level at presentation in NSCLC of any stage (nine institutions, 2063 patients). Multivariate regression was carried out with the Cox model. The proportional hazard assumption for each of the selected variables retained in the final model was originally checked by log minus log plots baseline hazard ratio. The follow-up ranged from 25 to 78 months. A total of 1616 events were recorded. In the multivariate analysis performed at the 1-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 level was an unfavourable prognostic determinant in all centres except one (Hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1.88 (1.64-2.15), P<10(-4)). Other significant variables were stage of the disease, age and performance status. Within the first 18 months, the procedure disclosed a nearly similar hazard ratio for patients having a high pretreatment serum CYFRA 21-1 level (1.62 (1.42-1.86), P<10(-4)). For patients who did not undergo surgery, the hazard ratio during the first year of follow-up was 1.78 (1.54-2.07), P<10(-4). Finally, in the surgically treated population, at the 2-year end point, a high pretreatment CYFRA 21-1 and a locally advanced stage remained unfavourable prognostic determinants. In conclusion CYFRA 21-1 might be regarded as a putative co-variable in analysing NSCLC outcome inasmuch as a high serum level is a significant determinant of poor prognosis whatever the planned treatment.

Prognostic impact of Cyfra21-1 and other serum markers in completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

PURPOSE

The aim of this prospective study was to assess the prognostic impact of serum tumor markers (Cyfra21-1, carcinoembryonic antigen, neuron-specific enolase, squamous cell carcinoma-antigen and TPAcyk) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) receiving complete resection.

METHODS

Sixty-seven patients with histologically proven NSCLC and complete resection of stage I-IIIA disease were included. The serum levels of all markers were measured using commercially available immunoassays.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 86 months for surviving patients, those with initial Cyfra21-1 serum levels higher than 3.57 ng/ml had a significantly worse prognosis (P=0.014). The remaining serum tumor markers showed no prognostic impact. In a Cox regression model, Cyfra21-1 proved to be an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival and disease-free interval. In addition, Cyfra21-1 sustained as an independent prognostic factor in completely resected stage I/II disease.

CONCLUSIONS

With a cut-off value of 3.57 ng/ml, Cyfra 21-1 was an independent prognostic factor for survival in NSCLC-patients with complete resection. Further evaluation is needed, particularly in stage I/II disease. When the prognostic impact is confirmed with larger patient numbers this may contribute to the identification of stratification variables for future treatment approaches of NSCLC.

Monitoring of therapy in head and neck patients during the radiotherapy by measurement of Cyfra 21-1

PURPOSE

Cyfra 21-1, measuring serum fragments of cytokeratin 19, has been found to be related to tumour stage and tumour size in patients with cervical cancer. It could be a promising marker in squamous lung cancer. We evaluated this new marker with carcinoembryonic antigen, (CEA) and squamous cell carcinoma antigen (SCC-Ag) in the monitoring of 27 patients with head and neck cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The retrospective study group consisted of 27 patients, 17 not suited for surgery and 10 after laser resection. Patients were clinically staged according to the TNM-classification. The mean age of the patients was 53 years (range 37-70 years). Serum levels of each marker were studied in relation to tumour stage and clinical status of the patients during radiotherapy and 6 weeks after the end of the treatment. The clinical performance of the various assays to separate those patients with complete remission from those patients with the presence of tumour was assessed.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment serum Cyfra 21-1, CEA, and SCC-Ag levels were not related to stage of disease and were not found to be predictive of tumour response. The clinical performance of post-treatment serum SCC-Ag levels in predicting the presence of tumour was not better than the Cyfra 21-1 assays.

CONCLUSION

We could not conclude from this study that Cyfra 21-1 marker is an additional parameter in identifying patients at risk of residual tumour after treatment, recurrent or progressive disease. An elevation of cyfra 21-1 marker was not detectable in 70% of the cases with macroscopic tumour. Therefore, Cyfra 21-1 is not a reliable parameter for the monitoring of patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy.

Cyfra 21-1, neuron specific enolase and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: prospective study in 621 patients

BACKGROUND

CYFRA 21-1, a serum cytokeratin 19 fragment, and neuron specific enolase (NSE), the gamma-subunit of enolase, are putative markers of lung cancer. Their clinical applicability as prognostic factors in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) would need an appraisal by simultaneous evaluation of other known survival determinants in a large population followed over a long period.

AIM

To determine the prognostic value of different clinical and routine biological variables at presentation with particular attention paid to the above-mentioned markers.

METHODS

621 histologically proven and previously untreated NSCLC patients have been prospectively studied (seven were lost to follow-up). Median follow-up was 4 years and 2 months. At presentation, 16 clinical and biological variables were recorded. Serum NSE and CYFRA 21-1 were assayed blind without any clinical information given.

RESULTS

The serum CYFRA 21-1 distribution differed significantly according to histology, disease stage and performance status, with the highest levels observed in squamous cell carcinomas, metastatic stage, positive mediastinal nodal status and poor performance status. However, the respective "receiver operating characteristic" curves showed that the CYFRA 21-1 serum level did not accurately predict tumour stage. Serum NSE distribution correlated neither with tumour stage nor with performance index and its sensitivity in the whole NSCLC was low. In the Cox proportional hazard model, the following variables were independent determinants of a poor outcome: performance status 2 or 3, hazard ratio (HR): 2.25; Nodal status N(2-3), HR: 1.84; Metastatic disease, HR: 1.73; NSE>12.5 ng/ml, HR: 1.52; CYFRA 21-1>3.6 ng/ml, HR: 1.41 and Tumour status T(3-4), HR: 1.31. When the survival analysis was restricted to the 274 patients affected by a metastatic stage, we observed that performance status, nodal status, NSE and CYFRA 21-1 remained prognostic determinants with similar hazard ratios.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic information given by a high serum CYFRA 21-1 level is independent from other well-known variables such as performance status and disease stage and is perennial throughout extended follow-up period. A high NSE level also prognosticates a poor outcome probably by reflecting tumour heterogeneity and underestimated neuroendocrine differentiation.

Diagnostic value of CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1, NSE and TSA assay in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the individual and combined diagnostic utility of six tumor markers in patients with pleural effusion. Pleural and serum levels of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), carbohydrate antigen 15-3 (CA 15-3), carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), cytokeratin fragment 19 (CYFRA 21-1), neuron-specific enolase (NSE) and total sialic acid (TSA) were assayed in 74 patients with pleural effusions (44 malignant and 30 benign). All tumor markers except TSA and NSE were increased in both serum and pleural fluid of patients with malignant diseases. Using the cut-off values 3 ng/ml, 14 U/ml, 5 U/ml, 8 ng/ml and 70 mg/dl for pleural fluid CEA, CA 15-3, CA 19-9, CYFRA 21-1 and TSA, respectively, the sensitivity (%) and specificity (%) of these tumor markers were as follows: CEA; 52/77, CA 15-3; 80/93, CA 19-9; 36/83, CYFRA 21-1; 91/90, TSA; 80/67, for differentiating malignant effusions from benign. When CA 15-3 and CYFRA 21-1 combined, the sensitivity and specificity were increased (100 and 83%, respectively). Classifying the malignant effusions as bronchial carcinoma and malignant pleural mesothelioma, CEA was shown to have the highest sensitivity and specificity (88 and 90%, respectively) while the combination of CEA with other tumor markers increased sensitivity but decreased specificity. According to our results, tumor markers are not suitable for the differential diagnosis of malignancy.