The Liverpool Care Pathway in intensive care: an exploratory study of doctor and nurse perceptions

The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) provides an evidence-based framework of care for the dying patient and provides guidance on comfort measures, discontinuation of inappropriate interventions, anticipatory prescribing, holistic care and care of the family after death. End-of-life care is becoming an important issue in critical care, and the LCP has been adapted for use in intensive care units in the United Kingdom. A qualitative study using descriptive phenomenology was used to explore doctor and nurse experiences of the impact of the LCP in two intensive care units in a 1000-bed teaching hospital in the north-west Midlands. The staff experience of the LCP was dependent on their role, with mixed reports about frequency of use and level of education received on the LCP. Education and adequate support was identified as being pivotal to the successful implementation of any type of LCP.

Creating clinically relevant knowledge from systematic reviews: the challenges of knowledge translation

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVE

A research translation strategy for chronic pain was developed that has significant potential to advance the usefulness of systematic reviews (SRs) in clinical practice.

METHOD

The strategy used interactive case-based workshops that summarize current evidence on treatments for chronic non-cancer pain. Health technology assessment researchers and clinicians collaborated to translate SR evidence into education aids, but this proved far from straightforward.

RESULTS

Sourcing and selecting the SR evidence required maintaining a credible balance between the diametrical concepts of comprehensiveness and efficiency, and relevance and validity. On examination of the collated evidence base, further challenges were encountered in dealing with the lack of consistency among the SRs in the quality of execution, the scales used to rate the quality of the evidence, and the conclusions on common topic areas. Strategies for overcoming these difficulties are discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The key elements for creating clinically relevant knowledge from SRs are: a flexible, consistent and transparent methodology; credible research; involvement of renowned content experts to translate the evidence into clinically meaningful guidance; and an open, trusting relationship among all contributors.